I personally still don't see the SSV vote, but the fact there was no hammer will make him appear to be the most logical target to lynch.
|
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 19:20 |
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2024 00:46 |
Still want to lynch you tho
|
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 19:20 |
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Telling it like it is. Hah, I like that somebody thought it was suspicious I didn't vote for SSV yesterday, but now my vote for him today is apparently coming off as suspicious too.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 19:32 |
|
tpink posted:Hah, I like that somebody thought it was suspicious I didn't vote for SSV yesterday, but now my vote for him today is apparently coming off as suspicious too. Yeah, it is a bit weird lol. I mean what's changed other than the cases outlined yesterday?
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 19:54 |
|
Jimson posted:I have a strong gut feel about SSV if you trust me on this we might have a clean run if he flips scum. Because invariably the next domino id wanna tip would be birb chain lynches... are bad ##vote Jimson
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 20:32 |
|
Kasumeat posted:Actually, let me expand on that. Jimson scum infinitum town [b]##vote jimson
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 20:40 |
|
SirSamVimes posted:Jimson scum infinitum town Please go into more detail.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 20:56 |
|
Why do you think those are their roles?
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 20:58 |
|
Birdstrike posted:chain lynches... Agreed. ##vote jimson
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 21:49 |
|
Just wanna point out that since YPM was a 1-shot vigilante, we probably don't have another vigilante in this game. According to the C9++ setup it would require rolling a 10%er 3 times in 7 rolls to have a regular vigilante as well, which is pretty unlikely.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 22:19 |
|
Kasumeat posted:Just wanna point out that since YPM was a 1-shot vigilante, we probably don't have another vigilante in this game. According to the C9++ setup it would require rolling a 10%er 3 times in 7 rolls to have a regular vigilante as well, which is pretty unlikely. that's a lot of analysis devoted to not hunting scum
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 22:50 |
|
Kasumeat posted:Why do you think those are their roles? Because Jimson's posting has been weird and off. Infinitum's just a gut read. Also I formatted my vote wrong. ##vote jimmy
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 22:53 |
|
SirSamVimes posted:Because Jimson's posting has been weird and off. Infinitum's just a gut read. Jimson has been unusually weird, and I honestly forget why you were so suspect because I am literally a goldfish. ##vote: Jimson
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 22:58 |
|
SirSamVimes posted:Also just so everyone knows. We are now using SA's fancy automatic vote-counting robot. This means that for votes to count, they must be formatted correctly like so. SirSamVimes posted:Jimson scum infinitum town
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 23:12 |
|
my gut is giving me strange feelings about inf or I'm just hungry
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 23:13 |
|
I got no strong reads on anyone after D1 but I agree it doesn't make sense to let another day go by without a lynch.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 23:25 |
|
And I just went back and re-read all of Jimson's posts and I don't see it.
|
# ? Apr 19, 2016 23:28 |
|
Sorry I would have voted SSV if I hadn't spaced out on deadline. The case on him was decent enough. I have to go back and look more at Kasumeat, but that recent posts of setup speculation and numbers chat reads scummy to me. I still don't like tpink.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 00:52 |
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Sorry I would have voted SSV if I hadn't spaced out on deadline. The case on him was decent enough. I guess you just don't like ROCK, brother.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 01:03 |
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Sorry I would have voted SSV if I hadn't spaced out on deadline. The case on him was decent enough. What case?
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 01:08 |
|
Birdstrike posted:that's a lot of analysis devoted to not hunting scum I've done more actual casing than anyone else in this thread so I don't know how you can possibly make this criticism of me. I guess I haven't been gutreading enough like everyone else? How does putting information like that out there possibly do anything except help the town, or at worst not hurt it?
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 02:47 |
|
Mayor Glowku hasn't posted in two days.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 02:56 |
|
And Tentative8 hasn't in a day and a half. I'd like to hear from both of them.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 02:58 |
|
SirSamVimes posted:What case? Mostly how you reacted to jimson and his obvious joke-claim. Trying to push too much into it.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 02:58 |
|
Kasumeat posted:And Tentative8 hasn't in a day and a half. I'd like to hear from both of them. Well for now you'll be hearing from me! Uh...keep up the good work?
