|
Because investigations don't work super great when people know they're being investigated. Like forgive me for not giving a blow by blow of my workings but that kind of defeats the point.
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 09:12 |
|
|
Asphyxious posted:I've been told I'm not allowed to be "inscrutable" by mith so I guess you'll have to live with it until I hit pay dirt. Just spit it out.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:25
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:You're throwing thus shade on tours elf. okay thread, there you go. you've got some data now. you can go back and re-read D1 and D2 and see who you think you should vote for, and maybe have a discussion about it. if you decide to vote for the guy who's done 90% of the legwork in actually generating conversation today for you to have a look at, you're an idiot
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:25
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:okay thread, there you go. you've got some data now. you can go back and re-read D1 and D2 and see who you think you should vote for, and maybe have a discussion about it. if you decide to vote for the guy who's done 90% of the legwork in actually generating conversation today for you to have a look at, you're an idiot Or you could back up your argument and go grab those timestamps toml. What's stopping you?
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:28
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:Because it's a weak argument, and it looks to me you're trying to defend tbk. So I ask you why? Why tbk? I'm out shopping. I'm not going to phone post anything. Especially since I'm still gathering data. You picked up on TOML coming across as defending ken so that's part of it. Picking a serial killer is to do with my role. I picked ken because his day one posts were pretty well identical to the other times he's been scum in size, content and complete non sequitur. Not actually sold on ken but seeing the results from the inevitable discussion that comes from it. There's more.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:29
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Are you psychic now? Asphyxious posted:Because investigations don't work super great when people know they're being investigated. Like forgive me for not giving a blow by blow of my workings but that kind of defeats the point. I can only comment on what you've done in the thread, I have no idea what you might have done last night in terms of investigating. Thank you for providing that scintillating analysis of the way I play every single day one in every mafia game.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:31
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:Or you could back up your argument and go grab those timestamps toml. What's stopping you? ok 29/4/15 10:03 MCED asks gaspy about TBK vote 29/4/15 10:12 gaspy posts, ignores question about TBK vote 29/4/15 10:20 MCED replies to gaspy, again asks about TBK vote 29/4/15 10:23 gaspy posts again, again ignores question about TBK vote, actually votes TBK again 29/4/15 10:25 gaspy posts again, again ignores question about TBK vote 29/4/15 10:52 mith asks gaspy about the tbk vote 29/4/15 12:01 beet asks gaspy about the tbk vote 29/4/15 12:03 tbk asks gaspy about the tbk vote 29/4/15 12:03 gaspy posts again, ignores questions about tbk vote 29/4/15 13:47 i post saying i want gaspy to answer questions about tbk vote 29/4/15 14:13 i post again saying i want gaspy to answer questions about tbk vote 29/4/15 14:30 mith asks gaspy about tbk vote 29/4/15 15:52 i point out that gaspy has been active in the other thread 29/4/15 15:54 gaspy arrives, argues with me, continues to ignore questions re: tbk gaspy was active in the other thread at 11:40 (by which time mith and MCED had asked questions about TBK vote) 15:29 (by which time beet and tbk and I had also asked questions about TBK vote)
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:36
|
|
|
Ignoring the question provided conversation. You provided a dummy spit.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:38
|
|
|
That you actually prefaced day one before anything even happened.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:38
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Ignoring the question provided conversation.  "by not contributing to the conversation, I in fact contributed something incredibly valuable to the conversation - the contributions of others" this is so silly
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:39
|
|
|
*gaspy gives pro town reasons to not lynch krell* "Okay let's all agree to lynch gaspy next"
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:40
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 2  Those On My Left (2): SKY COQ, bowmore, Asphyxious (1): Those On My Left thatbastardken (1): Asphyxious bowmore (0): Those On My Left, Not Voting (8): bowmore, everythingWasBees, Gough Suppressant, Gwynplaine, MC Eating Disorder, Mithranderp, MysticalMachineGun, thatbastardkenWith 12 alive, it's 7 votes to lynch. The current deadline is April 29th, 2015 at 10 p.m. EST -- that's in about 5 hours, 19 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:40
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:ok Thanks. It's hard as poo poo to do easily in awful app.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:42
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:*gaspy gives pro town reasons to not lynch krell* you are reading way too much into what was clearly a joke post between me and beet re: your "pro-town reasons to not lynch krell", i really don't care. it could be mod-confirmed d1 that krell is a beloved princess and i'd still vote to lynch him because i don't want to play with anyone who posts a screen full of rear end to mouth gifs
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:46
|
|
|
Hmm I'll think on this. One quick thought, Toml have you wondered what if gaspy has some role that's informing his decision and you're effectively pushing for a role claim?
