Geoj posted:Its probably just a brute force attacker - automatically guesses the password until it finds a hit. If they're able to defeat your encryption with one it means your password was relatively easy to guess (combination of common words and/or sequential numbers - like "password1234".) With a strong enough password a 256 bit encryption key is nigh unbreakable by any method that will deliver results in your lifetime. I've played around with some of the software before. Elcomsoft works in several ways to get a password, like for iCloud it can pull a binary authentication token off the user's computer if they have the iCloud Control panel and use that to get the iCloud password without brute forcing it (if the person has two-factor authentication, it still needs access to the second trusted device or recovery key to break in and it can't get through Microsoft two-factor authentication currently).
|
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 01:02 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 05:38 |
|
Geoj posted:Its probably just a brute force attacker - automatically guesses the password until it finds a hit. If they're able to defeat your encryption with one it means your password was relatively easy to guess (combination of common words and/or sequential numbers - like "password1234".) With a strong enough password a 256 bit encryption key is nigh unbreakable by any method that will deliver results in your lifetime. That's why the iPhone is set to *not* trust computers by default now. You have manually tell it to trust the computer, and the phone has to be unlocked before you can do that. That tool has a serious chicken and egg problem now. And if you're paranoid (smart) you never hook the phone up to any of your own computers and set up trust. There's absolutely no need any longer. Just hook it up to charge if you need to, but don't trust the computer. That means no cached key. And it doesn't matter if you have the iCloud password, the device is encrypted with a device level key that's not stored in the iCloud keychain. And the iCloud backups are encrypted using that same key. If you're using a 4 digit PIN, well that one is on you. If you use a longer one with the fingerprint, just power off the phone before you hand it over (it's a quick and easy swipe). It will reject a fingerprint after a power cycle.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 01:22 |
|
flosofl posted:If you're using a 4 digit PIN, well that one is on you. A guy datamined a leaked list of 3.4 million 4-digit pin codes and found that 25% of them can be guessed in 10 attempts or less.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 01:55 |
|
robodex posted:From a few pages ago, but these actually got pretty advanced in their hayday. I have a PS1 Gameshark Pro, which I believe is one of the few cheat devices released for consoles that you could actually do direct memory searches to make your own cheats. The PS1 I had didn't come with the serial port in the back, so I wound up buying the Gameshark CDX. I didn't know if it had that memory search option, since I always looked up codes on GameFAQs, et al. It made winning licenses for Gran Turismo and GT2 that much easier. I also had an Action Replay Max for my PS2, although most games I had already had their own cheat codes. I mainly used it to get cash and unlock cars on GT3 and GT4. eminkey2003 posted:Back in the 90s, my cousin had a humongous stereo like these. Does anyone use them anymore? Most people just use their computer. 80s boombox is best boombox. 90s Solo Cup has a new favorite as of 03:09 on Oct 21, 2015 |
# ? Oct 21, 2015 03:07 |
|
chitoryu12 posted:Elcomsoft works in several ways to get a password, like for iCloud it can pull a binary authentication token off the user's computer if they have the iCloud Control panel and use that to get the iCloud password without brute forcing it There's definitely ways around 256 bit encryption but they all involve some form or another of obtaining the password or key to open the encryption. If the government had a way to break the actual algorithm they certainly wouldn't waste it on common criminals and pedophiles, much less put it in the hands of common law enforcement. If the government has that capability (it's highly doubtful they do) it would be used to break spy rings and foreign dispatches, and kept highly classified.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 03:35 |
|
Somebody mentioned short distance FM for broadcasting across their property a couple of pages back. That reminds me, there's a Drive-In theater not far from me that broadcasts the movies audio that way. Drive-Ins are rad, BTW.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 03:59 |
|
deoju posted:Somebody mentioned short distance FM for broadcasting across their property a couple of pages back. That reminds me, there's a Drive-In theater not far from me that broadcasts the movies audio that way. Yeah, I live close to the biggest (only?) drive-in in northern Europe, and that's how they do it. 3 screens, 3 FM channels, they play music and upcoming movies when they aren't showing anything. It's pretty fun when you've got a totally banging system in your car.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 06:44 |
|
Gromit posted:A guy datamined a leaked list of 3.4 million 4-digit pin codes and found that 25% of them can be guessed in 10 attempts or less.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 07:28 |
|
Croccers posted:My phone pin has 7 digits but it would still be one of the easiest ones to guess
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 07:34 |
|
KozmoNaut posted:Yeah, I live close to the biggest (only?) drive-in in northern Europe, and that's how they do it. 3 screens, 3 FM channels, they play music and upcoming movies when they aren't showing anything. Until your car battery goes dead during a double feature...
