|
Votecount for Day 2  MC Eating Disorder (2): CapitalistPig, Epsilon Plus uranus (2): Gilok, EXAKT Science Peta (1): BottleKnight BottleKnight (1): Peta Allen Wren (1): uranus Kleedrac (1): MC Eating Disorder Not Voting (7): Allen Wren, AnonymousNarcotics, fiery_valkyrie, HiipFire, Kleedrac, Mithross, WHICH WAY MADNESSWith 15 alive, it's 8 votes to lynch. The current deadline is May 07th, 2015 at 4 p.m. PDT -- that's in about 23 hours, 5 minutes.
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 00:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 14:59 |
|
|
I want a serious set of reads off of Kleen before I pull my vote off him though because he's not really contributing in any meaningful way and I want to be able to get a better read on him since I've played with pig and epsilon before and at least have a vague idea of their styles
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 00:55
|
|
|
MC Eating Disorder posted:I want a serious set of reads off of Kleen before I pull my vote off him though because he's not really contributing in any meaningful way and I want to be able to get a better read on him since I've played with pig and epsilon before and at least have a vague idea of their styles Yeah I'm with you. He was just here, and then I asked for scumreads and he just vanished. ##vote Kleedrac I don't like EP either tbh
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 00:58
|
|
|
Kleedrac come back and give some reads while I'm at work please I'll be posting again in 10 hours or so but I'm a garbage employee so I'll probably be reading the thread on my phone when I'm bored so don't be afraid I'm gonna miss it or something
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 01:15
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:I don't like EP either tbh Yeah neither do I, gently caress that guy! ##unvote uranus's posting has been completely useless and it makes me feel poorly about him
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 01:22
|
|
|
yo EP please explain why you thought it was worth voting me to test Anus's claim when you already admitted it was useless and asinine
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 01:23
|
|
|
Ok, I have returned from the dead. I hereby declare this a holy day, during which we will stuff our children with caffeine and sugar and worship a giant pink rabbit. (Please tell me someone else has read transmetropolitan). Ok, actual post time. I think it's interesting MCED mostly ignored Uranus calling him scum. I guess you just assumed other people would see through him being crazy? I buy Kleedrac's defense so far, but like you guys, would like to see some him talk about people besides uranus. We all see he's trolling. More to follow shortly, just wanted to post some quick surface reads after being absent so long
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 01:24
|
|
|
I'm going to sum up everything I find suspicious about Peta.Peta posted:Policy lynch or NL today, there's really no excuse for anything else unless new information pops up. First, he led the nolynch, which even in this weird game is a scum move. It's pretty much always better to lynch if you're town. So if you have an item that makes you think you're not town, you probably want to see what your role is pretty bad. This next post is the one I find really scummy: Peta posted:OMG please NL I want to see my role Someone said they had a joke item, but Peta talks like someone who wants to see what team he's on so he can not work against himself, which wouldn't matter if he Thought He Was Town. Peta posted:Arson is my dream crime This is a stupid post. He makes like 4 posts in a row here that seem like breadcrumbing, because now Peta is like single-post making GBS threads all over people, but back then he was very chatty and weird and not making jokes. Very scum. Peta posted:Epic. Then he votes me without explaining, and later says it's a town move to troll for reactions, but his post quotes cpig and makes it seem like there's a reason he's voting me. I'd like to hear it. Then he, with very short posts, first quotes uranus's daycop lie with "Fail," as if he knows uranus is lying, and then very quickly comes up with the "oh you couldn't possibly believe you went 3/3, you could be an INSANE COP!!!!" which seems like an afterthought way to imply he doesn't have the information he does. Also he implies that uranus is an insane cop when he would more than likely be a paranoid cop. Actually, let's talk about that. Peta posted:There's more than one investigative role and you just got three guilty reports. Could it be that you are ... an insane cop???? Why would you assume insane cop instead of paranoid cop on 3 scum results? What's more likely, that peta thought anus was a lovely cop who thinks all is scum or that he somehow hit three town? This is basically a soft admission that he thinks it's likely that three different people are town, which is easy to hedge behind "oh derp was lying" but it's a scumslip. The only interesting reactions to uranus's lie is Peta's. He should've stuck with an "I know uranus is lying" stance instead of going for the poo poo he went for.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 01:25
|
|
|
Mithross posted:I buy Kleedrac's defense so far, but like you guys, would like to see some him talk about people besides uranus. We all see uranus is trolling. Clarification
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 01:27
|
|
|
MC Eating Disorder posted:yo EP please explain why you thought it was worth voting me to test Anus's claim when you already admitted it was useless and asinine The was a slim possibility he was telling the truth about his first scum claim and made up the other two for bullshit. Now that he admitted it's all false, it's completely pointless to think about and is revealed to be a lovely diversion rather than at all helpful.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 01:33
|
|
|
A lot of people have never seen uranus play previously, this is his standard milieu. Unhelpful. I've only read once through at the moment, so I don't have a viable target at this point, I'd probably just pick someone who was annoying me and vote them, but this is because I am lazy as gently caress.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 01:34
|
|
|
On BKs wall that I'm not going to quote because I'm on my phone. The d1 stuff I'm not sure I buy, there was a pretty strong consensus for a NL, smart or not. All the middle section has some merit, and is worth a closer look. As for your last point, I'm honestly not sure if paranoid cop is the right first assumption over insane, and would like someone else to chime in on it. Anyone?
