|
merk posted:I'm voting you until you're removed from the game. Now, I'm going to work. Later all. Quite reasonable. Nice job ignoring evidence contrary to your opinions Mafia edit: lyncher? Good game if so
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 14:45 |
|
|
Squiggly posted:How so? I've stated I think he's anti town and third party and would vote him in a deadline because I think he has his own agenda. How is that not clear? I'm having a hard time seeing how what you're saying lines up with your opinions.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:06
|
|
|
Right so your point is you didn't unvote when you voted gamer?
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:10
|
|
|
I like confident men like merk. I mean I am going to stay on Quid still but I'll jump when the time comes.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:10
|
|
|
Squiggly posted:I DONT JUMP OFF OF A VOTE ITS NT A REAL VOTE MY ONLY VOTE IS ON QUID STOP BEING SO loving DENSE How is an outside observer supposed to tell the difference between a player making a fake vote and a player who forgot to unvote?
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:11
|
|
|
Gamerofthegame posted:I like confident men like merk. Jump where?
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:11
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Right so your point is you didn't unvote when you voted gamer? It's a pretty big point. One of those is a real vote. With real content. The other is not.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:12
|
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:How is an outside observer supposed to tell the difference between a player making a fake vote and a player who forgot to unvote? By looking at the quality and contrast between the two? Even my vote on amoeba has an actual reason attached to it. Knowing the rules of the game shouldn't punish me because apparently I'm too stupid and would forget
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:14
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure that flew over the heads of everyone.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:14
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:I'm pretty sure that flew over the heads of everyone. And for people "analyzing" my posts it shouldn't have. If you're going to assign me a reason for something, and you can't show that it's consistent with other things of the same nature, how is that my fault? It's obvious that it's not of the same caliber or quality or really anything and yet I'm assigned a lovely reason: I must have forgotten. How about you all assume I'm a good player, and didn't forget THE RULES and it wasn't a real vote? There's a literal post that says any vote finder counts are not actually real and yet that's what some people are using as justification.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:19
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:I'm pretty sure that flew over the heads of everyone. That's because he is making it up to try to not look scummy for voting Gamer. This is an obvious lynch. What do you think of my case?
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:19
|
|
|
Squiggly posted:And for people "analyzing" my posts it shouldn't have. If you're going to assign me a reason for something, and you can't show that it's consistent with other things of the same nature, how is that my fault? It's obvious that it's not of the same caliber or quality or really anything and yet I'm assigned a lovely reason: I must have forgotten. How about you all assume I'm a good player, and didn't forget THE RULES and it wasn't a real vote? If you read this post and think it's sincere, please stop playing mafia. You can't climb up out of that failure hole.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:19
|
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:Jump where? On the Squigly vote. I mean I'd hammer as needed anyway but you know.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:20
|
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:Jump where? Obviously me, the vote leader. It's a p. scummy post but I still don't like amoeba pussyfooting around voting me
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:20
|
|
|
Squiggly posted:And for people "analyzing" my posts it shouldn't have. If you're going to assign me a reason for something, and you can't show that it's consistent with other things of the same nature, how is that my fault? It's obvious that it's not of the same caliber or quality or really anything and yet I'm assigned a lovely reason: I must have forgotten. How about you all assume I'm a good player, and didn't forget THE RULES and it wasn't a real vote? Literally what the gently caress
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:21
|
|
|
merk posted:If you read this post and think it's sincere, please stop playing mafia. You can't climb up out of that failure hole. Quoting this for ghost posterity Oh wait I thought you were going to work
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:22
|
|
|
Squiggly posted:Oh wait I thought you were going to work This is pretty common of me. Thanks for pointing it out though. Good reminder that I need to actually work.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:22
|
|
|
merk posted:I'm voting you until you're removed from the game. Now, I'm going to work. Later all. merk, you know I love you but I could write a merk bot that would be indistinguishable from you given all the catchphrases you've built up.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:24
|
|
|
wins32767 posted:merk, you know I love you but I could write a merk bot that would be indistinguishable from you given all the catchphrases you've built up. Could it write that great of a case on Squiggly?
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:24
|
|
|
I'm not voting squiggly.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:25
|
|
|
merk posted:Could it write that great of a case on Squiggly? It might be more accurate if it's a machine. Less room for error
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:26
|
|
|
Squiggly posted:And for people "analyzing" my posts it shouldn't have. If you're going to assign me a reason for something, and you can't show that it's consistent with other things of the same nature, how is that my fault? It's obvious that it's not of the same caliber or quality or really anything and yet I'm assigned a lovely reason: I must have forgotten. How about you all assume I'm a good player, and didn't forget THE RULES and it wasn't a real vote?
