|
fozzy fosbourne posted:I think that's a pretty old bug:
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2016 22:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 20:25 |
|
|
I think there is some way you can make it 120 on desktop and 144 in 3D applications. Let me see E: this is what I was thinking of, but it's the opposite: http://www.overclock.net/t/1581181/acer-xb271hu-share-your-experience-and-show-pics/2800#post_24764691 quote:
fozzy fosbourne fucked around with this message at 22:10 on Jun 25, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2016 22:07
|
|
|
drat the 980 ti was nearly a year after the 980? I'm hesitant getting a 1080 because I know I'll get burned again like I did when I bought by 780 on release, the ti came out 6 months later. They gotta drop a ti variant just before black Friday. My 780 is showing its age and I don't know what direction to go.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2016 22:17
|
|
|
They'll drop a new Titan before Ti.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2016 22:28
|
|
|
Yeah I think it's going to be like last generation where the x70 and x80 Ti have the best Performance/$, especially if the current GP102 rumors are true which show it having 50% more CUDA cores.
MaxxBot fucked around with this message at 22:37 on Jun 25, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2016 22:35
|
|
|
does amd have any offerings that will actually push the fps on a 144hz ultrawide freesync? Are they trying to push crossfire 480 as the solution?
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2016 22:42
|
|
|
Fauxtool posted:does amd have any offerings that will actually push the fps on a 144hz ultrawide freesync? I'm not sure anything is (in guessing 1440p?) really capable of that yet single card, that's an intense amount of data
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 00:10
|
|
|
Yeah, even the 1080 whirring at max gets just over 100FPS 1440p in the latest games. You're going to have to either way for the RX490/Fury 2 from AMD or maybe the 500 series depending on the reality (at an engineering level) of Polaris.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 00:30
|
|
|
Anyone have some insight into when we'll start seeing real stock of non-FE 1080s? I've been watching nowinstock all week, and non-FE cards coming into stock is very rare, in fact I suspect most of the instances this week have been newegg false alarms. Also, I've noticed that blt has pushed their estimated arrival dates for any non-FE card all the way back to August from early to mid July. Do the 3rd party manufacturers have any reason not to keep producing FE parts at a markup over their custom parts as long as supplies are as constrained as they appear to be? Chuu fucked around with this message at 00:39 on Jun 26, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 00:36
|
|
|
Chuu posted:Anyone have some insight into when we'll start seeing real stock of non-FE 1080s? I've been watching nowinstock all week, and non-FE cards coming into stock is very rare, in fact I suspect most of the instances this week have been newegg false alarms. Also, I've noticed that blt has pushed their estimated arrival dates for any non-FE card all the way back to August from early to mid July. No, but there was some real stock towards the end of this week. I wouldn't expect much longer. There were 1080's available for hours yesterday or Thursday (yeah I know how that sounds lol).
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 00:43
|
|
|
Should I wait for the EVGA FTW version of 1080 to become available online somewhere or should I just drive down to a Fry's 30 miles away to pick up a standard founder edition?
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 00:47
|
|
|
SweetBro posted:Should I wait for the EVGA FTW version of 1080 to become available online somewhere or should I just drive down to a Fry's 30 miles away to pick up a standard founder edition? I'd wait if it meant avoiding blower fan.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 00:58
|
|
|
THE DOG HOUSE posted:No, but there was some real stock towards the end of this week. I wouldn't expect much longer. There were 1080's available for hours yesterday or Thursday (yeah I know how that sounds lol). I don't know how I missed this, had now-in-stock up the entire time at work. Unless you mean the MSI blower card, which I passed on. I'm pretty sure the STRYX coming in stock was a false alarm, which I noticed nowinstock does sometimes specifically for newegg. Hoping you are right about availability. I'm so close to pulling the trigger on a FE card. If it was just the price I would have pulled the trigger a long time ago, but I just don't want to deal with the acoustic profile of a blower. Speaking of blowers, are the 3rd party blowers decent these days? Better than the reference FE blower? The MSI blower was in stock for $630 on newegg for several hours, but given my memory of the 680 blowers, i.e. pretty much every one was worse (sometimes considerably worse) than the Titan reference blower in terms of thermal profile and noise, I passed. Chuu fucked around with this message at 01:08 on Jun 26, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 01:00
|
|
|
Chuu posted:I don't know how I missed this, had now-in-stock up the entire time at work. Unless you mean the MSI blower card, which I passed on. I'm pretty sure the STRYX coming in stock was a false alarm, which I noticed nowinstock does sometimes specifically for newegg. You are probably correct on the cheap blowers. Id suggest using Neweggs auto notify on each of the "good ones"
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 01:22
|
|
|
Ak Gara posted:I'd wait if it meant avoiding blower fan. From what I heard though, the ACX is pretty bad too.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 01:22
|
|
|
Nfcknblvbl posted:They'll drop a new Titan before Ti. Do they have enough cores for that?