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:48
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:you are reading way too much into what was clearly a joke post between me and beet What if I wasn't joking? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:49
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:Hmm I'll think on this. Nah I don't think he could have known that. But I already have reason to believe that *someone* already worked out I had a role.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:50
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:Hmm I'll think on this. as i said to gwyn, i wasn't pushing for gaspy to tip his hand and post detailed reasons as to why he thinks it's tbk. i was pushing for literally any response whatsoever. I would have settled for "it's a gut feeling", but instead you, mith, MCED and I all got flat out ignored, which bugs me for the reasons i've expressed
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:50
|
|
|
I am really sorry, I might have missed something. I respect that gaspy won't reveal his investigation techniques but how did he prove there was an SK? If explaining that would reveal too much, that's cool but I'm dubious of proof in a game of Mafia. There are always multiple explanations. Doubtless it will be in his effort post.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 07:53
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:as i said to gwyn, i wasn't pushing for gaspy to tip his hand and post detailed reasons as to why he thinks it's tbk. i was pushing for literally any response whatsoever. I would have settled for "it's a gut feeling", but instead you, mith, MCED and I all got flat out ignored, which bugs me for the reasons i've expressed This is what's worrying me about your posts. It's like you're including us to force some sort of camaraderie and make an us / other type dynamic. I know what I asked and mentioned it myself but this is the second time you mentioned it and the other time you actually asked if I remembered it. Of course I do, why so you feel the need to do this?
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 08:00
|
|
|
Gwynplaine posted:I am really sorry, I might have missed something. I respect that gaspy won't reveal his investigation techniques but how did he prove there was an SK? If explaining that would reveal too much, that's cool but I'm dubious of proof in a game of Mafia. There are always multiple explanations. Whoa don't put words in my mouth and don't misread my posts. I didn't "prove" there was an SK, I know it. And there's no "effort post". I don't do that unless I'm sure I've got a gotcha. Otherwise I just try different things and get what I can from the results.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 08:03
|
|
|
Whoa, sorry
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 08:08
|
|
|
I'm starting to think Asph is scum
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 08:15
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:I voted against lynching a towny (more than you've done) I didn't read anything after this because I'm still at work and I'm toilet posting but this is a bullshit scummy post I'll be back to read the rest and explain why if anybody can't see the big red flags once I'm not getting paid to poo poo but ##vote asphyxious
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 08:18
|
|
|
Worried that the lynch won't go the way you want it scumdoc? Bit early to get this desperate.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 08:23
|
|
|
I'll role claim before I die, which will exonerate me. Who will double down? Who will see sense? Why am I not roleclaiming now? Well, you'll see I guess.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 08:27
|
|
|
Posting in my mid lecture break.Asphyxious posted:Nah I don't think he could have known that. Interesting.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 08:46
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:I'll role claim before I die, which will exonerate me. Who will double down? Who will see sense? quote:teehee i totally have an important role, which I will only reveal if sufficiently threatened! this is a sensible thing to say!
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 08:55
|
|
|
##unvote for now. Mith's posting looks very much like her scum posting.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 09:01
|
|
|
to be more specific i was in a scum team with mith once, and she was scum in a game that i modded in each game she posted very sporadically, mostly one liners she never really did her own scum hunting but just pushed and prodded, often without actually casting a vote so, pretty much exactly how she's posting here ##vote Mithranderp
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 09:06
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:to be more specific i was in a scum team with mith once, and she was scum in a game that i modded Nice 
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 09:08
|
|
|
that...seems reasonable. much better than gaspy's 'ohohoho I have a secret but i'll never tell' school of play. ##vote Mithranderp
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 09:11
|
|
|
I hardly ever do my own scum hunting, except for that one time where I accidentally pinged tirade. But yeah nah. I'm town, I have a role, and I visited gaspy last night.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 09:17
|
|
|
TOML defends ken. Ken backs up TOML. Also  suspicious punctuation
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 09:20
|
|
|
##vote Asphyxious
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 09:22
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:TOML defends ken. Yep. They are connecting with each other a bit.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 09:22
|
|
|
bowmore posted:##vote Asphyxious also defending krell yesterday like you definitely knew he was going to flip town so you wanted that "sweet town cred"
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 09:24
|
|
|
bowmore posted:##vote Asphyxious I'm prompting ironicat here but do you get paid a dollar for every time you do something stupidly scummy? You're pushing a role claim. Whoop whoop.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 09:25
|
|
|
aside from a barely explained vote on ken
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 09:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 09:12 |
|
|
Mithranderp posted:Yep. we are young and in love, please don't shame us.
|
|
#
?
Apr 29, 2015 09:26
|
|