|
EccoRaven posted:well get ready to be disappointed! I am already disappointed
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 20:49 |
|
|
# ? Mar 29, 2024 14:07 |
|
Rarity posted:I find this whole Ecco bandwagon opportunistic and I'm certain there's at least one scum in there somewhere. Hello, scummy post.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 20:49 |
|
merk posted:If you want to live, tell us who to lynch and why we should lynch that person. EccoRaven posted:and that's ultimately my problem Diqnol. You're basing your vote around things that are untrue ("ecco would never do this") and things that are totally and completely hypothetical ("ecco would never do that"). and you seem really, really confident about that all, which feels less like you're genuinely thinking you found scum and more like bravado to make your suspicion sound stronger than it is. EccoRaven posted:Diqnol I am sensing a lot of "damned if you do/damned if you don't" from you. the impression seems to be that it doesn't matter if I'm actually scum or not, just that I need to be punished for making a cipher. I need to die because the scum would kill me anyway (but I'm actually scum anyway so the scum wouldn't kill me). EccoRaven posted:I mean lol: EccoRaven posted:##vote merk EccoRaven posted:eviscerated is a pretty strong word merk. EccoRaven posted:nah. EccoRaven posted:I think of those, I would prefer voting for someone who is actually around but still not being helpful (i.e. not Rarity or Mithross). I especially am feeling right now: EccoRaven posted:and since I like you, my points against you: get bent.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 20:50 |
|
Yeah you omgus'd two people, how helpful in your argument with tHOSE SAME TWO PEOPLE YOU NINNY get bent
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 20:51 |
|
merk posted:You are way better than this stuff. If you want to live, tell us who to lynch and why we should lynch that person. This post does nothing, just like over half of your other posts. This post is loving garbage merk. You know ecco has said who she wants to hang several times now and included reasons why she thinks that way. This post does nothing at all.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 20:52 |
|
TMMadman posted:This post is loving garbage merk. You know ecco has said who she wants to hang several times now and included reasons why she thinks that way. What I'm saying is that just because you don't agree with her cases, don't make it out like Ecco hasn't been making cases against people.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 20:53 |
|
EccoRaven posted:get bent. You aren't persuasively arguing that we lynch anyone. You're whining about being the vote leader. You quoted a bunch of stuff that isn't persuasive at all. You aren't even voting me right now nor was I in your top 2 list from like two hours ago.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 20:54 |
|
merk posted:You aren't persuasively arguing that we lynch anyone. You're whining about being the vote leader. nah that is not at all reflected in reality. I'm voting Diqnol who is also in my top 2 list. bent: get.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 20:54 |
|
TMMadman posted:This post is loving garbage merk. You know ecco has said who she wants to hang several times now and included reasons why she thinks that way. It does plenty. I want Ecco to make a succinct case that isn't littered with fake emotional pleas and whining to see if my opinion about Ecco's alignment changes. Thanks for the callout though. It's not effective for that purpose now.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 20:54 |
|
I guess I'm done reading for the day. This is my vote. Later.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 20:55 |
|
merk posted:It does plenty. I want Ecco to make a succinct case that isn't littered with fake emotional pleas and whining to see if my opinion about Ecco's alignment changes. Thanks for the callout though. It's not effective for that purpose now. EccoRaven posted:and that's ultimately my problem Diqnol. You're basing your vote around things that are untrue ("ecco would never do this") and things that are totally and completely hypothetical ("ecco would never do that"). and you seem really, really confident about that all, which feels less like you're genuinely thinking you found scum and more like bravado to make your suspicion sound stronger than it is. EccoRaven posted:Diqnol I am sensing a lot of "damned if you do/damned if you don't" from you. the impression seems to be that it doesn't matter if I'm actually scum or not, just that I need to be punished for making a cipher. I need to die because the scum would kill me anyway (but I'm actually scum anyway so the scum wouldn't kill me).
