|
Propaganda Machine posted:It's not necessarily an SK. It could be a town vig who though Narc was scum and misfired.
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 16:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 09:55 |
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Outing a town pr (if it was a blind guess and I contradicted you) isn't worth scum giving up a member. This isn't necessarily a claim. He could very well have been a one-shot kill.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 17:14
|
|
|
Oh wait.MMM Whatchya Say posted:Pinterest Mom, town 1 shot bulletproof, was killed in the night Never mind  Sorry, I'm at work and slightly distracted.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 17:17
|
|
|
Fast Luck posted:The vig is one shot vig, so unless there's a bunch of vigs like there were trackers, there's going to be a SK. Given the three trackers, I wouldn't discount the possibility. All of the conflicting town claims would be good for scum, and it would balance the role-heavy town.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 17:19
|
|
|
 The Current Day 4 Votecount   Allen Wren (1): Fast Luck Not Voting (9): Allen Wren, Chic Trombone, DaisyDanger, EXAKT Science, garthoneeye, HiipFire, imgay, Propaganda Machine, TMMadman With 10 players alive, it takes 6 votes to be executed.  There is currently no deadline set.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 17:24
|
|
|
That votefinder is always stirring poo poo up. I think it's gotta be an SK because I think that the scum would be more likely to kill the third claimed tracker. So it seems like the most likely scenario is that the SK was jailed/RBed on one of the nights and tried to kill PMom on the other night and then finished the job on the third.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 17:46
|
|
|
Although I could see how an SK would also want a tracker dead. However that would mean that the one of the N1/N2 kills is the SK while the scum hit PMom. And that just doesn't seem to ring true to me.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 17:54
|
|
|
It's also possible that there was at least one successful doctor.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 18:22
|
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:It's also possible that there was at least one successful doctor. That's true. This is one complicated knot.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 18:30
|
|
|
I'm a little more skeptical about Allen after last night. Unfortunately I don't have much more to add right now. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 23:10
|
|
|
Why did you become less skeptical? His hammer came with 14 minutes left, if he hadn't done it someone else would have. I definitely think it was possible someone on the scum team threw in the towel on Met. What do you think of EXAKT?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 23:17
|
|
|
44 minutes left actually
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 23:18
|
|
|
Oops, I misread your post. Still though what do you think of EXAKT?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 23:19
|
|
|
Fast Luck posted:Oops, I misread your post. Still though what do you think of EXAKT? He's not really on my radar anymore at this point. Allen and TMMadman are my top two choices right now.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 23:20
|
|
|
I've cooled somewhat on TMM after Met's flip yesterday. Daisy, what are your cases on TMM and Allen?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 23:29
|
|
|
Fast Luck posted:I don't like this post either. A vote on a non-candidate and then an excuse to not change his vote even if we need it. sorry about the voting ANarc bit, I've been playing alot of auspol recently and lynch targets often get decided in like the last hour of the game day
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 23:34
|
|
|
I'm a little surprised Narc was killed. I would have figured there was enough suspicion on her that the scum may have been able to pull another mislynch by continuing to block her. Can roleblockers not target the same person repeatedly?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 23:41
|
|
|
A while back, I watched all of the seasons of The Mole. While watching, I would tell Max Peck who I thought was the mole during every episode. More often than not, the person who I picked as the mole was the person who ended up going home for being the most incorrect on the quiz they take to see how much they know about the actual mole. I'm really bad at guessing who the mole is and it's pretty much exactly like scumhunting. At any rate, I haven't gone and compiled Allen or TMM's posts in order to properly case them. I don't know if that's what you're expecting, but the whole Taste thing kind of made me not care or want to go as hard as I did on D2. I've been saying that I think Allen would be a lot more active if he were scum, but I'm not sure if that's true. For all I know, he could just be busy or he could be downplaying his role in this game to avoid drawing attention to himself. If scum knew Met was a lost cause, dropping the hammer wouldn't have been a big deal for him at all. My thoughts on TMM are still the same as they were on D3. He's new, but he can be coached by veterans. In general, I'm more wary of the lurkers right now than I am of the active players.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 23:44
|
|
|
DaisyDanger posted:A while back, I watched all of the seasons of The Mole. While watching, I would tell Max Peck who I thought was the mole during every episode. More often than not, the person who I picked as the mole was the person who ended up going home for being the most incorrect on the quiz they take to see how much they know about the actual mole. I'm really bad at guessing who the mole is and it's pretty much exactly like scumhunting. ehhhh
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 23:48
|
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:Given the three trackers, I wouldn't discount the possibility. All of the conflicting town claims would be good for scum, and it would balance the role-heavy town. Even if there are multiple vigs, that means that 2 vigs both incorrectly shot at town. I could see the shot at Narc, but who was the other bad shot? Everyone else who's died at night has seemed pretty town except maybe 8$?
