Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
How will you be voting in the UKEU Referendum?
This poll is closed.
Remain - Keep Britane Strong! 328 15.40%
Leave - Take Are Sovreignity Back! 115 5.40%
Remain - But only because Brexit are crazy 506 23.76%
Leave - But only because the EU is terrible 157 7.37%
Spoiled Ballot - This whole thing is an awful idea 61 2.86%
I'm not going to vote 19 0.89%
I'm not allowed to vote 411 19.30%
Pissflaps 533 25.02%
Total: 2130 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Locked thread
Ms Adequate
Oct 30, 2011

Baby even when I'm dead and gone
You will always be my only one, my only one
When the night is calling
No matter who I become
You will always be my only one, my only one, my only one
When the night is calling



Baloogan posted:

its 50% off till the 4th!

Bought it recently actually, just haven't got around to learning the drat thing yet :p But this wiki is actually helpful in that regard so thanks for inadvertently helping!

e; 559 AD, Anglian settlers move deeper into Scotland, setting the stage for germanic ruination of these fair gaelic isles for at least another millennium and a half.

Ms Adequate fucked around with this message at 22:02 on Jun 30, 2016

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pistol_Pete
Sep 15, 2007

Oven Wrangler

Jedit posted:

Can we have an agreement that in the new thread people will just not respond to Pissflaps? He's making the thread all but unreadable.

Yeah and stop quoting him ffs, I have him on ignore for a reason.

Vengeance of Pandas
Sep 8, 2008

THE TERRIBLE POST WENT THATAWAY!

radmonger posted:

Can the people who disagree with this show their working?

99.9% of people are t members of the Labour Party. Of those who aren't, the plausible reasons are

A: don't like left wing politics at all
B: Dont like left wing politics enough to actively join a party
C: member of some other political party to the left of labour

for what I said to.be wrong, c has to be bigger than a + b.

Bollocks, the vast majority of people are not members of any political party in the UK.

    From Wiki the current registered membership numbers.

  • Conservatives - 150k
  • Labour - 554,272 split between 380k full members and 170k registered supporters
  • SNP - 110k
  • Lib Dems - 66,905
  • Green Party of England and Wales - 60,000
  • UKIP - 27,517
  • Socialist Worker's Party - 2300

Even including the other small parties not listed with membership in the hundreds or the thousands we don't break 1 million registered members of a political party. In fact if we were to base interest in a type of politics based on party membership as you did then interest in Left Wing/centre-left politics is vastly more popular than Right Wing politics.

Simple truth is most people are too busy dealing with the daily grind of life to think much about politics beyond the headlines or in the weeks leading up to an election.

Gort
Aug 18, 2003

Good day what ho cup of tea

Ewan posted:

I honestly don't know. Leadership of the labour party seems to be a poison chalice at the moment. While I say Corbyn is not cut out to be leader, that is not purely a criticism of him. Leadership has two parts - the leader and the led. I expect the vast majority of other potentials are also not cut out for it. But, some of the natural (and necessary) traits of a good political leader, such as charisma and charm, are specifically missing from Corbyn's toolset.

Any left-wing leader would get the same treatment Corbyn would. They're not against him, they're against the idea of the Labour party being left-wing.

lollontee
Nov 4, 2014
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!
If you can't establish a political consensus or act according to the wishes of the party while representing it, why even have a loving party?

Mugsbaloney
Jul 11, 2012

We prefer your extinction to the loss of our job

Ewan posted:


you have to pour over every sentence with a fine tooth comb.

Kind of owned yourself there friend 😂.

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer
can someone link the sarah vine article about gove being bad at sex tia

a pipe smoking dog
Jan 25, 2010

"haha, dogs can't smoke!"

Jedit posted:

Can we have an agreement that in the new thread people will just not respond to Pissflaps? He's making the thread all but unreadable.

As a semi-lurker he's actually one of the things that keeps me coming back.

Pissflaps is the Jeremy Corbyn of this thread.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Miruvor posted:

Leadership takes conviction, and vision, in equal measures..

Pretty much any politician I can think of would have resigned in Corbyn's position, rather than be the victim of this smear campaign. Seeing him actually refuse to back down to the kind of poo poo thrown at him is one of the biggest acts of political courage I've seen in a long time.

Yeah I love that he just calmly goes "yeah whatever grow up" and carries on with his day.

Although failing to get into his HQ after shunning the journalist shows it can backfire.

Pissflaps
Oct 20, 2002

by VideoGames

Friendly Humour posted:

If you can't establish a political consensus or act according to the wishes of the party while representing it, why even have a loving party?

A good leader can achieve this.

MrL_JaKiri
Sep 23, 2003

A bracing glass of carrot juice!

