|
bowmore posted:use that logic brain of yours Let me reread.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 01:56 |
|
|
# ? Apr 19, 2024 08:39 |
|
CCKeane posted:If lumpen didn't promise to be civil (a promise he is maintaining) I'd vote him.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 01:56 |
|
Cassius Keane posted:I like you a lot, Bowmore, you're a fun player and I enjoy playing with you and chatting with you in the discussion thread. But I think you're scum. Gentleman Dhaes, Esq posted:Cassius comfirmed scum. IT WASN"T REALLY INDIGESTION ALL ALONG
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 01:56 |
|
bowmore posted:you know that it is just a mask though Civility is behavior based. A mask can be fine. I'm still reading.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:01 |
|
Gentleman Dhaes Esq posted:I eat poop and smell my own butt. Dhaes in the mason chat everybody.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:02 |
|
Sorry I got distracted.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:12 |
|
I claimed very specifically, with Eavesdropper. Bowmore first says something else,then changed his story, finally claims he has the same exact word in his PM but still supposedly doubts my claim, which does not make sense. So I guess the only possible conclusion is to think I have deployed a Mod-provided fakeclaim, because I could not possibly just come up with Eavesdropper by chance, and he claims the same. What Mod would ever provide such a fakeclaim? The point of fakeclaims is that they are SAFE. And suppose it were a Mod-supplied fakeclaim... Why would I, as Scum, calll a Thunderdome rather than rolling with the "multiple Tracker hypothesis"? Believing bowmore in the way the claim and "counterclaim" actually happened is logically impossible. The "multiple Tracker hypothesis" is the Scum move in this situation, and if I flip dont even consider it a minute, it does not hold water based on bowmore's specific (shifting) claims about his PM.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:14 |
|
I'm still on Lumpen's side.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:16 |
|
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:19 |
|
I never changed my story, I added to it because I didn't realise you wanted to flavor name of the role you did that on purpose to you could twist the vote around to me
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:21 |
|
My bet is you are a scum tracker
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:21 |
|
Section 31, are you around?
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:22 |
|
##vote Lumpen Okay.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:22 |
|
bowmore posted:I never changed my story, I added to it because I didn't realise you wanted to flavor name of the role
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:22 |
|
I'm sorry, lumpen.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:23 |
|
scum can have an eavesdropper tracker, knowing flavor doesn't mean poo poo. scum wouldn't have any reason to make a counter claim QED stop voting bromore start voting lumpen
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:23 |
|
bowmore posted:I never changed my story, I added to it because I didn't realise you wanted to flavor name of the role
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:25 |
|
CCKeane posted:I'm sorry, lumpen.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:26 |
|
Lumpen posted:It's all there to read on page 8. I encourage everyone to review and judge for themselves.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:26 |
|
Lumpen posted:Well, explain your reasoning for the record. One of the big things that was holding me back was that you thunderdomed bowmore. That is a risky move, since you're placing the focus on you and bowmore. But then I read you again, and you mention that thunderdomes never go to completion a lot. I think you were trying to pull a gambit, put a focus on you and bowmore as town would, and then escape once the town loses interest., while retaining some townie cred.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:29 |
|
Lumpen, sincerely: I do respect how you have been playing so far and it has been much more pleasant for it. I also know I have been much more inclined to take you seriously and listen to you since you have been more polite. Thank you for holding your end of the bargin on that.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:30 |
|
CCKeane posted:Lumpen, sincerely: I do respect how you have been playing so far and it has been much more pleasant for it. I also know I have been much more inclined to take you seriously and listen to you since you have been more polite. Thank you for holding your end of the bargin on that.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:31 |
|
bowmore posted:Whatever, gently caress this game, if what your saying is true and you are a town tracker we are going to lose two town trackers day 1 & 2 There was a gotcha, because you were caught in the illogic of your lying. II can see you're trying hard now and good for you, but I think in the end people will not be fooled by you at all
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:32 |
|
Lumpen posted:So... What is your theory again? Been talking it over in the ScumDoc?
