|
Watermelon cat owns bones
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2016 15:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 20:48 |
|
|
Deadpool's crotch shading sure uh, changed. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 06:01
|
|
|
Ol' crazy-legs Deadpool, they call him.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2016 07:29
|
|
|
"Tattoo a really ordinary gun on me. Poorly."
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2016 18:29
|
|
|
Local shop in my old hometown is putting things like this on people.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2016 18:38
|
|
|
SpliffClavin posted:Local shop in my old hometown is putting things like this on people. The rare Chiuhuahualope.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2016 18:43
|
|
|
SpliffClavin posted:"Tattoo a really ordinary gun on me. Poorly." In all fairness, it's a tattoo worthy of anyone who likes glocks.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2016 21:08
|
|
|
I had to look up the double trigger thing because I don't know anything about guns: https://us.glock.com/technology/safe-action
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
SpliffClavin posted:Local shop in my old hometown is putting things like this on people. Oh my god this has me tittering like crazy.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2016 23:26
|
|
|
fullroundaction posted:I had to look up the double trigger thing because I don't know anything about guns: https://us.glock.com/technology/safe-action It's a garbage as gently caress gimmick and belongs in this thread. Ask me about my multiple (3) coworkers who lost their jobs due to negligent discharges all using Glocks! Oh wait. Yeah that's pretty much the whole story.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 02:30
|
|
|
LingcodKilla posted:It's a garbage as gently caress gimmick and belongs in this thread. Where did they work?
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 06:39
|
|
|
LingcodKilla posted:It's a garbage as gently caress gimmick and belongs in this thread. You should be happy to no longer work with people who are somehow incapable of drawing and/or holstering their guns without fingerfucking the trigger.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 06:49
|
|
|
Nuevo posted:You should be happy to no longer work with people who are somehow incapable of drawing and/or holstering their guns without fingerfucking the trigger. Glock Leg happens. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 07:31
|
|
|
Nuevo posted:You should be happy to no longer work with people who are somehow incapable of drawing and/or holstering their guns without fingerfucking the trigger. The initial "Glock Leg" and "Glock TV" was because the gun needs to be decocked by pulling the trigger before removing the slide, and a ton of morons just pulled the trigger after removing the magazine without bothering to rack the slide first. The double trigger thing isn't a dangerous gimmick or anything, though. Mechanical safeties have always been a means of keeping something from accidentally yanking the trigger like your clothes or a stray branch. It's expected that the user won't turn the safety on and then start fiddling with the trigger for no reason. Glocks are safe as long as the user isn't pulling the trigger.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 17:17
|
|
|
chitoryu12 posted:The initial "Glock Leg" and "Glock TV" was because the gun needs to be decocked by pulling the trigger before removing the slide, and a ton of morons just pulled the trigger after removing the magazine without bothering to rack the slide first. One of the misfires happened at the barrel when part of his uniform snagged him up and he reached with his second hand to prevent it from dropping and managed to hit the double trigger with his off hand. Would have been safer to drop it really. The trigger was designed to not be fired unless pressure comes directly forward to aft but there was eye witness to the exact opposite. Mostly I hate the fact that it's marketed as a safety when it should really shouldnt have the word safety in it and it basically works like a single action auto yet we are not allowed to use 1911 due to no single actions autos allowed. Tuck in your loving uniforms you slobs.  Basically its a extremely well made, well marketed, simpletons clown gun.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2016 21:10
|
|
|
LingcodKilla posted:One of the misfires happened at the barrel when part of his uniform snagged him up and he reached with his second hand to prevent it from dropping and managed to hit the double trigger with his off hand. Would have been safer to drop it really. The trigger was designed to not be fired unless pressure comes directly forward to aft but there was eye witness to the exact opposite. Mostly I hate the fact that it's marketed as a safety when it should really shouldnt have the word safety in it and it basically works like a single action auto yet we are not allowed to use 1911 due to no single actions autos allowed. Last time I played with a Glock, that kind of action should be impossible. I even tried to pull the trigger just from the side, and it simply wouldn't go back without that center lever being pulled too. Chances are the eyewitnesses didn't see it right. Maybe he just needs one of those NYPD guns where the trigger pull is 11+ pounds and you can't hit the building in front of you without jerking the gun 45 degrees to the side with every shot.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2016 03:35
|
|
|
I think the reasonable compromise here is to agree that safety training programs based on DA or super heavy trigger pull guns will cause some accidents when you switch to a light single-action. I think the Glock is a hell of a lot safer, but that's what I learned on. A lot of folk I've seen at the range are just barely competent with, like, a S&W with a heavy trigger and a ton of disconnects, and really they shouldn't be shooting at all. But, to be fair, they'd ND themselves every other round if they were running Glocks. I imagine it's a tricky call; if you know your guys are not going to get all the training they really should have, or not going to do it, do you get a gun that's harder for them to fire? Or alternatively you can make your claim and stick that poo poo on your neck. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2016 05:22
