|
Can a cop clarify what targets were chosen N2?
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 02:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 18:37 |
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Can a cop clarify what targets were chosen N2? I personally wanted to investigate F_V since she was the only one with a scum result
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 02:50
|
|
|
Did merk say who tried to investigate, or FV?
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 02:51
|
|
|
Spoonsy posted:I personally wanted to investigate F_V since she was the only one with a scum result mafia: I investigated F_V, but was blocked
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 02:51
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Can a cop clarify what targets were chosen N2? Merk never mentioned who he targeted, just that he was roleblocked. I tried to investigate Quidnose.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 02:56
|
|
|
I was thinking if you went after the same target it could explain the roleblock in some way. There has to be some form of correlation we can get from it. Because there are not 3 more roleblockers beyond Nth since didn't target the cops at all.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 02:56
|
|
|
I was thinking if you targeted Spoonsy, he might have been jailed. But that's a bust. I would say that maybe FV was jailed but WWM got a result on FV and merk wouldn't investigate FV twice.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 02:59
|
|
|
drat it. I thought I loving had it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 03:09
|
|
|
You keep trying to talk this town in circles, maybe make them think they've got the wrong guy. Me, I'm happy with my vote right where it is.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 03:15
|
|
|
I'm not trying to talk this town around in circles. I'm trying to save it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 03:16
|
|
|
I'm at lunch and have about half an hour. What is happening? Is the day extended and then Amoeba gets lynched, or is he lynchproof or something?
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 04:15
|
|
|
AFAIK it's not a real executeproof.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 04:18
|
|
|
Quinquereme posted:I'm at lunch and have about half an hour. Thats how I read it. So if he still has 6 votes at whatever point Ecco ends the day then he'll get lynched again.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 04:21
|
|
|
It's pretty bad how a bloc of players wants to turbo me on the flimsy of reasons.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 04:23
|
|
|
I dare to question the intentions of Clarent and suddenly I'm up on the block waiting for a rope. How fitting. What is it they say? "If you want to know who is oppressing you, look at those who you are not allowed to criticise".
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 04:29
|
|
|
Amoeba, I'm really not into how you're going on and on about the setup. And as far as I can work out you haven't actually gotten anywhere with the setup spec either, you are just throwing around a lot of possibilities without any conviction except for being intent on painting the Clarents as mafia based purely on the fact cops maybe get a SCUM result on them. Re wins: Amoeba102 posted:Max, I think you're being opportunistic here. If wins thought I was the serial killer from rolecopping me, he would have said it. he would have voted. That's absurd to believe a rolecop gets a serial killer result and then sits on it. If wins thought I was a serial killer it would be unrelated to any results he got. I think that's pretty weak. wins wouldn't have straight up asked you to claim unless he got a SK or scum role from rolecopping you. The asking you to claim then never coming back as a plan doesn't make sense any way you look at it - if he found out you had a town role, why would he ask you to claim? If he was anti-town, and found out you had a town role but wanted to lynch you, why would he ask you to claim then disappear? Surely he'd have a better plan for getting you lynched then asking you to claim and then disappear as soon as you (as he'd expect) claim to not be SK/scum. If he town-aligned, and found out you had a scum role (or SK), it makes sense he would ask you to claim, then after your claim tell us what he found out. This makes the most sense to me. Since he never reappeared I'm going to guess something came up because it makes no sense to me otherwise. And re Max - if I'm reading right Max has indirect access to the other Clarents via the recruiter. So then isn't it kind of obvious why he'd know what wins thought?
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 04:32
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:No I broke the rules on purpose because WWM said I wasn't paying attention when it is clearly WWM who has not been following along. I thought I was gone and I was angry. What was the mod going to do, mod-kill me for breaking the rules when I was already executed? Amoeba you seem too nice to break the rules like this. Even when we're accusing you directly you haven't seemed particularly angry to me.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 04:34
|
|
|
Spoonsy posted:I'm going to go to the Wet Hot American Summer NYC premiere and in all likelihood a hammer is going to occur while I'm there. So with that in mind, ##vote Amoeba. fiery_valkyrie posted:The day has barely even started. Why are you putting votes down on players because that is where the thread is going, instead of trying to hunt scum? f_v this doesn't make sense to me - Spoonsy is clearly voting Amoeba because he'll be gone for a while and wants his vote down in case he's not back by the time the day ends. He is voting Amoeba because he also believes that wins had good reason for what he did. Why would you say Spoonsy is only voting based on where the thread is going?
