|
Wow this is hosed up. AFAIK they are now actively violating Australian Consumer Law every time an Aussie buys their product and hits accept. quote:""you agree that any Pledge amounts applied against the Pledge Item Cost and the Game Cost shall be non-refundable regardless of whether or not RSI is able to complete and deliver the Game and/or the pledge items" "YOU AGREE, THEREFORE, THAT YOU WILL NEVER ASSERT OR BRING ANY CLAIM OR SUIT AGAINST RSI, ITS PARENT COMPANY, DIVISIONS, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, OR ANY EMPLOYEES OF ANY OF ABOVE, WHICH IS RELATED TO OR BASED ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO; (I) A CLAIM THAT YOU “OWN” ANY VIRTUAL GOODS IN THE GAME, (II) A CLAIM FOR THE “VALUE” OF VIRTUAL GOODS IF RSI DELETES THEM (AND/OR TERMINATES YOUR ACCOUNT) WITH A REASONABLE CAUSE AT RSI’S SOLE DISCRETION""
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 07:41 |
|
|
# ? May 22, 2024 17:40 |
|
trucutru posted:http://imgur.com/a/Ov1Tt Not only that, but you can't violate anyone's copyright with your account name! CIG is SO responsible.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 07:41 |
|
what a bunch of thieving shitheads. Nobody in America may be able to blow this house of cards of a ToS down, but I can't imagine this will hold up anywhere with actual consumer protection laws. We're in the end-game here. I'd be shocked if CIG (as it exists) is a going concern by the end of the year. I think they're going to rig up one last set of smoke and mirrors for CitizenCon to pump the spergs one last time. It'll be a zombie enterprise by then, they'll say "GAME'S DONE EVERYONE" in Q2 2017, then Croberts can have Imaginarium West while everyone else gets hosed. I think it's 50/50 at best that any part of SQ42 ever comes out as a playable game; just as likely it's a Croberts nightmare machinima movie.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 07:50 |
|
ManofManyAliases posted:The Dragonfly will likely be flyable this year. Or is it "flyable" as a hovering variant of the golf cart for hangars and the social module?
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 07:55 |
|
I feel like that TOS is just written at Chris Roberts' express command and is like everything else with the game. The people that made it know its poo poo and won't work, but that's what they were told to do. Promising to never sue the company for any reason, under any circumstances just by buying the product? That's just funny.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 07:56 |
|
Chin posted:So a vehicle that was conceptualized as a "wasteland skiff" is going to be a thing that materializes on Olisar landing pads? I'm excited for people to fly away from Olisar in "Wasteland Skiffs" without their EVA-capable suits randomly farting through their business suits.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 07:57 |
|
Booourns posted:Come on man, you're getting trolled so bad by moma of all people that you are wishing for his death Yeah you're right that's exactly what I'm wishing, great point.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:01 |
|
This was supposed to be hyperbole.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:06 |
|
Bury 'em under red tape and jurisdictional assertions, swan off with the money. 'Till then, keep on doing exactly as you please with your pet project nobody asked for. This is all very unpredictable and hard to see coming! E: I guess the last thing I'm holding out for now is that if CIG have enough breathtaking contempt for their customers to put up an emergency 'Gosh, please pledge now - any money you can give will help us!' plea at the eleventh hour (whenever that occurs in the next year) for just a little bit more money to stop those evil publishers/goons/Derek winning and just maybe they'll be able to work hard and pull off a miracle. Just before they shut up shop and start folding key companies. Would they be that morally bankrupt? Your bets, please. Salt n Reba McEntire fucked around with this message at 08:16 on Jun 11, 2016 |
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:06 |
|
sanctimoniousqfd posted:Holy poo poo, they're basically saying that any pledges now are non-refundable until CIG has ceased development. Delivery date can be extended as long as they never admit they have stopped trying to ship the game. Then after that, any pledge amounts applied against pledge item cost and game cost (isn't that *all* of them?!) is "non-refundable regardless of whether or not RSI is able to complete and deliver the Game and/or the pledge items". So, yeah, we can keep your money until we have spent all of it on European vacations and have none left to refund, and when you order the UberOverlord 9000, we reserve the right to send you JPEGs of the Lesnicks engaged in scat play. THIS IS THE DREAM, PEOPLE! No publisher could EVER be worse than this! WE ARE YOUR MESSIAH!
