|
Hal Incandenza posted:Wow I have a lot of posts to catch up on here! Sorry I was not around at all the last 36 hours. I don't suppose anyone would summarize everything for me so I don't have to read back? This post is making my nose twitch
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 17:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 21:44 |
|
|
Doug Rattman posted:TheRam makes a very convincing argument. I would be willing to vote for LUTR if that's what it comes down to. Yeh sadly this feels like a scumpost to me too.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 17:58
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:you think "two scum running a claimed masons gambit" is likelier than literally anybody else being scum? I think that is a little bit of a biased read of that single sentence summary.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 18:02
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:This post is making my nose twitch As does your effort to appear like you're contributing! 
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 18:03
|
|
|
biased how? he listed three scum picks: the two claimed masons, and punt. that means he thinks the two claimed masons are likelier to be scum than anybody who isn't on that list. that's not a reasonable opinion.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 18:03
|
|
|
At Chuck E Cheese at a kids birthday party, as soon as I get done beating some six year olds at basketball I'll reread*, but I just wanted to take a moment for this postLook Under The Rock posted:I hate "list of everyone" posts, it falls under generating content but your opinions seem genuine to me. Can't agree more with this. Giant list posts are The Worst, especially this early in the game when there is hardly anything to work with. Phone posting so I can't go back and look at it now but if I remember correctly it contained two scum calls while asking six players for their top three scum picks. That is such an easy way to hedge and then use the opportunity to call people out on the three people they have labelled later. Especially when they didn't have the decency to give three themselves  But, for once in my life I've got a town read on the list as a town list.That's said quote:Top 3 scum are the claimed masons and Punt. I just don't know how on Day 1 you can argue against confirmed mason claim. Maybe it does turn out to be a scum gambit, but it's not a route worth pursuing D1 imo. Make a note of it and take the CapnAndy approach later. *Assuming I can talk my way into being rider on the way home it will be much sooner than later
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 18:12
|
|
|
Wow I was totally joking about the masons being scum, I didn't think it was gonna turn into a whole big thing. I can't give any reads now but I'll be back in a few hours and will do a reread of the thread. Also I hate day 1 and its bullshit to try to read people based on whatever you pull out of your rear end
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 18:30
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Wow I was totally joking about the masons being scum, I didn't think it was gonna turn into a whole big thing. I can't give any reads now but I'll be back in a few hours and will do a reread of the thread. in the last two games we played together -we dunked a scum day one -i identified 3/4 scum based on d1 alone free your mind from day one negativity
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 18:37
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Also I hate day 1 and its bullshit to try to read people based on whatever you pull out of your rear end Why do people say they hate day one all the time it's sooo dumb. D1 is funny and hard. It's the only guaranteed day you get in a game too unless you get vig'd or something so you should probably learn to enjoy it...
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 18:41
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:in the last two games we played together don't go for a pee mid post pmom will make you look like an echo
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 18:42
|
|
|
Look Under The Rock posted:Btw my new least favorite buzzphrase is any variation of "generating content" Maybe instead of policing my use of language you could engage with the points made? Nice job taking credit for other people's work without doing anything as well, makes me feel better about you. Look Under The Rock posted:Actually I'm on board because "generating content" Lazy opportunism and laughable reasoning. EAT MY VOTE SCUMBO ##vote LUTR Pinterest Mom posted:Deflecting from "come on, a confirmed mason claim isn't a good place to start looking for scum" with "what is even the nature of scumminess, or existence, or anything" is awkward af. It's a good vote. That's not a deflection your entire position rests on the assertion that set scum behaviours exist, pointing out that I think that is flawed logic is entirely legitimate.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 18:53
|
|
|
Hi everyone I'm back ill read the thread now what did i miss?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:00
|
|
|
Rurea posted:Hi everyone I'm back ill read the thread now what did i miss? we're voting lutr
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:04
|
|
|
TheRam posted:we're voting lutr Okay ill take a look
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:07
|
|
|
Look Under The Rock posted:I hate "list of everyone" posts, it falls under generating content but your opinions seem genuine to me. lol ##vote lutr
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:16
|
|
|
if anyone has a vig murder sombrero before we get another 2 pages of people arguing about absolutely nothing
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:17
|
|
|
Quoting is hard so I'll just say this -- you're upset because I admitted I didn't read ~every post~ of jokephase and then called someone out for not reading any of them False equivalency but w/e
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:20
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:if anyone has a vig murder sombrero before we get another 2 pages of people arguing about absolutely nothing There's a reason this guy is saying this
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:24
