|
D_Smart posted:I know the ship. But I am not going to reveal that information. Sorry. I didn't write that section to ruin surprises; that's why I only stated the obvious and based on stuff that was already hinted at or speculated on. You're more of a loving hack then Star Citizen is. Maybe this is why you're so attached to this? You're both gigantic failures.
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 10:23 |
|
|
D_Smart posted:I know the ship. But I am not going to reveal that information. Sorry. I didn't write that section to ruin surprises; that's why I only stated the obvious and based on stuff that was already hinted at or speculated on. That's awesome. I also happen to know what the ship is. Maybe we could compare notes after citizen con?
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:15
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:You're more of a loving hack then Star Citizen is. Maybe this is why you're so attached to this? You're both gigantic failures.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:16
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:You're more of a loving hack then Star Citizen is. Maybe this is why you're so attached to this? You're both gigantic failures. no star citizen is worse hth
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:17
|
|
|
Say what you want about Battlecruiser.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:18
|
|
|
It came out. Sorry, forgot to put that bit on the end, my bad.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:19
|
|
|
thatguy posted:Woah. No seriously why are we still listening to this dipshit? The Escapist has done far more to blow open the issues with Star Citizen. And by that I mean Derek Smart has yet to say anything we didn't already know.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:19
|
|
|
Romes128 posted:They're offering refunds. And I think it's only like a small percentage of people that are leaving the cult. So I haven't really kept up with the drama for a long time, I backed the original kickstarter when it came out and the goals/development timeline were looking reasonable/not-quite-insane. I didn't give any more cash than the baseline 30 or 35 or whatever for a digital copy when it came out (lol), and lost interest in following the goings on when CIG gradually started shifting focus to the stretch goal/imaginary spaceship sales snake oil. Are the refunds being offered/given to anyone who put in any money, or just to people who shelled out for the extra snake oil stuff?
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:21
|
|
|
Machado de Assis posted:So I haven't really kept up with the drama for a long time, I backed the original kickstarter when it came out and the goals/development timeline were looking reasonable/not-quite-insane. I didn't give any more cash than the baseline 30 or 35 or whatever for a digital copy when it came out (lol), and lost interest in following the goings on when CIG gradually started shifting focus to the stretch goal/imaginary spaceship sales snake oil. Are the refunds being offered/given to anyone who put in any money, or just to people who shelled out for the extra snake oil stuff? I paid for the $45 version and got a refund. I think one goon got a $1500 refund even?
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:22
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:No seriously why are we still listening to this dipshit? The Escapist has done far more to blow open the issues with Star Citizen. And by that I mean Derek Smart has yet to say anything we didn't already know. Nobody gave a poo poo until Derek started writing his novels
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:22
|
|
|
Tarranon posted:Nobody gave a poo poo until Derek started writing his novels If he wants to say something useful he should update on his lawsuit that he promised was coming within the same time frame as Star Citizen is going to be finished.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:23
|
|
|
kikkelivelho posted:That's awesome. I also happen to know what the ship is. Maybe we could compare notes after citizen con? If you assume they'll want to repeat the Glaive sale, it's either another Vanduul, or something else which could be nearly flight ready, which would be maybe the f8 lightning. Constellation is meant to be nearly ready so they could be unveiling that again after 10 months redesign and selling the new phoenix again. I doubt many people here care though, it's just going to be interesting to see what they think on Saturday will bring in the most money and that's normally using their nerd magic words of "limited edition" so limited number ships intended to drive impulse buys, "alien" or "military spec" combat ships. For best results combine all three. AP fucked around with this message at 00:33 on Oct 7, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:25
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:I know the ship. But I am not going to reveal that information. Sorry. I didn't write that section to ruin surprises; that's why I only stated the obvious and based on stuff that was already hinted at or speculated on. Look man, it's either this Cuntpunch posted:He doesn't even have to SAY what the prediction is - he posts or this kikkelivelho posted:That's awesome. I also happen to know what the ship is. Maybe we could compare notes after citizen con?
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:If he wants to say something useful he should update on his lawsuit that he promised was coming within the same time frame as Star Citizen is going to be finished. November 2015 is when the terms of the original TOS trigger. I really doubt he's going to explain what he's got planned in public at least if/until it happens.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:32
|
|
|
I have, in my briefcase/doggy carrier, a list of what CIG plans to reveal. I will name six of these items but will withhold the last due to having no desire to spoil the surprise.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:32
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:You're more of a loving hack then Star Citizen is. Maybe this is why you're so attached to this? You're both gigantic failures. F you!!!!
