|
CapitalistPig posted:I'm not scurrying anywhere, we have a claimed 3p and we are more likely to hit town right now if we lynch anyone but jake, statistically, we need to lynch Jake. Statistically speaking we're also gonna all die all day so why try to hit scum when it's all in a futile attempt to escape our fear of death and the oppresion of the bourgeoisie
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 07:46 |
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:I'm not scurrying anywhere, we have a claimed 3p and we are more likely to hit town right now if we lynch anyone but jake, statistically, we need to lynch Jake. I think we've had a miscommunication
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:48
|
|
|
i think lynching scum would be ideal imho if you really think about it
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:49
|
|
|
imho
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:49
|
|
|
HiipFire posted:rude ##doubledown CPig I don't know hiip. The strangest thing is his voting 2nd on Jake after the survivor claim. It was straight policy and ignored anything that followed. His Ecco opinions seem sound and honest and my meta of pig would place him as town here. Looking over Tommunist again still like my case and feel like he was trying to build to a vote on Kash since it doesn't seem like a natural opinion.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:49
|
|
|
We should lynch tommunist
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:51
|
|
|
Statistically speaking Tommunist is 100% scum 90% of the time, we pretty much have no choice but to lynch him
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:51
|
|
|
I took statistics 2 twice, you can count on my numbers
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:52
|
|
|
Pig literally only said that he thought ecco wasn't scum this game, I can't really get much of a read at all from that
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:53
|
|
|
So at least me and hiip will be gone super soon. Tommunist said he won't come back and I think Ecco said the same thing. A Hammer would require the Jake voters to move to tommunist and/or kash. Or, and which is more likely having Kash, Asiina, and/or Opop (or Jake I guess) vote Jake. Kash will. Is asiina around or willing? Or Opop? I ask only because I don't want a no-execution because I fell asleep. I hate when that happens. Still do re-consider moving to Tommunist! I mean ok it's lovely since he isn't around to defend himself now that I think about it but still. What would scum have to say that we'd want to consider?
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:53
|
|
|
There seem to be four people who aren't going to move from JakeP: Me, CPig, Keane and Taste. There are two people who aren't going to be around for the deadline: Tomm and Ecco. That makes 6 out of the 13 players who aren't moving their votes. So it's possible that that someone else could be lynched, but it's highly unlikely.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:54
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Still do re-consider moving to Tommunist! I mean ok it's lovely since he isn't around to defend himself now that I think about it but still. What would scum have to say that we'd want to consider? Wow this is a loaded statement.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:55
|
|
|
HiipFire posted:Pig literally only said that he thought ecco wasn't scum this game, I can't really get much of a read at all from that I'm looking at the way it was said. It feels like he thought about it, scum wouldn't have to think about it since they already know, and he could just say gut feeling. But there's reasonable thought behind his idea. Also try as I'd like his vote patterns aren't super weird. He starts the joke-turbo so it doesn't seem that opportunistic and his vote Jake is super policy but he gets on early not knowing that'd pick up momentum either.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:55
|
|
|
yeah thats fine i guess 100 I'm still not 100% sold on this tomm case rn let me reread em
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:57
|
|
|
I kinda wanna vote 100 after that statement I highlighted
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:58
|
|
|
I mean not today obviously because that would be a waste, but tomorrow!
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:59
|
|
|
##vote Tommunist I guess I was just giving him too much credit on that weird leap of logic this is fine
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:00
|
|
|
HiipFire posted:Statistically speaking we're also gonna all die all day so why try to hit scum when it's all in a futile attempt to escape our fear of death and the oppresion of the bourgeoisie Man I told you not to take that philosophy 101 class
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:00
|
|
|
Could you walk me through what makes it loaded?
