|
edit: new page SHISHKABOB posted:^^^uh duh? I don't see the relevance To be clear, I wasn't talking about you in particular. I'm talking about the review and why I can see this as a valid point to make in a review.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 15:42 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 15:09 |
|
But seriously what's that one empire chicks name, Hildegard Von Mariendorf??? That almost sounds right enough to be it but I'm too lazy to look it up.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 16:15 |
|
GimmickMan posted:LoGH goes at length to depict the problems of dictatorships and democracies both and its primary way of criticism is showing rather than telling. Thing is, it does a fair bit of telling too! The characters talk about it, the in-setting documentaries talk about it, even the narrator talks about it. I could be wrong but I don't recall a single point in the whole of LoGH where it does the same thing for sexism that it does to politics, war, etc. Tangentially related, between now and when I first watched LOGH I've become a lot more familiar with Japanese history. People tend to speak of LOGH's political values and ideas in universal terms, but it might be interesting to rewatch the show hunting for explicitly or implicitly Japanese political influences.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 16:34 |
|
LOGH depicts brutal bigotry against the disabled as a society-wide trend, to the point where it includes vivid and graphic depictions of mass euthanasia against the disabled. If there's one consistent theme that the entire cast voices it's that the reactionary social values of Goldenbaum are hosed up. Does LOGH come off as ableist propaganda because it portrays its one major disabled character, Oberstein, as a deeply morally ambiguous Machiavellian mastermind devoted to destroying that old society?
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 20:06 |
|
There's also atleast Admiral Wahlen who loses an arm during the attack on earth.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 21:17 |
|
Bad Seafood posted:It doesn't. It's not a major theme upon which the fulcrum of the story is balanced, nor even really a minor side note. It's an unconscious inclusion, which is probably what makes it so interesting to analyze, interpret, and debate. LOGH's political commentary is front-loaded and deliberate, and heavy-handed enough that there's not really a ton of room for speculation. LOGH is not a particularly subtle show when it comes to lecturing the viewer about its political values, which makes identifying and decoding the less purposeful aspects of the show more fun. Declaring them to be "unconscious inclusions" are essentially a dismissal of their importance. LoGH is a work of art, and I don't mean that in a pretentious way. I just mean to say that I believe that art is a reflection of life, and the works that we create are never "unconscious", they always are guided in every way by conscious understanding. I reread that and it sounds confusing, because most people define "unconscious" acts as acts that you didn't premeditate. But I think that any act that one takes, which is under the guidance of the conscious mind, is part of said conscious mind. We contain within our minds our culture and ideology, and whether we set a predefined goal to recognize these concepts or not, they will appear in our art. This isn't a strong entirely coherent argument, but I would appreciate criticisms of it. It's my attempt at explaining why LoGH is a misogynist/sexist work (among other things). Or should I say, it has those elements. But because it contains those elements, they are also one and a part of the whole.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 21:42 |
|
I don't think that calling them "unconscious" was meant to be understood as calling them unimportant; just the opposite, in fact.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 21:45 |
|
Bongo Bill posted:I don't think that calling them "unconscious" was meant to be understood as calling them unimportant; just the opposite, in fact. Yes, I just don't like the use of the word "unconscious". Makes it sound like it's an accident, or uncontrollable.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 21:49 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_Ve9h1HNBA&t=29s
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 21:52 |
|
Surely unconscious inclusions are more telling tha- Never mind. Who is going to be gender swapped in the anime? Pervy Poplan? Julia(n)? MASHENGO I can just picture Yang saying "What is that?" disgustedly as a woman approaches the bridge...
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 22:17 |
|
I think a good character for a female role would be Adrian Rubinsky's child. Who tries to usurp him and murder him or whatever, but fails, to Rubinsky's... moderate disappointment?
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 22:21 |
|
Chas McGill posted:Surely unconscious inclusions are more telling tha- Annerose
|
# ? Mar 10, 2016 22:23 |
|
Read the prologue of the book. I can understand some of the criticism. If I hadn't seen the series I'd be totally in "why do I care" mode. That said, I love the "pompous bombastic 19th century historian purple prose" style, having read enough of the real thing to appreciate taking the piss out of it. I will miss the Mahler and Dvorak and Mozart and Bruckner and...
