|
Look Under The Rock posted:I really do want to know why you were hitting that deadline argument so hard but eh I had misread the "typically" in the OP as "days will typically be 48 hours" and not the deadline "typically" being at a time.
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 5, 2024 22:07 |
|
|
Poque posted:I had misread the "typically" in the OP as "days will typically be 48 hours" and not the deadline "typically" being at a time. You could have said that way earlier, still don't like it, w/e ##vote samfucius cuz it's curtain.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:48
|
|
|
I'm here, will switch to Doug if I have to but I'm not feeling it at all
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:49
|
|
|
Poque posted:I had misread the "typically" in the OP as "days will typically be 48 hours" and not the deadline "typically" being at a time. I find I believe you less now...
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:49
|
|
|
10 minutes guys
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:50
|
|
|
Oop, now Sam's the vote leader. I'll read back and see why but I think my feelings on 11th hour turbos are pretty well known
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:50
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:10 minutes guys JESUS READ THE DEADLINE HOW COULD YOU MISREAD THAT
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:50
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:is it really just to save your mason partner that and his string of posts on this page, culminating with quote:Why waste our time talking about it, though? Asking us if anything has happened in 320 posts is just giving us dumb busywork. Skim those posts if you hate D1 that much, maybe look for things that seem to be quoted a bunch to gauge what is important, I dunno. this statement that wasting our time with a single question that no one is obliged to answer is scummy. when the logic of this statement is questioned, he says quote:I could vote Max. incredible!!! either that or a response to max saying he is weird. either way he doesn't vote max and holds onto doug vote that is based on incredibly flimsy reasoning
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:50
|
|
|
Oh...its 10:30. That's way too specific. fuk of votefinder
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:50
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:52
|
|
|
Ok so the samfucious dunk is kind of bullshit too as far as I can see. Anyone want to convince me?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:52
|
|
|
do it or i loving kil lyou
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:52
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:that and his string of posts on this page, culminating with Cool, between this and an earlier post, i mark thee town, kiss the bride
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:52
|
|
|
I didn't vote max because max currently has 1 vote and it doesn't seem like it would go anywhere, ya goof.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:52
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:Ok so the samfucious dunk is kind of bullshit too as far as I can see. Anyone want to convince me? You don't like my reasoning? I'm not gonna link it but its there and the whole reason for the votes, explain your issues with what I said
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:53
|
|
|
Poque posted:Curious how you like a Somber case but don't like Doug? Somber had the perfect opportunity to go after me and let it go, and you don't like the case on me as it exists. It stands to follow that you should like Somber. Aside from the claim I don't see any reason to think Doug is town based on his content. Because those posts from Somber I mentioned are posts that I did not like. I have no idea why anyone when counter claimed (potentially, obv assuming not two confirmed mason teams) would just go "eh, scum will take care of it." Meanwhile, to quote you, Poque posted:the case on doug is that he refuses to read the earlier pages of the game. Which is bad but to me just reads more stupid than scummy. Same with your arguing with Somber. It seemed pointless, sure, but didn't give me any alignment read, which is why it wasn't part of my thoughts on him. People of all alignments can get into arguments over dumb things
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:53
|
|
|
Samfucius posted:I didn't vote max because max currently has 1 vote and it doesn't seem like it would go anywhere, ya goof. reading thread intently but not posting until needed to. haha..
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:53
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:Ok so the samfucious dunk is kind of bullshit too as far as I can see. Anyone want to convince me? I'm voting for him but I don't think there's a strong case to be made. The question is whether you'd prefer voting for one of the claimed masons or getting a no lynch.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:54
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:You don't like my reasoning? I'm not gonna link it but its there and the whole reason for the votes, explain your issues with what I said It really feels like you're tilting at windmills. Granted you've caught me on some pretty stupid poo poo before so it has more weight than just anyone else making that case. I like it better than Doug, I guess.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:56
|
|
|
Samfucius posted:I didn't vote max because max currently has 1 vote and it doesn't seem like it would go anywhere, ya goof. It read to me like you were testing the waters to see if a vote on me would work. Do you even have a reason beyond "I'd vote for him?"
