|
A Neurotic Jew posted:CIG showed off its self-deprecating side in the april fools video today.  e: Wuntvor posted:They should make this a real item, then it would be just like those "y u no ship" foam pitchforks from bitcoin company butterfly labs. dammit
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 16:05 |
|
|
alf_pogs posted:hey reddit idiots theyre not makin fun of themselves, they are makin fun of YOU Not even I find Ben's obesity funny anymore, it's v sad and enraging
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:11
|
|
|
Ben for fucksakes buy a food scale and stop force feeding yourself tallow and syrup
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:12
|
|
|
Tippis posted:This avatar business is getting a bit silly, to be honest. Silly pays Lowtax's bills
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:22
|
|
|
Mr.Tophat posted:Silly pays Lowtax's bills It could have paid certain rent bills.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:26
|
|
|
I like how even Ben's attempt to eat healthily is done in true CIG style. Rather than order a healthy meal, he orders something stupidly unsuitable and tries to modify it to be something it isn't. CIG: We've learnt from our mistakes and we're sure we could repeat them exactly.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:26
|
|
|
[Gunnery Officer]: "Everyone up? Marcus, test your tilt, system says it's sticking." Coming soon, Star Citizen Pinball. The ball never enters the game and the bumpers are sliding around freely. [Player]: "Hey! HEY!!" [Wounded Marine]: "Come on, come onnnnnn-aaaaahh." Tijuana Bibliophile posted:Ben for fucksakes buy a food scale and stop force feeding yourself tallow and syrup [E1C01S08C] [????]: "Are they here?" [????]: "No idea. Can't see anything."
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:27
|
|
|
80+% of the poo poo he said is likely coming to 2.4 is not coming. Maybe one thing he said 'might' come (extra movement animation), will be in 2.4 . Hype level - extreme delusions.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:28
|
|
|
eXXon posted:That futuristic city looks like poo poo. Is Star Citizen designed to be the most boring sci-fi universe in existence? There's nothing interesting or inspiring about the universe, lore or art design. Some of the detail and ~fidelity~ in ships look neat, sure, but also glaringly pointless and following modern industrial design instead of something even vaguely futuristic. Should have just made a BSG MMO and been done with it (lol).  Maybe so but it seems they can do a nice tour.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:33
|
|
|
sorla78 posted:There was a Mass Effect Andromeda Tech Vid leak, unfortunately I doesn't look as polished as Star Citizen never played me but the explosions look good. (they are EA/Bio and on my do not buy list)
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:33
|
|
|
quote:[E1C04S02C_2] Chris was really proud of this line. Add it to Solar Plebian. And this should be on every page [E1C04S02D] [Becca Farneway]: "Full burn! Kickin' into overdrive! Full burn! Soon I'll be by your side! And you'll see, that the only truth, in this 'verse, is you and me!"
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:35
|
|
|
Crazy_BlackParrot posted:How is this even remotely funny? They obviously couldn't care less about the backers. Chris will piss on them... And they will love him for it
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:36
|
|
|
someone please make an image with Uncle DS face on the most high fidelity image of Dr Doom you can find. Well, that's how I see it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:36
|
|
|
Let me guess what 2.4 patch notes will bring Callouts - Using the terminal at Port Olisar to spawn a ship may cause players to be flagged for unlawful PvP - Walking backwards has no limit on acceleration or top speed - Players in EVA may fall to the bottom of the map and die New Features - New ship ONION added to hangar - New ship CORN added to PU and AC - New Big Benny vending machine added somewhere. We don't know where. If you see it please submit a support ticket so we can find it and remove it. Fixes - General bug fixes - Fixed a door spawning sideways - Fixed an asteroid spawning inside Port Olisar - Fixed a bug where the Hornet's controls were inverted - Fixed a bug where players in EVA fall to the bottom of the map and die
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:38
|
|
|
AP posted:
i see some tokens! are they meltable?
