|
If you back SC you own 2 things: Jpegs Yourself
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 03:17 |
|
|
# ? Apr 23, 2024 17:48 |
|
PTU patch is live.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 03:23 |
|
It's funny because sometimes you play really well developed and maintained games and you do accidentally throw some sort of input that the game wasn't really meant to handle but it's overengineered and your session survives no problem. SC seems like the opposite so far. The pictures are sort of pretty but it looks like it's held together by popsicle sticks and Elmer's glue.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 03:24 |
|
Imagine a star citizen
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 03:26 |
|
So I didn't follow the thread for a while, what ever became of derek smart taking star citizen to court? Was he just talking poo poo to make people pay attention to him again?
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 03:28 |
|
MeLKoR posted:You keep saying you don't care about the whales whining but who do you think will pay for server upkeep? If this ever comes out I give it 6 months before it veers into Payday 2 territory. Good point.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 03:35 |
|
spacetoaster posted:Got a response!.... Told you to keep trying. Ask them WHY it will take so long.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 03:35 |
|
AP posted:Lots of refunds today, it's almost like they had cash flow problems and came into some money somehow over the weekend. Anniversary sales. Also, I know for a fact that they're trying to do any many as possible before Nov 30 passes. There is a reason for that. Wait.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 03:40 |
|
I'm still waiting for the Swedish mafia.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 03:45 |
|
Madcosby posted:Is there some proposed Derek Smart lawsuit coming or was that just typical Smart We're working through it. Had a legal meeting today discussing some things (the arbitration clause which they've only just figured out how to get around). Also have a meeting with the AG of two States next week. Trust me, we're on it. It's huge. And if those pricks are reading this, I think they know by now that I'm not screwing around. I have given them every opportunity to do the right thing. D_Smart fucked around with this message at 03:59 on Nov 24, 2015 |
# ? Nov 24, 2015 03:50 |
|
Berious posted:Refunds in installments is the hallmark of a healthy non-shady company. ^this
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 03:52 |
|
Derek's going to put it all in his next blog
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 03:53 |
|
EminusSleepus posted:SC white knights be like ROTFLMAO!! Seriously, where the hell do you guys GET this stuff from? I'm dying here
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 03:55 |
|
Would anybody like an argument?
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 03:57 |
|
D_Smart posted:We're working through it. Had a legal meeting today discussing some things (the arbitration clause which they've only just figured out how to get around). Also have a meeting with the AG of two States next week. And what exactly have they done wrong that is illegal? They made a video game. It's not very good yet, and it was made in the most inefficient way humanly possible, but it's still a game. I am just curious what the exact grounds for this lawsuit are that calls for meetings with AGs in different states. Your demands before (I assume you are referring to your release financials/these people resign/whatever blog post) were not a "chance to do the right thing," they were demands fueled by your ego boner.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 03:57 |
|
Mirificus posted:Looking at someone's Reddit posts is occasionally is creepy but having an entire sub-Reddit devoted to stalking someone who critiques a game you like is not. Yeah, go figure.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 03:58 |
|
D_Smart posted:We're working through it. Had a legal meeting today discussing some things (the arbitration clause which they've only just figured out how to get around). Also have a meeting with the AG of two States next week.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 03:59 |
|
Ragequit posted:And what exactly have they done wrong that is illegal? They made a video game. It's not very good yet, and it was made in the most inefficient way humanly possible, but it's still a game. I am just curious what the exact grounds for this lawsuit are that calls for meetings with AGs in different states. Your demands before (I assume you are referring to your release financials/these people resign/whatever blog post) were not a "chance to do the right thing," they were demands fueled by your ego boner.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:03 |
The game didn't get finished because of D_Smart and the loving goons! It is their fault! *goes online and tries to hire a professional assassin and is arrested by the FBI*
|
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:03 |
|
Emotions running high
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:07 |
|
Unless they're in wheelchairs so I guess just rolling hard.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:10 |
|
So, how's the PTU patch? What changed?
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:10 |
|
Ok so it's nothing as usual. Good to know. "Yes, Florida Attorney General office? I'd like to schedule a meeting. It's about a video game that wronged me."