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 03:08 |
|
Kasumeat posted:I've done more actual casing than anyone else in this thread so I don't know how you can possibly make this criticism of me. I guess I haven't been gutreading enough like everyone else? How does putting information like that out there possibly do anything except help the town, or at worst not hurt it? Setup spec is a convenient way for scum to talk about the game and appear to contribute without having to do the hard work of making reads.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 03:10 |
|
Birdstrike posted:Setup spec is a convenient way for scum to talk about the game and appear to contribute without having to do the hard work of making reads. Talking about the setup doesn't somehow invalidate the contributions that I have been making.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 03:23 |
|
If you're going to criticise people for not contributing, how about the two posters I mentioned 60 seconds before you posted?
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 03:28 |
|
##vote Ssv You all can play dick touch, and pass the blame around, but I still think SSV is scum. Ymmv
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 03:35 |
|
I guess we will see soon enough. Worst case scenario, we will at least have more info to work with going into the next day. The
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 03:41 |
Kasumeat posted:the contributions that I have been making.
|
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 03:43 |
|
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 03:46 |
Yeah I'm happy with my vote on you still.
|
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 03:54 |
Your tone and style of play has changed up from D1, so I'm assuming scumdoc told you to reel it in a bit.
|
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 03:54 |
|
Infinitum posted:Your tone and style of play has changed up from D1, so I'm assuming scumdoc told you to reel it in a bit. I'm posting differently now than I was because we have 2 days before the next deadline, not two hours.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 04:05 |
Kasumeat posted:I'm posting differently now than I was because we have 2 days before the next deadline, not two hours. Yeah no. Anyone that reviews your post history will be able to see the tone change as well. You went from random postings and pushing a Jimson case once we were close to lynch D1, to posing questions and trying to analyse the game D2. You appear to be helpful, but you're not really adding anything to the game.
|
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 04:14 |
|
Infinitum. I am having a hard time meeting your read on Kasumeat. Mainly because of his argument before. Any chance you could quote postss for me?
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 04:18 |
|
Jimson posted:Infinitum. I am having a hard time meeting your read on Kasumeat. Mainly because of his argument before. Any chance you could quote postss for me? don't wanna bus a scumbro eh?
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 04:33 |
|
Let's take a look at Infinitum.Infinitum posted:I'm not defending SSV here, I just don't like anything whatsoever about this post or the way you're posting in general D1 Here, he attempts to distance himself from SSV by claiming he's not defending him, while simultaneously attacking me. The "I'm not defending, because we're not buddies or anything" and then going after SSV's attacker (me) rather than actually making a case for SSV is classic chainsaw defense. Infinitum posted:1hr to go. Infinitum posted:In bed watching Stargate trying to fall asleep. Infinitum posted:I personally still don't see the SSV vote, but the fact there was no hammer will make him appear to be the most logical target to lynch. For somebody who "isn't defending SSV" he sure is loving sure about SSV being town. Townies aren't sure on day 1, they question reads and change their mind based on evidence. Infinitum posted:Well aren't you just the sweetest Monty Python SPAM parody sketch, what with all that 'scum this' and 'scum that' Infinitum posted:Scum scum scum scum scum scum scum scum SCUMMITY SCUM Infinitum posted:I like how Kasumeat stops mentioning the word Scum once I call him out on it. Here we have a bunch of nonsense posts which do nothing but attack me. But not in any way with real substance by making a case against me, but rather by simply focusing on whether I use the word "scum" and single-emoticon garbage. He's continuing to defend SSV not by casing me but by ridiculing me. Infinitum posted:Yeah no. And now he's resorting to gaslighting me with this bullshit nonsense post. He's critical of the fact that I'm changing my mind? Town change their minds all the loving time because they don't know poo poo about who anyone is. You know who doesn't change their mind? People who know who the scum and who the town are. This entire game, Infinitum has been 100% sure that I'm scum and 100% sure that SSV is town. He hasn't put forth the slightest bit of effort into anything except focusing on attacking me. He hasn't made a single post that so much as questions anyone except me, and then he comes and says that I'M the one not contributing. That's been his line the entire game, attack me and defend SSV. And just out of curiosity, what does SSV about the whole thing? SirSamVimes posted:Because Jimson's posting has been weird and off. Infinitum's just a gut read. A gutread that Infinitum is town. No evidence to support it. ##vote Infinitum I'm still extremely suspicious of SSV and will happily lynch him, but the case on Infinitum is much stronger. They are almost certainly scumbuddies, but it's conceivable that Infinitum would defend a town SSV for towncred so please lynch Infinitum first.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 04:39 |
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2024 00:46 |
|
Getting tunnel-visioned into a single possibility isn't a mistake that veteran town make. It's a tactic that scum use.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2016 04:42 |