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 00:35 |
|
Chas McGill posted:Surely unconscious inclusions are more telling tha- Gender swap Yang IMO I don't even think it would change the subtext between Yang and Reinhard
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 00:51 |
|
SHISHKABOB posted:Declaring them to be "unconscious inclusions" are essentially a dismissal of their importance. LoGH is a work of art, and I don't mean that in a pretentious way. I just mean to say that I believe that art is a reflection of life, and the works that we create are never "unconscious", they always are guided in every way by conscious understanding. I reread that and it sounds confusing, because most people define "unconscious" acts as acts that you didn't premeditate. But I think that any act that one takes, which is under the guidance of the conscious mind, is part of said conscious mind. We contain within our minds our culture and ideology, and whether we set a predefined goal to recognize these concepts or not, they will appear in our art.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 02:17 |
|
Man, this page is a fuckin' MINEFIELD for anyone who hasn't seen the show. Like the guys doing the podcast.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 02:23 |
|
It's a ten-year-old thread for a twenty-year-old show, I'm not gonna go full police state and mandate black bars for the 1% of posters present who haven't seen the whole thing. No offense, podcast guys.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 03:07 |
|
Go RV! posted:Man, this page is a fuckin' MINEFIELD for anyone who hasn't seen the show. I don't give a gently caress
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 03:22 |
|
The book is constantly ogling Reinhard and Siegfried. Siegfried: "When he was out of uniform, he was 'nothing but a handsome, redheaded beanpole,' as the female officers in the rear service whispered." Reinhard: "Reinhard was a handsome young man. One might even say his good looks were without peer. His white, oval face was adorned on three sides with slightly curling golden hair, and his lips and the bridge of his nose had an elegance that brought to mind a sculpture carved by the hands of some ancient master craftsman." It will never stop being hilarious how homoerotic this story is.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 17:36 |
|
Patter Song posted:The book is constantly ogling Reinhard and Siegfried. I'm sorry, but unless he has a complexion as clear as jade, rich red lips, and ear lobes which hang to his shoulders then I want nothing to do with him. Liu Bei would look like a goddamn nightmare if you took the description literally.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 19:24 |
|
I'm still only a few chapters into the book, but I get the impression that besides Dusty, LOGH is one of the most faithful adaptations I've ever seen. The show even includes Tanaka's little digressions about tank beds and how most soldiers who are wounded survive.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 20:21 |
|
VostokProgram posted:I'm still only a few chapters into the book, but I get the impression that besides Dusty, LOGH is one of the most faithful adaptations I've ever seen. The show even includes Tanaka's little digressions about tank beds and how most soldiers who are wounded survive. Agreed. I feel like I'm watching episode 1. The dialogue is wordier but hits all of the same scenes. Also the author of the book's translation recognized the Phoenian gods naming scheme for placenames so the book starts out with a Battle of Astarte rather than the fansubbers' Battle of Astate. Probably the biggest namechange I've noted is that the ancient hero of the Alliance mentioned in the prologue is Yusuf Topparol rather than Yusuf Tparl.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 20:41 |
|
Patter Song posted:Agreed. I feel like I'm watching episode 1. The dialogue is wordier but hits all of the same scenes. Also the author of the book's translation recognized the Phoenian gods naming scheme for placenames so the book starts out with a Battle of Astarte rather than the fansubbers' Battle of Astate. Was Central Anime working without referencing the source material? I remember them changing some names over the course of the show. Like Earth Church -> Terraists. If they knew Japanese well enough to subtitle the show you would think they could read the books but perhaps it's not so simple. I don't particularly like the cover art. Feels like it was lifted from a Star Wars comic.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 21:19 |
|
VostokProgram posted:Was Central Anime working without referencing the source material? I remember them changing some names over the course of the show. Like Earth Church -> Terraists. If they knew Japanese well enough to subtitle the show you would think they could read the books but perhaps it's not so simple. Yes. Most notably "Zephyr Particles" should be "Seffle Particles", after the discoverer. But I think that zephyr particles sounds better anyway.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 22:41 |
|
"Yang's Name Notation Type was E. This was a tradition carried over from the days of the federation. People whose family names came before their given names were designated E, which stood for Eastern. Those whose given names came before their family names were called W, for Western." Well, that's one mystery cleared up.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2016 22:53 |
|
I want to say these books sound really bad, but I guess it's like reading technical literature. My dads a fuckin computer nerd and he actually enjoys reading programming language manuals and poo poo like that.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2016 00:25 |
|
You don't like LoGH, cool. We get it.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2016 01:12 |
|
Infected posted:You don't like LoGH, cool. We get it.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2016 05:29 |
|
The LOGH book reads like the show-Bible of the show: the volume long-running TV shows put together to remember who all the characters are, what they were doing when and why. I would not recommend this book to anyone who has not already seen the show. That said, from a series vet's perspective, it's a fascinating "so that's where that came from" experience. I just read the story of Yang Wen-Li's early childhood that the series doesn't touch until Spiral Labyrinth, as a massive digression in the Battle of Astarte.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2016 06:12 |
|
Infected posted:You don't like LoGH, cool. We get it. w h a t It was good, though?
