|
What exactly do I need in an SSL certificate for a hybrid office 365 scenario? I can't find any proper definite answers but what am getting so far is you need a wildcard SSL certificate capable of at least 3 SANs. As in domain.tld for my primary email namespace @domain.tld, one SAN for autodiscovery.domain.tld, one SAN for adfs.domain.tld and one SAN for my edge servers mail.domain.tld. Does that sound about right? I don't fully what all the relationships are here. When you are purchasing a wildcard certificate do you just get an infinite number of SANs with it or are you charged per SAN. Somewhat related: office 365 requires the UPN of user accounts to match the external domain. I wrote a quick script that would change all UPNs of accounts in a domain. Does changing UPNs cause any weird problems that I should be aware of down the line? Should I be more selective of changing UPNs and specify it only to change user accounts and not service accounts/etc, or does having mixed UPNs cause issues? quote:Get-ADUser -SearchBase DC=domain,DC=internal -filter * | ForEach-Object { Set ADUser -UserPrincipalName domain.com} Methanar fucked around with this message at 07:12 on Jan 29, 2016 |
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 07:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 00:31 |
|
|
Wildcard you get as many subdomains as you need because it is a wildcard. They are more expensive than the 5 UPN ones or whatever that you'll see from resellers. If you have a wildcard you are good and should be able to use that for any application for your domain.tld address.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 16:02
|
|
|
Your powershell script as quoted is just going to try to set everyone's UPN to domain.com which isn't what you want (also it's set-aduser, not set aduser). That said I'd probably just run it on the OU with mail enabled accounts, no need to mess with things that don't need to be messed with.
|
|
#
?
Jan 29, 2016 16:09
|
|
|
Methanar posted:What exactly do I need in an SSL certificate for a hybrid office 365 scenario? When you set up directory sync (still needed for a Hybrid deployment as Office 365 needs to know about the users) it installs the IdFix tool for you - https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Install-and-run-the-Office-365-IdFix-tool-f4bd2439-3e41-4169-99f6-3fabdfa326ac
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2016 00:27
|
|
|
So am I correct that to have proper pass through auth with outlook with 365 is to have ADFS and modern authentication enabled for the 365 tenant? Or is it possible to have it with just Azure AD and modern auth enabled?
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2016 00:46
|
|
|
Harry Lime posted:So am I correct that to have proper pass through auth with outlook with 365 is to have ADFS and modern authentication enabled for the 365 tenant? Or is it possible to have it with just Azure AD and modern auth enabled? I use Azure AD Connect
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2016 16:09
|
|
|
Life lesson: don't put litigation holds on stuff that no one asked you to put a litigation hold on. It's really difficult to remove when it comes time to purge the e-mail.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2016 19:20
|
|
|
So here's a strange one on Office 365. Add a domain to a tenant and validate it, don't actually use the service at all and continue to send email as normal from your current provider or on-premise server. Go into the message trace and pull up the results from the last 24 hours or so. Any email that arrived inbound to the Office 365 platform that was sent from a domain that you have authenticated seems to be tagged as actually being sent from your Office 365 tenant as far as the message trace is concerned.
|
|
#
?
Feb 4, 2016 22:40
|
|
|
I don't know if this question goes here but I'm putting it here. IT finally got around to changing me to Office 2013 (they started doing this MONTHS ago) and one thing I lost from Office 2010 was, in the conversation view, there was a line that connected (or sometimes connected) emails in the conversation when it's expanded. Office 2013 doesn't seem to have this. Anyone know how I can get this back? TIA.
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 20:34
|
|
|
O365 migration Q from on prem Exch 2010 to Exchange Online: 1. Should I still use migrationwiz or can I use built-in migration plan 2. built-in migration plan says don't assign licenses until after migration is over. is this for real?
|
|
#
?
