|
This is amazing.
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 20:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 14, 2024 00:37 |
|
|
Hahhaaha WHAT WOULD THE REPUBLICANS HAVE DONE DIFFERENTLY?
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 20:18
|
|
|
Starshark posted:Hahhaaha WHAT WOULD THE REPUBLICANS HAVE DONE DIFFERENTLY? Carpet bomb the nation into a flat pile of rubble, I imagine.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 20:22
|
|
|
I'd just like everybody to pick their favorite face in this pile, and compare it with the before/after. Holy poo poo he didn't cagle it. Look at this beautiful pile of doodles. Drawn twice even though cut and paste exists. Amazing.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 20:25
|
|
|
Starshark posted:Hahhaaha WHAT WOULD THE REPUBLICANS HAVE DONE DIFFERENTLY? Killed everyone for freedom.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 20:33
|
|
|
Hah I was just doing that, you can even tell he starts to get tired of it on the fourth one. Everyone is spot-on too.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 20:35
|
|
|
Kakairo posted:It's Monday! What size is that Latté? Must be at least a Gigaventi if not a...  e: Oh god, I just noticed his pants!
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 20:40
|
|
Kelly is taking a bold stance ahead of the Iowa caucus...
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:Killed everyone for freedom. ToxicSlurpee posted:Carpet bomb the nation into a flat pile of rubble, I imagine. They had their chance under Bush. If it was an option, they'd have done it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 20:52
|
|
|
This is fantastic.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 21:06
|
|
|
Starshark posted:They had their chance under Bush. If it was an option, they'd have done it. The GOP was less bloodthirsty then and Bush was pushing for winning with positive thinking instead of what would actually accomplish anything. At the time Islamophobia hadn't taken root yet; now the GOP would push for a high-intensity war with a great deal of collateral damage. Then the strategy was lower-intensity faffing about rather than actual war.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 21:27
|
|
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:The GOP was less bloodthirsty then and Bush was pushing for winning with positive thinking instead of what would actually accomplish anything. At the time Islamophobia hadn't taken root yet; now the GOP would push for a high-intensity war with a great deal of collateral damage. Then the strategy was lower-intensity faffing about rather than actual war. Is that why they hired death squads and called them a surge?
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 21:32
|
|
|
quote:At the time Islamophobia hadn't taken root yet; LOL. How old were you when 9/11 happened?
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 21:33
|
|
|
I feel like it's gotten even worse. The idea of a republican candidate today saying that Islam is the religion of peace is laughable.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 21:40
|
|
|
W. Bush is an odd bird. He did indeed pay lip service to respecting Islam and Muslims in the wake of 9/11, but that of course never stopped him from surrounding himself entirely with neocons who thought of the Muslim world as a fun, bloody game of Risk. Which led to the odd internal paradigm for wingnuts circa 2004 that Bush Is Great President But Also Bush Terrible About Bombin' Them Muslims. Dr Cheeto posted:I feel like it's gotten even worse. The idea of a republican candidate today saying that Islam is the religion of peace is laughable. They don't really even try for the compassionate conservatism bullshit anymore. Before, in the case of a situation like the Syrian refugee crisis, various wingnut hacks and flacks would put out statements saying that we only want peaceful refugees, and by the way Muslims are somewhat inclined to not be peaceful. Nowadays? Christians only dammit.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 21:54
|
|
|
This is how Stantis would get banned from Freep.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 21:57
|
|
2
|
Garrison: quote:When the EPA ‘accidentally’ released 3 million gallons of toxic sludge from an abandoned mine, nobody went to jail. Yet when the Hammonds accidentally burned a miniscule amount of government land in Oregon, it was called ‘arson.’ They were convicted, but then Big Guv wanted a harsher sentence. A federal judge imposed the maximum sentence, thus violating the ‘double jeopardy’ clause in the Constitution. Kirschen:  quote:Kirschen's source (Gatestone institute)
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 22:14
|
|
|
Trogdos! posted:Garrison: ...because of the daily threats and attacks on refugee centers?