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:56
|
|
|
Wait, who even really responded to my post about wasting time? Who questioned it? If you mean this:GulagDolls posted:is wasting time scummy now, because, if so, we may have to lynch the sombrero. This is not... anything. This is Gulag white noise. It is just a setup for a sombrero dig. If it was a genuine question instead of a needle that I ignored, the answer is something I already posted, that is is definitely bad play, potentially scummy. It's my best read and I am sticking with it, unless I need to switch to a decent candidate to avoid a nolynch.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:58
|
|
|
max wasted our time by making his name three letters instead of Ma, or maybe even M
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:58
|
|
|
Samfucius posted:Wait, who even really responded to my post about wasting time? Who questioned it? If you mean this: how do you not interpret that as a real question lol you haven't explained why it is bad play or potentially scummy to say "i'm not reading jokephase f off"
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 02:59
|
|
|
Max posted:It read to me like you were testing the waters to see if a vote on me would work. Do you even have a reason beyond "I'd vote for him?" Because you never made any attempt to post until there was some momentum going Doug's way, then you changed to me when the momentum shifted my way. You are doing a great job of floating along.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:02
|
|
|
I actually got off Doug when I remembered he was a mason. I hadn't noticed you until GP brought you up. And I've never seen one vote on someone as momentum.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:03
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:max wasted our time by making his name three letters instead of Ma, or maybe even M My friend bought me this account a long time ago, so I never had a choice in that matter.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:05
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:how do you not interpret that as a real question lol It is bad play to ask everyone else pick up slack, not to dislike joke phase. If he's town, why?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:06
|
|
|
Agh, nearly at deadline ##vote Samifuchius
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:15
|
|
|
Samfucius posted:Because you never made any attempt to post until there was some momentum going Doug's way, then you changed to me when the momentum shifted my way. You are doing a great job of floating along.  Samfucius posted:I could vote Max. See, were you actually town, you would pick one guy and try to actually get him lynched. ##vote samfucius Anonymous had been my vote, but that lynch doesn't have a chance of happening. Sam hasn't seemed to put any effort into the day. Read him again and the one thing that jumped out at me is his complete unwillingness to commit to any strong position, other than the fact that Doug is "lovely, potentially scummy." Giuseppe is "bombastic" and "trying to be a presence with minimal effort." Then he moves to LUTR, who he hadn't mentioned prior to that. Max sums up Sam's post history, and so Sam says he could vote Max. I mean at this point he's just flailing. Maybe claim? Because time is short, and I'm not voting Doug.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:20
|
|
|
##vote Samfucius
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:25
|
|
|
-2, 3 minutes
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:29
|
|
|
Poque posted:-2, 3 minutes We have to have at least 2 people around.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:31
|
|
|
Max posted:We have to have at least 2 people around. Doesn't appear so
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:31
|
|
|
Oh gently caress it ##chop Samfucius
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:31
|
|
|
El Dorado, 4:30pm, Denny's An officer stands questioning a waitress. "So just tell me from the start what happened Sally." "Sure thing officer, Mr. Brooks came in at 4:30 just like every day for his dinner. Then a bunch of other townsfolk came in all rowdy after a shouting match with Used Car Hank, Poor old harry told them to get out they were ruining his dinner and then before you know it Pete pulled out an axe and killed him!" "So you are telling me that everyone basically just accused an 80 year old man in a Rascal of being a criminal mastermind and then a man chopped him up with an axe?" "Yes sir." "I'm getting too old for this poo poo Sally. They immediately went to his home and searched it discovering nothing incriminating or unusual. Oh well, better luck next time citizens. Samfucius - Harry Brooks - Town aligned normal old dude was chopped to death with a fireaxe! You are Harry Brooks  You are an old guy and your wife is dead. You might as well help the police with what little time you have left. VANILLA TOWN'D You win when all threats to town have been eliminated. Day 1 has ended in a no lynch! It is now Night 1 please get your actions and search locations in to me and when I have them all or an hour from the hammer, whichever is first, I will send links to docs to everyone in the same location. Strict 24 hour night deadline from THIS POST, have your actions to me by then.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:37
|
|
|
twilight until I close the thread
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:38
|
|
|
So it's no lynch, but he died anyway? Huh. Well if I don't survive the night please vote Doug tomorro kthx.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:40
|
|
|
wall monitor posted:So it's no lynch, but he died anyway? He got chopped by WWM
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 5, 2024 22:07 |
|
|
wall monitor posted:So it's no lynch, but he died anyway? Why would you not survive the night?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:41
|
|