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 00:02
|
|
|
garthoneeye posted:I'm a little surprised Narc was killed. I would have figured there was enough suspicion on her that the scum may have been able to pull another mislynch by continuing to block her. SK probably killed her over the tracker claim
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 00:07
|
|
|
DaisyDanger posted:At any rate, I haven't gone and compiled Allen or TMM's posts in order to properly case them. I don't know if that's what you're expecting, but the whole Taste thing kind of made me not care or want to go as hard as I did on D2. Excuses for not playing are scummy as gently caress, as is the whole argument - I'm towny for not posting until it's convenient for you to think I'm scummy for not posting?
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
Mega-suspicious about that change of heart, as if it's policy-mandated.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
##vote DaisyDanger
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 00:33
|
|
|
Yeah, would. ##vote DaisyDanger
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 00:46
|
|
|
I could probably get behind a Daisy vote, but I'll have to go through and read her posts ashen l again before I do it. I'm out right now, so maybe later tonight or tomorrow during the day.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 00:51
|
|
|
I am playing the game unless playing the game means you absolutely have to follow some sort of protocol when you think someone is scum. There hasn't been a sudden change of heart regarding you, Allen, and I'm pretty sure I've even pointed out several times that I've slowly grown more suspicious of you.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 00:54
|
|
|
I wish we had some useful night results :/
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 01:01
|
|
|
Also Allen haven't you been making excuses for lurking this whole game? ##vote allen
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 01:11
|
|
|
There's a difference between not constantly posting and actively saying "I'm not going to bother to read these guys, but believe me, they're the scums"
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 01:16
|
|
|
What I've done is put my play in context. What you're doing is actively rejecting the idea of playing.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 01:16
|
|
|
I have read everything but 90% of my phones have been phone posting and gently caress quoting multiple posts this way. Also it's silly that the only way to case people, as you and Taste have both told me now, is to quote several of their posts with responses when I've already responded to posts as they've been made. I've discussed how I feel plenty of times at this point! It's all there for people to read!
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 01:18
|
|
|
No I reject the idea that the only way to play is by quoting posts I've already responded to.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 01:19
|
|
|
One of those "phones" should be "posts" but guess how I'm posting right now!
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 01:20
|
|
|
But my point still stands. I have been playing and reading and responding to people. You've been coming in with poo poo like "ah yeah let's take out the lurkers #vote chic" and have barely engaged at all beyond jumping on ideas without much effort from you at all.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 01:21
|
|
|
The best content to base cases on is votes, why don't you start by looking at the votes made by the people you're trying to case.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 01:23
|
|
|
You have played the game for the most part, yeah, but what I'm suspicious of is the rejection of further gameplay along with the telegraphed-by-one-or-two-posts change of position on me. But hell, you wanna talk about lurkers? Where precisely the hell are: imgay Chic Hiip imgay hasn't even showed up since late Sunday night.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 01:40
|
|
|
Its finals week I've been distracted
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 01:53
|
|
|
mods please rename imgay to kibo tia
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 01:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 09:55 |
|
|
I think we should go for a lurker, especially if the consensus is that we have an SK to deal with. we want to get rid of the SK, right? I think there's definitely lurking scum, and I strongly suspect that the SK is laying low to avoid suspicion and the lynch. #vote chic I like her least. Constant excuses for not posting, and even less content than imgay and Hiip.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2015 06:00
|
|