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 22:16
|
|
|
quote:Yet when the Hammonds accidentally burned a miniscule amount of government land in Oregon, it was called ‘arson.’ Ahahahahaha. Right.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 22:20
|
|
|
Trogdos! posted:Kirschen: the author of this comic wants us to side against the people in hiding, unlike the last time members of a religious minority all over germany feared for their safety
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 22:22
|
|
|
Krinkle posted:I'd just like everybody to pick their favorite face in this pile, and compare it with the before/after. Holy poo poo he didn't cagle it. Look at this beautiful pile of doodles. Drawn twice even though cut and paste exists. Amazing. All that great effort in support of a tepid and obvious gag.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 22:25
|
|
|
Flip Yr Wig posted:All that great effort in support of a tepid and obvious gag. With unnecessary labels, too! Him and Chris Riddell should form a gang.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 22:30
|
|
|
Trogdos! posted:Garrison: Garrison is too thick to understand the difference between the EPA and the BLM. Nice to know.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 22:34
|
|
|
Zeroisanumber posted:Garrison is too thick to understand the difference between the EPA and the BLM. Nice to know. Something something all federal agencies are but separate extensions of the ZOG/illuminati/etc something something *draws cartoon of menacing octopus-creature with limbs labelled "EPA, "BLM" and other agencies, in a fashion strongly resembling but still distinct from that of 1930s anti-Semites*
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 22:44
|
|
|
Ben Garrison posted:They were convicted, but then Big Guv wanted a harsher sentence. A federal judge imposed the maximum sentence, thus violating the ‘double jeopardy’ clause in the Constitution. Garrison has to be intentionally stupid. The Hammonds were not tried twice for the same crime. There was only one trial which convicted them of arson. No violation of double jeopardy. The problem was with the sentencing. In this case a sympathetic judge who had nothing to lose as it was his last case ever IGNORED the federal MINIMUM sentencing laws on arson and gave the Hammonds illegally short sentences. The feds appealed and the appeals court imposed the minimum sentence of 5 years. That's it. A case can be made that the 5 year minimum is too harsh but that's a matter for congress and they prefer to look though on crime rather than allow judges discretion in sentencing. Zeond fucked around with this message at 23:25 on Feb 1, 2016 |
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 23:20
|
|
|
Trogdos! posted:Kirschen: If you had no a-priori knowledge of Kirschen's opinions, what would you make of this toon? I mean, it's kinda childishly cute and funny. The people hiding are just little pairs of eyeballs. They don't seem either threatening or threatened, they just seem to be hiding for fun, like they're playing hide and seek with the reader. Seriously, what is the point Kirschen is trying to convey? I have no idea.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 23:32
|
|
|
Cat Mattress posted:If you had no a-priori knowledge of Kirschen's opinions, what would you make of this toon? They went into hiding because they're terrorists plotting secret plots in the dark. Beware the perfidious Musselman!
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 23:34
|
|
|
I just noticed the fancy pirate boots on Trump dad... is that a Kelly thing or a Trump-supporter thing? Rubio's the one getting stick for fancy boots with cuban heels, right?
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 23:46
|
|
|
Cat Mattress posted:Seriously, what is the point Kirschen is trying to convey? I have no idea. "Be afraid of the Muslim hordes hiding in your very neighborhoods!"
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 23:48
|
|
|
Ward Sutton did a thing:
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 23:50
|
|
|
D.N. Nation posted:W. Bush is an odd bird. He did indeed pay lip service to respecting Islam and Muslims in the wake of 9/11, but that of course never stopped him from surrounding himself entirely with neocons who thought of the Muslim world as a fun, bloody game of Risk. Which led to the odd internal paradigm for wingnuts circa 2004 that Bush Is Great President But Also Bush Terrible About Bombin' Them Muslims. At this point the Republican campaigns are just barely above open hate groups.
|
|
#
?
Feb 1, 2016 23:55
|
|
|
 1 2 3
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 00:04
|
|
|
Geostomp posted:At this point the Republican campaigns are just barely above open hate groups. They're open hate groups with the world's shiniest PR departments.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 00:13
|
|
|
hi, just popping in to say get hosed you concern trolling piece of poo poo, thanks, bye
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 00:19
|
|
|
Fulchrum posted:They're open hate groups with the world's shiniest PR departments. Good point. This is why Trump terrifies me. I know there's no chance in hell of him getting near the White House (we're not that far gone) but watching his hordes of supporters all but goose stepping out shows that mindless bigotry has become one of the largest draws in politics over the years. Hell, the KKK have written letters touting how his campaign really speaks to their values of "we hate anyone darker than beige". Cruz proves that nearly destroying the government will bring more support from them. Please go and chug a barrel of Flint water. McCoy and Gorrell can join if they want. Geostomp fucked around with this message at 00:39 on Feb 2, 2016 |
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 00:28
|
|
|
I agree, Payne. The EPA needs to have more funds, more personnel, more means, and more powers so that they could effectively monitor both the global issues and the local issues.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 00:39
|
|
|
Jay Rust posted:Could someone post the Original Weathervane Cartoon? Or just let me know who drew it? I don't think I've seen it. I think it was a whole series of comics, after someone (Biden?) called Romney a perfectly tuned weathervane.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 00:40
|
|
|
E: nvm, I can't read today.
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 00:46
|
|
|
"People that work nights or evenings should starve to death"- Glenn McCoy
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 00:47
|
|
|
Socialists are going to support LAZY MOOCHERS at the expense of those of us who WORK for a living - A cartoonist
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 00:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 14, 2024 00:37 |
|
|
TheMaskedChemist posted:"People that work nights or evenings should starve to death"- Someone who draws pictures at home for a living
|
|
#
?
Feb 2, 2016 00:49
|
|
