|
Podima posted:Chic has been mostly posting a lot about not playing and taking easy shots at people (poked me for voting merk when he/she already had a jokevote on merk), which I don't like. Two "sorry I've been busy" posts in like a 10 minute timespan isn't exactly "a lot" there friendo, that's pretty disingenuous
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 20:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 20, 2024 01:24 |
|
|
For the record, Quid's townreading me still gives me ~vibes~, because it didn't come across as a joke to me and it feels weird that Quid is trying to spin it as one. Day 1 town reads always ping me.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 20:23
|
|
|
To reiterate, here's my case on PodimaPodima posted:The start of the whole 'scumslip' saga for those who are lazy. I don't love it but it's a decent backup. For now, ##vote merk till he resurfaces. This is crap. He sets Vimes up as a potential "backup" candidate when he hasn't voiced real suspicions beyond a policy vote on Kash and a lazy bangwagon vote on MMG, then votes merk on no case whatsoever. When called on it, he responds with this: Podima posted:To briefly and succinctly explain myself because it was a bad post: He cops to his last post being bad, and then says that behaviors of Vimes and merk are "notable" while saying he would vote them, but doesn't explain why that notability has any bearing on alignment. Podima posted:So was that a voice-to-text goof or something, merk? ##unvote Again, describing things that have happened, and calling them "notable" without explaining why it's any sort of alignment tell, aside from birb, whom he calls townie. Finally, we have the vote on Chic: Podima posted:Maybe this is something I don't get about the ~SA Mafia Meta~ but is it really that important to slam a vote down with every post/read on d1? If so, then ##vote Chic Trombone to back up my read. Would also vote MMG. This reads fake to me. He obviously doesn't want to vote on the weak accusation he's made on Chic, but seems self-conscious that it's scummy while excusing his lack of a vote by citing the ~SA Mafia Meta~, which is a poor excuse and the easy way out.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 20:33
|
|
|
Hey ANarc what do you think about SSV, EXAKT, Podima, etc.? Not a fan of the way she came in and dropped a lurker vote without comment
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 20:35
|
|
|
Chic Trombone posted:Hey ANarc what do you think about SSV, EXAKT, Podima, etc.? Mafia edit: commenting on anything else going on.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 20:37
|
|
|
Kashuno why did you vote merk but then agree with him that Kat wax potentially a good lynch?HiipFire posted:man I liked it when auspol games just ended up pushing xenophobic lynches like 5 minutes before the deadline instead of this actually scumhunting thing They used to have like 12 hour days though.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 20:51
|
|
|
Chic Trombone posted:Hey ANarc what do you think about SSV, EXAKT, Podima, etc.? My very first post on the last page was addressing the SSV/exakt thing. And my last posts on the last page were addressing the MMG thing. It's pretty disingenuous to say I'm not commenting on anything else going on.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 20:56
|
|
|
Looking back I admit I didn't see your first post, that's my bad. I don't see where you mention EXAKT though, just SSV
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 21:02
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:To reiterate, here's my case on Podima I think this is a good case on Podima. That first post definitely gives me vibes~
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 21:16
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:Kashuno why did you vote merk but then agree with him that Kat wax potentially a good lynch?