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:00
|
|
|
I'll vote either Jake or Tommunist since I think they're both but have a strong preference for Jake and am keeping my vote there for now. I'll switch to avoid a no-lynch if need be. To me the case on Jake (specifically over Tomm) is - Tomm is either town or scum, Jake is either 3P or scum - If Tomm isn't scum, he could be a town PR and mislynching him would be a Strong Misplay - If Jake isn't scum, we still take out someone who might help scum out down the road - "college dropout" sounds like a scum role more than a survivor role in a college-flavored game
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:01
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Still do re-consider moving to Tommunist! I mean ok it's lovely since he isn't around to defend himself now that I think about it but still. What would scum have to say that we'd want to consider? This right here. It's like "wow golly sure is lame he won't be around but he's 100% scum so who cares right?" It's very leading and trying to make it sound like the tomm case is open and shut and that puts me on edge.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:02
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:This right here. It's like "wow golly sure is lame he won't be around but he's 100% scum so who cares right?" It's very leading and trying to make it sound like the tomm case is open and shut and that puts me on edge. I actually agree with this point fwiw. Based on other peoples' posts I'm feeling like Tomm is town that scum identified as the easiest person to scapegoat.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:06
|
|
|
Im gonna go sleep i think also my hands smell like onions and its loving weird
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:06
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:This right here. It's like "wow golly sure is lame he won't be around but he's 100% scum so who cares right?" It's very leading and trying to make it sound like the tomm case is open and shut and that puts me on edge. I was trying to be flippantly humorous but that's fair. I'm not the funniest of people. Murmur Twin posted:I'll vote either Jake or Tommunist since I think they're both but have a strong preference for Jake and am keeping my vote there for now. I'll switch to avoid a no-lynch if need be. Honestly you Jake voters have good reason to vote him. Only thing I can say is that we can take care of Jake at any time since he's a (well-enough) known entity. The main thing I have against my case is that Tommunist isn't here to clear anything up. I'd feel awful if he was a power role and we just killed him. It's very reasonable argument to make. Yet ultimately I like standing by my own cases when I can and I do stand by this case.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:06
|
|
|
HiipFire posted:Im gonna go sleep i think Did you cut onions? It usually sticks if you do. Also so what's the final count on that numbers run? Are there enough people to avoid a no-execution one way or the other? I should go to bed, but feeling responsibility here is gonna make that bit tough.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:07
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Did you cut onions? It usually sticks if you do. its cool we got this, good night!
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:08
|
|
|
##unvote
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:08
|
|
|
I forgot the smell sticks around for so long since I made dinner like 8 hours ago
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:10
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Honestly you Jake voters have good reason to vote him. Only thing I can say is that we can take care of Jake at any time since he's a (well-enough) known entity. I feel like it's as open-and-shut as they come yet we don't seem to be able to pull it off. How potentially losing two town will make it any easier D2?
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:11
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:I feel like it's as open-and-shut as they come yet we don't seem to be able to pull it off. How potentially losing two town will make it any easier D2? Makes the chance of hitting scum statistically higher
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:16
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Honestly you Jake voters have good reason to vote him. Only thing I can say is that we can take care of Jake at any time since he's a (well-enough) known entity. Explain to me again the part where you'd feel awful taking out a town PR but refuse to switch your vote to someone who is, at best, slightly worse than VT? Right now my money is on a Jake/100 scumteam.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:19
|
|
|
Sorry for the late deadline guys. It'll be earlier next time. If I fall asleep before hammer please be patient. I'll be up bright and early to post the flip!
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:21
|
|
|
JakeP posted:i think lynching scum would be ideal imho if you really think about it Ok so who is definitely 100% scum then? because yes that would be ideal. You know as well as I that you can't say with 100% accuracy that you have found scum. In the absence of a sure fire scum hit, the survivor is the next logical conclusion.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:34
|
|
|
Can we please just lynch JakeP? Nobody else is viable at this point since Ecco and Tomm aren't going to be here and are voting Kash.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:43
|
|
|
##vote jake sorry bud
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:44
|
|
|
I really hope Asiina or Opop comes in and hammers since Ecco and Tomm aren't going to be here and I think 100 years and Hiip are now gone too.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:50
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I really hope Asiina or Opop comes in and hammers since Ecco and Tomm aren't going to be here and I think 100 years and Hiip are now gone too.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 03:13
|
|
|
it bothers me that 100 said they would switch and didn't. Or at least implied they would
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 03:17
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:it bothers me that 100 said they would switch and didn't. Or at least implied they would I was thinking the same thing. Also that Hiip just flat out refused to vote for a claimed 3P.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 03:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 07:46 |
|
|
I'm here! Good thing for getting antsy and drinking too much water before bed. ##vote JakeP
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 03:23
|
|