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:40
|
|
|
Skellybones posted:Let me guess what 2.4 patch notes will bring Fixed
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:41
|
|
|
SelenicMartian posted:And this should be on every page Is this the love interest? Please let her be voice by Sandi
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:43
|
|
|
Ursine Catastrophe posted:
yessssssss I was just thinking of these
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:43
|
|
|
SelenicMartian posted:"B'Tak" sounds like a noise made by a surprised hen.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:43
|
|
|
I will feel grief: an ethical discussion One of you may be asking yourself if it is morally acceptable to, in game (that will never be released), hunt b’tak continuously for sport (using mechanics that will never be implemented). This essay will attempt to convince you, using established ethical systems, of whether or not this can be considered an acceptable and morally justifiable position. Utilitarianism is the concept of maximizing pleasure while minimizing suffering. Now, as commando b’tak has made abundantly clear, his interactions involving other players he can't effortlessly destroy will cause him suffering. More than likely an immense amount of suffering. However, utilitarianism treats this strictly in terms of whether or not his amount of grief will outweigh the pleasure derived from both goons and others by continuously making GBS threads up his safe-space space experience, and even the most favorable accounting could not come to that conclusion. Under utilitarianism, it is moral to grief this carebear gently caress. Deontological ethics are based on the idea that adhering to an obligation or duty is the highest good, and whether an action can be considered moral is determined by compliance to that duty. Now, if you consider yourself a pirate in this (nonexistent) game, is it not your duty to pirate? If you are a griefer, is it not your obligation to grief? Here we have b’tak, a whale that will feel grief. Contrast the good commando with other (delusional) players. You may have a target of opportunity that is carrying goods to steal, but may view the experience as fun and dynamic even if those goods are lost, feeling no grief. On the other hand, you may have someone feeling grief simply by the inconvenience of piracy, yet never experiencing it in game (no one will, there's no game). At this point, the only guaranteed way to fulfill the moral imperative of carrying out your duty is dunking on the chuckle gently caress known as b’tak. Conversely, virtue ethics is concerned not with the outcome or effects of an action, but with the character of the actor and their pursuit of virtue in carrying out that action. While the individual motives of all that would cause grief to b’tak can not be determined, there are several scenarios that can fit the criteria for being considered virtuous. For example, one may take his aversion to all things that have the possibility to cause him grief as a type of mental issue, and are attempting exposure therapy in order to help him function like a relatively normal goddamn person in a massively multi-player (non) game. Or perhaps one views the redistribution of the whale’s assets to less well equipped players as just. There are numerous reasons why a player would decide to hunt b’tak, and as long as that player is doing it for a reason that could be considered virtuous, then it would be considered moral in a virtue ethics system. Perhaps you are a follower of Randian ethics, or objectivism. If so, objectively you should go gently caress yourself. It is clear that every ethical system examined shows that at a minimum it is acceptable to ruin this his day (if the game ever came out), and in some cases, requires it in order to be considered moral. It is right and just that b’tak feels grief, and when the game fails to release in any form other than a jank rear end tech demo, b’tak will feel grief. Therefore the lack of Star Citizen itself may be considered moral and good. God bless.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:45
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIy6cMeFTnc&t=35s
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:48
|
|
|
Sunswipe posted:I like how even Ben's attempt to eat healthily is done in true CIG style. Rather than order a healthy meal, he orders something stupidly unsuitable and tries to modify it to be something it isn't. CIG: We've learnt from our mistakes and we're sure we could repeat them exactly. Good observation.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:50
|
|
|
Tokamak posted:80+% of the poo poo he said is likely coming to 2.4 is not coming. Maybe one thing he said 'might' come (extra movement animation), will be in 2.4 . Hype level - extreme delusions. Is this vid from the same guy who mentioned about having manic depression? Because hand and glove if so.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:51
|
|
|
You cannot leave now you aren't even immersed yet
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:53
|
|
|
Also that April Fools from CIG is such a snub. The whole two chairs business is endemic of failed business practices.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:55
|
|
|
Just try and stop me from just posting.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 12:56
|
|
|
I get the feeling that Shazbott is not necessarily equipped to offer support advice to unhappy Citizens https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/73184/star-citizen-support-group/p28
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 13:00
|
|
Welcome to the
|
 
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 13:07
|
|
|
B'tak feels grief as he passes the window of a funeral home, the word 'grief' swims into his peripheral vision and he curses the world for such exposure. As he presses on, he can't help but notice a yellow car and a black car next to one another, and B'tak feels even more grief, for it reminds him of the central character from Peanuts and his' regular expression of protestation. "How could it be good Charlie? How it is possible for there to be a good form of grief?" he mutters incredulously for the hundredth time as he opens a browser on his phone and proceeds to browse the CIG forums for possible solutions to his innumerable circumstances.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 13:08
|
|
|
Money spent on delaying your mental collapse is a good purchase for these guys. Might be cheaper in the short term than the psych/lifestyle help they truly need?
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 13:10
|
|
|
I like how everyone is super distracted by that big benny's thing
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 13:11
|
|
|
I like everyone - pink elephant
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 13:13
|
|
|
Daztek posted:I like how everyone is super distracted by that big benny's thing
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 13:18
|
|
|
SelenicMartian posted:Which big benny are you talking about? Not 
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 13:22
|
|
|
Parallelwoody posted:I will feel grief: an ethical discussion That's good work hakimashou fucked around with this message at 13:25 on Apr 2, 2016 |
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 13:23
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 13:30
|
|
|
does not help with the question asked
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 13:33
|
|
|
You can do all you do in ED, except mining, trading, exploring, minor things that they haven't enabled yet.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 13:37
|
|
|
AP posted:
"Thanks for the awesome cup of coffee" 
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 13:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 16:05 |
|
|
Skellybones posted:Toops I guess you didn't see this earlier I thought I'd have a go making this.  Still work to be done but a good start I think.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2016 13:45
|
|
