|
Quidnose posted:In what way? Let's analyze: This post has a lot of words in it. I think both your numbered questions are already answered by Rarity's vote. Rarity voted you because you were trying too hard, pointing out your engaging with Lumpen's gibberish as nonsense content. A post like this strengthens that argument, you're asking unnecessary questions like "why are you suspicious of me in a Mafia game" and it's not a particularly effective defense.
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 08:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 23:20 |
|
|
That's a misrepresentation of what I am doing. I'm asking Rarity to actually back up her claims rather than saying "your posting stands for itself." Her argument is circular and doesn't include scumhunting or facts to back up scumhunting. It is An Easy Vote that she is justifying Because It Is Scummy. It's bad play. If you think Rarity has answered my questions already, then answer them for her. You claim she already said "why me" over everyone else. Show me! "I chose you because you are scummy and they are not" is not a valid sentiment to point to because that's gut, and while gut is fine, she hasn't said "well it's a gut feeling from your posting," she's said "your posting is so clearly scummy in its disingenuous composition I don't need to explain it." I don't buy that. Are you also claiming that she already HAS addressed my questions as to why she's ignoring my intent argument with Lumpen, and that she doesn't need to stop avoiding that question? Because that's untrue as well. It's easy to come in and go "I agree with Rarity" but if you're going to say my questions have already been answered, back it up. You're also making a very lazy call, especially since you're soft buying me as scum without dropping a vote or really even an opinion on me. Very easy to do and then shift with the wind.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 09:04
|
|
|
Do you really think I'm going to engage with all of that? I think you missed my point completely. You're trying to perpetuate an argument that doesn't defend yourself particularly well and wastes everyone's time. Rarity is suspicious of you; you're acting like this is unreasonable in a Mafia game.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 09:14
|
|
|
I mean, Rarity is suspicious of me because she is claiming my analysis is grounded in disingenuous schlock. My retort has been "well, I don't see it that way, can you answer these questions that you have been ignoring, because I believe it is you who is being disingenuous." You're just ignoring my argument and my content and are also saying "Rarity is right and I'm not going to read what you're saying." Is it unreasonable in a mafia game for me to ask you to read my questions, consider them, check back on what other people have posted based on what I am claiming they are doing, and comment on it? You're doing it for Rarity and refusing to do it for me. Why? Because she posted less words? Laaaazyyyyy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 09:27
|
|
|
Also my answer is yes, gently caress you, play mafia instead of yelling at me for...playing mafia. My god.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 09:28
|
|
|
I did read what you're saying. You're asking why Rarity is suspicious of you over anyone else. I'd recommend you read the post in which Rarity votes you, it explains why she finds you suspicious. It's not exactly something that needs pointed questions to figure out.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 09:35
|
|
|
That's crap, I've analyzed it several times and explained my thoughts on it. Your thoughts are "rarity is right about you," with no backup. Care to add anything else? Seems like no.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 09:58
|
|
|
Obviously I don't agree with Rarity completely or I would have voted you already. I'm letting you know that, from my perspective, you're extending a pointless argument. A day 1 vote doesn't need to be "analyzed several times." Are you really that incredulous that someone would find you suspicious?
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 10:09
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:From what I can tell that's what imgay/Jake's alliance is already based on 
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 14:22
|
|
|
Lumpen posted:Especially when Asiina might not actually be wolfy, but I just don't know, So I trimmed eveything except the important part. For as long as I've been playing/lurking mafia games the commonly accepted term has always been Scum/Scummy/ScumSelf. This is a really weird phrasing to use... Possible role slip?