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 07:37 |
|
John Big Booty posted:8675309?
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 07:47 |
|
Geoj posted:There's definitely ways around 256 bit encryption but they all involve some form or another of obtaining the password or key to open the encryption. Yeah generally you can get around encryption by using the key to decrypt it.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 08:32 |
|
Croccers posted:My phone pin has 7 digits but it would still be one of the easiest ones to guess 5318008 is not a secure PIN, nor is 9112001.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 08:43 |
|
sleepy gary posted:Yeah generally you can get around encryption by using the key to decrypt it. That seems like a big security hole!
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 08:49 |
|
flosofl posted:I think it's still murky in the US. They also can't compel you if the fact that you know the safe combination is evidence that the safe is yours. Like, if it's known that you own the safe, and they suspect the safe is full of drugs, they can get a court order requiring you to divulge the combination. But if they have a safe full of drugs and they merely suspect that it's your safe, then compelling you to divulge the combination would violate your right against self-incrimination, because giving up the combination would prove that it's your safe. They'd need to establish via other evidence that doesn't come from you that it's your safe, first. Digital encryption methods have the additional benefit of hidden volumes (one password decrypts the hard drive so you can read your list of drug contacts and arms dealers, the other decrypts that same hard drive to show nothing but your embarrassing, but entirely legal, nunporn collection) or duress codes (you don't surrender your password, you surrender a code that when entered scrubs the data. You might go to jail for destruction of evidence but that's probably a lesser charge than what they were investigating you for).
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 10:29 |
|
KozmoNaut posted:Don't bother with that plastic junk. You want stuff that looks like this: As cool as it looked, I just couldn't think of a use for it. It was huge, had no aux/line-in, and the guy already left some working B&O amplifiers and receivers that were much more useful.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 13:11 |
|
Jedit posted:5318008 is not a secure PIN, nor is 9112001. It's long enough that it's going to stop people from casually picking up my phone and loving with it which is all I'm really worried about. Also is 9112001 really that popular of a PIN?
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 13:56 |
|
Tubesock Holocaust posted:80s boombox is best boombox. The one my cousins had took something like 10 D cell batteries if you didn't want to plug it in. From what I remember, despite having to clean out a store's entire battery supply to power it, it still didn't last very long.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 14:08 |
|
Croccers posted:
8675309 is almost uncrackable.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 14:16 |
|
Croccers posted:Also is 9112001 really that popular of a PIN? It's important that you pick something you'll never forget.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 14:18 |
|
Pilsner posted:Are you going to hurt me when I say that I recently threw this out, as it was left in my house by the previous owner? Nah, that's just a tuner and not worth much unless you're deeply into FM/AM radio. You could probably have gotten a couple hundred kroner on DBA for it, though. Now, had that been a receiver, it would have been another story altogether, and I would have been on my way to your address with a dull rusty knife. KozmoNaut has a new favorite as of 14:25 on Oct 21, 2015 |
# ? Oct 21, 2015 14:22 |
|
KozmoNaut posted:Nah, that's just a tuner and not worth much unless you're deeply into FM/AM radio. You could probably have gotten a couple hundred kroner on DBA for it, though. I'll have to post pictures of my 70s Sansui Receiver/tuner tonight.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 15:02 |
|
1500quidporsche posted:I'll have to post pictures of my 70s Sansui Receiver/tuner tonight. what was really interesting to me was in the late 90s, sansui started popping up as a budget home/car audio brand, and no one in Australia that I knew of had ever heard of that brand before. It's not a revelation to me now as I researched it back then and I know it's an old Japanese brand, but interesting how they faded out of existence again from our market. There's a heap of 2nd hand stuff around from the 90s that people bought which are now orphans, but I don;t know of any older gear.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 15:19 |
