|
to elaborate: the more games we play, the more i find that this type of hypothesizing doesn't actually really help us hunt scum, especially not on day 2, it just distracts us from the hunting as people just spend most of a day putting forward their pet theories.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 03:04 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 13:10 |
|
Matthew Beet posted:to elaborate: the more games we play, the more i find that this type of hypothesizing doesn't actually really help us hunt scum, especially not on day 2, it just distracts us from the hunting as people just spend most of a day putting forward their pet theories. yup, I agree. whatever the story is re: sk / 2 scum factions / town vig, our task remains exactly the same
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 03:06 |
|
Actually going from the flavour text: Anidav posted:Ah yes, that makes sense... I'm pretty sure birdstrike was investigating bifauxnen - probably based on her anti-SEGA rhetoric yesterday. if I'm correct then that at least rules out PGO, leaving SK and vig as the most likely options - game's too small for multiple scum teams. Given Auspol's bad experience with vigs I'm inclined to agree with Gaspy that it's probably a serial killer. maybe that doesn't help much, but at least investigators don't need to worry about getting gunned down.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 03:14 |
|
When I see a dead badge, my gut tells me a PGO is probably involved. Poor sap picked the wrong guy to follow. I reviewed Birdstrikes posts and sadly I couldn't tell who he was most suspicious of. Which is a pity, because if we knew who this nutburger was we could spare our deputy the same fate. Assuming we're lucky enough to have one. Gwynstinct has me looking at Bowmore or TOML any time two folks bicker for that long it makes me think it's a smokescreen. Could be overthinking, but that doesn't sound like me. I don't know Bowmore and Gaspy seems to like them but that doesn't mean they're innocent. They seem scummy to me, but then they said they are bad at mafia. I can sympathize with that predicament. Sorry for sparse posts in general, currently house sitting at family members house so that their cats stay fed. Gimp internet. Having to ricochet between houses to also maintain my new garden. Will try and post more usefully, but I am largely relegated to phone posts. TBK's theories are bad. Might be the PGO in question.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 03:25 |
|
Votecount for Day 2 Those On My Left (1): SKY COQ, bowmore, bowmore (1): Those On My Left thatbastardken (1): Asphyxious Not Voting (9): bowmore, everythingWasBees, Gough Suppressant, Gwynplaine, Matthew Beet, MC Eating Disorder, Mithranderp, MysticalMachineGun, thatbastardken With 12 alive, it's 7 votes to lynch. The current deadline is April 29th, 2015 at 10 p.m. EST -- that's in about 8 hours, 58 minutes.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 04:01 |
|
Bifauxnen posted:Alternatively, my comedy option for guessing the scumteam is: this is the only post in which bif suggests anything, and it's pretty clearly all jokes based on her preference for nintendo. Birdstrike was Sega and town, so that's probably not a factor at this stage.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 04:06 |
|
bowmore posted:It would not surprise me at all if the scum were sega bowmore posted:also was this a subconscious, -almost involuntary defence of MB? Birdstrike posted:sure why not? bowmore - wrong on sega, wrong on birdstrike, what else is he wrong on? a suspicious cavalcade of incompetence.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 04:12 |
|
the longer asphyxious goes without responding to any of the requests to explain his tbk vote the more inclined i am to switch my vote to asphyxious.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 04:47 |
|
he may be stuck at work or something.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 04:58 |
|
So I'm gonna be at work a bit later than I thought tonight so I wanna get some content in while I'm on break thatbastardken posted:this is the only post in which bif suggests anything, and it's pretty clearly all jokes based on her preference for nintendo. Birdstrike was Sega and town, so that's probably not a factor at this stage. Actually she's mentioned sega being scum a couple of times now. It's not that important as far as I can tell since we've had a flip from Nintendo AND sega and setup speculation is dumb as hell this early on, but it was important enough to note in my spreadsheet for the game on d1 and bif was certainly the one suggesting it the most so I thought that's worth pointing out
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 05:13 |
|
thatbastardken posted:he may be stuck at work or something. asphyxious has made about six posts today. he's cared enough to keep his post count up but not enough to actually engage with anyone asking what's behind his vote.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 05:13 |
