|
##vote LUTR Scum as before, and also apparently is too busy for Mafia due to a life full of buffalo stampedes and rides at Six Flags.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2015 20:37 |
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2024 18:21 |
|
MEDS CURE SCHIZOS posted:Yeah, I'm down for this. I don't need a reason. So where were you yesterday?
|
# ? Jun 6, 2015 21:34 |
|
Look Under The Rock posted:So where were you yesterday? I don't see the need to use the forums as my personal liveblog.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2015 21:35 |
|
MEDS CURE SCHIZOS posted:I don't see the need to use the forums as my personal liveblog. Sucks that you have no friends here I guess, but that doesn't mean you have to poo poo on people for skipping a few hours of activity when you miss basically a full day ##vote meds cure schizos Either you're scum or you're salty over something that happened two years ago but either way you're trying to get me dunked based on logic that applies doubly to you.
|
# ? Jun 6, 2015 22:52 |
|
PSA IN CASE YOU MISSED IT DEADLINE IS AT NINE FOR SOME loving REASON
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 00:05 |
|
i'm gonna need knife puns
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 00:07 |
|
GulagDolls posted:i'm gonna need knife puns I've got a pretty sharp wit, what are you looking for?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 00:15 |
|
Look Under The Rock posted:Sucks that you have no friends here I guess, but that doesn't mean you have to poo poo on people for skipping a few hours of activity when you miss basically a full day
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 00:42 |
|
Gulag if you stab this dude I will send you cookies irl
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 00:44 |
|
Look Under The Rock posted:Gulag if you stab this dude I will send you cookies irl Hey, look at that, LUTR can't actually make a decent case and is resorting to injecting her personal life (again).
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 00:47 |
|
MEDS CURE SCHIZOS posted:Hey, look at that, LUTR can't actually make a decent case and is resorting to injecting her personal life (again). You have one page of post history that mostly consists of slapfighting with QPQ, who you then dropped your case on to vote met, who you then dropped your case on to vote me -- "I don't need a reason" -- you've been inactive and have dropped any attempt at actually playing the game outside trying to get me lynched and I have yet to see you (or anyone else) make a case on me how's that
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 00:52 |
|
Wonderful. Now let's be adults and stop bringing in personal poo poo.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 00:53 |
|
I've been drinking for the last four hours Vote lurt?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 00:54 |
|
yall have voted me every day, at what point are you actually gonna put a case behind it?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 00:57 |
|
cookies u say
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:00 |
|
GulagDolls posted:cookies u say I mean it's the third night in a row where some quick voting assclown could kill me right at deadline and I would like to actually play instead of self preservation voting so yeah cookies
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:06 |
|
ladies and gentlemen
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:09 |
|
do cookies prevent scurvy
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:10 |
|
##vote qpq
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:11 |
|
You have one vote on you. You could put a third on QPQ and lessen your risk, instead you're trying to claim some sort of "self preservation" by throwing a protest vote against me. It's eerily mirroring the previous couple of days where you got oddly defensive when QPQ dropped a vote on you.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:14 |
|
MEDS CURE SCHIZOS posted:You have one vote on you. You could put a third on QPQ and lessen your risk, instead you're trying to claim some sort of "self preservation" by throwing a protest vote against me. Voting QPQ would be self preservation Voting you is voting scum
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:16 |
|
Look Under The Rock posted:Voting QPQ would be self preservation He voted for me and makes fun of me for using the forums as my own personal Livejournal, guys, scum!
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:18 |
|
You've done literally nothing the past two days except push a vote for someone you haven't even bothered to make a case on. If that's not scum behavior I really don't know what is.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:22 |
|
GulagDolls posted:do cookies prevent scurvy maybe
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:24 |
|
betrayer i dont think you're scum but a bad thing will happen to you if you continue to be a butt
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:25 |
|
Look Under The Rock posted:You've done literally nothing the past two days except push a vote for someone you haven't even bothered to make a case on. If that's not scum behavior I really don't know what is. It's really not, so I'm glad you're able to understand how you've offered nothing to the game beyond bribes and being defensive.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:26 |
|
GulagDolls posted:betrayer i dont think you're scum but a bad thing will happen to you if you continue to be a butt Let the record show that I'm being remarkably civil, all things considered.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:27 |
|
MEDS CURE SCHIZOS posted:Let the record show that I'm being remarkably civil, all things considered. nah
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:29 |
|
Guess we're the only ones here for deadline. Pinterest, Gulag, could we knife someone other than QPQ?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:42 |
|
for whom the knife tolls
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:44 |
|
The Ninth Layer posted:I'm reading some of QPQ's link posts more closely than I originally did and one thing I'm noticing is that all these helpful links point to filtered post histories. Even if it's a one-off link it almost always leads to a filtered post history. (One of his links actually led me to a "New Post" window.) I know it's somewhat his style to link like crazy, but to me this looks a lot like paint-by-numbers scumhunting. In other words instead of discussing conversations in context he's scanning down peoples' post histories for his cases and picking stuff out. I am not sure I understand your case, because all this really says is that I use a lot of footnotes, which has been my playstyle since time immemorial. As for the actual cases you quote, I disagree with your assessment that they are nothing more than post summaries. When "I don't like that" or think "this is weird," I find it usually pretty important to indicate what it is that I find to be suspicious or weird so that others can provide their thoughts. To say that my posts are "literally just a summary of... post history with an "I don't like that" or "this is weird" to transition" is like saying a recipe is literally just a list of ingredients with vague directions to transition. You can not really have one without the other. Given the overall tenor of this game and the level of activity, I won't fault using copious footnotes and trying to engage with other people.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:46 |
|
i was waiting for u. QPQ who woulD YOU stab
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:47 |
|
Ixtlilton posted:What's your reasoning now though? Your original thing is no longer valid so give me something new. Do cases have an expiration date? If someone puts pressure on you for making a weird vote and you subsequently unvote, are we banned from calling attention to that earlier weird behavior because "the original thing is no longer valid."
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:50 |
|
QuoProQuid posted:Do cases have an expiration date? If someone puts pressure on you for making a weird vote and you subsequently unvote, are we banned from calling attention to that earlier weird behavior because "the original thing is no longer valid." Way to completely miss the point of the conversation.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:52 |
|
I for real JUST noticed that Quandary adjusted the deadline time to 11 EST instead of 9 EST, I am chiller now knowing that there's still a possibility of getting some more people in here before deadline.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:53 |
|
Day 6 Vote Count QuoProQuid (3): The Ninth Layer, Opopanax, GulagDolls Ixtlilton (1): QuoProQuid, Look Under The Rock (1): MEDS CURE SCHIZOS MEDS CURE SCHIZOS (1): Look Under The Rock GulagDolls (1): dscruffy1 ETA to deadline: 2 hours, 3 minutes
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:56 |
|
GulagDolls posted:i was waiting for u. To be quite candid, I would probably stab dscruffy. Have not really liked dscruffy for the entire game and his contributions are dangerously thin. I am on a mobile and cannot easily bring up his posts, but it feels like he is just punching his card every few days by mentioning people then disappearing. Maybe also Shanakin but that is almost entirely because he is a lurker and he has missed several opportunities to increase participation.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:57 |
|
Ixtlilton posted:Way to completely miss the point of the conversation. Explain it to me like you would an infant.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 01:57 |
|
The point was that his arguments were never valid, not that something changed to make them invalid.
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 02:00 |
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2024 18:21 |
|
Ixtlilton posted:Way to completely miss the point of the conversation. Were you just waiting around for someone to drag you into the game?
|
# ? Jun 7, 2015 02:01 |