|
Junior G-man posted:I've never understood why TV companies block access to non-US youtube users. I would guess licensing or contractual issues, such as the scope of a license to use the background music.
|
#
?
May 12, 2015 22:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 09:01 |
|
|
muscles like this? posted:Kind of weird that that People Are Talking description forgets to mention one of the main characters (Meaghan Rath.) Turns out its because she's likely to be recast as the show she's in for Fox is her first choice.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 01:38
|
|
|
A Coach reboot set in Philly? I will watch every episode. On second thought, guess they will make up a fictional Ivy and set it somewhere else in PA. Still watching.
FuriousxGeorge fucked around with this message at 01:43 on May 13, 2015 |
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 01:40
|
|
|
Based on just the trailers I'll give Blindspot and The Player a chance. I'm not going to judge any of the other shows just on a press release description though so I'll have to wait on them. I will watch Coach though for sure because it's Craig T. Nelson. Though without Dauber and Luther I'm not sure it'll work.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 02:00
|
|
|
Deadpool posted:Based on just the trailers I'll give Blindspot and The Player a chance. I'm not going to judge any of the other shows just on a press release description though so I'll have to wait on them. I will watch Coach though for sure because it's Craig T. Nelson. Though without Dauber and Luther I'm not sure it'll work. I just saw Jerry Van Dyke on The Middle, and I don't think Bill Fägerbake is doing anything aside from some more Spongebob voices, I'm sure they can show up at some point. People Are Talking actually doesn't look terrible. I wish I could say anything about any of the other shows, but there's not a single drat trailer up, so I honestly can't tell.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 02:35
|
|
|
DoggPickle posted:They're bringing back Heroes with the ONE CHARACTER that broke the show? I mean, he was everyone's favorite awesome guy, but they had to keep coming up with new and dumber ways to cripple his powers (amnesia?) because time travel > all other powers ever. He wasn't fully in control of it and his alterations to the past had consequences, so it wasn't that bad. The one who really broke the show was Claire with her magic healing blood that could bring people back to life. Like if they used it once, why not just use it all the time?
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 06:37
|
|
|
I refuse to believe Shades of Blue is a real show and not somebody playing TV pitch madlibs
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 11:55
|
|
|
sticklefifer posted:He wasn't fully in control of it and his alterations to the past had consequences, so it wasn't that bad. The one who really broke the show was Claire with her magic healing blood that could bring people back to life. Like if they used it once, why not just use it all the time? Guys I think there were more than a few characters who broke the show.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 13:52
|
|
|
The writers broke it.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 13:59
|
|
|
Even more accurate.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 14:05
|
|
|
Ray Liotta playing a corrupt cop? That's some brave casting.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 14:33
|
|
|
Didn't the original run of Heroes have to have Peter and Sylar have their climactic battle off-screen because they were both too powerful to show using their powers like that on a TV budget?
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 16:46
|
|
|
Gaz-L posted:Didn't the original run of Heroes have to have Peter and Sylar have their climactic battle off-screen because they were both too powerful to show using their powers like that on a TV budget?
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 16:48
|
|
|
Gaz-L posted:Didn't the original run of Heroes have to have Peter and Sylar have their climactic battle off-screen because they were both too powerful to show using their powers like that on a TV budget? Yes and no. The leadup to Heroes finale had episodes that were in the future. Where there was a Peter who had full control of his powers, vs a Sylar who had an assortment of powers as well. That off screen battle, with Mohinder's door, at the time I at least wrote off as being understandable, as "obviously" they were saving that payoff for the face off in the final fight of the season in the season finale where they would both be able to show out. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLo0PAciIMc Then that fight turned out to be a dud too, and I should have realized then that Heroes was going to do nothing but disappoint me. But man. Company Man was sooo good, and to this day is still one of my favorite episodes of Television. Edit: Also man, I forgot how bad the mid-00s were on Youtube. There are way too many Peter/Sylar fan music videos with terrible music.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 17:18
|
|
|
Writing a story around what you can actually show to the viewer is such a basic production task that it was sort of shocking how badly they hosed it up.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2015 18:00
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLRUSbbQynOdGDHtWaJhW8k07GpVPJ60KJ Any season now this will be the new NBC linuep! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuIZCJEu9a4
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 01:12
|
|
|
I'm pretty unhappy about About A Boy being cancelled, and against all odds I really liked One Big Happy. Boooo.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 02:49
|
|
|
Dexo posted:Then that fight turned out to be a dud too, and I should have realized then that Heroes was going to do nothing but disappoint me. Didn't Nathan die literally every season? I remember they kept bringing him back and he'd just keep dying again in some other convoluted way.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 10:35
|
|
|
My favorite goofy part of Heroes was how when the second season started they did a time skip and then over the course of the season they filled in the gaps. One of the things was Nathan started the season with this big bushy beard and eventually the show kind of forgot about it because by the time they got all the skipped over stuff sorted out he was left with about a week to grow it.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 11:58
|
|
|
muscles like this? posted:My favorite goofy part of Heroes was how when the second season started they did a time skip and then over the course of the season they filled in the gaps. One of the things was Nathan started the season with this big bushy beard and eventually the show kind of forgot about it because by the time they got all the skipped over stuff sorted out he was left with about a week to grow it. I remember that the best thing about it were all the "we have to go back!" Lost jokes it inspired. It's a shame the show forgot about it, like that girl Peter left in the future he erased.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2015 12:30
|
|
|
Jack Gladney posted:It's a shame the show forgot about it, like that girl Peter left in the future he erased. That was awful. I kept hoping that Peter would try to get her back or talk about trying to save her or something but whelp...