|
Yeah I had no clue they were actually a big market force in the 60s and 70s until I got mine and looked up the brand. They're kind of like Blaupunkt where if you told somebody that name now they'd have no clue what you're talking about, but they were practically an institution in car audio in the 80s. Crazy how fast you can fall.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 15:48 |
|
flosofl posted:I do the first two, but your third variation never occurred to me. Thanks for the tip! It's important to have encrypted backups in a very secure location if you need to use Option 3. Jedit posted:5318008 is not a secure PIN, nor is 9112001. I get the first one, but what's the second referencing? Exit Strategy has a new favorite as of 16:42 on Oct 21, 2015 |
# ? Oct 21, 2015 16:40 |
|
JesustheDarkLord posted:It's important that you pick something you'll never forget.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 16:49 |
|
Exit Strategy posted:I get the first one, but what's the second referencing? Don't tell me you forgot
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 16:50 |
|
Exit Strategy posted:
Hint: it's a date.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 16:52 |
|
in fairness i tried turning it upside down and wondered what loosiib meant
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 17:53 |
|
loos libs sink shibs
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 17:56 |
|
Jedit posted:5318008 is not a secure PIN, nor is 9112001. Took me way too long to get the second one, but what's the first one? My guess it has to do with boobs.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 18:15 |
|
HardDisk posted:Took me way too long to get the second one, but what's the first one? My guess it has to do with boobs. its computer language for boobies and its how nerds flirt
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 18:18 |
|
HardDisk posted:Took me way too long to get the second one, but what's the first one? My guess it has to do with boobs.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 18:21 |
|
Completely forgot about that. At least I got the boobs right.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 19:51 |
|
for shame
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 19:59 |
|
1500quidporsche posted:They're kind of like Blaupunkt where if you told somebody that name now they'd have no clue what you're talking about, but they were practically an institution in car audio in the 80s. Crazy how fast you can fall. Blaupunkt is basically the only company that makes a head unit that doesn't look completely retarded in a 1986 Crown Victoria. About $100 and it's pretty usable too.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 20:52 |
|
Pham Nuwen posted:Blaupunkt is basically the only company that makes a head unit that doesn't look completely retarded in a 1986 Crown Victoria. About $100 and it's pretty usable too. They make good looking units and admittedly I've got one sitting in a box waiting to go into my Scirocco. But Bosch just licenses the name out and the quality isn't as good as what it used to be.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 21:13 |
|
1500quidporsche posted:They make good looking units and admittedly I've got one sitting in a box waiting to go into my Scirocco. But Bosch just licenses the name out and the quality isn't as good as what it used to be. Along those lines, someone was going crazy that Kmart and Sears were selling Nakamichi-branded speakers and headphones with an "They are the best!" However, I never heard of them until I saw them at Sears/Kmart. Is it similar to one of those things that they were at one time a sort of semi-premium brand that is now only that brand in name only, having its name used on products sort of like how there's a ton of Polaroid-branded electronics out there?
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 21:26 |
|
KozmoNaut posted:Nah, that's just a tuner and not worth much unless you're deeply into FM/AM radio. You could probably have gotten a couple hundred kroner on DBA for it, though. Oooooooooooooookay, stupid question time. What's the difference between a tuner and a receiver? As for Sansui, I have a super-early 90s Sansui (I don't know if it's a tuner or receiver) that's super nice. I've had it since new, and it just recently got relegated to garage stereo along with the big old Pioneer cabinet speakers it's been driving all these years.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 21:36 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 05:38 |
|
Stealing a nice piece of nostalgia from YOSPOS: boomshakalakakickitupmothafucka
|
# ? Oct 21, 2015 21:39 |