|
Cricket This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Blackface in crowd |
|
129 | 55.36% |
| References to Lord of the Rings |
|
104 | 44.64% |
| Total: | 233 votes | ||
|
This could be over quite quickly
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 09:25 |
|
|
Nevill looking good so far. Hopefully Starc can hang in there.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:05
|
|
|
2 loving edges and none carry hah.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:06
|
|
|
First 2 overs have made me confident Australia will have a 200 lead by lunch
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:10
|
|
|
Scylo posted:First 2 overs have made me confident Australia will have a 200 lead by lunch All off nevilles edge.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:10
|
|
|
Jim Maxwell's sounding hopeful. Good to see Nevill get some tough runs. edit: spelling Coucho Marx fucked around with this message at 11:22 on Jul 31, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:10
|
|
|
England doing their best to keep this interesting.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:11
|
|
|
Aggressive declaration about now I reckon.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:12
|
|
|
I wonder if Anderson will bat when he's needed
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:12
|
|
|
Coucho Marx posted:
Are they that tough or has he just worked out that not batting like a retard is a winning strategy?
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:13
|
|
|
this could still go badly wrong, i think
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:13
|
|
|
I've said it already and I'll say it again, if Australia can get a lead of 100 then this match is wide open.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:14
|
|
|
If England lose this from here, then it will truly break them mentally.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:16
|
|
|
Why arent there a billion close fielders ffs?
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:16
|
|
|
monkeu posted:I've said it already and I'll say it again, if Australia can get a lead of 100 then this match is wide open. 100 is interesting, 150 is legitimately challenging.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:20
|
|
|
No reviews 
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:20
|
|
|
Serves them right for wasting reviews
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:21
|
|
|
Welp
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:21
|
|
|
Fuuuuuuuuuck
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:21
|
|
|
HAHAHAHAHA wasted reviews strike again!
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:21
|
|
|
Honest Pete
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:22
|
|
|
Shane Warne voice: drs should be there for the howler
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:22
|
|
|
The fix is in
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:22
|
|
|
The umpires should be giving those out I feel. Thats what DRS is for, the batsman can review that if he knows he hasnt hit it. Not as obvious as the one last night that buttler dropped mind.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:23
|
|
|
serious gaylord posted:The umpires should be giving those out I feel. Thats what DRS is for, the batsman can review that if he knows he hasnt hit it. Not as obvious as the one last night that buttler dropped mind. The umpires should absolutely not let their decision be effected by who has reviews left.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:24
|
|
|
serious gaylord posted:The umpires should be giving those out I feel. Thats what DRS is for, the batsman can review that if he knows he hasnt hit it. Not as obvious as the one last night that buttler dropped mind. What's the point of having an umpire at all then if they aren't there to call it how they see it? Just scrap them and go full third umpire only.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:25
|
|
|
Smorgasbord posted:The umpires should absolutely not let their decision be effected by who has reviews left. Because theres no way for an umpire to really know if hes hit that or not. This is why DRS should be entirely in the umpires hands and taken completely away from the teams.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:26
|
|
|
If you put TV review in the hands of umpires every drat thing will go to review. See: run outs
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:27
|
|
|
England engaging in some top quality Englanding right now
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:31
|
|
|
Good. Then we'd quickly realise they're useless and can go to a third umpire only. Ive been impressed with Neville in this innings. Hes riding his luck loving hard but hes doing the job.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:31
|
|
|
serious gaylord posted:Good. Then we'd quickly realise they're useless and can go to a third umpire only. Who is going to hold the bowlers hat ??????
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:32
|
|
|
Would be funny to see the umpire replaced by a hat rack with a camera and a monitor that counts to six on it
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:34
|
|
|
Burn Down Canberra posted:Who is going to hold the bowlers hat ?????? The off strike batsman, he can wear it over his helmet
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:34
|
|
|
Nevill should move up the order because he can actually leave the ball when it's outside off
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:34
|
|
|
EMC posted:Would be funny to see the umpire replaced by a hat rack with a camera and a monitor that counts to six on it We joke but the umpires still gently caress up counting to 6 at least once every test.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:35
|
|
|
Get rid of humans all together. Robot cricket is the future.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:36
|
|
|
do first class records count towards test records? 9 just showed some batting stats for starc and said his best in tests was 99 and his best in first class was 99? so does that mean hes been out for 99 in both formats or are they counting the same innings?
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:38
|
|
|
Airstream Driver posted:Get rid of humans all together. Robot cricket is the future. Australian robots lunge forward on English pitches with hard hands.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:39
|
|
|
Pretty big overreaction from one guy getting a tiny bit of glove on it
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 09:25 |
|
|
snaeksikn posted:do first class records count towards test records? 9 just showed some batting stats for starc and said his best in tests was 99 and his best in first class was 99? so does that mean hes been out for 99 in both formats or are they counting the same innings? Yes test matches are first class matches.
|
|
#
?
Jul 31, 2015 11:39
|
|