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 21:16
|
|
|
Chic Trombone posted:Looking back I admit I didn't see your first post, that's my bad. I don't see where you mention EXAKT though, just SSV I called out Tommunist for attacking SSV, he said "why me and not exakt" and "look at this in the context of jokephase" and I looked back and said okay I see what you're saying. It was all related.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 21:18
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:They used to have like 12 hour days though. 12 hour days are fun tho
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 21:37
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:What was really pinging me about Quid was the way he dropped in and felt almost smug about not reading the thread. It irked me when we have people lurking and and people who are contributing a lot, and then Quid who was coming in and not contributing but making a big show of it. Unfortunately, I'm not in office today, so I'm not going to be around between now and deadline. Since Quid showed up and actually started contributing a bit, I'd much rather go back to voting Podima, because I feelt aht's a stronger case right now. I actually really dislike this reasoning. First of all, I haven't been contributing, I've been asking questions and kinda just hanging around. I still haven't read the thread, I haven't cased anyone, and to back away from me is really freaking strange, especially with this many words. Furthermore, merk also came in with the same "I haven't read the thread" attitude, and although he's read a bit of it and has contributed far more than me, it's odd that EXAKT doesn't bring him up even as a point of comparison. Everything surroudning this looks real fake. ##vote EXAKT
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:11
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:I actually really dislike this reasoning. First of all, I haven't been contributing, I've been asking questions and kinda just hanging around. I still haven't read the thread, I haven't cased anyone, and to back away from me is really freaking strange, especially with this many words. I think you just addressed the reason for the "oddness" yourself.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:13
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:I actually really dislike this reasoning. First of all, I haven't been contributing, I've been asking questions and kinda just hanging around. I still haven't read the thread, I haven't cased anyone, and to back away from me is really freaking strange, especially with this many words. This can't be real
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:13
|
|
|
Hey everyone, here's the player list and the post count since the feature doesn't work currently: EXAKT Science 80 CCKeane 46 Birdstrike 37 imgay 37 Kashuno 37 SirSamVimes 31 Kommando 29 Ixtlilton 28 MysticalMachineGun 28 Tommunist 27 Bifauxnen 24 Quidnose 22 Chic Trombone 20 merk 18 fiery_valkyrie 17 HiipFire 16 iajanus 16 Podima 16 Tremendous Taste 15 AnonymousNarcotics 11 thatbastardken 10 Kat Delacour 9 bowmore 6 bromplicated 6 Little Mac 3 Don't expect me to do this that often because it's a pain  To be honest I'm always down a lurker lynch on Day 1 - as I've said previously all scum have to do to survive D1 is lie low while town thrash at each other, especially since the lurkers have now had something like 40 hours to show up. In that regard we've got some excellent candidates down the bottom of the list there, but I'm going to ##vote bromplicated due to poo poo like this: bromplicated posted:Is there any chance all the scum could just come out of the woodwork and cop to their evil deeds?? I don't want to read too much, thanks. bromplicated posted:do you guys still want to mass claim?
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:23
|
|
|
Doesn't vote finder keep count?
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:25
|
|
|
The other post on CCKeane is a joke post so not going to include it:Kommando posted:Yeah, nah. How do you (and i guess the thread at large) feel about CCKeane as a Jester, its the only way these posts make any sense to me. CCKeane posted:Vimes is probably the most scummy but my sincere vote for day one is likely going to be on a lurker because gently caress those guys. CCKeane posted:Wow, claiming vibes on the mod confirmed town power role, pretty shady business. CCKeane posted:In my PM, silly.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:26
|
|
|
gently caress I hope not. *checks* No, I don't think so. Tommunist posted:How do you (and i guess the thread at large) feel about CCKeane as a Jester, its the only way these posts make any sense to me. What's the jester role again?
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:27
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 1  SirSamVimes (2): EXAKT Science, Kashuno (2): Tommunist, Podima, CCKeane (2): Birdstrike, thatbastardken, Birdstrike (1): EXAKT Science, merk (1): Chic Trombone, Kommando, Podima, Chic Trombone (1): Podima bromplicated (1): MysticalMachineGun, Podima (1): Kommando, EXAKT Science (1): MysticalMachineGun, Quidnose, Ixtlilton (1): fiery_valkyrie, bowmore (1): AnonymousNarcotics AnonymousNarcotics (1): Tommunist MysticalMachineGun (1): EXAKT Science, Kat Delacour (1): merk, thatbastardken (1): MysticalMachineGun, HiipFire, imgay (0): Quidnose, Bifauxnen (0): Kommando, Quidnose, Quidnose (0): EXAKT Science, Tommunist (0): Kashuno, Kommando (0): Bifauxnen, MysticalMachineGun, Not Voting (7): bowmore, bromplicated, CCKeane, iajanus, Kat Delacour, Little Mac, SirSamVimesWith 25 alive, it's 13 votes to lynch. The current deadline is November 12th, 2015 at 12:30 p.m. EST -- that's in about 4 hours, 1 minute.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:28
|
|
|
MysticalMachineGun posted:
"A Jester is a fairly uncommon third-party role that must be executed to win the game"
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:29
|
|
|
I don't think Keane is a jester, it's just Keane being Keane. Also if you think he's a jester your best bet is to ignore him.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:29
|
|
|
A jester's job is to get lynched. Claiming cop is doing the exact opposite of that. Unless he's some weird reverse jester that has to get NKed. Which is def possible since anidav said he invented some roles
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:29
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 1 SirSamVimes (2): EXAKT Science, Kashuno (2): Tommunist, Podima, CCKeane (2): Birdstrike, thatbastardken, Birdstrike (1): EXAKT Science, merk (1): Chic Trombone, Kommando, Podima, Chic Trombone (1): Podima bromplicated (1): MysticalMachineGun, Podima (1): Kommando, EXAKT Science (1): MysticalMachineGun, Quidnose, Ixtlilton (1): fiery_valkyrie, bowmore (1): AnonymousNarcotics AnonymousNarcotics (1): Tommunist MysticalMachineGun (1): EXAKT Science, Kat Delacour (1): merk, thatbastardken (1): MysticalMachineGun, HiipFire, imgay (0): Quidnose, Bifauxnen (0): Kommando, Quidnose, Quidnose (0): EXAKT Science, Tommunist (0): Kashuno, Kommando (0): Bifauxnen, MysticalMachineGun, Not Voting (7): bowmore, bromplicated, CCKeane, iajanus, Kat Delacour, Little Mac, SirSamVimes With 25 alive, it's 13 votes to lynch. The current deadline is November 12th, 2015 at 12:30 p.m. EST -- that's in about 4 hours. Hey so uh. Deadline is in 4 hours apparently?