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 20:55 |
|
Also, last time I caught Ecco as scum this is exactly what he did: Feign a bit of concern of my alignment without actively pushing it that boiled up over the course of hours into a mega case. I'm pretty sure he also mixed in emotional pleas and whining about how anyone could have the audacity to vote him. Ecco is scum here. I ended up getting saved by a CPig day cop. CPig, what was this game?
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 20:56 |
|
Sorry your post suck ecco, you should work on that
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 20:57 |
|
merk posted:Also, last time I caught Ecco as scum this is exactly what he did: Feign a bit of concern of my alignment without actively pushing it that boiled up over the course of hours into a mega case. I'm pretty sure he also mixed in emotional pleas and whining about how anyone could have the audacity to vote him. It was Tournament of Heroes btw. GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Sorry your post suck ecco, you should work on that nah.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 20:58 |
|
merk your points against me are demonstrably wrong. See here where I pick apart your actual case:EccoRaven posted:nah. bulletpoints without any appeals to emotion or whinings about being voted for or complaints that I am the vote leader. You are accusing me of whining and making emotional pleas as if I have done this excessively or at the exclusion of scumhunting, and that is demonstrably not correct.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:00 |
|
Shouting into the wind and slamming your feet repeatedly on the ground isn't going to prevent people who legitimately believe you are scum to in any way relent, Ecco. If you want us to give a crap about your dumb posts you have to make some good posts too, okay?
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:00 |
|
Yeah, Ecco is definitely scum. Just glanced at Tournaments. I'm locked in (again). Ok, back to work for real this time.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:01 |
|
AND to tie it all back: I think it is because you are (genuinely) not engaged with the game right now, and you saw an opportunity to remove a powerful town player early on and went for it. You are imitating how you normally play as town because you haven't had the time to get your hands dirty and get involved with the game until now. But it doesn't work because ultimately what you say just isn't true. It's scummy because it's fake and opportunistic.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:02 |
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Shouting into the wind and slamming your feet repeatedly on the ground isn't going to prevent people who legitimately believe you are scum to in any way relent, Ecco. If you want us to give a crap about your dumb posts you have to make some good posts too, okay? Your tone is really concerning too by the way.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:02 |
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Shouting into the wind and slamming your feet repeatedly on the ground isn't going to prevent people who legitimately believe you are scum to in any way relent, Ecco. If you want us to give a crap about your dumb posts you have to make some good posts too, okay? Hoo boy, let me fix that mess of a sentence: Shouting into the wind and slamming your feet repeatedly on the ground isn't going to prevent people who legitimately believe you are scum from continuing to vote for you, Ecco, or to believe you have anything to offer. If you want us to give a crap about your dumb posts you have to make some good posts too, okay?
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:03 |
|
Rarity posted:I think KB is using his case on Ecco to avoid having to put down reads on any other players. He hasn't made a single alignment call on anyone in this game except Ecco and it's simple for scum to push a lurker lynch to get rid of a towny without having to take any blame for it. Nope, I just didn't have any other strong opinions. It's really hard to form opinions on people who aren't posting, for example.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:03 |
|
merk posted:Your tone is really concerning too by the way. How so, merk? Break it down for me: I think tone is a dumb buzz word.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:04 |
|
EccoRaven posted:I think it is because you are (genuinely) not engaged with the game right now Correct. Everything you wrote after this doesn't make any sense. Also, just because I'm not engaged doesn't make my case wrong. It is a great d1 case. It's the best d1 case in this thread so far. It's going to get you lynched.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:04 |
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:How so, merk? Break it down for me: I think tone is a dumb buzz word. Your timbre is off putting.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:04 |
|
merk posted:Your timbre is off putting. Yeah, I think that's a lovely dodge. Give me more than that, bud!