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 01:42
|
|
|
Mithross posted:The d1 stuff I'm not sure I buy, there was a pretty strong consensus for a NL, smart or not. I voted nolynch too, I'm not saying it was the worst move for a room of people who didn't know what the gently caress they were. I'm just saying that the only reason I voted that way really is because there was no content, and the reason there was no content is because of Peta.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 01:45
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:First tell me who you think is a scum, friend Well CPig's been on my radar - lying about rocket launcher (or lying about not having it) is not a town play - his excuse of thinking he was jester and attempting a day 1 lynch is a bad one as it's easier to get lynched after people know their role and alignment. I've never played with Bottle and he feels very helpful to me - though could be a cover obviously. Uranus feels townie in a very weird, meta, sense - like it's a big splashy play and a huge magnet with so much room for error I can't see a scum just throwing away their game on it. Of course as always it could be a big splashy play to make people like me think he's town. I am slightly concerned by one person claiming to have been bussed without a second. I don't like Gilok - given a big splashy play like Uranus he wants to lynch Uranus - that seems like the wrong play to me - listen to him first - or ignore him - but lynching him. This is also my first game with Peta and I find him abrasive and not in a "I'm digging for truth" kinda way. Not enough content on Anon or Epsilon or Hiipfire to really make a value judgement. Peeps need to play harder :P As for you - you make big, bold assertions with confidence but that seems more your playstyle than anything. I'm not sure why you agree with MCED's opinion of me so readily but I've been there where you agree with someone's opinion and instead of echoing poo poo you just quote and go. Which brings me to MCED - as a meta argument his claim of having a dress sure seems like something I'd say if I wanted to seem non-threatening. At one point he was fishing for item information. He spends a large amount of his time hypothesizing about the setup and items and roles. His posts seem edited or abbreviated somehow - now I've not played with MCED before so this could be his posting style - but he sure seems to be watching his words carefully. Honestly - it really really feels like something's off about him. So currently my vote is going back where it was; ##Vote MCED Though I'd consider CPig for his dishonesty (Lynch all liars), Gilok for his odd ideas, or Peta to get rid of his abrasive rear end.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 01:50
|
|
|
I last played a long time ago but I think claiming, even fake, was kind of a big deal then. If that's just what people like uranus do now I guess it doesn't mean anything at all. I'm still not sold on his being town but I'm not sold on his being scum either. ##unvote I'm gonna read through the thread again and see if anything jumps out at me. I kind of want to vote Peta for being obnoxious or uranus for making scumhunting more difficult but I don't have enough votes to cover everyone who annoys me at any given time.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 02:15
|
|
|
Mithross posted:At this point we're basically confirming that we got breadcrumbs in a PM, that are probably going to be 50% teases. This is kind of interesting in light of things. Do you have bus keys, Mithross?
