|
Derek, if you had a Limit Break (see video below) what would you name it? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2xtggrMFWo i.e "Smart Bomb".
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 02:02 |
|
|
peter gabriel posted:This bunch of Clownshoes Tried Making A Game, What Happened Next Will Leave You Breathless... 5 Gamebreaking bugs Derek Smart doesn't want you to know about, #3 will astound you!
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:27
|
|
|
Warcabbit posted:So, how's the PTU patch? What changed? People are still getting frequent crashes, but the option to go straight from the menu to the Crusader station without needing to go through the hangar speeds things up at least.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:27
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:FTFY I've heard the goal is to kill you, chief.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:28
|
|
|
Raticus79 posted:People are still getting frequent crashes, but the option to go straight from the menu to the Crusader station without needing to go through the hangar speeds things up at least. lol.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:30
|
|
|
Game Publishers Hate Him! Chris Roberts Shares 5 Marketing Secrets!
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:32
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:Don't let them win! I think there has been enough self-ownage at this point that no matter what happens, they will never win anyway. Like I told Bootcha, there's really no point in wasting time on it when the truth will come out sooner or later.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:33
|
|
|
T.G. Xarbala posted:This explains a lot. Hmm, yes; it is pretty disturbing. It's starting to take on an uncomfortable resemblance to a stalking incident I experienced a while back. That said, perhaps I should have added to my earlier post: Hi, Karl. I'm a lot meaner than Bootcha and a lot less likely to be forgiving if you gently caress up. Don't gently caress up.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:36
|
|
|
fuzzknot posted:I think there has been enough self-ownage at this point that no matter what happens, they will never win anyway. Like I told Bootcha, there's really no point in wasting time on it when the truth will come out sooner or later. True, and it's always worth remembering - this goes to everyone here - these people reported their own images and got them removed from Imgur  We need to never forget that one small but hilarious thing.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:36
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:True, and it's always worth remembering - this goes to everyone here - these people reported their own images and got them removed from Imgur 
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:38
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:38
|
|
|
Derek, Krazy Karl is waiting for your lawsuit so he can apply his Nazi accounting subliminal messaging to counteract your lawsuit. don't let this peaceful world go into the hands of a Nazi Accountant
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:38
|
|
|
http://youtu.be/jo85N7P5UeQ Latest 10 for the producers Skip to 8:20. What are you most proud of? Delivering on time, emotes.. The second guys answer is the best thing ever. Like truly fantastic. 
ZenMaster fucked around with this message at 04:41 on Nov 24, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:40
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:True, and it's always worth remembering - this goes to everyone here - these people reported their own images and got them removed from Imgur . . . Yeah, that's true; I probably don't have anything to worry about. gently caress it. The self-ownage is bound to prevail.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:45
|
|
|
A Neurotic Jew posted:For someone who literally only posts in this thread to call out Derek Smart, its kind of amazing you still don't know what he's claiming to base his lawsuit on. Between the regular goon shitposts and Derek's shitposts it's hard to keep up when I pop in every other day or so. I don't read his blog posts or Reddit, so this thread is it. I honestly can't remember. I see lots of "You'll see!" "They'll rue the day!" huffing and puffing, but cannot recall a "I am taking them to court over this" post that is succinct and doesn't repeat itself or link to literal thousands of words blog posts. RuckusRouser posted:Chris Roberts will call you up tomorrow and say, "Ragequit, the end of November 2015 is only a week away and I originally promised in our TOS to release financials by that date if the game was not fully released. I need your advice, should I release CIG's financials on Dec 1, 2015? If no, why not?" Does the TOS actually say financials will be released by Dec 2015 if no game is out by then? Because if so, that's amazing. But then there is the whole argument over what is and isn't a game with a jury of peers, and that sounds like a nightmare.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:46
|
|
|
Ragequit posted:Does the TOS actually say financials will be released by Dec 2015 if no game is out by then? Because if so, that's amazing. But then there is the whole argument over what is and isn't a game with a jury of peers, and that sounds like a nightmare. "ToS v1.1 of 08/29/13" posted:IV. Charges & Billing
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:49
|
|
|
Ragequit posted:Does the TOS actually say financials will be released by Dec 2015 if no game is out by then? Because if so, that's amazing. But then there is the whole argument over what is and isn't a game with a jury of peers, and that sounds like a nightmare. I never thought anything, or anyone, would ever challenge Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing to define just what a game actually is. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:50
|
|
|
neonbregna posted:Please post the screenshot I am so close right now  IT CAN BE COMMON.  It's already past 30 days. I'll keep sending emails.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:52
|
|
|
Ragequit posted:Between the regular goon shitposts and Derek's shitposts it's hard to keep up when I pop in every other day or so. I don't read his blog posts or Reddit, so this thread is it. I honestly can't remember. I see lots of "You'll see!" "They'll rue the day!" huffing and puffing, but cannot recall a "I am taking them to court over this" post that is succinct and doesn't repeat itself or link to literal thousands of words blog posts. I think any dramatic lawsuits, etc., will have to wait till well after the end of this month, and even at that, I'm sure it won't be nearly the level of drama everyone seems to expect. Most likely it will be a bunch of tedious bullshit and technicalities and nothing will come of it except maybe people will be able to get refunds more easily. I would like to think that crowdfunding legislation would result, at least because of the dollar amount involved, but I don't think it's enough of a high profile case to warrant even that.  That said, I will be very surprised if no one goes to jail over this.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:54
|
|
|