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 14:44
|
|
|
##unvote I don't want my joke vote on Quid to be used to help lynch him as I don't think Quid is scum.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 14:48
|
|
|
Jimson posted:So I trimmed eveything except the important part. For as long as I've been playing/lurking mafia games the commonly accepted term has always been Scum/Scummy/ScumSelf. This is a really weird phrasing to use... Possible role slip? there was some other board that combined mafia players from across the land in a "World Championship of Mafia" and people in those games said Wolfy instead of scummy, so it kind of became a joke here for a while
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 15:00
|
|
|
The Ninth Layer posted:This post has a lot of words in it. ##vote The Ninth Layer
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 15:05
|
|
|
Let's not forget the most important thing, when Quidnose first started it, how convenient the opportunistic vote without and justification for saying so was. Time and tme again Quidnose keeps saying what happened was the thing nobody else noticed but that's just what he would say, considering the situation and the circumstances. Rarity doesn't believe it, and she doesn't feel like Quidnose has done exactly what he said would happen, because she knows what Quidnose has said before and that means that voting him wouldn't fail to flip a right Thunderdome gotcha, that's obvious. Speaking of Thunderdomes, even that really Quidnise thought defensivelt when it was obviously that quick to decide not having ever been in the Thunderdome before and knowing deep down I'm right. Thay's more awkward than anything and it tells you a lot that Quidnose doesn't want you to believe or notice he's hiding what he truly wants to do. That's Scummy of course. Ninth understands better than anybody what tp do anoit this sort of thing, and I think he has been telling all about it. Kordansk needs to take a serious lookat Jimson before he wants to slip in and just go ahead all over the place with what he's saying, because that isn't going to mean a lot when in fact the next hingt that happens is to start buddying up suspiciously, and Quidnose conspicuously doesn't want to seem to have been seen to want to have any part of that, which definitely pings me even more. BottleKnight is doing the same thing, you'll notice.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 16:00
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 1  BottleKnight (2): Rarity, Murmur Twin, Podima, Quidnose (2): TMMadman, Lumpen, Rarity, Barehanded Brother (2): JakeP, Asiina, imgay, imgay (1): Barehanded Brother Khris Kruel (1): The Ninth Layer The Ninth Layer (1): Khris Kruel, Rarity (1): BottleKnight, AnonymousNarcotics (1): Khris Kruel Lumpen (1): Quidnose, Chic Trombone (1): Podima, Jimson, BottleKnight, Jimson (0): Quidnose, JakeP (0): Barehanded Brother, Asiina (0): Quidnose, Murmur Twin (0): Rarity, Not Voting (5): AnonymousNarcotics, Chic Trombone, JakeP, Quidnose, TMMadmanWith 18 alive, it's 10 votes to lynch. The current deadline is March 18th, 2016 at 10 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 10 hours, 20 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 16:39
|
|
|
Can we please just lynch Lumpen because I can't loving understand his posting. Like holy poo poo this is some stream of conciousness poo poo. If this is a posting restriction I loving hate you Kashuno.JakeP posted:there was some other board that combined mafia players from across the land in a "World Championship of Mafia" and people in those games said Wolfy instead of scummy, so it kind of became a joke here for a while Also, oh haha guess I should have lurked instead of jumping right into a new game.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 16:58
|
|
|
Jimson posted:Can we please just lynch Lumpen because I can't loving understand his posting. Like holy poo poo this is some stream of conciousness poo poo. If this is a posting restriction I loving hate you Kashuno. Mafia edit. I feel like Lumpen's restriction is that he has to parse all his text into google translate, into one language, and then back into english again. The syntax looks like it might be Chinese or Korean, but I doubt know that will help us.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 17:02
|
|
|
I vote we call 911 to deal with Lumpen apparent stroke. He's clearly got something wrong with his Broca's area.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 17:15
|
|
|
Lumpen, do you smell toast?
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 17:15
|
|
|
When considering the quizzical apprehension that a post restriction is in play what merit lies in speculating whether just when you thought you had it in fact there's contravening factors of post facto denialism in play, when actually nothing of the sort happens to be the case in point, I felt this next thing would decisively clarify the state of elocution considering that, like has been said before, a stroke having been suggested, no in fact just the opposite. I assure you that if you reread the relevant posting you can easily find all the answers; fun fact: it relates and naturally flows from and reflects the exact thing behind what Rarity said, but at the same time Murmurtwin has more of a sense of having been once again looking for just what alternatively might have been figured out. Obviously, Quidnose wouldn't really be said to have accurately, given the subtle reaction, known to have said that Scumhunting gives up the tells that he supposedly thought he was to have given off, but instead once again clearly didn't, and that's why I strongly fell that advocatingclybching Quidnose, who by the way was earlier pooh-poohing the hesitancy of others to lunch abTownie, which to me indicates more than anything the likelihood of an upcoming Scum flip on his part, safe to say least of all one of the people who expected nothing less than exactly that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 17:21
|
|
|
Haha, yeah, of course Lumpen! Totally. You're so right. Let's go and grab some celebratory milkshakes after some posts well done.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 17:40
|
|
|
Lumpen you want to join Club Men?
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 18:33
|
|
|
jesus christ am I the only one that understands what Lumpens doing?