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 01:26
|
|
|
Not if those yield problems that are being rumored are true.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 01:27
|
|
|
If they have yield problems they'll definitely drop a Titan first, and crank the price to get demand to match their supply until they have enough to release a Ti.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 02:25
|
|
|
the question is, how much will Titan Xen sell for during the fire sale
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 02:30
|
|
|
Anime Schoolgirl posted:the question is, how much will Titan Xen sell for during the fire sale Realistically, $1200. Optimistically, $1000.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 02:35
|
|
|
Enos Cabell posted:Still tweaking mine, but I hit 18502 on firestrike with a 24000 graphics score on a 1080. Core at +120 and memory at +400 I hit 16,058 (24k graphics score) on Fire Strike with a 1080 & i5 4690K with that same overclock. How are were you able to take it?
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 04:07
|
|
|
wargames posted:Do they have enough cores for that? Not all Titans are uncut dies - the original GTX Titan had one shader engine disabled, only the Titan Black was a full uncut die. Or in other words, the 780 Ti actually had more cores than the first Titan. I can absolutely see them following the same formula with Pascal - release a crop-die Titan and then release a Titan Black down the road around the time when they release a (crop) 1080 Ti. Then maybe the 1180 Ti is uncut.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 04:36
|
|
|
Resounding preference for uncut.  I'll show myself out now...
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 07:03
|
|
|
fletcher posted:Does anybody have a use for this fancy SLI bridge? If so, you can have it for free. Just throw me a couple bux for shipping. It lights up and looks cool. Unfortunately the red sticker makes it more pink. At any rate, I only have one graphics card now, no need for this thing anymore. Last chance of trying to give this thing away, otherwise it disappears to the depths of the spare parts bin, never to be seen again! edit: It has been claimed! fletcher fucked around with this message at 18:13 on Jun 26, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 08:25
|
|
|
Chuu posted:Anyone have some insight into when we'll start seeing real stock of non-FE 1080s? I've been watching nowinstock all week, and non-FE cards coming into stock is very rare, in fact I suspect most of the instances this week have been newegg false alarms. Also, I've noticed that blt has pushed their estimated arrival dates for any non-FE card all the way back to August from early to mid July. Hmm. Just looking at Belgium, there's actually a decent amount of 1080 FE's available for immediate delivery. Most of the customs are indeed preorder, though. And I have no idea how long it would take to actually get one. Could be anywhere from two days to months. The 1070's availability seems to be even more limited. Here's hoping the release of the RX 480 will put some pressure on retailers to lower prices and/or on nVidia to increase production of the Pascal cards. This could be good for AMD if they get the timing and marketing right. Phlegmish fucked around with this message at 10:43 on Jun 26, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 10:38
|
|
|
3DMark put out a teaser for their DX12 benchmark. Soon, we won't have to rely solely on Ashes of the Singularity anymore.  Should note that if you care about benchmarking things, 3DMark is also on sale on Steam for a measly five bucks. (Or, £2147483647. =P) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2JMD1Ytn5M SwissArmyDruid fucked around with this message at 12:30 on Jun 26, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 12:27
|
|
|
I got a GTX 1070 recently and I noticed it never goes to idle clocks at the desktop. I only have one monitor. I tried changing all the usual settings to no effect. Any pro tips?
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 16:20
|
|
|
If you're Overwatching or whatever, the Battle.net launcher client makes my 1080 clocks stay high even with the hardware acceleration option ticked off.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 16:29
|
|
|
teh_Broseph posted:If you're Overwatching or whatever, the Battle.net launcher client makes my 1080 clocks stay high even with the hardware acceleration option ticked off. I'll try I clean install of the driver I guess.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 16:33
|
|
|
Spatial posted:I got a GTX 1070 recently and I noticed it never goes to idle clocks at the desktop. I only have one monitor. I tried changing all the usual settings to no effect. Any pro tips? fozzy fosbourne posted:I think that's a pretty old bug: Do you have a 144hz display?
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 16:38
|
|
|
fozzy fosbourne posted:Do you have a 144hz display? The clean install did work, for whatever reason. From my perspective in the control panel nothing has changed, but the clocks are fine now. Sitting pretty at 215/405MHz at 2560x1440 144Hz.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 16:52
|
|
|
fletcher posted:I hit 16,058 (24k graphics score) on Fire Strike with a 1080 & i5 4690K with that same overclock. How are were you able to take it? I have an i7 6700k @ 4.6 and a GTX 1080 with +150 GPU and + 400 RAM and I am getting 17483 on 3D mark with 20971 graphics score. How are you 2 getting such higher GPU scores than I am?