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:05 |
|
Rarity posted:I don't see how Ecco's game reflects the way I've treated you when I've been scum. What you're talking about is willful ignorance and misrepresentation of your posts but I think Ecco's take on it was genuine because as I've already stated, that was my take on it as well so you can't just argue that 'oh it must be ignorance cause nobody agrees with her' My read of Ecco's take of me was exactly that. Willful ignorance and misrepresentation of my posts. I argued that based on reality vs her interpretation. I only used others opinions to further reinforce that I wasn't being a crazy person and other people were seeing the same thing.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:05 |
|
merk posted:Your timbre is off putting. Jokes aside, your posts don't sound real. You're playing up a Diqnol character which I can't tell whether it's for laughs or otherwise. It's not very funny though.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:05 |
|
King Burgundy posted:Nope, I just didn't have any other strong opinions. It's really hard to form opinions on people who aren't posting, for example. hey KB as far as we know right now Keane has still selected me to be in the battle today. If Keane comes in and says he removed me, well obviously your vote should stay that's just sensible, but if Keane says I am indeed in the battle, would you unvote me? If you did, who would you vote instead? Might I suggest Diqnol or merk?
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:05 |
|
merk posted:Jokes aside, your posts don't sound real. You're playing up a Diqnol character which I can't tell whether it's for laughs or otherwise. It's not very funny though. I'm afraid I'm not doing anything but being me. You saw me posting under the influence of the devil weed yesterday, though, so could that be it? At any rate I'm just being straightforward, haters vacate.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:06 |
|
merk posted:Correct. Everything you wrote after this doesn't make any sense. It does make sense. If you aren't around to put in the effort, you go on autopilot, and just do what you think you'd do as town. See: my posting in Met's game, where I went to the bat to defend S31 because I thought it was what I'd do if I were town. It's a bad day 1 case. And, again, it's not going to get me executed. I'm dying today because of multiple, disparate, very loosely connected cases. Only Asiina has voted with your case.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:07 |
|
Hey, so you guys would be real dumb to kill me alongside Ecco but I think it's okay so long as we both die. That said, I'm a real useful fighter and I'm probably better at mafia than you, dear reader, so please consider not voting for me so I can help us win, thank
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:09 |
|
EccoRaven posted:It's a bad day 1 case. And, again, it's not going to get me executed. I'm dying today because of multiple, disparate, very loosely connected cases. Only Asiina has voted with your case. I think it's really great that you feel the need to respond to this now two times that I've brought it up. You need to make yourself believe that I didn't catch your scum game and persuasively advocate your lynch on day 1.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:11 |
|
merk, hate to be a jerk but, um, who did you persuade exactly?
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:12 |
|
HiipFire posted:tbh I like all the high volume posters for town(though Ecco is my least strong read of those) and I'd like to lynch Rarity cause she aint got no posts This is probably the right second lynch.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:12 |
|
merk posted:This is probably the right second lynch. ...for completely unrelated reasons, right?
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:13 |
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:merk, hate to be a jerk but, um, who did you persuade exactly? Every vote on Ecco by a town player has at least a base of my case ingrained in their read. It's an irrelevant question though. The fact that Ecco feels the need to respond immediately every time I bring up that I'm getting him lynched is the telling point here.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:14 |
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:...for completely unrelated reasons, right? Oh, I stopped typing. That's the only content post he's made all game, and it came after I said we should lynch him for having no reads.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:14 |
|
Ok, really need to work. Later.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:14 |
|
no, I brought it up because it's hollow and empty much like the rest of your posts against me. it's just something you think you'd say. ninja: like, if this were an anonymous game, I'd say "oh hey it's someone roleplaying merk" if I read your posts. that's how forced and fake they sound to me.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:15 |
|
|
# ? Mar 29, 2024 14:07 |
|
TMMadman posted:Since it's a double plurality, I think we should dunk one lurker and then probably someone from the ecco/diqnol/merk/KB scuffle. I'm not really sure which one though because all them have been kind of scummy, so I'd rather put my vote somewhere else. TMM's got it, let's figure out who CCKeane sent into the fight and try to synchronize our vote along with who he sent into the battle. if ecco's fighting, let's hit another of our high volume guy. as for the lurker dunk, i'm still voting asiina. do you guys think that's a safe-lurker vote? the mid-level posters have merit as well. cckeane, please let us know as soon as the final votes are locked who's fighting.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 21:17 |