Feb 5, 2016 22:34
|
|
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:O365 migration Q from on prem Exch 2010 to Exchange Online: We're in the middle of this too, so my $0.02 1. I'm doing everything with PowerShell scripts because that's how I roll ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 2. Mailboxes can operate without a license for 30 days without a problem, which is probably why it says that.
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
This is a relatively new and awesome resource vs. trawling TechNet to find the most recent article about a particular problem: http://powershell.office.com/
|
|
#
?
Feb 6, 2016 21:53
|
|
|
Mierdaan posted:2. Mailboxes can operate without a license for 30 days without a problem, which is probably why it says that. ok BUT if I assign a license to a user and do the migration after, will it screw something up
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 02:22
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:This is a relatively new and awesome resource vs. trawling TechNet to find the most recent article about a particular problem: noice
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 02:22
|
|
|
totalnewbie posted:I don't know if this question goes here but I'm putting it here. Not really the place but what the hell. Don't know offhand about the 2010 behavior but 2013 has conversations. It's just a long list of emails in that conversation that show up no matter what folder they're in. Option's still located under the view tab on the ribbon. Check "show as conversations" and fiddle with the view settings there as needed.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 13:48
|
|
|
NevergirlsOFFICIAL posted:ok BUT if I assign a license to a user and do the migration after, will it screw something up Nope. You can even reassign a license to a user who already had one, it doesn't matter.
|
|
#
?
Feb 7, 2016 17:35
|
|
|
Looks like this is the spot. So uhh... I'm trying to set up email alerts in LanSweeper. We have an Exchange server of course. I just need to know where the heck to go to find this info. I'm REALLY new here (to this field, really) and nobody's given me any access to this info on a sort of  "Look it up yourself" basis. I just need to know how to find the "From address" and uhh... what port I should be using. I'm trying "noreply@(our domain name).com" but that's not working. I'm also not sure if I'm doing the User / Password right. I know the password is 100% correct however... Sorry guys I'm useless.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 20:37
|
|
|
NT Plus posted:Looks like this is the spot. So uhh...
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 20:47
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:Is noreply@domain.com a mailbox that uses the (your domain name?, which is in the screenshot)\Administrator account credentials? Does the Administrator account have its own mailbox? It is but the error I'm getting says "SMTP server connection test failed: Unable to connect to the remote server" The redded out box is basically (server).(serverdomain).com anthonypants posted:You shouldn't plug an Administrator username and password into that box. Make a LanSweeper service account mailbox, and give it access to send mail from noreply. Noted. I'll hop over to that when I can get the Exchange server to even talk to Lansweeper.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 20:55
|
|
|
NT Plus posted:It is but the error I'm getting says
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 21:03
|
|
|
anthonypants posted:Have you gone through these steps? https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb123686.aspx When I type 'telnet' into the cmd line, it's not a recognized command.  EDIT: NEVERMIND! Got it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 21:13
|
|
|
Or just tell Exchange to permit the IP address of that server to relay through it and don't bother authenticating.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 21:16
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:Or just tell Exchange to permit the IP address of that server to relay through it and don't bother authenticating. Went ahead and tried this. I get the following error from the Lansweeper screen in the screenshot: "SMTP server connection test failed: The specified string is not in the form required for an e-mail address."
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 21:43
|
|
|
It's probably checking for a .com or something on the end of the email address. Set it to noreply@internal.yourdomain.com and try again.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 21:44
|
|
|
Hm... Now I'm getting "SMTP server connection test failed: Unable to connect to the remote server" I'm not sure how to proceed.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 21:52
|
|
|
Got it working by telling it to go through our email/web filter. I guess I should've mentioned earlier we use Barracuda. But at least I learned a bit about the Exchange environment. Thanks SH/SC goons.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 22:04
|
|
|
Ugato posted:Not really the place but what the hell. What is the right place, then? I can ask there, instead. Meanwhile, what I'm looking for is the line going down the side of the emails in each conversation, like you can see here: http://www.businessproductivity.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/How-to-view-email-by-conversation-03.png It's disappeared in Outlook 2013 and I just miss it as a good visual indication of where conversations begin and end.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 22:41
|
|
|
We have some customer service people....like ten or so. When one of those people is on vacation, sick, etc, some other person has to check the missing person's email. So we let the covering user open that person's mailbox (after giving them permissions). But it's a pain to do so, and then you have to remove the mailbox afterwards... OWA doesn't work because they'd have to have that user's password. Suggestions?