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:if anyone has a vig murder sombrero before we get another 2 pages of people arguing about absolutely nothing you seemed to be on my side during that argument. why scold both of us?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:24
|
|
|
the reason is that i want him to die.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:25
|
|
|
Poque posted:you seemed to be on my side during that argument. why scold both of us? i'm not.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:26
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:biased how? Well he said it was joke anyway, but the point is regardless of whatever claims have been made there is nothing wrong with going "well these people seem scummiest" and trying to paint that as something that makes no sense and is totally scummy to say feels phony to me. Especially early in the game.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:41
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:the reason is that i want him to die. Be specific, why hold back? Why Somber?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:46
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Well he said it was joke anyway, but the point is regardless of whatever claims have been made there is nothing wrong with going "well these people seem scummiest" and trying to paint that as something that makes no sense and is totally scummy to say feels phony to me. Especially early in the game. AnonNarc said they were joking, not LUTR, unless I missed it
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:47
|
|
|
Do not vote lutr under any circumstances.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 20:02
|
|
|
##vote lutr
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 20:04
|
|
|
Whatever. She is my confirmed mason. Hence why she did not trust the other assholes because confirming 4/21 players on day one is nuts.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 20:06
|
|
|
there's only two confirmed masons here, and it's not you two dingbats
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 20:10
|
|
|
Look Under The Rock posted:Quoting is hard so I'll just say this -- you're upset because I admitted I didn't read ~every post~ of jokephase and then called someone out for not reading any of them lol I'm not upset Somberbrero posted:Whatever. She is my confirmed mason. Hence why she did not trust the other assholes because confirming 4/21 players on day one is nuts. Confirmed town masons? You are 110% sure of this?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 20:10
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Whatever. She is my confirmed mason. Hence why she did not trust the other assholes because confirming 4/21 players on day one is nuts. Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 20:11
|
|
|
WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:PERPETUAL IDIOT: Lurker. One content post. No idea who you think is scum. Who are your top 3 scum picks? In no particular order, I'd say that I think Max, LOTU, and Hal are my top 3. Max has the third vote on wall monitor with very little to back it up. He says that he doesn't think wall monitor is scum: Max posted:
But follows up a half hour later with a vote with no explanation in it at all Max posted:I hate PR but also ##vote wall monitor LOTU for listing Punt among his top 3 scum candidates for apparently using a buzzword. I find the arguments others have posted about him pretty convincing. Hal Incandenza seems to be defending LOTU (which is reasonable enough, I don't think the argument against him is unassailable) by saying that this post: Pinterest Mom posted:you think "two scum running a claimed masons gambit" is likelier than literally anybody else being scum? Look Under The Rock posted:I hate "list of everyone" posts, it falls under generating content but your opinions seem genuine to me. Later Hal claims that LOTU said he was joking, when of course LOTU never said anything like that at all.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 20:13
|
|
|
oh okay ##unvote
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 20:15
|
|
|
If we're giving LUTR a by then I think I'll vote to kill Perpetual Idiot for that stupid scumpost just now or Doug for his followup post to my case on LUTR which felt scummy. Though I need somber or lutr to post saying this: "I am confirmed town mason with [insert name here]" I will accept no other format.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 20:17
|
|
|
TheRam, I will do this if you'll answer why you didn't have Gulag and Doug do that.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 20:36
|
|
|
Look Under The Rock posted:TheRam, I will do this if you'll answer why you didn't have Gulag and Doug do that. I thought gulag was joking and didn't see any reason not to let it play out. Gulag has a sense of humour y'see. okay now go!
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 20:40
|
|
|
I am confirmed town masons with Somberbrero.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 20:49
|
|
|
I was bluffing but okay good enough for me. Still I'm assuming gulag was lying and if I did have some lie detector it would have been a terrible use since gulag lying != scum. ##vote doug ratman
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 20:55
|
|
|
WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:Long rear end post snipped A lot of this is pressing on gut for me. You say lurker a lot. Lurker, lurker, lurker. Did you really need to make the longass list just to call half the people on it for not posting much yet on D1? Doug Rattman posted:TheRam makes a very convincing argument. I would be willing to vote for LUTR if that's what it comes down to. The wind seems to be shifting in Doug's direction. He seems bandwagony and eager to get votes off of himself.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 21:20
|
|
|
Doug Rattman posted:TheRam makes a very convincing argument. I would be willing to vote for LUTR if that's what it comes down to. This is no joke the same exact reasoning you found me scummy and voted for me, which is really a terrible injustice.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 21:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 21:44 |
|
|
I guess now I'm not trying to keep from claiming so ##vote Doug
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 21:22
|
|