|
Gamerofthegame posted:alright so the last two games i scumhunted with perfect accuracy how does this help us
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 19:49 |
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2024 16:56 |
CCKeane posted:Please say it then. What are you, my boss?
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 19:51 |
|
Max posted:What are you, my boss? What's your objection?
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 19:52 |
|
Max posted:What are you, my boss? I'm just interested, Mr. Max. Please make the statement.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 19:52 |
Why the insistence? You know how I feel.
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 19:54 |
|
Max posted:Why the insistence? You know how I feel. Why the push back?
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 19:55 |
Why dodge the question?
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 19:56 |
QuoProQuid posted:how does this help us it doesn't help you, you're right. scum.
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 19:57 |
|
Max posted:Why dodge the question? I am letting the question hit me square in the chest and fall to the floor. Why are you avoiding posting the statement?
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 19:57 |
Why do you need me to specifically make that statement when I've answered it in spirit.
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:01 |
Like, if someone truncated that statement to "I'm town, 'x' is town," would that satisfy you, or would you ask them to rephrase it exactly the way you have asked?
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:02 |
|
Gamerofthegame posted:it doesn't help you, you're right. I'm just trying to figure out how you think set-up speculation is in any way useful, especially on D1 when there are multiple other tangents to pursue. It's just a little pointless and distracting, friend.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:03 |
|
Max posted:Like, if someone truncated that statement to "I'm town, 'x' is town," would that satisfy you, or would you ask them to rephrase it exactly the way you have asked? I would appreciate a specific conjunction, yes. You may use and if you would like.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:03 |
I think it was an empty scummy statement.
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:03 |
I'm not going to say it.
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:05 |
|
Max posted:Why do you need me to specifically make that statement when I've answered it in spirit. You're being awkward and self-conscious about the whole thing. It's not so much about posting the statement, as much as it is about you avoiding an issue that could have been really easily resolved for no apparent reason.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:05 |
|
Max posted:I think it was an empty scummy statement. What makes it scummy?
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:06 |
It could have been resolved by taking my "Yeah, sure" answer and leaving it there.
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:06 |
|
Oh hey a role PM. I swore I dreamt finding that on my phone at 3am. I'm a first timer please don't call me scum tia.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:08 |
QuoProQuid posted:What makes it scummy? "Hi, I have a good track record and now I will speculate on how many people are here publicly for no reason." <- I don't understand the impetus for making that post aside from wanting to create content for the sake of looking helpful.
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:09 |
Max posted:"Hi, I have a good track record and now I will speculate on how many people are here publicly for no reason." <- I don't understand the impetus for making that post aside from wanting to create content for the sake of looking helpful. Mafia Edit: "How many scum are here"
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:10 |
|
Is this the point where I make the comment that most d1 posting is worthless until we get a flip of some sort? I think it is.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:11 |
|
Max posted:It could have been resolved by taking my "Yeah, sure" answer and leaving it there. Nope.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:11 |
Spoonsy posted:Is this the point where I make the comment that most d1 posting is worthless until we get a flip of some sort? I legit hate this mindset.
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:12 |
CCKeane posted:Nope. We're between a rock and a hard place, because I'm not going to make that statement.
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:12 |
|
Max posted:We're between a rock and a hard place, because I'm not going to make that statement. Can I ask why not?
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:13 |
|
To me, it looks like Keane is playing a variation of the Synx Gambit (1), which I don't see as harmful. I don't understand what you mean by it "speculat[ing] on how many people are here for no reason," because the point seems to be getting reactions out of people.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:14 |
|
MAFIA EDIT: The above post was made in response to this post:Max posted:"Hi, I have a good track record and now I will speculate on how many people are here publicly for no reason." <- I don't understand the impetus for making that post aside from wanting to create content for the sake of looking helpful.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:14 |
|
Spoonsy posted:Is this the point where I make the comment that most d1 posting is worthless until we get a flip of some sort? thats dumb all content is worthwhile all content is created equal endowed by their creator with certain inalienable value
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:16 |
QuoProQuid posted:MAFIA EDIT: The above post was made in response to this post: That post was about Gamer.
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:17 |
|
QuoProQuid posted:thats dumb As long as I don't have to make a 30 page deck about the content and how the integrated marketing team is going to create, track, measure, and report on it, I'm happy
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:17 |
CCKeane posted:Can I ask why not? You can ask, yes.
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:17 |
|
Max why are you refusing to post the statement directly?
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:18 |
Because I don't understand what information you could glean from it that you couldn't from what I've already said.
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:19 |
|
Max posted:That post was about Gamer. Sorry, I thought this post (1) was part of the ongoing conversation between you and Keane and was asking why you thought Keane's post was an "empty scummy statement."
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:20 |
|
Max posted:Because I don't understand what information you could glean from it that you couldn't from what I've already said. I think it will be a useful statement to have.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:20 |
|
Max do you think the derail about this is more useful? Because I am not planning on backing down either, and I will stop if you make one post in a specific format with content that you ostensibly agree with.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:22 |
QuoProQuid posted:Sorry, I thought this post (1) was part of the ongoing conversation between you and Keane and was asking why you thought Keane's post was an "empty scummy statement." No, I was talking about Gamer's "I'm here and ready to talk about how many scum may be in this game." statement, which I just kinda voted him for.
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:22 |
CCKeane posted:Max do you think the derail about this is more useful? Because I am not planning on backing down either, and I will stop if you make one post in a specific format with content that you ostensibly agree with. What will happen at the end of Day 1 when I have not made that statement?
|
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:24 |
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2024 16:56 |
|
Max posted:What will happen at the end of Day 1 when I have not made that statement? My guess would be you hanging by your neck.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 20:24 |