|
I only have two strong town reads and that makes me sad  I will not vote LUTR or Gulag today.
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2015 23:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 23:36 |
|
|
what about me makes you think i'm town
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2015 23:07
|
|
|
The way you trolled me yesterday.
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2015 23:08
|
|
|
I do not know if I buy that answer
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2015 23:09
|
|
|
sorry, I mean, I do not know know if I buy that answer, yar, matey
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2015 23:09
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:I do not know if I buy that answer GulagDolls posted:sorry, I mean, I do not know know if I buy that answer, yar, matey scumslip spotted
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2015 23:13
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:I do not know if I buy that answer Why?
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2015 23:21
|
|
|
why would that be indicative of alignment
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2015 23:37
|
|
|
Because it was to get a response out of me, or so I though.]
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2015 23:37
|
|
|
i had actually forgot it was still d1 because two people were dead
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2015 23:39
|
|
|
Hey Gulag, what do you think of Shanakin?
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2015 23:41
|
|
|
Oh, I thought you were trying to see if I had info from the scumdoc or something.
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2015 23:46
|
|
|
Ixtlilton posted:Can someone give me a short version of the case on QPQ? For me the big thing is that I find a lot of his casing to give the impression of being super well done and thought out but is in fact pretty flimsy which he admits in his first couple of posts. MCS did a big post on him that is pretty good, but I'm actually not sure what MCS opinion on QPQ is/was, he could've just as easily been antagonizing him as making an actual case. QuoProQuid posted:That's a pretty substantial shift to make over an evening. What exactly caused that? You quote the exact same post as part of both reads. There were two things that changed it for me. The first was I read it this morning with a clearer mind as opposed to last night where I read the 12 pages in one go at around 2 am. Also, I read the individual post histories as opposed to reading the thread in itself. I don't actually know if that's better or worse but I prefer it personally, not only because it's a way easier and less dense way to read up on people. Doing so like that you don't get the antagonism of MCS posts and his case seems a bit more solid. Also, for me, it pointed out the sort flimsy fabrication I'm getting from your posts.
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2015 23:47
|
|
|
1st thought: who is that upon reading post history: i dont think he's taken a s tance on anything this whole game. bad guy??? new?? both?? probably a good candidate for stab
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2015 23:47
|
|
|
Ixtlilton posted:Oh, I thought you were trying to see if I had info from the scumdoc or something. This is some really twist-your-neck kinda logic yo
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2015 23:53
|
|
|
You use someone's who's just replaced in an skimmed the game is 12 minutes' reaction to that to see if they looked in the scumdoc and saw there were no night actions/someone told them their vote didn't count. It's pretty simple.
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2015 23:56
|
|
|
Ixtlilton posted:Also what he just described the dude getting offed as doing is town af, this dude is a cum man. I.... what?
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 01:39
|
|
|
you heard him
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 01:45
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:you heard him I really don't like picturing it though. Also deadline is 3 days? What the hell?
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 01:46
|
|
|
I don't have any strong suspicions at the moment, may need to do a reread sometime. I'm not as suspicious of QPQ as I was earlier, his play looks about the same as what I've seen from him in other games (links in all his posts and all) and he's one of the few players I feel is really trying to contribute.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 01:50
|
|
|
I think there is probably something to the idea that Ecco would have worked up an early case on his scumbuddy LUTR to punch the ticket on distancing. Their exchange looked more like friendly sparring than any real suspicion behind it. I'll hold my vote until I can do a reread though.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 01:51
|
|
|
Day 4 Vote Count 100YrsofAttitude (2): Pinterest Mom, Somberbrero QuoProQuid (2): 100YrsofAttitude, dscruffy1 Shanakin (1): Look Under The Rock ETA to deadline: 1 hour, 51 minutes
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 02:08
|
|
|
gently caress it, let's kill the person with like four posts. ##votw Shanakin
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 02:14
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:gently caress it, let's kill the person with like four posts. thank you although you might want to fix that, unless votefinder can handle typos
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 02:15
|
|
|
Typo...OR FAKED DAY ACTION?! ##vote Shankakin This person has like a post a day.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 02:28
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Typo...OR FAKED DAY ACTION?! This is my case.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 02:28
|
|
|
Having gone through LUTR, his content is just as as unexceptional as I remembered. He has lots of jokevotes (1), (2) but that's not exactly noteworthy in this game. His only major contributions until Met's lynch is his defense of Gridlocked (4) (5) which is only weird because of his previously laid-back demeanor, and his sparing with Ecco (6), (7), (8) which I had initially used in LUTR's benefit. Now, I'm not entirely sure. As TNL says (9), the exchange comes off much less extreme than I remember. The crux of my suspicions still boil down to the last moments of yesterday. I really don't like how defensive he gets when Mets and MEDS cast suspicion on him (10). His explanation for this behavior, and his thoughts on why Met was pulling a gambit seem weak to me (11). Also, I dislike the Shanakin lynch (12). I won't mourn his passing if it happens, but it comes off to me as an exceptionally lazy play. The Ecco Gambit, which seems to be LUTR's reasoning for the lynch (Ibid)works more in theory than in practice, where it can act as smokescreen for scum looking for an easy target. ##vote: LUTR
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 02:45
|
|
|
Yeah, I'm down for this. I don't need a reason. ##vote LUTR
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 02:47
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:The Ecco Gambit, which seems to be LUTR's reasoning for the lynch (Ibid)works more in theory than in practice, where it can act as smokescreen for scum looking for an easy target. i found scum with the ecco gambit 
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 02:49
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:i found scum with the ecco gambit Obviously the exception that proves the rule!