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:33 |
|
CCKeane posted:Lumpen, sincerely: I do respect how you have been playing so far and it has been much more pleasant for it. I also know I have been much more inclined to take you seriously and listen to you since you have been more polite. Thank you for holding your end of the bargin on that.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:34 |
|
Lumpen posted:Your failure to hold your end disappoints me, I must admit. If you turn out to be Scum, all is forgiven, but if you're Town this is a real betrayal.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:40 |
|
CCKeane posted:One of the big things that was holding me back was that you thunderdomed bowmore. That is a risky move, since you're placing the focus on you and bowmore. But then I read you again, and you mention that thunderdomes never go to completion a lot. I think its more likely you are currently showing your true colors now, and it should be noted and remembered.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:41 |
|
bowmore posted:what were you saying about manipulation and posturing?
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:44 |
|
Lumpen posted:That theory is not consistent with my posting at all. If you're Town, reconsider please. Honestly though, your temporary vote on bowmore never really seemed convincing, and it was based on a bargain and self-preservation when you were at -2, not Scumhunting. You mention never seeing a thunderdome come to completion here: Lumpen posted:Hopefully they will be spit upon and thought badly of. There is no "official" validity or game-mechanics enforcement of THUNDERDOME. Lumpen posted:It sure would be nice to have the first THUNDERDOME that actually gets carried out to completion. Every one I've tried has gotten declined or derailed Lumpen posted:GulagDolls, are you around? If you move your vote (to whichever side you judge best) then this can be the very first fully realized Mafia THUNDERDOME (to my knowledge). That'd be pretty darn cool whichever way it goes.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:44 |
|
The Mayfield Daily Ledger, Day 1 Lumpen (5): CCKeane, CapitalistPig, chaoslord, Dhaes, bowmore, bowmore (4): Deadbeat Dad, CCKeane (1): Lumpen, GulagDolls, Section 31 (0): CCKeane, CapitalistPig, Tremendous Taste (0): Section 31, Lumpen, CapitalistPig (0): Lumpen, chaoslord (0): Dhaes, JakeP (0): CCKeane, GulagDolls (0): Dhaes, Deadbeat Dad (0): CCKeane, Not Voting (1): chaoslord With 11 alive, it's 6 votes to lynch. Lights out is September 10th, 2015 at 11 p.m. EDT, partner. That's in about 1 hour, 15 minutes.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:45 |
|
Lumpen posted:Don't gloat too much or prematurely, you absolutely cannot survive my flip. This is not a gullible roster.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:46 |
|
really
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:47 |
|
what if i told you all this...that this thunderdome was never filed with the official judicial dome of thunder, and is thus...invalid
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:48 |
|
CCKeane posted:One of the big things that was holding me back was that you thunderdomed bowmore. That is a risky move, since you're placing the focus on you and bowmore. But then I read you again, and you mention that thunderdomes never go to completion a lot. keane...you are a criminal this game
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:50 |
|
CCKeane posted:You mention never seeing a thunderdome come to completion here: In the quotes you posted, I am persistently urging and lobbying for it! If I were Scum and "actually" wanted it ignored, I would have had ample opportunity to do so, just by embracing the trialballoon floating around, going "Oh wow multiple trackers? Eavesdropper you say? Wow what a big misunderstanding lets finish off Keane instead." Your vote change is not reasonably justified, friend Keane.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:53 |
|
GulagDolls posted:keane...you are a criminal this game Nope.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:54 |
|
Lumpen posted:Yes, but that does not support your premise at all. i was writing this post but yeah same
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:55 |
|
Section 31 or chaoslord, are either of you around?
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 02:56 |
|
So Gulag if Keane is Scum bowmore must be Scum as well or else why would Keane make a lame excuse to flip, so conveniently timed? If bowmore were Town and Keane Scum why would Keane bother switching? Please vote bowmore, Gulag.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 03:05 |
|
|
# ? Apr 19, 2024 08:39 |
|
Please vote Lumpen, Gulag.
|
# ? Sep 11, 2015 03:09 |