|
Ok that's stretching the definition of 'content' but if anything else brilliant hits me in the next 25 minutes I'll be around
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 05:16 |
|
Those On My Left posted:the longer asphyxious goes without responding to any of the requests to explain his tbk vote the more inclined i am to switch my vote to asphyxious. subtly trying to get a bandwagon going, hmmmmm? But yeah I'd really like gaspy to answer my question about WHY we should vote for tbk. And please don't try to give us some inscrutable, "I have my reasons" crap.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 05:30 |
|
##unvote
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 05:42 |
|
Also I'm at uni til 7 tonight so y'all better not hammer too early again
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 05:55 |
|
asphyxious is active in the other thread, but, yeah, guess he still cbf explaining his vote. ##vote asphyxious
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 06:52 |
|
Those On My Left posted:asphyxious is active in the other thread, but, yeah, guess he still cbf explaining his vote. "Oh no that guy I was randomly pushing for isn't doing what I want guess I have no choice but to vote for him!" Oh please.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 06:54 |
|
Asphyxious posted:"Oh no that guy I was randomly pushing for isn't doing what I want guess I have no choice but to vote for him!" if you're town and have a good reason to think tbk is scum, you should want everyone else to vote tbk so that we can eliminate a scum. you're not doing anything to encourage anyone to vote tbk, but you're voting for him anyway tell me how this behaviour is pro-town
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 06:56 |
|
also i see you found time to make a post in this thread but didn't actually answer the question that mithranderp asked, the question that i asked, the question that beet asked, and the question that MCED asked like, you have to have a pretty good reason for openly ignoring a question asked of you by four other players so could you please let us know what it is
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 06:58 |
|
Those On My Left posted:asphyxious is active in the other thread, but, yeah, guess he still cbf explaining his vote. Lol this is such a stretch. Why are you reaching so far on this one toml?
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 06:59 |
|
Matthew Beet posted:Lol this is such a stretch. Why are you reaching so far on this one toml?
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:01 |
|
Matthew Beet posted:Lol this is such a stretch. Why are you reaching so far on this one toml? it's day 2, there's very little discussion or ~data~ being generated, which is bad for town as it increases the chance of an unreasoned lynch or a no-lynch i am trying to get things going, and honestly i am skeptical of the way asphyxious is ignoring the questions asked of him in the thread a question that you asked him, by the way
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:02 |
|
I can understand that people might be demoralized, but yeah, TOML is doing the right thing. Gaspy, why are you voting for me? It's a fair question.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:04 |
|
there you are again, sitting around, ignoring the perfectly legitimate question that the thread has asked. you're not even engaging, you're just throwing shade on people who are trying to if you could explain how literally anything you've done so far has been pro-town that'd be great
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:04 |
|
Maybe he can't explain his thoughts, Tom. That happens. You just come across as picking on him. I'm trying not to let this effect my own investigation. You're better than this, Tom. Gaspy will come up with something good, or he'll be incompetent scum. Minimum concern.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:05 |
|
Those On My Left posted:there you are again, sitting around, ignoring the perfectly legitimate question that the thread has asked. you're not even engaging, you're just throwing shade on people who are trying to I voted against lynching a towny (more than you've done) I've worked out that there's definitely a SK (more than you've done) I'm not trying to lead a lynch on a town player now (more than you've done)
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:07 |
|
Gwynplaine posted:Maybe he can't explain his thoughts, Tom. That happens. You just come across as picking on him. I'm trying not to let this effect my own investigation. he's not even responding to any post that asks him a question. he's not saying "hey, gut feeling" or "can't tell you, that would compromise my position". he's just refusing to engage with the thread at all. honestly though, it's a pretty good play, because it appears like the rest of auspol finds that behaviour far less suspect than actually trying to generate some loving discussion in a game that is based almost entirely around discussion
