|
Hi it's me hi hello 
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 16:35 |
|
|
it is in fact not needed
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:27
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:Allen and CPig, one of you two are scum. Convince me it's not you.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:32
|
|
|
Look Under The Rock posted:##vote Byers
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 03:34
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:Trust me feels like a softclaim, I don't want to push that D1. So I backed off. Really? That passes for a softclaim in these parts? Weird.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 18:55
|
|
|
##vote Byers
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 18:56
|
|
|
Look Under The Rock posted:##vote Byers 
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 18:57
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:Wrong, but fair enough. So, we did a Mythbusters on the phrase "fair enough" that was busted, but only barely. I really haven't liked anything you've said so far.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 18:58
|
|
|
How do I see a tally? There isn't one in the first post like the other game I'm playing.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 18:59
|
|
|
yeah its probably byers ##vote byers
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 19:05
|
|
|
ljtrigirl posted:How do I see a tally? There isn't one in the first post like the other game I'm playing. there is. either your eyes or your screen are not working
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 19:09
|
|
|
uranus posted:there is. either your eyes or your screen are not working It's at the top. That's way more convenient.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 19:21
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:yeah its probably byers I mean, pretty much everyone else is a giant bag of shades of neutral for me so far. But Byers just seems super evil.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 19:22
|
|
|
I love Byers and would hate to send him to the morgue..
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 19:41
|
|
|
Why are we backing off of wren?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 19:54
|
|
|
ljtrigirl posted:So, we did a Mythbusters on the phrase "fair enough" that was busted, but only barely. Look, Allen's reaction to pressure was scummy. You not liking what I say isn't something I can defend against, so I won't waste my time trying, but don't ignore his posting. Still, if that's how you feel, fair enough.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 19:54
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:yeah its probably byers Why are you bouncing around so much? If I eat the lynch, do you use my flip to go after Allen tomorrow?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 19:56
|
|
|
Magnus Gallant posted:Why are we backing off of wren? Because I said fair enough.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 19:57
|
|
|
Yeah Allen over reacted and I was just loving around at the beginning but now I'm serious.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 20:13
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:Why are you bouncing around so much? If I eat the lynch, do you use my flip to go after Allen tomorrow? LOL what? yeah my whole two votes is just bouncing all over the place.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 20:45
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:Why are you bouncing around so much? If I eat the lynch, do you use my flip to go after Allen tomorrow? This is a really weird chain lynchy way to look at things
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 20:47
|
|
|
Look Under The Rock posted:This is a really weird chain lynchy way to look at things It's really not; he bounced from Allen to me and said I'm the one, implying scum in our back and forth.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 22:05
|
|
|
Byers what role do you think was soft claimed
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2015 22:25
|
|
|
I have literally no idea what Byers and Magnus are trying to do here, but goddamn, I don't like it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 00:05
|
|
|
Allen Wren posted:I have literally no idea what Byers and Magnus are trying to do here, but goddamn, I don't like it. Its called a rynch
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 00:24
|
|
|
MMM Whatchya Say posted:Byers what role do you think was soft claimed Dunno, daycop maybe? I was more interested in avoiding diving down the rabbit's hole of D1 claims that deciding what I thought he was softclaiming.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 01:21
|
|
|
Allen Wren posted:I have literally no idea what Byers and Magnus are trying to do here, but goddamn, I don't like it. We're trying to show people your responses were scummy, I understand if that disagrees with you.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 01:22
|
|
|
At this point, CPIG and Allen are the two that should be up for discussion. CPig for the initial reaction and his tap dance between Allen and myself, and Allen for his more extreme reaction to any pressure, not just mine. The remaining scum right now are sitting back and avoiding making any waves, but notice how many people are avoiding talking about those two.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 03:15
|
|
|
ljtrigirl posted:Really? That passes for a softclaim in these parts? Was rereading and caught this; where'd you play before?
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 03:20
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:Dunno, daycop maybe? I was more interested in avoiding diving down the rabbit's hole of D1 claims that deciding what I thought he was softclaiming. "I was more interested in saying there was a softclaim so I could back off that read in order to do dumb poo poo." Byers2142 posted:We're trying to show people your responses were scummy, I understand if that disagrees with you. garbage post Byers2142 posted:At this point, CPIG and Allen are the two that should be up for discussion. CPig for the initial reaction and his tap dance between Allen and myself, and Allen for his more extreme reaction to any pressure, not just mine. The only reason we "should be up for discussion" is because you decided you'd play the old "I'll call people scum and say it's proof that they're scum when they balk" canard and it's really loving boring. Yeah, scum is sitting back doing nothing right now and you know why? Because you're clogging up the airwaves with stupid poo poo. It's bad play, you should feel bad, and when I flip town, you should maybe take a seat and settle the gently caress down. ##vote Allen Wren Come on, let's get this to day two already. Do it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 03:21
|
|
|
Allen Wren posted:"I was more interested in saying there was a softclaim so I could back off that read in order to do dumb poo poo." What read did I back down from? quote:The only reason we "should be up for discussion" is because you decided you'd play the old "I'll call people scum and say it's proof that they're scum when they balk" canard and it's really loving boring. The wasn't the play I made, I saw something potentially scummy and when I pushed it you both blew up. But the real reason you should be up for discussion is that there have been three reads made this game, and two are being ignored. That is significant. From the rest of your post you're now calling me bad town, not scum? What changed your mind? Also, please don't self-vote, that is almost always a bad play.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 03:33
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:Also, please don't self-vote, that is almost always a bad play. Don't get patronizing with me. I'm not making any read, I'm saying you're bad at mafia.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 03:34
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:The wasn't the play I made, buuuullshit
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 03:35
|
|
|
Emotional you are.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 03:36
|
|
|
Magnus Gallant posted:Emotional you are. deal w it
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 03:36
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:What read did I back down from? my bad
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 03:37
|
|
|
Allen Wren posted:Don't get patronizing with me. Then don't make emotional gestures, it's just a stupid party game on the Internet. Self-votes are awful, and they're impossible to get a read on. You're frustrated, but do I read you now as frustrated town or scum? Who do you see as scum?
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 03:39
|
|
|
Allen Wren posted:buuuullshit It's really not. It might play out similarly, but the intent was different. One play forces a scum read, the other looks for a response to then make a read off of.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 03:40
|
|
|
Magnus Gallant posted:Emotional you are. Magnus, thoughts on CPig? You didn't really say anything about him.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 03:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 16:35 |
|
|
Byers2142 posted:It's really not. It might play out similarly, but the intent was different. One play forces a scum read, the other looks for a response to then make a read off of. it really is
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2015 03:42
|
|