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:32
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:If he wants to say something useful he should update on his lawsuit that he promised was coming within the same time frame as Star Citizen is going to be finished. He doesn't want to say anything useful. He's living with a mental health disorder. He's not going to get better. He's just going to be exactly what he's always been. Star Citizen is likely to release before medical science catches up enough to help. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:33
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:I know the ship. But I am not going to reveal that information. Sorry. I didn't write that section to ruin surprises; that's why I only stated the obvious and based on stuff that was already hinted at or speculated on. Spoil Everything. Also you should totally buy out my account and use it as a new foil to stab at CRoberts. 6 days since request, and I'm getting impatient. I'll be lucky if I hear anything a week after CitCon, assuming it doesn't go up in a huge fireball.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:34
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:You're more of a loving hack then Star Citizen is. Maybe this is why you're so attached to this? You're both gigantic failures.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:35
|
|
|
Maybe we could start some form of fundraiser to get the treatment money?
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:35
|
|
|
Post a hash and the salt afterward.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:35
|
|
|
Everyone involved in this is a train wreck lmao
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:35
|
|
|
Eonwe posted:Everyone involved in this is a train wreck lmao
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:36
|
|
AP posted:If you assume they'll want to repeat the Glaive sale, it's either another Vanduul, or something else which could be nearly flight ready, which would be maybe the f8 lightning. Constellation is meant to be nearly ready so they could be unveiling that again after 10 months redesign and selling the new phoenix again. It'll be the Espera Prowler. Military boarding ship, with not only alien stuff, but alien stuff from a never before seen alien race.
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:37
|
|
|
is kimsemus in goonrathi yet or are they pulling a derekt smart "our leaked photos" show evidence that he goonfucked I've seen those photos and they show the opposit
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:37
|
|
|
Citizen Con reveal SPOILED: Konami announces Star Citzen pachislot machine, desktop modules 'scaled back'
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:38
|
|
|
PULL THE LEVER
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:39
|
|
|
tooterfish posted:PULL THE LEVER every time you pull the lever on a Star Citizen pachislot, it backs $100 straight from your bank account
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:41
|
|
|
tooterfish posted:It came out. Battlecruiser was less complete than Star Citizen is now.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:41
|
|
|
AP posted:I doubt many people here care though, it's just going to be interesting to see what they think on Saturday will bring in the most money and that's normally using their nerd magic words of "limited edition" so limited number ships intended to drive impulse buys, "alien" or "military spec" combat ships. For best results combine all three. I think they're kinda reaching whale saturation, unless they do something like a new ship featured prominently in a new demo that appears to be the most amazing thing for FPS module or multicrew or whatever.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:42
|
|
|
OhDearGodNo posted:Post a hash and the salt afterward. Why the gently caress would you even salt something like "This is Derek Smart saying the next ship will be called the Litigator" ? - that poo poo ain't going to be in a rainbow table somewhere. I mean you can literally salt it by adding a period, this isn't like "uh oh what happens if the DB gets hacked a week from now and a million user password hashes get leaked" - it's a unique string with a 1 week deadline.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:42
|
|
|
2011 posted:These engines, whether it’s Unreal engine or CryEngine, you can use as a baseline. I could build my own engine…but in today’s world I wouldn’t do that. I’m not sure it’s worth it [rather] than spending my time in making a better gameplay experience and building cool content. This is an actual CR quote, apparently. Never mind the cult, this is the cult leader, and...I have no words. OK, that's a lie. quote:I’m actually taking a look at the game business now I haven't had anything to do with the game business for over a decade, but I have read a few articles whilst high. quote:I see it a bit more like the movie business Which I am obsessed with, but have repeatedly failed to make any impact on. quote:There are more stable tools No-one has to code in assembler any more, and you can license 'engines' pretty cheap. No need to waste money on expensive nerds. quote:it just sort of feels like This is the basis for all sound business decisions. quote:you can do very ambitious, high-end projects and not have to take five years to do them Of course you can. No one else seems to have managed it, but, that's 'cause they are using 'unstable' tools, and listening to techies who make everything sound so complicated. quote:do something pretty special in two years This quote is from 2011, right? quote:hits my creative sweet spot 
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:42
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:You're more of a loving hack then Star Citizen is. Maybe this is why you're so attached to this? You're both gigantic failures. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:44
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:Battlecruiser was less complete than Star Citizen is now. No, it was full of bugs but there was a full mound of poo poo game there.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:45
|
|
|
#iamastarsticezzn
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:46
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:You're more of a loving hack then Star Citizen is. Maybe this is why you're so attached to this? You're both gigantic failures. D_smart gonna sue you so hard dude. Legal has been notified.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:47
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:Battlecruiser was less complete than Star Citizen is now. Nope. It was an unplayable bug-filled mess, but it was a complete unplayable bug-filled mess.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:47
|
|
|
You'd think they'd want to avoid the word 'Con' right now. But reworking the intro graphics to their demo would probably take them three weeks.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 10:23 |
|
Cuntpunch posted:Why the gently caress would you even salt something like "This is Derek Smart saying the next ship will be called the Litigator" ? - that poo poo ain't going to be in a rainbow table somewhere. I mean you can literally salt it by adding a period, this isn't like "uh oh what happens if the DB gets hacked a week from now and a million user password hashes get leaked" - it's a unique string with a 1 week deadline. Because he doesn't understand the purpose of a salt. From his wording, he may even think it's some way to reverse the hash.
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2015 00:47
|
|