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:08 |
|
Those On My Left posted:he's not even responding to any post that asks him a question. he's not saying "hey, gut feeling" or "can't tell you, that would compromise my position". he's just refusing to engage with the thread at all. I've been told I'm not allowed to be "inscrutable" by mith so I guess you'll have to live with it until I hit pay dirt. Thanks for that, Mith. Pro move.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:09 |
|
Asphyxious posted:I've worked out that there's definitely a SK (more than you've done) Asphyxious posted:I'm not trying to lead a lynch on a town player now (more than you've done)
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:09 |
|
And honestly not engaging with the thread is probably better than being unchill? :mills:
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:10 |
|
Those On My Left posted:also i see you found time to make a post in this thread but didn't actually answer the question that mithranderp asked, the question that i asked, the question that beet asked, and the question that MCED asked I want the answer too but you're talking about twenty minutes here dude.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:11 |
|
Matthew Beet posted:I want the answer too but you're talking about twenty minutes here dude. what? 1) gaspy made a bunch of posts at the start of day, in between which people asked him to explain his tbk vote. 2) gaspy disappeared 3) people continued to ask questions 4) gaspy posted in other thread 5) i pointed out that he was posting in the other thread but ignoring everyone's questions here 6) gaspy came here and continued to give the thread absolutely no material whatsoever regarding his tbk vote the shade that you are throwing on me now is really disappointing tbqh, you know better than most people that mafia needs discussion to actually work as a game. well, it's D2 and gently caress all has been said, and 90% of what's been said has involved me - whether it was my spat with bowmore, or my current spat re: gaspy. if you want me to shut up i guess i can, but there's every indication that this will be followed by town loving sleepwalking into a no-lynch
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:14 |
|
thatbastardken posted:I can understand that people might be demoralized, but yeah, TOML is doing the right thing. Gaspy, why are you voting for me? It's a fair question. Yeah it's a fair question, I even asked it, the beat up about him disappearing, avoiding queries and then posting in the other thread first " Omg he's scum" , isn't. That's a beat up.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:14 |
|
how is it possible that one poster can say they are certain that (1) there's a serial killer, and (2) TBK is scum, and yet it's the poster who asks "hey could you tell us more about this" who gets labelled as suss what is wrong with you auspol
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:15 |
|
Maybe because I'm just trying to investigate and see what's going on instead of doing a really obvious beat up? What's wrong with Auspol? its you.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:18 |
|
Asphyxious posted:Maybe because I'm just trying to investigate and see what's going on instead of doing a really obvious beat up?
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:18 |
|
Those On My Left posted:what? You're throwing thus shade on tours elf. I'm on my phone so this is hard to get together, but from what I can see of the timestamps gaspy has stopped posting for three hours or so before his reappearance. So his last posts he posted in chill thread, posted here after that then disappeared from both threads for a few hours. Then he comes back, posts in chill thread and posts back here within half an hour. That's not a big deal toml, especially chill toml who was going to be more chill like bell jar in mafia and is now clock watching player posts. ##vote those on my left
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:20 |
|
what investigation though? you haven't really done anything.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:21 |
|
thatbastardken posted:what investigation though? you haven't really done anything. Are you psychic now?
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:23 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 13:10 |
|
Those On My Left posted:how is it possible that one poster can say they are certain that (1) there's a serial killer, and (2) TBK is scum, and yet it's the poster who asks "hey could you tell us more about this" who gets labelled as suss Because it's a weak argument, and it looks to me you're trying to defend tbk. So I ask you why? Why tbk? That said. I'd still like gaspy to answer though. Gaspy, spit out whatever your opinion is because the longer it goes on the less likely it is you're town in my opinion.
|
# ? Apr 29, 2015 07:24 |