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 17:54
|
|
|
Question: I'm looking in afterburner and sometimes my core clock jumps from about 240 to about 1595 when idle in windows. Memory clock also jumps, from 405 to about 4500, at the same time. Power use jumps from about 7-9 to mid 30s but the GPU use drops from 5-8 to 0-1 at the same time. Any ideas what's doing this, or is it a normal thing that you only notice when you have the program up and activity visible? Idle temp doesn't seem to change from 39-40C during those brief periods either. e: It does this even with the monitor set to 120hz so I doubt it's related to that 144hz bug mentioned earlier. Lowen SoDium posted:I have an i7 6700k @ 4.6 and a GTX 1080 with +150 GPU and + 400 RAM and I am getting 17483 on 3D mark with 20971 graphics score. How are you 2 getting such higher GPU scores than I am? When I did a test at +75 core and +700 memory briefly* my graphics score was 20,746 on a G1 1070 so your graphics score does seem oddly low. * dropped to +50 and +500 since it seemed like my drivers were starting to fail in FFXIV and possibly other games Evil Fluffy fucked around with this message at 19:25 on Jun 26, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 18:04
|
|
|
I'm in the 18k/24k club too but I have a pretty meager overclock on my g1 1080. +59 and +50, iirc. My card absolutely hates memory overclocking for some reason. 6700k at 4.5, 16gb at 3200. It's really stable though in everything I've tested, unigine heaven/valley/overwatch/witcher. I guess I could throw furmark at it  Maybe your memory overclock is too high and the error correction that people speculated about has kicked in? What are your temperatures and boost like when running the benchmark? Have your tried cranking all of your fans up to max during a bench as a point of comparison? Have you checked nvidia control panel for any image quality options that may be lit up? One thing that I've noticed running unigine heaven to find a stable overclock is that benchmarking without a warmup to get your card to its load temperatures is kind of silly. Boost will happily kick me put to 2025 when I'm first going from idle to load but once I reach max temperatures I'm 1950-1977. Benching after letting unigine heaven loop for 15 minutes would be much more scientific.mmaybe 3dmark already does this and I'm just naive. fozzy fosbourne fucked around with this message at 18:08 on Jun 26, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 18:05
|
|
|
fletcher posted:I hit 16,058 (24k graphics score) on Fire Strike with a 1080 & i5 4690K with that same overclock. How are were you able to take it? Mine was stable up to +150 core +450 memory, with the power limit bumped up to 110. Started getting driver crashes pushing past that. I eased back a little to +130 core and +400 memory, and played several hours of Doom and Witcher 3 without any problems.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 18:12
|
|
|
So I'm looking at building a new computer and want 1440p 144mhz screen. Right now I'm leaning towards free sync and an rx480, but could be convinced to spend more on an nvidia setup if it's significantly better. Only two games i care about probably are WoW and HotS. Can I get good results out of the less recursive AMD path?
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 18:15
|
|
|
don't those games run at 100+hz even on a 970? rx480 should be fine.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 18:31
|
|
|
Lowen SoDium posted:I have an i7 6700k @ 4.6 and a GTX 1080 with +150 GPU and + 400 RAM and I am getting 17483 on 3D mark with 20971 graphics score. How are you 2 getting such higher GPU scores than I am? Hmm, good question. Even with Shadowplay turned on I'm getting a graphics score of 23,000. Any backup programs or antivirus running in the background that would be hogging resources? I'm running Windows 10 with the GeForce 368.39 driver, if we wanna rule that out as well.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 18:39
|
|
|
tijag posted:So I'm looking at building a new computer and want 1440p 144mhz screen. Gsync is the best technology, the problem is that it requires an expensive FPGA and new pcb which is why it's more expensive. I've seen a freesync monitor (5-10 min) and lived with a gsync (gsync autocorrects to gay club btw) 144hz 1440p, and gsync still wows me.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 18:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 20:25 |
|
|
Evil Fluffy posted:
fletcher posted:Hmm, good question. Even with Shadowplay turned on I'm getting a graphics score of 23,000. Any backup programs or antivirus running in the background that would be hogging resources? I found part of my problem. The NV control panel was set to V-sync for all applications and my X34 only goes to 100hz so I was being frame limited. V-sync off and now I get 18249 and 22574. Still not as high as some people but getting there. I will try turning off shadow play next. edit: Turning off Shadow play bumped me up to 19008 and 24015. Thanks for the help guys. Lowen SoDium fucked around with this message at 19:02 on Jun 26, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 18:46
|
|