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:10 |
|
Ragequit posted:And what exactly have they done wrong that is illegal? They made a video game. It's not very good yet, and it was made in the most inefficient way humanly possible, but it's still a game. I am just curious what the exact grounds for this lawsuit are that calls for meetings with AGs in different states. Your demands before (I assume you are referring to your release financials/these people resign/whatever blog post) were not a "chance to do the right thing," they were demands fueled by your ego boner. Source your quotes
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:11 |
|
Ragequit posted:"Yes, Florida Attorney General office? I'd like to schedule a meeting. It's about a video game that wronged me."
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:11 |
|
. . . . . . . . . Karl's creepiness is one of the main reasons Bootcha isn't posting much these days.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:11 |
|
I'd be ok with not getting my $65 back if that lawsuit provides me with $65 of entertainment. As much as I'd like them to be successful and make a solid game, schadenfreude is just fine.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:13 |
|
Dusty Lens posted:Unless they're in wheelchairs so I guess just rolling hard. Let's see if you are a psychic What's that limp biscuit song I am thinking of?
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:13 |
|
fuzzknot posted:. . . Don't let them win!
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:14 |
|
Have I, in any of the Star Citizen threads, said that Cloud Imperium Gaming is an unbelievably stupid loving name? Because Cloud Imperium Gaming is an unbelievably stupid loving name.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:17 |
|
Omi-Polari posted:Google: Washington v. Altius. That was actually pretty interesting, but it looks like the group just took the money and ran, offering not a single product nor returns. Quite a bit different here. I know some people have gotten items like the crappy mugs and jackets - are there still items undelivered? The only real problem I can see so far is the issue with refunds taking a long time. That is definitely not good, but I don't know if it's exactly illegal.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:17 |
|
Ragequit posted:They made a tech demo. It's not very stable yet, and it was made in the most hilarious way humanely possible, but it's still a tech demo. FTFY Until there are actual goals, a story, some way to win, etc. this "game" is and shall remain a demo.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:18 |
|
ALL-PRO SEXMAN posted:Have I, in any of the Star Citizen threads, said that Cloud Imperium Gaming is an unbelievably stupid loving name? Agreed, it is very misleading. They should have called themselves No Game gently caress It Lets Sell Jpegs
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:19 |
|
Ragequit posted:And what exactly have they done wrong that is illegal? They made a video game. It's not very good yet, and it was made in the most inefficient way humanly possible, but it's still a game. I am just curious what the exact grounds for this lawsuit are that calls for meetings with AGs in different states. Your demands before (I assume you are referring to your release financials/these people resign/whatever blog post) were not a "chance to do the right thing," they were demands fueled by your ego boner. For someone who literally only posts in this thread to call out Derek Smart, its kind of amazing you still don't know what he's claiming to base his lawsuit on.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:19 |
|
peter gabriel posted:Derek's going to put it all in his next blog
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:20 |
|
G0RF posted:I hope Derek will consult us on a suitably bombastic blog title for this next. The various sequels of "Interstellar" having started to feel a bit worn out. This bunch of Clownshoes Tried Making A Game, What Happened Next Will Leave You Breathless...
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:22 |
|
fuzzknot posted:. . . This explains a lot. And yeah, his weird vendetta against Bootcha basically killed any possibility of me having any sympathy whatsoever for that fucko.
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:23 |
peter gabriel posted:This bunch of Clownshoes Tried Making A Game, What Happened Next Will Leave You Breathless... Congratulations, you've won a lawsuit!
|
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:24 |
|
Ragequit posted:That was actually pretty interesting, but it looks like the group just took the money and ran, offering not a single product nor returns. Quite a bit different here. I know some people have gotten items like the crappy mugs and jackets - are there still items undelivered? The only real problem I can see so far is the issue with refunds taking a long time. That is definitely not good, but I don't know if it's exactly illegal. Chris Roberts will call you up tomorrow and say, "Ragequit, the end of November 2015 is only a week away and I originally promised in our TOS to release financials by that date if the game was not fully released. I need your advice, should I release CIG's financials on Dec 1, 2015? If no, why not?" How do you respond?
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:24 |
|
|
# ? Apr 23, 2024 17:48 |
|
Google Butt posted:Congratulations, you've won a lawsuit! Shoot The Monkey To Buy A Jpeg
|
# ? Nov 24, 2015 04:25 |