|
Real question: 100 years, would you also volunteer to be the D1 lynch?
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2016 23:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 22:53 |
|
|
Birdstrike posted:This is a good read I would vote gamer. I disagree. He just called D1s "pot luck" but then said someone acting "unconfident" in his D1 vote pinged him. Weird.
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2016 23:51
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:Real question: 100 years, would you also volunteer to be the D1 lynch? This is dumb as the two are not the same
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2016 23:53
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:This is dumb as the two are not the same I think he should be the one to answer me......
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2016 23:53
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:I disagree. He just called D1s "pot luck" but then said someone acting "unconfident" in his D1 vote pinged him. Weird. primarily pot luck he's saying "oh this is super scummy, I'm going to vote, can someone confirm this is scummy for me" the core part of my message is own your vote and make your own arguments don't rely on others to do it for you.
|
|
#
?
Jan 8, 2016 23:54
|
|
|
tithin posted:In my experience hitting a scum day one is pot luck tithin posted:primarily pot luck tithin posted:he's saying "oh this is super scummy, I'm going to vote, can someone confirm this is scummy for me" Gamerofthegame posted:This pings me real bad for some reason, I dunno. I need time to think on it, but Ridonkulous going full ham on Ixt and then letting go without ceremony after it's obvious no one is jumping in, yet spending so much time in the circlejerk.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 00:06
|
|
|
Okay
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 00:09
|
|
|
tithin posted:Okay What I mean is, he wrote Gamerofthegame posted:I DON'T LIKE IT I'M AMBIVALENT SEND HELP Which seems like the exact opposite of calling someone is "super scummy", which was your read. So either you are faking an opinion or you need to explain better to me what you saw here that I didn't!
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 00:17
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:Real question: 100 years, would you also volunteer to be the D1 lynch? What's the point of this question?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 00:23
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:Which seems like the exact opposite of calling someone is "super scummy", which was your read. So either you are faking an opinion or you need to explain better to me what you saw here that I didn't! Then we have conflicting reads, because I don't read ambivalence there, I'm looking at someone whos trying to have someone else justify his vote. As for your continued usage of "super scummy" as a method of diminishing my read, I'll remind you that he has specifically said quote:##vote Ridonkulous the most scummy right now with this argument I guess but I dunno I really would like a ~~~second opinion~~~ Maybe "super" was a bit of an overexageration, but it's how I type, and it's what I took from his post.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 00:26
|
|
|
Podima posted:What's the point of this question?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 00:31
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:To determine 100years's alignment. After he answers I'm going to be curious how you're planning to parse both the one he picks and the one he didn't pick, because I don't get your train of thought
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
Oh hey, my internet is back. Neat.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 00:38
|
|
|
Viva that post was extremely hedgy and I see where tithin is coming from. Your defense doesn't read all that genuine to me
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 00:46
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:Viva that post was extremely hedgy and I see where tithin is coming from. Your defense doesn't read all that genuine to me Do you read "hedgy" as scummy or just unsure?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 00:55
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:Viva that post was extremely hedgy and I see where tithin is coming from. Your defense doesn't read all that genuine to me Which post exacty? cause I wasn't defending anything, I was trying to illicit clarification to form a read on tithin.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:05
|
|
|
I think that's a scummy way to ask that question.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:06
|
|
|
I am good at ranged, dinky at melee, and have a decently useful home ability
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:07
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:Which post exacty? The post tithin was casing him for
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:07
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:I think that's a scummy way to ask that question. This is at donk, for the record.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:08
|
|
|
nah that vote is actually me being unsure, with the subject (at the time) rubbing me the wrong way but I wasn't one hundred percent on it and was prompting a few people to weigh in or not with their opinion on it. Just letting it go felt after being so stubborn felt super weird to me and just taking the easy way out after a failed tunneling. The vote has been solidified with later posting. you can't both give someone poo poo for hedging and then give them poo poo for putting a vote down but with a shadow of a doubt as if everyone is going to go "yeah 100% scum right here" on every encounter, lol. That said please explain how it's a lovely reason. Person goes ham trying to stir poo poo immediately D1 and then lets it go after it's obvious no one is going to jump in it without comment or even bringing it up again, with they themselves having a flimsy and already explained away case yet still trying to noisily push it. That is not a lovely reason imo, but the dilemma was if it was just lovely towning or trying to tunnel someone hard.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:08
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:To determine 100years's alignment. You're dumb and I can't wait to hear the dumb alignment rationale here
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:18
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:This is at donk, for the record. I was just looking for clarification, but you have a soft trigger finger.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:18
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:You're dumb and I can't wait to hear the dumb alignment rationale here
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:20
|
|
|
Ridonkulous posted:I was just looking for clarification, but you have a soft trigger finger. The framing of the question pinged me.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:27
|
|
|
This day sucked. I'll hopefully check in tonight after some relaxation, or tomorrow latest.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:30
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:This day sucked. I'll hopefully check in tonight after some relaxation, or tomorrow latest. Feel better, KB 
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:31
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:You're dumb and I can't wait to hear the dumb alignment rationale here Kash why you gotta be the rude cop to my awkward cop
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:31
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:This day sucked. I'll hopefully check in tonight after some relaxation, or tomorrow latest. you got plenty of time til deadline man 
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:36
|
|
|
Podima posted:Kash why you gotta be the rude cop to my awkward cop Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaave you met Kashuno?
