|
Asiina posted:Anyway, why Ernie? Because of the way the vote momentum swung after [url=http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3753141&pagenumber=7&perpage=40#post453511490]this votefinder post[/b]. Ernie was one of the vote leaders, but then there was a super fast swing onto Vimes predicated on, well, not much of anything. However, Ernie wasn't leading the charge and hopped on the vote after having nothing to say about him previously, and after saying that you and BK were his top scum picks.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 01:51 |
|
|
# ? Mar 29, 2024 02:08 |
|
EXAKT Science posted:Because of the way the vote momentum swung after this votefinder post. Ernie was one of the vote leaders, but then there was a super fast swing onto Vimes predicated on, well, not much of anything. However, Ernie wasn't leading the charge and hopped on the vote after having nothing to say about him previously, and after saying that you and BK were his top scum picks. fixed link
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 01:53 |
|
did we ever get a final votecount for day 1?
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 01:53 |
|
Exakt should I eat you y/n/m
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 01:57 |
|
CCKeane posted:Exakt should I eat you y/n/m depends. do you want a snack with a tasty kick?
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 01:58 |
|
EXAKT Science posted:Because of the way the vote momentum swung after [url=http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3753141&pagenumber=7&perpage=40#post453511490]this votefinder post[/b]. Ernie was one of the vote leaders, but then there was a super fast swing onto Vimes predicated on, well, not much of anything. However, Ernie wasn't leading the charge and hopped on the vote after having nothing to say about him previously, and after saying that you and BK were his top scum picks. This is more thought than I have put into anything this whole game. ##vote ernie.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 01:59 |
|
EXAKT Science posted:depends. do you want a snack with a tasty kick? EAT THEM FROM THE OVEN OR THE MICROWAVE. THINK ABOUT ALL THE TIME YOU SAVE.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 02:10 |
|
Jimson posted:This is more thought than I have put into anything this whole game. Scumhunting. It's literally all we have. But is it any good?
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 02:11 |
|
BottleKnight posted:EAT THEM FROM THE OVEN OR THE MICROWAVE. THINK ABOUT ALL THE TIME YOU SAVE. Totino's? Totino's! How did you know??
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 02:11 |
|
BottleKnight posted:Scumhunting. It's literally all we have. But is it any good? depends if you are a scum, i think
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 02:11 |
|
hmmmmmm
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 02:21 |
|
EXAKT Science posted:depends. do you want a snack with a tasty kick? SCUM CLAIM RIGHT HERE.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 02:23 |
|
CCKeane posted:SCUM CLAIM RIGHT HERE. go on
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 02:24 |
|
BottleKnight posted:go on yes please do
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 02:28 |
|
Thats exactly what Exakt would say if they were scum
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 02:48 |
|
Therefore it is a scum claim. That's a little thing called logic.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 02:48 |
|
keane we go through this song and dance every single game
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 02:52 |
|
also you are obviously a scum for not wanting to eat a delicious totino's pizza roll
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 02:53 |
|
CCKeane posted:Therefore it is a scum claim. That's a little thing called logic.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 02:57 |
|
SamVimes is scum IMO. It's entirely meta, but most of the time that he plays he tries to piece the game together in whatever ways make sense to him. Here he's being careful, critical and very very reserved. He is having none of our frivolity. I think he is scum. ##vote SSV
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:00 |
|
EXAKT Science posted:keane we go through this song and dance every single game Yeah but some of our games are couples.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:15 |
|
EXAKT Science posted:Because of the way the vote momentum swung after [url=http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3753141&pagenumber=7&perpage=40#post453511490]this votefinder post[/b]. Ernie was one of the vote leaders, but then there was a super fast swing onto Vimes predicated on, well, not much of anything. However, Ernie wasn't leading the charge and hopped on the vote after having nothing to say about him previously, and after saying that you and BK were his top scum picks. "ernie is scum because other people voted sirsamvines"? what? Jimson posted:This is more thought than I have put into anything this whole game. ##vote jimson my vote won't be moving, it's to rid this game of lovely attitudes and i will die on this hill
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:33 |
|
Ernie. posted:"ernie is scum because other people voted sirsamvines"? Nice misrepresentation of my case there Ernie.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:33 |
|
EXAKT Science posted:Nice misrepresentation of my case there Ernie. haha i'm being trolled and it's not by cckeane, this is a new feeling
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:35 |
|
i was one of the vote-leaders but there were others, including bottleknight. what makes me scum but him not based on the vote swing?