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 04:38
|
|
|
Quinquereme posted:Amoeba, I'm really not into how you're going on and on about the setup. And as far as I can work out you haven't actually gotten anywhere with the setup spec either, you are just throwing around a lot of possibilities without any conviction except for being intent on painting the Clarents as mafia based purely on the fact cops maybe get a SCUM result on them. Working from the bottom up. Yeah I got that Max was talking to the recruiter. My point is the specific language "Wins thought". If Wins KNEW i was a SK from a rolecop, he would have said that. It's couched language. It's leaving the reader to make the jump between what wisn thought and wins being a rolecop and going "Oh, wins thought SK, wins is a rolecop, Amoeba must be an SK". If "Wins thought Amoeba was the SK", he would not have a rolecop result on me. I am not an SK. If wins was town, asking me to claim and then disappearing while thinking I was the SK makes no sense. If he told his recruiter, they could have also done something more. Wins got something weird as a rolecop - I don't know what role name is going to flip with all these secret powers - and I figure he thought he could get leverage for a bad execution. It didn't work so he disappeared while the dethy chat took over.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 04:40
|
|
|
Quinquereme posted:Amoeba you seem too nice to break the rules like this. Even when we're accusing you directly you haven't seemed particularly angry to me. I am usually nice but WWMs hammer while I was making a post did make me mad.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 04:41
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:I dare to question the intentions of Clarent and suddenly I'm up on the block waiting for a rope. How fitting. Amoeba, if you're really town, shouldn't you be looking for scum or the SK instead of still going on about what is most likely a pro-town group? Amoeba102 posted:I'm getting a little overwhelmed, but my gut says Quin and Hal are bad guys. Sad to say it. Amoeba102 posted:I just get a gut feeling she is Clarent aligned and evidence to me in the game points to Clarent being bad for the town despite what the flavour would lead yopu to believe. Do you actually think I'm scummy? You think I'm connected to the Clarents and based on your setup spec Clarent is scum and therefore I must be scum if I'm Clarent, but that is the basically the whole case right? This is why I don't like all the setup speculation - based on what people have said about Ecco's games the setups are very unique, so it seems a bit pointless to me compared to how each person reads. Having thought about the dethy and Clarent stuff a bit - what if Clarent is pro town and the cop results say they are scum to make town suspicious of each other? Maybe to balance having a group of townies who are all confirmed to each other? There are at least two confirmed masonries so that's a lot of confirmed town if they can be confirmed by cops. Or I could be completely wrong - there are so many ideas Ecco could have come up with. So once again, this is why I think claiming an entire faction is anti-town just based on the cop result saying scum (and I don't think this is even confirmed with all the sanity possibilities, right?) is wrong.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 04:52
|
|
|
Gamerofthegame posted:Alright. I posted about ww in the mason doc, agreeing with merk on his impression of the post ww made. Regarding Hal, there was a succession of my thoughts in my post history where I had gut town -> needs to post more -> suspicious. It wasn't a "spin" like you're portraying. Also, protip, it's bad form to link players who haven't flipped. Your case is poo poo, try again.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 04:52
|
|
|
Quin. Maybe you're right. Maybe I've just let this all get away from me. I can't get over the idea that Clarent is a cult. Maybe I should just let it go. ##unvote
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 04:55
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:You've said something like this before. Yeah, there was a whole day left till deadline. But wins last post was asking me to claim on Jul 18, 22:22, I voted on Jul 20 22:20. So in those 48 hours wins couldn't come in and say anything? You'll excuse me if I got bored waiting for him to elaborate. Yeah I get that it's boring to wait when you really want to know the flip, but if it's already been two days a bit longer wouldn't have hurt. I think I didn't post for almost as long because of a few really late work nights, then getting our house stuff sorted. It's conceivable that something could have been keeping wins really busy but he could have come back on the third day. I don't blame you guys for not wanting to wait more but I wish he'd had a bit more time since he could have come back with his results.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 04:57
|
|
|
It was boring waiting because we were in a wins or zzyzx dichotomy at the time.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 04:59
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Quin. Maybe you're right. Maybe I've just let this all get away from me. I can't get over the idea that Clarent is a cult. Maybe I should just let it go. I think you're a nice person and I'm sorry we're on different sides - I still think you are either the fireball or the mauler so I'm not going to unvote. Actually, if you had no idea what your secret powers are as you claimed, couldn't you be the fireballer or mauler without knowing it?