|
# ? Mar 12, 2016 08:01 |
|
75 pages in and I think it's decided: Legend of Galactic Heroes might be the most faithful book->TV adaptation ever. A lot of the dialogue is word for word (excepting minor shifts due to different translators). It's a story that works much better in a visual medium, in my opinion. That probably even includes those ridiculous LOGH stage plays that have never made it out of Japan. Pretty much the only time the narrator shows any signs of emotion is either A. when he's calling non-Yang Alliance people or non-Reinhard Imperial people idiots or B. when the narrator is talking about how sexy Reinhard is, which actually gets weirder because the book attaches descriptions of Reinhard's lovely blue eyes shining or flashing pretty much every time he talks. Show don't tell as a cliche was born for our dear Reinhardo-sama : if I hadn't already seen 165 episodes and 3 movies worth of stuff about the guy, I wouldn't really be sure what to picture. At the point I'm at, I've read basically word-for-word transcripts of the first two episodes of the show and the first episode of Spiral Labyrinth (Yang's childhood), described at this point in the story rather than much later.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2016 04:14 |
|
quote:In a sonorous voice, the coordinator of ceremonies called for the man of the hour to come forth.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2016 18:25 |
|
Tanaka certainly has a way with words.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2016 22:20 |
|
I'm starting to think that people were way off for criticizing the lack of women in Legend of Galactic Heroes. No poo poo there's few women...this is the gayest setting ever written. There's only homoerotic subtext in the TV version...in the book it's the most blatant text I've encountered in a long time. Pretty much without exclusion every male character who has been introduced who has met Reinhard wants to bang Reinhard and the narrator has said so in so many words, and while there are references to anonymous women characters who also do, none have actually been named yet. Couple that with the references to Kaiser Rudolf "the Great" banning homosexuality 400 years ago, creating a closet case dynamic in Imperial society, and it's easy to imagine that the entire cast is closet cases trying to feel each other out through innuendo.
|
# ? Mar 13, 2016 23:05 |
|
Patter Song posted:it's easy to imagine that the entire cast is closet cases trying to feel each other out through innuendo. Whatever you're into, man.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2016 01:08 |
|
Patter Song posted:I'm starting to think that people were way off for criticizing the lack of women in Legend of Galactic Heroes. Your analysis definitely makes the apocryphal story of the Otaku at an early comicket who had happened upon the first LOGH Yaoi Doujin who proclaimed "It's already as gay as it gets, how can you make it more gay!?!" even more credible.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2016 02:02 |
|
If you want to jump Reinhards bones that doesn't make you gay.
|
# ? Mar 14, 2016 17:38 |
|
quote:Ten years ago! Again, Kircheis felt that pain in his heart. Edit: Alliance Rear Admiral Caselnes' name will take some time to get used to, although Caselnes is not really odder than Cazellnu. "Job Trünicht," complete with umlaut, dramatically changes the sound of that character's name and raises questions. Is he descended from recent Imperial refugees? Patter Song fucked around with this message at 20:23 on Mar 14, 2016 |
# ? Mar 14, 2016 19:11 |
|
Last post for now, but there's actually an interesting explanation of how the hell the Alliance government worked in here.quote:The face of Defense Chairman Job Trünicht rose up in both of their recollections. Also, the Alliance's anthem is somewhat different. Liberty, alas, no longer stands for freedom. quote:My friends, someday, the oppressor we'll o'erthrow
|
# ? Mar 15, 2016 01:31 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 15:09 |
|
Has Schenkopp made an entrance yet? How is he described?
|
# ? Mar 15, 2016 01:42 |