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:41
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:That's basically my point, though. I'd expect a town TMM to case/engage me, if he indeed thinks I'm using faulty logic consistent with what scum does. Concluding "I don't know if MMT is scum" with no follow-up seems scummy to me. But again, why should I bother to engage/case you in a 25 person game when you're the only vote on me and a few people had called it out as a bad vote? You dropped a contentless vote on me and I rarely engage those unless there's already momentum on me. Just look here is your vote and immediate follow up: Murmur Twin posted:##vote TMM Murmur Twin posted:It's mostly meta and not something I want to specifically say at this point. I will definitely address it later. To me, it was plainly obvious what you were trying to do, so why should I bother to engage with it? Frankly, it's more fun to ignore it and watch you get bothered by it. You're essentially making meta argument against someone who has admitted that he likes to play with his own meta by bringing his scum tells into his town game instead of the other way around. As for me ending with I don't know if you're scum, it's just the truth. I think you are most likely town trying to make that play, but there is still the outside chance that you're scum and trying to get me to burn the thread down on D1. If there had been some follow up votes, I almost certainly would have had a different reaction. I'm still working on my scum reads, I tend to work a little slower in the bigger games and don't throw my vote around as much. Right now, I'm a bit suspicious of Exakt; I don't like that she is just sniping with her few posts and I especially don't like the way she has dropped shade on me. I'm a little curious about why diqnol included me in his catapult thoughts. He named me, Podima and Birdstrike as three people he is thinking about launching. Podima is who he is currently voting and Bird is one of the people who voted him last night (and he has said he thinks one of the votes on him is scum), but I'm not sure why I got included in the mix. However, I don't really know if I fully believe his claim, so I just let it go at the time. Also think it's curious that he left bowmore off his catapult list when he had earlier said that bowmore had the worst vote. While one of the votes on diqnol may be scum, I think it's more likely a scum bussing/distancing himself from diqnol. And now it's time to go finish Life is Strange.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:46
|
|
|
Doing a reread and this jumped out at me:Tommunist posted:Dear max, while i am not a battle beast, i can choose to join the battle even if you've picked an entire battalion, such is my need to kill the swamp shitters. This seems like a really powerful ability and I have no idea why you would just straight up claim that, turning a fight into 7 on 6 sounds like a big deal
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:51
|
|
|
##vote TMM
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:52
|
|
|
Max posted:I'm going to bed, please answer these questions for me to mull over and then give my opinion on later tomorrow: Doktor Per has contributed one joke vote and no actual content while trying to explicitly stay out of battle: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3759143&userid=111306 At this point I agree most with 100Yrs' vote on Doktor Per. ##vote Doktor Per Would also swap back to f_v for similar no-content reasons.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 01:57
|
|
|
Podima posted:Kash why you gotta be the rude cop to my awkward cop I'm here to chew gum and kill scum, and I'm all out of gum
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 02:00
|
|
|
Podima posted:Doktor Per has contributed one joke vote and no actual content while trying to explicitly stay out of battle: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3759143&userid=111306
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 02:01
|
|
|
Podima posted:Doing a reread and this jumped out at me: i mean like it would be if i wasn't poop
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 02:02
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:I assumed scum would prefer to be in battle. yeah scum in battle is basically another kill as far as I'm aware, granted they put themselves in danger. I don't think that's a scumtell in and of itself.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 02:02
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:This day sucked. I'll hopefully check in tonight after some relaxation, or tomorrow latest. Game is a game. Real life takes priority, fee better dude
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 02:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 22:53 |
|
|
BabeLiker90 posted:##vote TMM Love this vote. It feels like a preemptive vote so you can say I'm OMGUSing you.
|
|
#
?
Jan 9, 2016 02:03
|
|