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2016 16:00
|
|
|
If the covering person has permission, have them login to their own OWA, then click on their own name (top right) and choose Open another mailbox...
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2016 16:28
|
|
|
What Wilford Cutlery said, OWA does work. If they have full access permission to the mailbox, it should Auto Map in Exchange 2010+ and Outlook 2010+
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2016 17:10
|
|
|
gently caress public folders forever. If any of you ever considers migrating them to O365: It's doable, but you will almost certainly pay for it in flesh and blood. Burn them to the ground and never look back.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2016 18:23
|
|
|
Bob Morales posted:We have some customer service people....like ten or so. Use a ticketing application
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2016 18:40
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:Use a ticketing application They do, but individuals will email the rep for their territory directly. Not to create and incident but for miscellaneous stuff.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2016 18:45
|
|
|
Bob Morales posted:We have some customer service people....like ten or so. https://owa.domain.com/owa/otherpersonihavefullaccessrightsto@domain.com doesnt work (permissions can take a few min to show up after the first time they're granted mind you.)? Granted that doesn't take away the need for managing permissions, but doesn't add it to that person's outlook profile. e: Goddamn formatting! Stop trying to be helpful!
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2016 19:41
|
|
|
Here's a dumb problem we have. In Outlook 2010 (with exchange 2003, if that matters), sometimes I get people complaining that they can't just type ahead with some people's first names and find them. It seems the reason is that in the auto-complete list, some addresses are stored as 'first last' <flast@company.com> while most are stored as first last <flast@company.com> Note the difference in single quotes. That means I can't start typing their first name and have it show up, unless I type a single quote first. People claim this happens to them a few times a year and even to addresses that used to work correctly. The solution is just to click the 'to' button, and add the person from the GAL. Doing that once will fix the issue for that contact, but of course a "temporary" fix isn't enough to satisfy people. I've been working on this system for a few years and have never seen it happen before, so I'm guessing some people are doing something differently, I just don't know what it is. Has anyone else experienced this?
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
wa27 posted:Here's a dumb problem we have. In Outlook 2010 (with exchange 2003, if that matters), sometimes I get people complaining that they can't just type ahead with some people's first names and find them. It seems the reason is that in the auto-complete list, some addresses are stored as 'first last' <flast@company.com> while most are stored as first last <flast@company.com>
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2016 21:09
|
|
|
Holy poo poo this is a thing.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2016 21:43
|
|
|
ChubbyThePhat posted:Holy poo poo this is a thing. Holy poo poo the amount of wailing and moaning you'll get from people the day their autocompletes are wrong/are gone/are why they're getting NDRs. I've encountered people who think if you delete it, you can never email that person again.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2016 21:47
|
|
|
AutoArgus posted:Holy poo poo the amount of wailing and moaning you'll get from people the day their autocompletes are wrong/are gone/are why they're getting NDRs. I've encountered people who think if you delete it, you can never email that person again. I feel them, though, I realized most of my composing emails is done with autocomplete <TAB> nonsense
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2016 22:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 00:31 |
|
|
AutoArgus posted:Holy poo poo the amount of wailing and moaning you'll get from people the day their autocompletes are wrong/are gone/are why they're getting NDRs. I've encountered people who think if you delete it, you can never email that person again. JIMBOB ISN'T IN MY CONTACTS! Sure he is. Right there! NO LOOK!! *starts typing* gently caress NK2 files. I saw a woman kill a man because her HD crashed and the new computer didn't have her old NK2's on it. Okay not really but almost.
|
|
#
?
Feb 10, 2016 22:32
|
|