|
D_Smart posted:It's about compliance and submission. Between this and your blue-balling ways I think gamedeveloper wasn't your true calling in life. Catte: (give me a break, I'm in the metro)
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:00 |
|
|
# ? Apr 24, 2024 03:07 |
|
redditors think B) is unthinkable because then we'd be wrong on the Internet, the most unforgivable sin
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:01 |
|
KiddieGrinder posted:Someone made a flowchart before. Went something like: everyone involved in SC in any capacity at this point is a loser though
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:06 |
|
That glassdoor review is amazing. I suspect Glass Door contacted CIG about the previous review being removed or something and there just wasn't anyone brave enough in the office to tell Sandi it was a bad idea.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:12 |
|
Jason Sextro posted:like Romero's going to abandon Stevie Case for Sandi Gardiner, you clearly know nothing about fraud trial development. Tippis posted:Lolno. We are through the looking glass here people!
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:13 |
|
B_of_InfoRedux posted:Honest question, what if 8ace is being serious though? What would the implication for you,or others here be? What if SQ42 really is a masterpiece (highly doubtful, but stranger things have happened) as 8ace claims? Just wondering. Which makes more sense to you? 1) That despite all prior evidence, every testimonial, every scrap of information released that SQ42 has had a complete 180 in development in the past couple of weeks. Somehow having a complete paradigm shift in the entire project in a very short time making it the first project Chris Roberts would have successfully ever done. The guy with an extensive history of going over budget, over time and being unable to finish projects has completely turned this one around for the first time ever. or 2) It's a joke. I'm on the fence myself (I'm not.) Here's a hint to sarcasm on the internet. When you read things like "This will not only change FPS but change gaming itself" and "There were tears in my eyes" that means those comments are probably sarcastic. I speculate that at this point nothing anyone says actually matters, the project is over and we are waiting for mass realization of that fact. So people are having a laugh by over the top praise of what has been a universally panned clusterfuck. They probably just didn't expect anyone to believe it. Fat Shat Sings fucked around with this message at 22:23 on Apr 30, 2016 |
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:17 |
|
Justin Tyme posted:everyone involved in SC in any capacity at this point is a loser though That's my thoughts on it. No offense, but anyone still with money in this willfully (with small exception like Pgabz and a handful of others) is part of the problem. That said, though I may not agree with a freakshow I do understand why someone would pay to stare at the freaks.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:19 |
|
Fat Shat Sings posted:Which makes more sense to you? Oh, I've made it clear from day 1 I don't believe this failure of a development will ever amount to anything close to what was promised. I also don't necessarily trust 8ace, or ANYONE, involved in the development of that game. I take everything they say with a grain of salt. Not anything personal towards them, but if you're actively involved in the fleecing of people, and knowingly at that, then sorry but no. I was just posing a hypothetical. What if it all worked out in the end? Thats all. Doesn't mean I believe it will. But I do believe in looking at all possibilities and planning accordingly. E: and after catching up on 8aces latest comments, yeah (as you pointed out) the sarcasm is thick.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:25 |
|
Also that Glassdoor review and STIMSIS were totally Sandi. It reads like a middle aged soccer mom trying to fit in with a bunch of teenagers. Sandi. Call me.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:27 |
|
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:27 |
|
B_of_InfoRedux posted:Honest question, what if 8ace is being serious though? What would the implication for you,or others here be? What if SQ42 really is a masterpiece (highly doubtful, but stranger things have happened) as 8ace claims? Just wondering. Easy. We get a masterpiece game to play and everyone is happy, only we had more fun along the way since we sat on the sidelines yucking it up for lols rather than furiously masdebating and circlespeculating with delusional morons. I don't see how you can possibly think 8ace is doing anything other than Just Poesting though...
