|
theres a degree of subtext and intuition that you seem incapable of grasping in this game.
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 07:47 |
|
|
##vote aa
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:01
|
|
|
dongsbot 9000 posted:you literally approach the game like a broken robot "uhhh roleblockers are better than doctors cuz if you just randomly block people youre more likely to hit mafia as roleblocker than town as doctor" "uhhh if we randomly lynch people then we might accidentally lynch ferngully and then town will lose" "uhhh if youre vanilla tree i guess youre basically useless just wait for ferngully to tell us whos scum" I was scum and my RB scumbuddy was on the block. Wtf is ur problem?
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:01
|
|
|
what is your problem
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:02
|
|
|
like, clinically
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:02
|
|
|
quidnose, please analyse my posts for towniness vs scumitude
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:04
|
|
|
Adahn1986 posted:Wtf is ur problem? dongsbot 9000 posted:what is your problem mafia.txt Seriously though don't talk about other games, and if it means anything at all I would personally enjoy the game more if we could keep things chill-ish?
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:06
|
|
|
i forgot president game was still running in gbs
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:07
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:mafia.txt 
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:08
|
|
|
Also, MT, where do you fall on the "do we lynch or no-lynch day 1 and 2?" quesiton.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:09
|
|
|
dongs could you cool it slightly this is a fun cool game for players of all ages
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:10
|
|
|
i wish it was a fun cool game for players of all ages except one
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:12
|
|
|
wish it were
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:12
|
|
|
dongsbot 9000 posted:##vote aa Don't be so salty lil bacon bit.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:13
|
|
|
Max posted:Also, MT, where do you fall on the "do we lynch or no-lynch day 1 and 2?" quesiton. I feel like we have to lynch D1 and D2, there's no other way to gain information. If we no-lynch D1 and D2, isn't that essentially the same as starting the game with 2 people primed for arson?
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:15
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:I feel like we have to lynch D1 and D2, there's no other way to gain information. Hooray! I had an opinion that someone agrees with!
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:16
|
|
|
Hah, I hadn't really read the game before answering that but apparently my answer seems to be the consensus. If anything I say we turbo someone to accelerate the process by which people are forced to make in-game decisions. ##vote Moatillata - I eenie-meenie-miney-mo'ed the playerlist.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:20
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:Hah, I hadn't really read the game before answering that but apparently my answer seems to be the consensus. If anything I say we turbo someone to accelerate the process by which people are forced to make in-game decisions. Moat is indeed a meanie-head.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:25
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Don't be so salty lil bacon bit. you entertained adahn1986s obviously bad idea like a SCUM would
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:26
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:Hah, I hadn't really read the game before answering that but apparently my answer seems to be the consensus. If anything I say we turbo someone to accelerate the process by which people are forced to make in-game decisions. why turbot
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:27
|
|
|
dongsbot 9000 posted:you entertained adahn1986s obviously bad idea like a SCUM would False, I rode the fence because the two courses suggested both had good points.  Lynching is probably the best course though given stumps being in the game.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:32
|
|
|
Random lynching is absolutely the worst thing we can do.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:37
|
|
|
Use the power of deduction.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:38
|
|
|
dongsbot 9000 posted:you entertained adahn1986s obviously bad idea like a SCUM would **entertained adahn1986s idea
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:42
|
|
|
As of right now I don't want to bark up the wrong tree and am stumped as is usual for day 1 play. The mechanics discussion seems a bit heavy handed, but not warrantless. I just don't want the game to devolve into that. I'll be releafed if we get scum today.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:46
|
|
|
you will taste my chainsaw arm aa
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:47
|
|
|
Maple you'll learn to love me bacon bit.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:47
|
|
|
suffer not the bad tree to live
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:49
|
|
|
dongsbot 9000 posted:suffer not the bad tree to live Willow you give me a hug? I'm pining for your affection.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 18:53
|
|
|
Holy crap things exploded here. I agree with everyone who's against Adahn's plan because it sounds like the worst idea.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 19:00
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:I feel like we have to lynch D1 and D2, there's no other way to gain information. If Ferngully douses incorrectly N1 and N2, yes. But D3 it puts us in an interesting situation. The arsonists won't want to lynch the people they've primed, even if Ferngully saved them. Town also has 4 potentially useful lynches, because lynching either arsonist or either primed townie is "good" in that it slows scum. The 'strategy' makes use of our power role. If we get lucky and she correctly douses a couple townies, the arsonists are boned. If, however, we play the game with a 'lynch erryday' mentality, we cripple ferngully as we're likely to lynch her, out her, or get her randomly primed. You guys do make good points though. It's just a question of whether we want to make use of our power role or not.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 19:08
|
|
|
It seems like the consensus is that we will not rely on the power role.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 19:09
|
|
|
Adahn1986 posted:If Ferngully douses incorrectly N1 and N2, yes. You seem to be approaching this as if the person that gets lunched will be a completely random decision. That's not the case. A big part of this game, and this setup in particular, is dissecting what people say. Dongs was rude before, but they had a point. No lunching day 1 and 2 gives scum two free primed targets, or even a free kill, before they ever have to worry about getting lunched. It's sort of suspicious that you can't see that, but I don't know how new a player you are.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 19:13
|
|
|
##unvote
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 19:15
|
|
|
I see it more as people describing a chess game as if it's being played with checkers pieces, but I can see that the consensus is against the idea so I'll let it alone.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 19:16
|
|
|
Can you please read the things you post and make an effort to sound less condescending Adahn?
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 19:17
|
|
|
Li Dawny posted:Can you please read the things you post and make an effort to sound less condescending Adahn? Condescending? Not one person has considered the possibility that the firefighter will be useful in this game, and everyone who's argued against my thoughts has operated under the assumption that she will never douse effectively. That's not condescension, that's observation.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 19:19
|
|
|
Adahn1986 posted:I see it more as people describing a chess game as if it's being played with checkers pieces, but I can see that the consensus is against the idea so I'll let it alone. Oh come on. This setup was known, it's mostly going to be a game where we figure things out on our own. This is actually possible. Our firefighter may help us, or they may not. It's dangerous to forgo two days of gaining no information on the chance that they do help us. But if scum pick their targets completely randomly, there's only a 1/9 chance that the firefighter will cancel out their action. Even the math is bad in that sense. People's opinions about a flipped player are far more valuable than that, plus we get the opinions of stumped but confirmed town players, who again, will probably not be primed because that seems like a total waste of a night action.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 19:21
|
|
|
Adahn1986 posted:Condescending? Not one person has considered the possibility that the firefighter will be useful in this game, and everyone who's argued against my thoughts has operated under the assumption that she will never douse effectively. Show me one post where someone said Ferngully isn't useful. We all agree she's our most important tool, but we disagree on how to proceed from here. And the assertion that we just don't 'get it' is condescension.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 19:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 07:47 |
|
|
I also just generally rebel when someone is publicly suggesting what the PR should do. It's on them to figure out the best path forward.
|
|
#
?
Jun 14, 2016 19:24
|
|