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 02:49
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:Having gone through LUTR, his content is just as as unexceptional as I remembered. He has lots of jokevotes (1), (2) but that's not exactly noteworthy in this game. His only major contributions until Met's lynch is his defense of Gridlocked (4) (5) which is only weird because of his previously laid-back demeanor, and his sparing with Ecco (6), (7), (8) which I had initially used in LUTR's benefit. Now, I'm not entirely sure. As TNL says (9), the exchange comes off much less extreme than I remember. Haha okay DFW.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 02:51
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Haha okay DFW. Imagining him as the ghost of DFW condemned to play Mafia games actually improves my opinion of him and makes his play seem more natural.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 02:53
|
|
|
With CCKeane's vote resolved, we're at a four-way tie. I'd rather if we put our heads together to get a bit more consensus. I'll reread 100 Yrs and Shanakin to see if there is something exceptional that I missed. As with before, who is here right now and will be around for the deadline? CCKeane posted:Haha okay DFW. I don't know what that acronym means, CCKeane!
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 02:54
|
|
|
Sharkakin is a non entity, 100 is playing and I'll give him a pass. I'd really like to get rid of Sharkakin.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 02:55
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:With CCKeane's vote resolved, we're at a four-way tie. I'd rather if we put our heads together to get a bit more consensus. I'll reread 100 Yrs and Shanakin to see if there is something exceptional that I missed. David Foster Wallace is an author who was known for his love of footnotes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 02:55
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:David Foster Wallace is an author who was known for his love of footnotes. I'll put him on my list of authors to read.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 02:57
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:I'll put him on my list of authors to read. Infinite Jest is one of the great American novels. It gets talked about a lot, but that it because it is quite good. I recommend it! In exchange for this book recommendation, please vote Sharkakin.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 02:59
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Infinite Jest is one of the great American novels. It gets talked about a lot, but that it because it is quite good. I recommend it! You should probably start with the short story collection Oblivion first as Infinite Jest is pretty hard to get into if you have no knowledge of his style before starting. f'real don't get me started on Wallace rants in this thread. btw I don't even know what the Ecco gambit is?
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 03:02
|
|
|
A few brief thoughts on 100 Yrs: I remember liking her content yesterday and for her Her opening bout of impressions, that remains true (1), (2). I like the rapid fire attempt to catch-up and very little about those first few posts trip me up. Where I start to have a problem is with her retort to Pinterest Mom, which comes off as oddly menacing (3). I've noted the flip-flop on myself, and while 100 Yrs explanation for this shift makes sense, the event still reads to me as off. I also have an issue with this post (4) which gives me really bad ~~vibes~~. I am not sure if I can entirely articulate why this post gives me such a bad feeling, except by saying that it accomplishes nothing but bemoaning yesterday's lynch. It also seems obvious to me where scum were, likely supporting Met's lynch, but for 100 Yrs this is apparently an issue of contention. Overall: Started off with good town vibes, which slowly eroded as I went through her posts. Still would prefer to lynch LUTR, but I see 100 Yrs as a good alternative candidate.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 03:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 23:36 |
|
|
Anyone who hasn't been active today is a chode
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2015 03:15
|
|