|
|
|
LingcodKilla posted:One of the misfires happened at the barrel when part of his uniform snagged him up and he reached with his second hand to prevent it from dropping and managed to hit the double trigger with his off hand. Would have been safer to drop it really. The trigger was designed to not be fired unless pressure comes directly forward to aft but there was eye witness to the exact opposite. Mostly I hate the fact that it's marketed as a safety when it should really shouldnt have the word safety in it and it basically works like a single action auto yet we are not allowed to use 1911 due to no single actions autos allowed. Am I being too critical if I hate the hair? The face looks great(even considering the clown), but what's up with the hair? e:Okay, now I'm just getting that the gun is...somehow her hair, specifically the butt? Postal Parcel has a new favorite as of 05:46 on Jun 27, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2016 05:37
|
|
|
FistOfTacitus posted:I think the reasonable compromise here is to agree that safety training programs based on DA or super heavy trigger pull guns will cause some accidents when you switch to a light single-action. I think the Glock is a hell of a lot safer, but that's what I learned on. A lot of folk I've seen at the range are just barely competent with, like, a S&W with a heavy trigger and a ton of disconnects, and really they shouldn't be shooting at all. But, to be fair, they'd ND themselves every other round if they were running Glocks. I imagine it's a tricky call; if you know your guys are not going to get all the training they really should have, or not going to do it, do you get a gun that's harder for them to fire? Give them only unloaded guns duh. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2016 06:20
|
|
|
Postal Parcel posted:Am I being too critical if I hate the hair? The face looks great(even considering the clown), but what's up with the hair? The hair is egregiously bad.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2016 07:17
|
|
|
FistOfTacitus posted:I think the reasonable compromise here is to agree that safety training programs based on DA or super heavy trigger pull guns will cause some accidents when you switch to a light single-action. I think the Glock is a hell of a lot safer, but that's what I learned on. A lot of folk I've seen at the range are just barely competent with, like, a S&W with a heavy trigger and a ton of disconnects, and really they shouldn't be shooting at all. But, to be fair, they'd ND themselves every other round if they were running Glocks. I imagine it's a tricky call; if you know your guys are not going to get all the training they really should have, or not going to do it, do you get a gun that's harder for them to fire? people who brand slogans and logos on their bodies bum me the gently caress out
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2016 07:18
|
|
|
At least it should make you happy to know that I looked to see if anyone had the 'Damaged' forehead tattoo from the new joker movie and was only able to come up with temporary tattoos rather than real ones
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2016 07:27
|
|
|
Zelder posted:people who brand slogans and logos on their bodies bum me the gently caress out even creepier to me is that it calls her (him?) "property" ugh      
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2016 10:51
|
|
|
I kind of like the girl on the swing one.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2016 14:11
|
|
|
Humbug Scoolbus posted:I kind of like the girl on the swing one. It looks like a copy of a copy of something the tattoo artist saw one time in a magazine, a victim of lost in translation.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2016 14:28
|
|
|
LingcodKilla posted:Give them only unloaded guns duh. Is this the tattoo they give you when you had a vasectomy?
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2016 14:48
|
|
|
"this property"
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2016 15:08
|
|
|
Elsa posted:It looks like a copy of a copy of something the tattoo artist saw one time in a magazine, a victim of lost in translation. It still looks kind of understated and cool.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2016 15:39
|
|
|
Elsa posted:It looks like a copy of a copy of something the tattoo artist saw one time in a magazine, a victim of lost in translation. I could have sworn this was an actual thing that existed and was just badly translated by the artist, but apparently it's just a couple of very prolific stock drawings. I did find this one though, which would be a pretty  tattoo if done by someone competent.
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2016 16:20
|
|
|
davidspackage posted:Is this the tattoo they give you when you had a vasectomy? Nah. This is the one. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2016 17:15
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 27, 2016 23:44
|
|
|
Humbug Scoolbus posted:It still looks kind of understated and cool. It's boring at best.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:10
|
|
|
Someone Awful! posted:even creepier to me is that it calls her (him?) "property" ugh This actually owns
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 00:17
|
|
|
MoreLikeTen posted:"this property" Honestly it's probably just a straight copy from a sticker somewhere.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 01:32
|
|
|
Does that dog have a gun for a head?
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 04:38
|
|
|
StuG Jeebus posted:Does that dog have a gun for a head? It's half-cockederspaniel.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 04:44
|
|
|
StuG Jeebus posted:Does that dog have a gun for a head? Yes, and the hawk has hands for talons.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 04:44
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:It's half-cockederspaniel. Glockerspaniel.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 05:11
|
|
|
Nuevo posted:Yes, and the hawk has hands for talons. Birds of Pray  e:       and two fun ones  
Postal Parcel has a new favorite as of 06:37 on Jun 28, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 06:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 20:48 |
|
|
rydiafan posted:Glockerspaniel. Yours is better
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2016 06:37
|
|