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:36 |
|
Ernie. posted:i was one of the vote-leaders but there were others, including bottleknight. what makes me scum but him not based on the vote swing? I didn't say that. You also were pretty strong on his being scum yesterday. Have you cooled on that for some reason?
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:37 |
|
EXAKT Science posted:I didn't say that. You also were pretty strong on his being scum yesterday. Have you cooled on that for some reason? no, but it doesn't matter because the context of the game's state matters more yesterday i voted ssv and made it clear i was voting them on principle because i want to get the game going. same with my vote today on jimson. if that seems lovely to you, then call it that. but there's no need to invent 'scumhunting reasoning' to put a vote on me.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:39 |
|
Ernie. posted:no, but it doesn't matter because the context of the game's state matters more I'm not inventing anything. I saw a shift in momentum and called it out.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:41 |
|
and before you say 'i didn't invent anything' i want you to read your own 'case' and tell me if it, made by someone else, makes any sense at all to a reasonable reader you lose track halfway through your own case and start going down a completely different line of reasoning. that doesn't read like a case coming out of actual critical thought, but a case someone just wanted to throw down Just Because
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:41 |
|
EXAKT Science posted:I'm not inventing anything. I saw a shift in momentum and called it out. a shift in momentum not led by me is absolutely worthless in every. single. universe. where. rational. thought. exists. If Ernie is scum, then people helping him to shift momentum must be scum. Therefore, Go after Ernie???? That's circular, self-fulfilling reasoning.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:42 |
|
EXAKT Science posted:I'm not inventing anything. Ernie. posted:and before you say 'i didn't invent anything' i'm just the best at mafia
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:43 |
|
I mostly glossed over Exakt's case but the reasoning seems genuine to me.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:49 |
|
Here's what I saw. Other people voted Vimes, you hopped onto the vote after it had started to pick up momentum, you justify it post facto by saying it's a policy vote based on his lurkiness. There's also this post from your exchange with Asiina:Ernie. posted:okay, if ssv doesn't gain traction Why not just vote BK in the first place, when he's already a voteleader, and already someone you're reading as scum. Hopping onto the newly formed Vimes bandwagon doesn't make sense if you actually believe BK is scum.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:51 |
|
BottleKnight posted:I mostly glossed over Exakt's case but the reasoning seems genuine to me. I didn't say his reasoning was fake more that the motivation for that post is not scumhunting.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:54 |
|
EXAKT Science posted:Here's what I saw. Other people voted Vimes, you hopped onto the vote after it had started to pick up momentum, you justify it post facto by saying it's a policy vote based on his lurkiness. There's also this post from your exchange with Asiina: Momentum. In that moment votes on ssv counted for more. Again, my play makes sense in context of the game's state, not in context of the content in it. I.e. anything that gets activity going.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:55 |
|
Ernie. posted:I didn't say his reasoning was fake more that the motivation for that post is not scumhunting. so he's not scum, just dumb? is that your point? I know I'm boiling it down but I only look for fake posts when ~scumhunting~
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:57 |
|
I still think bk is scum and I'd put a vote there. Unfortunately jimson is checked out of this game and I don't want that kind of low effort around. If I wanted to hop a bandwagon I could have gone either way. If momentum shifted off me because I'm scum, it makes no sense for it not to shift to bk who was also a vote leader at the time unless you're saying both bk and I are scum in which case all the scum must be involved in this one hail Mary move at the end of a quiet d1.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:58 |
|
jesus bk is not scum so get off his case ernie, jeez
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:59 |
|
BottleKnight posted:so he's not scum, just dumb? is that your point? I know I'm boiling it down but I only look for fake posts when ~scumhunting~ I didn't say they are dumb. I think exakt is very smart which is why I don't think they'd make this kind of sloppy case unless they wanted to make a case to either get the game going or me talking or me out of the game or whatever.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 03:59 |
|
|
# ? Mar 29, 2024 02:08 |
|
Ernie. posted:to either get the game going or me talking or me out of the game or whatever. ERGO
|
# ? Dec 8, 2015 04:01 |