Ragequit posted:Does the TOS actually say financials will be released by Dec 2015 if no game is out by then? Because if so, that's amazing. But then there is the whole argument over what is and isn't a game with a jury of peers, and that sounds like a nightmare. I believe so since the lawsuit is based on the TOS, which have been held up in civil court. The product is the game as promised, which hasn't been released. I think they have a responsibility to show where the money has gone. $90 Million+ for a tech demo is unacceptable. Also CIG will prevent this lawsuit from going forward with every breath, they'll collapse before this even goes to court. Dapper Dan fucked around with this message at 04:57 on Nov 24, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:54
|
|
|
Dapper Dan posted:I believe so since the lawsuit is based on the TOS, which have been held up in civil court. The product is the game as promised, which hasn't been released. I think they have a responsibility to show where the money has gone. $90 Million+ for a tech demo is unacceptable. Bare minimum, unjust enrichment should be easy to prove.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:57
|
|
|
spacetoaster posted:
Pro Hint: Sometimes customer support lies to you.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:58
|
|
|
Dapper Dan posted:I believe so since the lawsuit is based on the TOS, which have been held up in civil court. The product is the game as promised, which hasn't been released. I think they have a responsibility to show where the money has gone. $90 Million+ for a tech demo is unacceptable. Well that makes more sense then, but ultimately sounds pretty boring with all of this announced buildup and bluster. I would be genuinely curious to see where the exact line is between tech demo and game, and how that conclusion is reached. Like fuzz mentioned, I see absolutely nothing coming from this except a tied up legal system, wasted money from both the prosecution and defense, and if everyone is very lucky, some new crowdfunding rules years down the road.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 05:01
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:Pro Hint:
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 05:04
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:If you back SC you own 2 things:
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 05:04
|
|
|
Ragequit posted:Well that makes more sense then, but ultimately sounds pretty boring with all of this announced buildup and bluster. I would be genuinely curious to see where the exact line is between tech demo and game, and how that conclusion is reached. Like fuzz mentioned, I see absolutely nothing coming from this except a tied up legal system, wasted money from both the prosecution and defense, and if everyone is very lucky, some new crowdfunding rules years down the road. Star Citizen 2.0 is a proof of concept you show to publishers to get your game funded. Only this time there are no evil publishers.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 05:05
|
|
|
Reposting for posterity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGRsEF953n0
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 05:10
|
|
|
Star Citizen isn't about making a game, it's about sending a 
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 05:10
|
|
|
fuzzknot posted:That said, I will be very surprised if no one goes to jail over this.  Hey Karl? gently caress right the hell off.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 05:11
|
|
|
no_recall posted:Star Citizen 2.0 is a proof of concept you show to publishers to get your game funded. Exactly, but if it should (it won't) go to court, CIG lawyers just have to prove to some average [state] jurors that what they are seeing in exhibit A/B/C/infinity is actually a game, which doesn't sound like it'll take all that much convincing to do.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 05:12
|
|
|
Ragequit posted:Well that makes more sense then, but ultimately sounds pretty boring with all of this announced buildup and bluster. I would be genuinely curious to see where the exact line is between tech demo and game, and how that conclusion is reached. Like fuzz mentioned, I see absolutely nothing coming from this except a tied up legal system, wasted money from both the prosecution and defense, and if everyone is very lucky, some new crowdfunding rules years down the road. it's very possible that chris roberts used backer money for dumbass poo poo beyond $20k coffee machines for which he should be shamed.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 05:13
|
|
|
Does the DickWulf have any IRL friends that he didn't buy? https://twitter.com/CaptainZyloh/status/668895051733336064
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 05:13
|
|
|
Transcribing this while I wait for it to finish downloading because I couldn't find a version online anywhere: 2.0b Patch Notes
Returning to the hangar from Crusader crashes the client Gameplay
Fixes
Arena Commander Module Fixes
Social Module/Persistent Universe Fixes
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 05:13
|
|
|
Patch for 2.0 dropped a few hours ago. Stability not enhanced. That is all.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 05:13
|
|
|
no_recall posted:Star Citizen 2.0 is a proof of concept you show to white knights to sell more jpeg spaceships.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 05:14
|
|
|
Sarsapariller posted:Approaching the atmosphere of a planet or moon too closely will result in your ship receiving a warning, and if you continue flying toward it for too long, your ship will begin to rattle apart and be destroyed. Freelancer 1.3 is looking really good.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 05:15
|
|
|
A Neurotic Jew posted:
 Bootcha bought me that avatar, a quote from my first post in this thread, for a reason.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 05:17
|
|
|
Ragequit posted:Exactly, but if it should (it won't) go to court, CIG lawyers just have to prove to some average [state] jurors that what they are seeing in exhibit A/B/C/infinity is actually a game, which doesn't sound like it'll take all that much convincing to do. Yeah, I think this is the case with the sudden abrupt move into "alpha". the Jury doesn't care if it's "prealpha", "alpha", "beta" whatever. All that matters is we can purchase, login and play. In this promised 16 player instanced world where you can, board your ship, fly with your friends, do missions, jump in and out of your ship, and has 1 million km square of play space. And that's what matters, in context CR did achieve what he set out to do; you can argue with the points Derek has raised up but I don't think he has much to stand on. Unless Derek can prove us wrong.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 05:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 02:02 |
|
|
Ragequit posted:Exactly, but if it should (it won't) go to court, CIG lawyers just have to prove to some average [state] jurors that what they are seeing in exhibit A/B/C/infinity is actually a game, which doesn't sound like it'll take all that much convincing to do. Maybe the average layperson won't know anything about games, but mis-managing funds is very different. "Why did Sandi need several tens of thousands of dollars to travel, go on vacation, finance her 'acting' career, etc?"
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 05:19
|
|