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:10 |
Fat Shat Sings posted:I feel like that TOS is just written at Chris Roberts' express command and is like everything else with the game. The people that made it know its poo poo and won't work, but that's what they were told to do. iirc there was some court decision upholding forced arbitration in leiu of lawsuits a few years back. Though I think that was for, like, actual contracts and stuff. Of course that doesn't matter since rsi doesn't have any of that in the tos it's just "NO TAKE BACKS AND NO SUING OKAY?" but im no lawyer. Sankis fucked around with this message at 08:18 on Jun 11, 2016 |
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:14 |
|
I'd just like to point out that if you look at an actual real games tos it doesn't include any of that poo poo about refunds or giving up the right to sue. It's shady.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:16 |
|
Sankis posted:iirc there was some court decision upholding forced arbitration in leiu of lawsuits a few years back. Though I think that was for, like, actual contracts and stuff. Of course that doesn't matter since rsi doesn't have any of that in the tos it's just "NO TAKE BACKS AND NO SUING OKAY?" but im no lawyer. unless I'm mistaken, the ToS doesn't even mention arbitration - it just says "got a problem? gently caress off, we're taking your money"
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:20 |
|
flyboi posted:But seriously though I'm gonna GORF post for a second although not as long as a GORF post. Man, anyone that didn't turn and run when they saw the dichotomy of "We will build you the game you are dreaming about." versus "Minimum Viable Product" are beyond all hope and all help since they have demonstrated a staggering, nay, completely psychotic break with reality. I am ever so sorry for them, and, I hope CIG management burns, burns like no company leadership has ever burned to date. I want them to suffer legal ravages that leave Enron ex-management pissing themselves with nightmares. Of course, you know what is going to happen. The crobber is going to tell them they need to return the great star carrier mothership in the sky. Grape or cherry?
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:24 |
|
Jason Sextro posted:unless I'm mistaken, the ToS doesn't even mention arbitration - it just says "got a problem? gently caress off, we're taking your money" It mentions arbitration but also says you can't sue by agreeing Lmao. Whatever gently caress head wrote that tos wrote to appease their boss cause that poo poo won't hold up in court.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:25 |
|
Lets see if I get this straight.. The minute you come anywhere close to this TOS, you are hosed. Happy foruming...<3 You will only get the small "unearned" portion of the money you gave us back if we roll over and die. By that time, we will have "earned" all portions of your money anyway via trying not to die, so you get nothing. You agree that if the game you have originally pledged for is not a glorified single player FMV movie with 0 gameplay, you get no money back. Did you buy something on the grey market? gently caress you, twas a gift. No refunds. - Fine, I'll melt the fucker and then ask for a refund. Store credit yo. - Too late, we have refactored the database to account for that and track if the credit came from gifted assets. Happy summer holidays, Br0wnHornet <3 Dante80 fucked around with this message at 08:45 on Jun 11, 2016 |
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:29 |
|
It doesn't need to hold up in court. It just needs to muddy the waters enough - that and the jurisdictional bullshit - so any opponents give up and don't bother. The more people don't bother, the more money they keep. Given the sort of people who're vocally supporting this I would say they've judged their marks quite well. I hope it explodes in their face, but it probably won't.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:30 |
|
So up until about 2 hours ago when I read the new ToS I was supporting Star Citizen. Truth be told, I'm not a Derek fan... and I have a significant investment in Star Citizen... But with all the recent events of finding out I'm being labeled, the plagiarism, this new ToS made me genuinely angry. I don't believe that the ToS is legal, because it's worded as a "Contract" with the new indefinite clause in it. That's a perpetuity contract, I'm pretty sure... and not legal here in the States. Anyone know a good lawyer?