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 04:59
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:And congratulations on the house. Sydney prices suck so I hope you still have at least one limb remaining. I don't know if it still counts as Sydney when it's a whole hour out  But it's a nice house so there's that 
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 05:00
|
|
|
Quinquereme posted:I don't know if it still counts as Sydney when it's a whole hour out With Sydney traffic, that's the Inner west 
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 05:01
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:With Sydney traffic, that's the Inner west The good thing about living in Brisbane.... oh wait, there is no good thing.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 05:03
|
|
|
chaoslord posted:Oh, also, I don't think Amoeba is the werewolf. Granted, it's speculation on my part, but I think there's a much better explanation around. (Quote this post and laugh at me when I'm wrong) Hey chaos can you please elaborate on this - what do you think would be a much better explanation? And are you referring to an explanation for wins' actions here or for Amoeba's weird role or something else entirely?
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 05:04
|
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:The good thing about living in Brisbane.... Are we all Aussies lunchtime posting?  I miss living in Tasmania
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 05:05
|
|
|
Quinquereme posted:I think you're a nice person and I'm sorry we're on different sides - I still think you are either the fireball or the mauler so I'm not going to unvote. Technically I could be the mauler. Unless I fireballed myself. The crux is that I could be secret killer, unknown by myself. I think the zzyzx kill was too deterministic to be at random or some other mechanic. It feels like a town vig, seeing as we figured one of zzyzx or wins had to be scum due to cop sanities. I would have, and certainly anyone else, taken Clarent-aligned to be pro-town at the time. Meaning that zzyzx would be scum. It feels like a targeted kill, not some secret random killing. It's really only zzyzx's flip and an extension of the dethy that makes me say Clarent is scum. hence all of what's happened today in thread.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 05:05
|
|
|
I'm work posting. Don't tell anyone.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 05:06
|
|
|
Iron Chef Ramen posted:Ignore this completely. I am a ninja. I'm really curious
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 05:09
|
|
|
WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:I just opened my item, and apparently this thing is a 1-shot BP. WWM I don't think that was a good idea, if you are town you could have kept quiet and possibly tanked a scum kill, fireball or mauling but now that's not going to happen
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 05:11
|
|
|
Ok way past my lunch time now, need to get back to work sorry guys!
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 05:12
|
|
|
WWM is scum, by the way. I'll keep "Clarent is a cult" in my back pocket for post-game to either eat crow or be all "i told you so". ##vote WHICH WAY MADNESS I don't buy his "slow phone" hammer. It was to cut the day short no doubt. The item + BP is a bluff to avoid being killed. There isn't enough spare players floating around for there to be someone giving out items.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 05:16
|
|
|
Quinquereme posted:Are we all Aussies lunchtime posting? Yes. My sister lives in Tasmania. I went there once and ate lots of food. It was good.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 05:21
|
|
|
WWM is scum and making up their results; so FV probably got Jailed so Spoonsy got "blocked" because they couldn't complete their action.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 05:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 18:37 |
|
|
How am I supposed to drink my beverage when I don't have a straw? You've grasped them all.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2015 05:27
|
|