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 18:33
|
|
|
you guys seriously need to pay attention more
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 18:33
|
|
|
Khris Kruel posted:you guys seriously need to pay attention more Please explain it to the rest of us.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 18:37
|
|
|
Jimson posted:##vote Lumpen found scum guys. ##unvote ##vote Jimson Lumpen's posting style has nothing to do with alignment
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 18:38
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:Please explain it to the rest of us. nah I'd rather not. If he wants to be explicit he can. I think he's wasting his time though
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 18:38
|
|
|
Anyways Jimson just wants to lynch Lumpen regardless of alignment, and that's definitely not pro-town.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 18:44
|
|
|
ya that jimson post comes from a scum point of view. Its just so weird that he instantly reverts to "even if he is a third party" which makes it seem like he knows lumpen isn't scum because he isn't on his scum team with him ##vote jimson
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 18:47
|
|
|
JakeP posted:ya that jimson post comes from a scum point of view. Its just so weird that he instantly reverts to "even if he is a third party" which makes it seem like he knows lumpen isn't scum because he isn't on his scum team with him I think we might get along this thread 
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 18:48
|
|
|
Rarity posted:All the best mafia ladies are here. And lutr and pmush!
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 19:29
|
|
|
JakeP posted:ya that jimson post comes from a scum point of view. Its just so weird that he instantly reverts to "even if he is a third party" which makes it seem like he knows lumpen isn't scum because he isn't on his scum team with him I said "even if he is a third party" in response to someone whos post embarresingly enough I did not quote where they infered he might be third party with post restriction. Khris Kruel posted:Anyways Jimson just wants to lynch Lumpen regardless of alignment, and that's definitely not pro-town. WHICH MIGHT I ADD. Could be a perfect scum move if it's not actually a post restriction. Lets him make as many accusations as possiblw and hides any possible scum slips behind a wall of incomprehensible text.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 19:49
|
|
|
Jimson posted:I said "even if he is a third party" in response to someone whos post embarresingly enough I did not quote where they infered he might be third party with post restriction. Who said that? not gonna lie I did a fair amount of skimming after having several drinks yesterday
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 19:50
|
|
|
Jimson posted:I said "even if he is a third party" in response to someone whos post embarresingly enough I did not quote where they infered he might be third party with post restriction. just be honest. You have no idea what lumpen is doing, you aren't reading his posts, and you just want to lynch him because he's providing a poo poo ton of reactions and info for us to peruse through
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 20:00
|
|
|
JakeP posted:Who said that? not gonna lie I did a fair amount of skimming after having several drinks yesterday Quidnose posted:
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Jester So yeah idk, maybe I was pushing it to heavy I've been in my head lately thinking about roles for a game I wanna run so maybe I am over analyzing but his assesment hit the nail on the head.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 20:01
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 1 BottleKnight (2): Rarity, Murmur Twin, Podima, Quidnose (2): TMMadman, Lumpen, Rarity, Barehanded Brother (2): JakeP, Asiina, imgay, Jimson (2): Quidnose, imgay (1): Barehanded Brother Khris Kruel (1): The Ninth Layer The Ninth Layer (1): Khris Kruel, Rarity (1): BottleKnight, Lumpen (1): Quidnose, Chic Trombone (1): Podima, Jimson, BottleKnight, JakeP (0): Barehanded Brother, Asiina (0): Quidnose, AnonymousNarcotics (0): Khris Kruel, Murmur Twin (0): Rarity, Not Voting (4): AnonymousNarcotics, Chic Trombone, Quidnose, TMMadman With 18 alive, it's 10 votes to lynch. The current deadline is March 18th, 2016 at 10 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 6 hours, 48 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 20:11
|
|
|
##vote asiina from what I know asiina doesn't post when they scum, and asiina aint posted poo poo
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 20:13
|
|
|
Khris Kruel posted:just be honest. You have no idea what lumpen is doing, you aren't reading his posts, and you just want to lynch him because he's providing a poo poo ton of reactions and info for us to peruse through I think you're giving scum too much credit, I've never played that tactically as scum. I just want to look town.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 20:14
|
|
|
 Friendly reminder, 5 posts per game day is a really low number and I hope you guys can all hit it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 20:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 23:20 |
|
|
imgay posted:##vote asiina Yeah I'm def thinking this too. ##vote asiina It was like a relief to her that she had an alibi in the discussion thread of being tired from the gym so she didn't have to post here.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2016 20:15
|
|