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2015 04:53
|
|
|
DoggPickle posted:That was like some kind of bizarre list of everything I have no interest in watching at all. "Chicago Barista" made me laugh!! Actually, Hiro has a recurring role, it seems, but the main character they're bringing back is actually the only one they should be bringing back, Noah Bennett. I feel like he was actually everyone's favorite awesome guy. 
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2015 05:52
|
|
|
Noah Bennett was like a character from a different, better show decided to drop in on Heroes because he's cool and sneaky and can do what he wants.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2015 09:30
|
|
|
sticklefifer posted:Noah Bennett was like a character from a different, better show decided to drop in on Heroes because he's cool and sneaky and can do what he wants. Best episode of Heroes was Noah/Sylar buddy cop episode. I would have watched the poo poo out of a show like that, too bad the writers felt the show was getting too good and ended that story line fast.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2015 14:47
|
|
|
The best thing about heroes was the entire first season of the guy running for Congress, and in the first episode of season two he was a senator.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2015 17:39
|
|
|
Golden Bee posted:The best thing about heroes was the entire first season of the guy running for Congress, and in the first episode of season two he was a senator. I don't remember the show at all except for the crazily bad first season finale. Why was this the best thing?
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2015 17:56
|
|
|
Because Senators aren't Congressmen.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2015 18:51
|
|
|
Victorkm posted:Because Senators aren't Congressmen. However the Senate is part of Congress, which is what Golden Bee actually referred to. I take it from your answer, however, that the show specified he was originally running for the House.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2015 18:54
|
|
|
It was 5 years later. He spent two years in the house and then ran and won the senate seat. I mean it probably wasn't mentioned in the show, and was more than likely a mistake, but it is possible. Also Senator's are congressman. As are Representatives. Both the House and Senate are a part of "Congress" Dexo fucked around with this message at 22:28 on May 15, 2015 |
|
#
?
May 15, 2015 22:26
|
|
|
Dexo posted:Also Senator's are congressman. Weirdly, this is not the common usage in America.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2015 22:29
|
|
|
Sir Kodiak posted:Weirdly, this is not the common usage in America. Really? I live in the Midwesst and I've only heard Senator's and representatives used. That's weird.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 00:22
|
|
|
Astroman posted:They're bringing back Coach? If they don't faithfully cover the Luther Van Dam child molestation scandal I'm out.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 01:54
|
|
|
Sir Kodiak posted:Weirdly, this is not the common usage in America. Yeah it is.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 14:13
|
|
|
boom boom boom posted:Yeah it is. Nah, you won't typically find the media referring to a Senator as a Congressman/Congresswoman, but you will frequently see them refer to a Representative that way.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 15:44
|
|
|
I hear it all the time. Literally everyday, if not two or three times a day.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 16:21
|
|
|
In what context, out of curiosity?
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 16:22
|
|
|
Just chatting with people.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 16:28
|
|
|
The people you know talk weird, both in subject matter and phrasing.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 16:30
|
|
|
Sir Kodiak posted:The people you know talk weird, both in subject matter and phrasing.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 16:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 09:01 |
|
|
Sir Kodiak posted:Nah, you won't typically find the media referring to a Senator as a Congressman/Congresswoman, but you will frequently see them refer to a Representative that way. Yeah Representative is the title but the direct address fir is Congress(wo)man. It gets confusing to some since Senator serves as both for Senators.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2015 20:46
|
|