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:29
|
|
|
Fair warning I'm goin to bed in 30. I dunno what schedule you guys are actually on and clearly people are pushing for an early lynch so yeah
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:29
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:And you accuse me of lawyering a technicality. And yet I'm right
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:30
|
|
|
Squiggly posted:Quite reasonable. Nice job ignoring evidence contrary to your opinions Your reaction to merk's case and stuff is really over the top. You play it cool with everyone else but here you just blew a fuse. Max posted:I'm not voting squiggly. Why? I'll admit I didn't feel it until these last 5 or 6 posts. wins32767 posted:merk, you know I love you but I could write a merk bot that would be indistinguishable from you given all the catchphrases you've built up. You should! and have the two face each other and see who wins Deep Blue style or whatever that chess-bots name is.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:31
|
|
|
merk posted:That's because he is making it up to try to not look scummy for voting Gamer. This is an obvious lynch. What do you think of my case? It paints a good picture. It lines up with my interpretation that Squigs wants to discredit you but doesn't want to be as open about it as Quidnose was.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:31
|
|
|
Oh yeah bed. It's like 3:30 am and hot as all hell but I should sleep. I think I will do that. I'll... stick around 10 minutes if anyone has any last minute questions for me.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:32
|
|
|
Squiggly posted:And yet I'm right It's hard to believe that you'd not expect people to misinterpret your non-unvoted vote as a real vote. It's what you wanted gamer to think afterall right? So you go about misleading people with an escape plan worked out already.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:33
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Your reaction to merk's case and stuff is really over the top. You play it cool with everyone else but here you just blew a fuse. Because he's peddling bullshit and I don't want to be lynched while I sleep by the bandwagon of awfulness. It's pretty frustrating to reiterate a point to infinity and have everyone ignore it to make their own baseless assumptions
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:34
|
|
|
wins32767 posted:merk, you know I love you but I could write a merk bot that would be indistinguishable from you given all the catchphrases you've built up.  I still like my Quinque vote, wins has done nothing to warrant trust, the fact that he's staying so noncommittal this game has me feeling more like a 3rd party. I am not sold on the Squiggly case fully, but will vote him to avoid NL.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:36
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:It's hard to believe that you'd not expect people to misinterpret your non-unvoted vote as a real vote. It's what you wanted gamer to think afterall right? So you go about misleading people with an escape plan worked out already. Seeing as it didn't show up in the official vote count and there was no discussion about it, I didn't expect any misinterpretation. I didn't expect it to be an issue at all because it didn't play out. And you're still sniping at me without voting
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:39
|
|
|
 I will leave the deadline where it is but make it super floating (I'll deliberately find things for me to do for a very long time) Correct Robot Votecount   Squiggly (3): merk, fiery_valkyrie, Quidnose, -Quidnose, chaoslord Quidnose (2): Gamerofthegame, Max Puntification (2): wins32767, 100YrsofAttitude Spoonsy (2): Hal Incandenza, zzyzx, chaoslord, -chaoslord Amoeba102 (1): Squiggly Quinquereme (1): WHICH WAY MADNESS Max (1): Quinquereme zzyzx (0): 100YrsofAttitude, -100YrsofAttitude merk (0): Quidnose, -Quidnose Not Voting (5): Amoeba102, Nth Doctor, Puntification, Quidnose, Spoonsy With 17 players alive, it takes 9 votes to be executed. The current deadline is July 17th, 2015 at 11 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 1 day, 1 hour. Note that the deadline is FLOATING
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:42
|
|
|
Do I need to be voting?
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:44
|
|
|
What the gently caress? Deadlines not til tomorrow? Well poo poo I thought deadline was in like an hour. Whatever suck my nutz bitches I do what I want
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:46
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Do I need to be voting? If you're gonna sit and snipe at me and pick at my posts, it's rather scummy to not vote me as well
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:48
|
|
|
Squiggly posted:Seeing as it didn't show up in the official vote count and there was no discussion about it, I didn't expect any misinterpretation. I didn't expect it to be an issue at all because it didn't play out. I would more expect people to forget to unvote because not all games are Ecco games than for a player to try and be tricky by not unvoting to get a reaction from a non-unvote vote.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:49
|
|
|
Max posted:I'm not voting squiggly. Why not?
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:50
|
|
|
Squiggly posted:If you're gonna sit and snipe at me and pick at my posts, it's rather scummy to not vote me as well I don't see how.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:50
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:I would more expect people to forget to unvote because not all games are Ecco games than for a player to try and be tricky by not unvoting to get a reaction from a non-unvote vote. Yeah but I took a big break from mafia and only came back to play in Ecco's game. I actually took the time to read what he wrote
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 14:45 |
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:I don't see how. You're encouraging votes on me without actually committing yourself to the cause
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2015 02:53
|
|