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:31 |
|
That TOS is utterly bonkers Someone needs to put it to the legal test
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:31 |
|
Streetroller posted:So up until about 2 hours ago when I read the new ToS I was supporting Star Citizen. welcome oh yea that has no more kool-aid in his blood stream as for the lawyer, try Ortwin lol
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:32 |
|
someone get the accc on the blower cuz this poo poo is mental ha ha haaaa
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:33 |
|
Streetroller posted:So up until about 2 hours ago when I read the new ToS I was supporting Star Citizen. Welcome aboard Commando. How much are you in for? Also, don't click agree on the latest TOS.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:34 |
|
Streetroller posted:So up until about 2 hours ago when I read the new ToS I was supporting Star Citizen. Welcome commando. o9
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:34 |
|
Streetroller posted:So up until about 2 hours ago when I read the new ToS I was supporting Star Citizen. Derek smart DEREK SMART DEREK SMART Welcome to the forums
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:37 |
|
Streetroller posted:So up until about 2 hours ago when I read the new ToS I was supporting Star Citizen. welcome to purgatory, join us in the ascent
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:39 |
|
Streetroller posted:So up until about 2 hours ago when I read the new ToS I was supporting Star Citizen. Get a refund, citizen. If that doesn't work, do a chargeback. And if you're not in the USA, you have consumer protection laws that allow you to get it all back.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:40 |
|
so if you're a backer who signed up with the old ToS and don't agree to the new terms do you get a refund?
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:42 |
|
Also, to all the shitizens out there who thought that Derek was full of bullshit for talking about a new TOS, surprise, he was right! Again! As he has been time and time again!
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:43 |
|
Dragonstoned posted:so if you're a backer who signed up with the old ToS and don't agree to the new terms do you get a refund? Yes.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:45 |
|
Dante80 posted:Welcome aboard Commando. How much are you in for? Also, don't click agree on the latest TOS. About $3000 (From RSI directly, not gifted) AlmightyPants posted:Get a refund, citizen. If that doesn't work, do a chargeback. And if you're not in the USA, you have consumer protection laws that allow you to get it all back. Unfortunately, I am in the USA - East Coast. I've already sent in my request, but I'm assuming it will be denied as I had to use the website in-order to send in the request in the first place, thereby agreeing to the terms according to them. I've started documenting everything. I've paid through PayPal, but it was back in 2014, so I'm not sure they will allow a chargeback of that magnitude from that period. Like I said, I am pretty sure that the ToS "Contract" is illegal due to the perpetuity nature of it... but hopefully this won't end in court.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:46 |
|
Streetroller posted:Anyone know a good lawyer? Perhaps you could agree to walk Legal for Derek? Humor aside, it's getting harder and harder to point to ways out of this project. Edit: Paypal will stop allowing disputes on crowdfunding stuff as of the 25th. Try a dispute, not sure what the best possible explanation would be though. Matlock Birthmark fucked around with this message at 08:55 on Jun 11, 2016 |
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:47 |
|
Streetroller posted:So up until about 2 hours ago when I read the new ToS I was supporting Star Citizen. Well, welcome, buddy! Nice to see you got out at some point before bankruptcy. Welcome to the war.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:49 |
|
Streetroller posted:About $3000 (From RSI directly, not gifted) Paypal stops accepting charge-backs from crowd-funding projects sometime this month. Whatever you do, be fast about it.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:53 |
|
Streetroller posted:About $3000 (From RSI directly, not gifted) Well, as mentioned, initiate chargeback with Paypal asap because they're about to shut that window for good and I have zero doubt Star Citizen is responsible for them changing their policies. (and no, CIG, this is not out of an "anonymous hate campaign", YOU failed to deliver the product, YOU need to come clean about what is and isn't feasible with this project, but until you cease failing to deliver by your own timeframes, people deserve their money back and a full accounting)
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 08:54 |
|
Streetroller posted:About $3000 (From RSI directly, not gifted) The TOS you agreed to when making purchases are expired, you still haven't received the final product so you should be able to get a refund. In any case, be careful with your posting. CIG monitors this thread ( Hi CIG!)
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 09:01 |
|
Streetroller posted:About $3000 (From RSI directly, not gifted) Like everyone said, charge back. Hopefully this new tos serves as a wakeup to more people cause having stuff about no refunds and agreeing not to sue is NOT normal and should raise a bunch of flags.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 09:10 |
|
Lime Tonics posted:Just posting patch notes again, Hasn't this been in the patch notes for 3 or 4 letters of the Greek alphabet? What exactly is going on in Selfland Hangar?
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 09:11 |
|
If everything about Star Citizen before this new TOS were a bunch of red flags, this is basically an array of tire bonfires spelling "THIS IS A SCAM."
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 09:12 |
|
This is so goddamned funny. Realizing the level of knowledge about CiG and this thread required to truly appreciate it made me feel ashamed.
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 09:14 |
|
|
# ? May 22, 2024 17:40 |
|
Oh noes!
|
# ? Jun 11, 2016 09:16 |