|
Xandu posted:I hate to quote reddit, but lol jesus christ lol
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 20:39 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 22:06 |
|
Xandu posted:I hate to quote reddit, but lol
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 20:39 |
|
you better post the PMs if they ever show up
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 20:40 |
|
if hillary is so good at voter suppression, it seems like she is actually the most electable candidate after all.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 20:40 |
|
Xandu posted:I hate to quote reddit, but lol I love this election.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 20:40 |
|
Concerned Citizen posted:if hillary is so good at voter suppression, it seems like she is actually the most electable candidate after all. This unironically.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 20:42 |
|
Xandu posted:I hate to quote reddit, but lol Beautiful.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 20:45 |
|
Hey Sanders people don't listen to these haters. I actually do have the deets for the secret clinton voting fraud app, PM me for a picture of that and totally not one of a dude's hosed up butthole
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 20:49 |
|
I kinda hope that reddit person paid for plat just for that DM. that won't be going to Sanders if that's the case.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 20:55 |
|
Xandu posted:I hate to quote reddit, but lol
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:05 |
|
so business as usual then
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:05 |
|
No real source, but https://twitter.com/BNONews/status/722513586724171777
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:08 |
|
Assuming that's real, what does "audit" entail in this case? Cross-referencing registered voters lists, or something more involved?
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:18 |
|
Xandu posted:No real source, but i thought this was supposed to be a berniebro conspiracy?
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:19 |
|
Mystery Goomba posted:Assuming that's real, what does "audit" entail in this case? Cross-referencing registered voters lists, or something more involved? Probably "a lot of registered voters addresses weren't right, what was the cause of that so it doesn't happen again".
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:20 |
|
"Yea we got a lot of complaints, we'll check this out and see how to prevent it later" "ANOTHER WIN FOR TEAM SANDERS"
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:22 |
|
Condiv posted:i thought this was supposed to be a berniebro conspiracy? Just berniebro whining
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:23 |
|
lol @ shills in here that find nothing suspicious about the fact that Brooklyn democrats in particular have been purged from voter rosters. i wonder who brooklyn would probably vote for
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:24 |
|
Mystery Goomba posted:Assuming that's real, what does "audit" entail in this case? Cross-referencing registered voters lists, or something more involved? It's an audit of the city's elections department. It involves trying to fix it for future elections, shouldn't affect this primary.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:24 |
|
Skyl3lazer posted:lol @ shills in here that find nothing suspicious about the fact that Brooklyn democrats in particular have been purged from voter rosters. i wonder who brooklyn would probably vote for hillary
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:25 |
|
Shaun King apparently lifted some sections from 538 and the Daily Beast for an article he wrote. The editor forgot the attribution to the quotes so he got accused of plagiarising. He is blaming this on Hillary.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:25 |
|
even when shown definitive proof of corruption in the system they'll fight agents of change because they have nothing to fear as upper class white people
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:25 |
|
Skyl3lazer posted:lol @ shills in here that find nothing suspicious about the fact that Brooklyn democrats in particular have been purged from voter rosters. i wonder who brooklyn would probably vote for hillary
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:26 |
|
Skyl3lazer posted:lol @ shills in here that find nothing suspicious about the fact that Brooklyn democrats in particular have been purged from voter rosters. i wonder who brooklyn would probably vote for See what I mean?
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:26 |
|
Skyl3lazer posted:lol @ shills in here that find nothing suspicious about the fact that Brooklyn democrats in particular have been purged from voter rosters. i wonder who brooklyn would probably vote for One of the bonus features of the Vote for Hillary app is that every time I use it another berniebro hipster that's gentrifying Brooklyn gets purged.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:27 |
|
Skyl3lazer posted:lol @ shills in here that find nothing suspicious about the fact that Brooklyn democrats in particular have been purged from voter rosters. i wonder who brooklyn would probably vote for i also find it suspicious that hillary voters have been denied their right, enshrined by the constitution, to vote in new york today in the democratic primary.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:27 |
|
pathetic little tramp posted:Shaun King apparently lifted some sections from 538 and the Daily Beast for an article he wrote. The editor forgot the attribution to the quotes so he got accused of plagiarising. He is blaming this on Hillary. Thank's Hillary doesnt have the same ring as Thanks Obama
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:27 |
|
btw if you want an easy list of people that would rather live out a life of slavery rather than actually try to change the world for the better just look at people that have quoted me and said something disparaging. they can't face the truth of their self imposed incarceration
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:27 |
|
I am sure that Brooklyn is well known for having demographics that typically favor Sanders
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:27 |
|
fishmech posted:hillary given the demographics of brooklyn: In the County the population was spread out with 26.9% under the age of 18, 10.3% from 18 to 24, 30.8% from 25 to 44, 20.6% from 45 to 64, and 11.5% who are 65 years of age or older. it's more likely to be a bernie stronghold than not. no polls done so hard to say.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:28 |
|
Skyl3lazer posted:btw if you want an easy list of people that would rather live out a life of slavery rather than actually try to change the world for the better just look at people that have quoted me and said something disparaging. wake up sheeple
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:28 |
|
Fojar38 posted:I am sure that Brooklyn is well known for having demographics that typically favor Sanders youve never been to brooklyn have you? the demos don't matter sanders is literally from there. If it goes to hillary it's actually just farther proof of a targeted suppression as opposed to just general incompetence and corruption.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:29 |
|
Skyl3lazer posted:btw if you want an easy list of people that would rather live out a life of slavery rather than actually try to change the world for the better just look at people that have quoted me and said something disparaging. to make this adequately smug, you have to use "lumpenproles" and "petite bourgeoisie" a bunch.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:30 |
|
Skyl3lazer posted:btw if you want an easy list of people that would rather live out a life of slavery rather than actually try to change the world for the better just look at people that have quoted me and said something disparaging. See what I mean?
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:30 |
|
Skyl3lazer posted:youve never been to brooklyn have you? the demos don't matter sanders is literally from there. If it goes to hillary it's actually just farther proof of a targeted suppression as opposed to just general incompetence and corruption. incredible how the new york election administration can psychically predict who will and won't vote for bernie sanders with such precision
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:30 |
|
Sanders is the last chance that anyone other than rich oligarchs have for a happy future and you'd squander it because you think you'll be rich some day, or because you think that the candidate with the highest favorability deficit can actually win an election against a terrifying 'other' in the republican party
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:32 |
|
It's like a more wordy Immortan.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:33 |
|
https://twitter.com/lhfang/status/722482097609265152
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:33 |
|
Skyl3lazer posted:Sanders is the last chance that anyone other than rich oligarchs have for a happy future and you'd squander it because you think you'll be rich some day, or because you think that the candidate with the highest favorability deficit can actually win an election against a terrifying 'other' in the republican party Hillary doesn't have the highest favorability deficit. Her opponent does.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:33 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 22:06 |
|
Skyl3lazer posted:Sanders is the last chance that anyone other than rich oligarchs have for a happy future and you'd squander it because you think you'll be rich some day, or because you think that the candidate with the highest favorability deficit can actually win an election against a terrifying 'other' in the republican party well if she can commit election fraud this well, i don't see why she should have trouble defeating the republicans
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:33 |