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:29 |
|
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:29 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmyvYMk-Oqo
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:32 |
|
Thoatse posted:Easy. Didn't say he was doing anything wrong, nor would I. Just said I don't trust em. They work for CIG at thee end of the day. Why would anyone trust anyone working there 100%? I also enjoy 8ace post. So hope they keep on.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:34 |
|
oh Sandi such a creative individual, she needs to add best selling author since she was a little girl to her resume.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:35 |
|
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:37 |
|
I am flabbergasted at that Glassdoor review. You can't fake something like that. I've been following this thread since last summer and my brains are still getting blown that that's the director of marketing and human resources roflmao for gently caress's sake.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:42 |
|
B_of_InfoRedux posted:I was just posing a hypothetical. What if it all worked out in the end? Thats all. Doesn't mean I believe it will. But I do believe in looking at all possibilities and planning accordingly. I agree with him, SQ42 is going to be awesome and like you, I too get really confused when people use this humour stuff I've read about but never actually experienced.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:45 |
|
For a thought experiment, let's believe that Sandi is the best salesperson in the world of all time and she's running a highly successful company blah blah, and the employees who got sacked deserved it because they were lazy slackers. Let's enter the Sandi-verse for a second. Now, even if all of that is true, why in God's name would you post that in the review section of your own company? It's just astoundingly unprofessional.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:47 |
|
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:48 |
|
AP posted:I agree with him, SQ42 is going to be awesome and like you, I too get really confused when people use this humour stuff I've read about but never actually experienced. Humor is so hard to come by on the internet isn't it.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:49 |
|
Wikkheiser posted:For a thought experiment, let's believe that Sandi is the best salesperson in the world of all time and she's running a highly successful company blah blah, and the employees who got sacked deserved it because they were lazy slackers. I love how if nothing else, it confirms the other negative reviews were legitimate.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:49 |
|
she pretty much describes herself in the cons section
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:50 |
|
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:51 |
|
B_of_InfoRedux posted:Humor is so hard to come by on the internet isn't it. No offense, but you may be part of the problem.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:53 |
|
Meanwhile at CIG. https://twitter.com/RobertsSpaceInd/status/726175715633188865
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:55 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3J8FYKZ52w
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:58 |
|
B_of_InfoRedux posted:I love how if nothing else, it confirms the other negative reviews were legitimate. Bingo. It also a more subtle confirmation that they were implicit in trying to take the review down the first time. When it went back up, this was "Phase 2" of the totally clever and not-at-all obvious plan to steer the narrative.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 22:58 |
|
AP posted:No offense, but you may be part of the problem. Thank god its subjective then.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 23:03 |
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stevie_Case
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 23:05 |
|
AP posted:Meanwhile at CIG. Lol, the replies to that tweet
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 23:05 |
|
AP posted:Meanwhile at CIG. im the mad men reject who describes the receptionist as a "pretty new addition" in writing to the world at large
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 23:09 |
|
Here's CR's response to the escapist side by side with some of the glassdoor review, for comparisons sake.quote:CR: This is the statement that really makes my blood boil. If any current employee feels this way they should not be working on Star Citizen or at CIG! I suspect these are the words of a few bitter ex-employees trying to stir trouble but I consider it a privilege and an honor to have so many people support myself and the team in making the game of all our dreams. I have nothing but gratitude to our backers for their support and patience and nothing but respect for the CIG team giving their all to make this game. Anyone who doesn’t feel this is welcome to the door, and as you must now realize there have been a few people who haven’t shared the same passion or love and now resent being called out for it. quote:A lot of the negative reviews below are from former employees that did not understand the bigger picture of our goal or were called out for bad performance and could not keep up with their work. Please do not waste our backers money, do yourself a favor and resign if you cannot pull your own weight. I've had to manage a few that came to work late constantly, played a bunch of online games when they should be working, and once they are called out all of a sudden CIG is a 'bad place to work in'.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 23:11 |
|
Daztek posted:Lol, the replies to that tweet https://twitter.com/cdnr1/status/726178592313466880
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 23:13 |
|
A Neurotic Jew posted:Here's CR's response to the escapist side by side with some of the glassdoor review, for comparisons sake. Now that you post that, I wonder how much of Chris's Escapist rant was actually written by him. As opposed to a certain someone sitting on his shoulder making damned sure "make sure you mention this, and this, and this, and ... gently caress it, move over, I'll write it."
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 23:14 |
|
Murderion posted:im the mad men reject who describes the receptionist as a "pretty new addition" in writing to the world at large im sipping from a snifter of canadian club
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 23:15 |
|
The sign is a good idea imo. It will remind those lazy slackers that they are not at home and that they need to leave their "online gaming" at the airlock door. The fuckers.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 23:18 |
|
A Neurotic Jew posted:Here's CR's response to the escapist side by side with some of the glassdoor review, for comparisons sake. certainly explains all the Restoration Hardware furniture in the place, the 27k + one off custom sliding door thing for the break room, the 20k + coffee machine, and all the first class tickets to F1 Monaco GP Agrajag fucked around with this message at 23:20 on Apr 30, 2016 |
# ? Apr 30, 2016 23:18 |
|
https://www.reddit.com/r/DerekSmart/comments/4h50lv/dereks_cleaning_up_shop/d2npt7b?context=3
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 23:20 |
|
|
# ? Apr 24, 2024 03:07 |
|
Hahaha put your big boy pants back on.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2016 23:23 |