|
Agree with Jake and Lumpen that Keane you are reading waaaay too much into what Jake said
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 21:36 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 18:23 |
|
Lumpen posted:Keane why are you posting as if you assume CL is Town? Your point seems a bit overblown, but your conclusion is weird in not allowing a "JakeP is excusing and defending his Scumbuddy" hypothesis, which hit me as a more likely interpretation. That's actually a good point. gently caress, that's a really good point.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 21:36 |
|
chaoslord posted:Agree with Jake and Lumpen that Keane you are reading waaaay too much into what Jake said gently caress, lumpen may have been right.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 21:37 |
|
CCKeane posted:That's actually a good point. lol you scum, if you actually believed that I was scum who was assuming CL was town then how does it make sense that CL is scum, if I were scum why would I assume that CL is town. you don't even have your own fake idea straight
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 21:38 |
|
JakeP posted:lol you scum, if you actually believed that I was scum who was assuming CL was town then how does it make sense that CL is scum, if I were scum why would I assume that CL is town. you don't even have your own fake idea straight Because you were defending a scumbud.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 21:40 |
|
CCKeane posted:Because you were defending a scumbud. Your argument was that my speech assumed him as town. If your case was I was defending a scumbro I wouldn't have argued it because I could see where you are coming from on it, but thats not where you came from at all
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 21:42 |
|
JakeP posted:Your argument was that my speech assumed him as town. If your case was I was defending a scumbro I wouldn't have argued it because I could see where you are coming from on it, but thats not where you came from at all Yes, and then lumpen brought up a better point.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 21:44 |
|
chaoslord posted:I wonder how many posts it will be before Lumpen comes in and gloriously declares that his vote is what got me posting again this game. Now the new biggest lurker is: ##Vote Tremendous Taste All his posts: Tremendous Taste posted:Hi DBD! Tremendous Taste posted:Chill lumpen Scum lurker, good lynch.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 21:44 |
|
We have content now and I don't like that Lumpen is just hopping from lurker to lurker.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 21:45 |
|
CCKeane posted:Yes, and then lumpen brought up a better point. Can you expand on why you think Lumpen has a good point? Because I absolutely cannot see it unless you are assuming Jake is very bad at being scum.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 21:48 |
|
CCKeane posted:Yes, and then lumpen brought up a better point. But your read on me and his point are contradictory, so for his read to reinforce your read somehow just goes to show that you are just looking for an excuse to vote me
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 21:49 |
|
actually ##vote CCKeane I don't like your play in this game so far and you seem very scummy.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 21:49 |
|
CCKeane posted:We have content now and I don't like that Lumpen is just hopping from lurker to lurker. I told you I was going to lynch a lurker today. I did that when I said Lumpen posted:My plan today is to lynch a lurker.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 21:50 |
|
JakeP posted:But your read on me and his point are contradictory, so for his read to reinforce your read somehow just goes to show that you are just looking for an excuse to vote me They are contradictory in the sense that only one can be true. They are not contradictory in the sense that both acknowledgeand rely on your hedging. Lumpen's point made an additional possibility that was reinforced by CL's later post.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 21:56 |
|
Im not hedging, I just think its a bad idea to vote CL today for behaving as town CL often behaves especially when he is often very useful later in games when he is a town player
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 21:58 |
|
JakeP posted:Im not hedging, I just think its a bad idea to vote CL today for behaving as town CL often behaves especially when he is often very useful later in games when he is a town player JakeP posted:i mean id vote CL, but he is often lurky like this early, and good to have around later Then why would you vote him?
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 22:00 |
|
just to avoid a no lynch
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 22:00 |
|
Section 31 posted:##vote Tremendous Taste What's this vote about?
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 22:27 |
|
chaoslord posted:Can you expand on why you think Lumpen has a good point? Because I absolutely cannot see it unless you are assuming Jake is very bad at being scum.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 22:33 |
|
chaoslord posted:Can you expand on why you think Lumpen has a good point? Because I absolutely cannot see it unless you are assuming Jake is very bad at being scum. Lumpen's point is that JakeP was deflecting away from you, it is pretty obvious and I don't know why you wouldn't see that.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 22:43 |
|
CCKeane posted:Lumpen's point is that JakeP was deflecting away from you, it is pretty obvious and I don't know why you wouldn't see that. Because it doesn't make any sense to me and that's why I was hoping you could lay it out for me. I was at -4 in a very slow moving game. Deadline is a day and change away. The two votes on me were Lumpen who has promised to vote out a lurker and DBD who followed suit. I had said I would be here to post today. You put all that together and I'm in no danger unless someone was going to throw down a dayvig on me. From there, you're saying that a scum Jake with me as his scum buddy decided the best course of action was to come into the thread and defend me. Absolute best case from him doing that? No one notices it. If I show up as promised, then Lumpen's vote would be moving (and since has) and DBD's likely will too since his vote was "Good idea Lumpen." Life moves on and people forget that Jake said it. Worst case? Jake gets called out for it. It is a "Medium risk no reward" play if we're scumbros. I feel like it's an insult to me to say that I would sign off on a play like that haha If you want to say he was trying to build town cred for if I ended up flipping (which I believe was your first point), go for it, but in no way is Lumpen's trying to link the two of us together a better point.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:08 |
|
##unvote cause posting
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:12 |
|
What a terrible, Scummy post, chaoslord! There were a lot of words in it, though.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:12 |
|
dbd why are you defending Lumpen?
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:14 |
|
Lumpen posted:What a terrible, Scummy post, chaoslord! There were a lot of words in it, though. If you think that is a lot of words you should have seen the first draft
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:14 |
|
Are you saying that you are self-consciously putting your calculated, overdefensive awkward posts through multiple drafts?
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:15 |
|
bowmore posted:dbd why are you defending Lumpen?
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:17 |
|
Lumpen posted:Are you saying that you are self-consciously putting your calculated, overdefensive awkward posts through multiple drafts? Sure, why not? If my post is not effectively going to get my point across, I'm wasting my time. I type whatever comes to mind then edit out the rambly bits to make things concise. Don't need to have someone read ten sentences if I realize I can get the point across in two.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:25 |
|
chaoslord's meta is being a weirdo. it's fine. this is all fine. kill keane though.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:26 |
|
GulagDolls posted:chaoslord's meta is being a weirdo.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:27 |
|
bowmore posted:dbd why are you defending Lumpen? Defending is sort of a loose term
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:41 |
|
It's not losing Lumpen tbh it's losing a potential tracker
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:44 |
|
GulagDolls posted:chaoslord's meta is being a weirdo. it's fine. this is all fine. kill keane though. Rude.
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:44 |
|
I have information that tells me Lumpen is not a tracker
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:57 |
|
I can't specify what it is
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:58 |
|
bowmore posted:I have information that tells me Lumpen is not a tracker gently caress it. ##vote lumpen
|
# ? Sep 9, 2015 23:58 |
|
1. bowmore - unknown 2. CapitalistPig - unknown 3. CCKeane - unknown 4. chaoslord - unknown 5. Deadbeat Dad - unknown 6. Dhaes - unknown 7. GulagDolls - unknown 8. JakeP - unknown 9. Lumpen - unknown 10. Section 31 - good alignment 11. Tremendous Taste - unknown
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 00:01 |
|
Section i claimed good alignment
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 00:01 |
|
chaoslord posted:##vote Lumpen ##unvote JakeP posted:Section i claimed good alignment
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 00:05 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 18:23 |
|
Deadbeat Dad posted:It's not losing Lumpen tbh it's losing a potential tracker
|
# ? Sep 10, 2015 00:10 |