|
Tremendous Taste posted:I couldn't. I wouldn't have the sincerity, good faith, and motive to fall back on I'm not so new to the game that I believe that. You've said yourself that you're a very good scum player.
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 04:55 |
|
|
If I'm going on the assumption that taste IS actually a town tracker, then I'd guess scum are hiding somewhere through this whole ordeal. People like Allen and garth.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:16
|
|
|
I'm in reh now so can't talk. Please don't lynch me until I get a chance to come back. If it gets to that point I will role claim.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:17
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:If I'm going on the assumption that taste IS actually a town tracker, then I'd guess scum are hiding somewhere through this whole ordeal. People like Allen and garth. I think Allen would be a lot more talkative if he were scum. I'm not so sure about garth either way.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:18
|
|
|
I like how she answers the question once people start voting
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:19
|
|
|
Ummm I told you I was driving...?
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:20
|
|
|
You also patently refused to answer it lol Like if I said I'm going to make dinner and come back and say Met is town that doesn't make it OK
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:21
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:I'm in reh now so can't talk. Please don't lynch me until I get a chance to come back. If it gets to that point I will role claim. Wait, what? After getting on Taste for his role claim you're going to pull the same stunt? And let me guess, your role will have something to do with knowing that Taste is lying, so we should believe you.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:21
|
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:Wait, what? After getting on Taste for his role claim you're going to pull the same stunt? And let me guess, your role will have something to do with knowing that Taste is lying, so we should believe you.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:22
|
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:Wait, what? After getting on Taste for his role claim you're going to pull the same stunt? And let me guess, your role will have something to do with knowing that Taste is lying, so we should believe you. Well yeah that's exactly how I know taste is lying. Did people think I was pulling it out of my rear end? Why would I have been so drat sure that he's lying if I had nothing to back it up.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:24
|
|
|
i think taste is an sk
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
Yeah, I've played real life before, but this is my first forum game. Also, I don't normally post a whole lot in anything I do. I've tried to be a little better about it today.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Well yeah that's exactly how I know taste is lying. Did people think I was pulling it out of my rear end? Why would I have been so drat sure that he's lying if I had nothing to back it up. Ok, what's your role
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:28
|
|
|
"IM ALSO A TRACKER!!!"
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:i think taste is an sk That could be an interesting twist to all his arguments.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
I wish
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:"IM ALSO A TRACKER!!!" See, this is rude.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:31
|
|
|
Only if you're hypersensitive
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:32
|
|
|
Here's how it works. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kk8eJh4i8Lo Taste kills me in the night. He gets a message that the action is successful but I'm still alive, which only happens if the target is bulletproof. MMM Whatchya Say posted:If an action is unsuccessful (if it's roleblocked, the target is jailed or otherwise invalid) the player making the action will be informed it was not successful but will not be informed why. because there's only one SK in the game, he knows I'm town 1-shot bulletproof. That means I can't have gone anywhere last night, so claiming to have tracked me nowhere is safe.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:32
|
|
|
If there were an SK, would we normally see two kills in the night? Outside of the scenario Pmom is talking about.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:33
|
|
|
I was skimming over the first posts of rules/roles and noticed this:MMM Whatchya Say posted:Action resolution I know it's kind of stirring poo poo up again from the PMom argument, but Taste's claim that because PMom didn't go anywhere so she must be town because the scum would send a vanilla out to kill doesn't hold water. Anyone who is scum can make the kill.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:34
|
|
|
Butttt if that were the case anarc wouldn't have a way to say her result showed me lying
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:34
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:Butttt if that were the case anarc wouldn't have a way to say her result showed me lying You can both be bad~ You would have been planning to withhold your kill the rest of the game, of course.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:35
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I was skimming over the first posts of rules/roles and noticed this: If a tracker tracks a player to two targets, that player is confirmed scum It is not a sensible risk to take unless they need to
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:35
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:You can both be bad~ That's totally my play style
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:36
|
|
|
I think you trying to catch me caught narc instead haha
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:37
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:If a tracker tracks a player to two targets, that player is confirmed scum Yeah.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:37
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:Butttt if that were the case anarc wouldn't have a way to say her result showed me lying she wasn't planning on saying that her result said you were lying. she implied that her role made her think you were lying.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:37
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Here's how it works. Are you serious? Not being sarcastic. I'm genuinely curious if you think this is going on. I don't read sarcasm too well, myself.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:38
|
|
|
Nah this is super strong AnonymousNarcotics posted:Well yeah that's exactly how I know taste is lying. Did people think I was pulling it out of my rear end? Why would I have been so drat sure that he's lying if I had nothing to back it up.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:38
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:she wasn't planning on saying that her result said you were lying. she implied that her role made her think you were lying. No taste. Exakt is correct here.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:39
|
|
|
Met posted:Are you serious? Not being sarcastic. I'm genuinely curious if you think this is going on. I don't read sarcasm too well, myself. ##vote tremendous taste
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:40
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:No taste. Exakt is correct here. What? You need to claim here.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:41
|
|
|
I have incontrovertible proof taste is scum! What I really meant is...
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:41
|
|
|
Is that a serious vote j Don't tease met if not
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:45
|
|
|
##unvote while anarc frantically tries to come up with something 
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:45
|
|
|
Well, the only think ANarc could claim is that she is the jailor or cop right? Either she claims she is the jailer and thus Taste couldn't have followed PMom even if he was a second tracker or she claims she is the cop and investigated Taste and he came up scum.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:49
|
|
|
It's funny that you think I'd have to frantically come up with something. I have been unwavering in saying that taste is lying (since the second he claimed it) and I have something to back it up.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:49
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:Well, the only think ANarc could claim is that she is the jailor or cop right? There could be more than one tracker.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 04:55 |
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:It's funny that you think I'd have to frantically come up with something. I have been unwavering in saying that taste is lying (since the second he claimed it) and I have something to back it up. ##vote anarc
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2015 00:50
|
|