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:30
|
|
|
Just throwing the idea out there since his posting comes across to me as wanting to get night killed/lynched in thread.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:31
|
|
|
How is it a surprise to you the deadline is coming up
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:32
|
|
|
SirSamVimes posted:I think you just addressed the reason for the "oddness" yourself. What? What does this have to do with anything? I was talking about Merk. Why would EXAKT come in and dismiss his case on me as "he's contributing" when he has a direct comparison point to merk, who also said "I haven't read anything," and then actually DID contribute? I don't see your point at all.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:32
|
|
|
Morning all. I still think the SSV case is at least as good as any of the other D1 suspects, but I'd be up for MMG or Podima or Quidnose instead. (Or some other lurker if things swing that way fast enough)
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:32
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:How is it a surprise to you the deadline is coming up That was an expression of concern, considering how spread the votes are
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:33
|
|
|
Kashuno you are doing a ton of sniping and not a lot of anything else on this page and having just played a scum game with you this is reminiscent of that, what's the deal
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:33
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:Morning all. I still think the SSV case is at least as good as any of the other D1 suspects, but I'd be up for MMG or Podima or Quidnose instead. (Or some other lurker if things swing that way fast enough) ##vote Bif
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:33
|
|
|
Tommunist posted:Just throwing the idea out there since his posting comes across to me as wanting to get night killed/lynched in thread. Nah this is pretty much standard Keane play rn
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:34
|
|
|
Chic Trombone posted:Nah this is pretty much standard Keane play rn ah ok i don't think i've played with him before (except the soldiers game)
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:34
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:Kashuno you are doing a ton of sniping and not a lot of anything else on this page and having just played a scum game with you this is reminiscent of that, what's the deal My scum reads are Podima and Mmg and not much else to say yet. You are weirding me out and I think you might be scum, but not enough to make a case or vote on you
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:35
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:Morning all. I still think the SSV case is at least as good as any of the other D1 suspects, but I'd be up for MMG or Podima or Quidnose instead. (Or some other lurker if things swing that way fast enough) Great contribution.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:35
|
|
|
Alright I guess it's time for me to actually read the thread.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:36
|
|
|
Forgot I was still voting merk ##vote Podima
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:40
|
|
|
At this stage (since I may be in a meeting in the last hour and don't want to miss having my vote on the record) I'm agreeing with EXACT's post about Podima. Podima has been throwing out aspersions without any real weight or reasoning behind them, and then voting with only a flimsy rationale against the person who it would seem that he was always really wanting to vote the whole time, without ever giving any real reason why. To me it seems like a smokescreen to try to sound reasonable but still target someone directly and with some purpose, and I'm happy for this vote to stand (unless someone else puts their hand up before deadline as an obvious scum, of course). ## vote Podima
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:43
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:What? What does this have to do with anything? I was talking about Merk. Why would EXAKT come in and dismiss his case on me as "he's contributing" when he has a direct comparison point to merk, who also said "I haven't read anything," and then actually DID contribute? I meant that when comparing two people, one of which has contributed more, the one who hasn't comes off as scummier.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 20, 2024 01:24 |
|
|
SirSamVimes posted:I meant that when comparing two people, one of which has contributed more, the one who hasn't comes off as scummier. Which is exactly my point as to not understanding why EXAKT dismissed me as "town" for "generating content." How are you not reading?
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2015 23:45
|
|