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 02:24
|
|
|
I think I believe cpig's hat story
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 02:29
|
|
|
Gilok posted:This is kind of interesting in light of things. Do you have bus keys, Mithross? I dont, actually, I purposefully talked about something I didn't have, and happened to pick that.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 02:31
|
|
|
Ok I finished my re-read. Allen needs to post like, way more. Really everyone needs to post more but especially him, I got no read at all. I'm getting a bad feeling from BottleKnight and Kleedrac. But the person who I'm most suspicious of right now is Hiipfire. Seriously, look at this poo poo. Nothing but white noise, mostly on day 1. He hasn't posted anything worthwhile today at all.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 02:47
|
|
|
Kleedrac posted:This post seems kinda scummy - the people who know a lot of other's alignments are generally scum - plus this discussion is about the only content we've got. In the process of catching up (apparently I was gently prodded to post more?) but this is the most vote worthy point so far. ##vote Peta
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 02:59
|
|
|
Gilok posted:Ok I finished my re-read. Hiipfire is bad but when presented with a case (my case of Peta) you ignore it, don't talk about it, say you have a bad feeling about the person who posted it and then target a lurker (without voting). What poo poo. If you're town, you're really bad at town. This whole game has been you just saying random poo poo in the wind.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:00
|
|
|
WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:In the process of catching up (apparently I was gently prodded to post more?) but this is the most vote worthy point so far. I actually forgot about this post and even though I don't think it's the best evidence against Peta I do think it's yet another good point.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:02
|
|
|
Epsilon Plus posted:can we vote this guy for being a trash-tier poster Also this.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:03
|
|
|
I'm at the Sox game and kinda drunk but Bottle Knight is being a retard so tuck it I'm watcher he visited Uranus let's roll
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:17
|
|
|
Can't quote m y soft due to fail phone app but see whale bottle arson crime posts
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:19
|
|
|
And caught up. Ok so my initial reads are that MC<-->Exact interaction was just a townie slapfight. Gilok, clueless town. Item discussions (dress, rocket launcher, funny hat) are red herrings and should not be brought up again. loving  at the number of times the word 'jester' was used in this game. BottleKnight, even though I am voting Peta I literally glazed over halfway through your post because really your whole case boils down to "he's a meanie!  The rest is just dumb.Allen's most recent post makes him just as viable a lynch as Peta. Arsonist is likely a lawn sprinkler or something to that effect that allows him to hit 3 targs at once.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:31
|
|
|
pffft lol. I'm going to just make a few points here. 1) You didn't even try to pin me until you just fullclaimed. You didn't say poo poo until right now. You're so casual, bro. 2) I did visit uranus, and the results of that visit are why I made a soft dig at cpig for what I assume is lying about being doused. But I am not, as I assume you are implying, an arsonist. 3) You're at -6, the only reason you claimed is because you're super sensitive to your appearance in this thread. That is hella scummy. I'm going to go ahead and extend my case to saying that Peta is a scum tracker. He can't be lying about tracking me, but his play is still hosed.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:31
|
|
|
Peta posted:I'm at the Sox game https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kO9wIrvTvSw Either way, have fun.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:34
|
|
|
Peta posted:whale bottle arson crime posts lol what?
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:34
|
|
|
Peta posted:I'm at the Sox game and kinda drunk but Bottle Knight is being a retard so tuck it I'm watcher he visited Uranus let's roll If you're a watcher, who else visited uranus since BK says he's not an arsonist?
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:34
|
|
|
WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:BottleKnight, even though I am voting Peta I literally glazed over halfway through your post because really your whole case boils down to "he's a meanie! No. I made some alignment calls too which, while making a point of his low content meanie posts, are important . WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:Arsonist is likely a lawn sprinkler or something to that effect that allows him to hit 3 targs at once. Huh? Do you know more about the arsonist than the rest of us?
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:35
|
|
|
Peta posted:I'm at the Sox game and kinda drunk but Bottle Knight is being a retard so tuck it I'm watcher he visited Uranus let's roll Red Sox fan? That's not gonna fly with me. ##vote peta
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:35
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Red Sox fan? That's not gonna fly with me. 
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:36
|
|
|
baaah I just realized I typed tracker in my earlier posts when I meant watcher. BottleKnight posted:I'm going to go ahead and extend my case to saying that Peta is a scum tracker. He can't be lying about watching me, but his play is still hosed. that's the only thing I would change in an edit of my post, I was not confused I just typed the wrong thing.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:37
|
|
|
BK are you new? Or has there been a significant amount of time since you last played?
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:40
|
|
|
I have never played mafia beforeeeee.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:40
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Red Sox fan? That's not gonna fly with me. To be fair, could be Chicago. Is Chicago, is not Chicago? WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:Allen's most recent post makes him just as viable a lynch as Peta. Wow, mean.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:42
|
|
|
Allen Wren posted:To be fair, could be Chicago. if he's a white sox fan, then I apologize sincerely. The Royals are gonna win the WS this year  .
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:43
|
|
|
I mean, I can understand looking at my post history and going "viable plorp," sure. But as viable as Peta? Goddamn.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 14:59 |
|
|
Hiipfire are you bored or what? I guess if you want to answer with one syllable, that's fine. Wouldn't want to throw you into a crisis or something.
|
|
#
?
May 7, 2015 03:52
|
|