Ewan posted:

And an afterthought, he was hugely naive to say those things about Israel. Sure, he didn't mean to make a direct comparison, but in the world of politics you have to pour over every sentence with a fine tooth comb. Leader of a political party that is going through an anti-semitism crisis AND as someone that is often labelled as a HAMAS sympathiser, he should not make such an obvious faux pas. My friends and I literally face palmed when we saw that.

I love the double think here; Corbyn is bad because he's a Hamas supporter. Corbyn is bad because he compared Israel to Hamas.

lollontee
Nov 4, 2014
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

Pissflaps posted:

A good leader can achieve this.

I don't think you understand politics at all.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

a pipe smoking dog posted:

Pissflaps is the Jeremy Corbyn of this thread.

We already determined that Corbyn is capable of answering a question with an answer and not a vague handwave, thus making this unlikely.

Pissflaps
Oct 20, 2002

by VideoGames

Friendly Humour posted:

I don't think you understand politics at all.

It's true, the nuance sometimes eludes me.

lollontee
Nov 4, 2014
Probation
Can't post for 10 years!

Pissflaps posted:

It's true, the nuance sometimes eludes me.

Yeah, it happens to the best of us. So anyway, why don't you like Corbyn?

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

MrL_JaKiri
Sep 23, 2003

A bracing glass of carrot juice!
Being deliberately tedious with someone who enjoys being deliberately tedious is mainly just loving irritating for everyone else

Ewan
Sep 29, 2008

Ewan is tired of his reputation as a serious Simon. I'm more of a jokester than you people think. My real name isn't even Ewan, that was a joke it's actually MARTIN! LOL fooled you again, it really is Ewan! Look at that monkey with a big nose, Ewan is so random! XD

forkboy84 posted:

Yeah, it's been pointed out 100 times since Friday that this thread has a lot of desperate love for left wing politics (which isn't exactly a new development), Corbyn is simply the only thing even vaguely close to an important, national left-wing politician since the resignation of Michael Foot in 1983. A year before I was born. If another left-wing candidate came along who had the charisma & guile of Obama, but combined it with being a socialist rather than a centre-right liberal then I'd support that person. But that isn't the choice. So yeah, my support for Jeremy Corbyn is a long way short of blind. I have (& others have too) acknowledged his faults in this thread. But he's who we've got. And I'm quite content to support a man who is highly principled and treats the electorate with respect and doesn't talk in black & white in the most simplistic terms but is poo poo at "playing the game" when the alternative is people who aren't particularly principled, or their principles don't really reflect my principles.

For far too long the left gave in to the idea that you could only beat the Tories by stealing their policies. That really doesn't seem like winning to me.

I totally understand the love for Corbyn's policies here, and why he is seen as somewhat of a "saviour" of left wing politics and I respect the efforts he has taken to try to bring Labour back to its roots. I agree UK politics having a political party more truly to the left in order to give the electorate more of a choice of centre-right vs centre-right is long overdue and reflect the views of a large chunk of the wider Labour party.

BUT, I revert to my previous point, however amazing or visionary his policies are, he is simply not a natural political leader and he has failed to bring factions of the party together. For a start (I will repeat this ad infinitum), he lacks energy, wit, charisma and charm.

But, as I said above, I am sure most other prospective Labour leaders will similarly fail with the current bunch of snakes in the PLP. But someone with more charisma would at least have an automatic head start over him.

OvineYeast
Jul 16, 2007

Freiheit ist immer Freiheit der Andersdenkenden

Ewan posted:

To expand - it is a negative against him, but I am not saying it is solely his fault. The PLP shares a large chunk of the blame too.

For the fact that Corbyn's electoral and polling performances have been underwhelming, I'd say it's fair to say the PLP share some of the blame. For the fact that the Labour party's about to be ripped in two, the PLP is fully responsible.

Ewan
Sep 29, 2008

Ewan is tired of his reputation as a serious Simon. I'm more of a jokester than you people think. My real name isn't even Ewan, that was a joke it's actually MARTIN! LOL fooled you again, it really is Ewan! Look at that monkey with a big nose, Ewan is so random! XD

MrL_JaKiri posted:

I love the double think here; Corbyn is bad because he's a Hamas supporter. Corbyn is bad because he compared Israel to Hamas.
He's not bad. He is just incredibly naive to say something like that, knowing that the media is out to get him and with something that can so easily (if not disingenuously) be portrayed as saying "Israel is akin to a terrorist organisation".

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Ewan posted:

But, as I said above, I am sure most other prospective Labour leaders will similarly fail with the current bunch of snakes in the PLP. But someone with more charisma would at least have an automatic head start over him.

And as I said, I'm okay with him hanging on long enough to save the inner party from the shitbags even without improving as a 'leader' - it will also be interesting to see him up against the Tories currently in the leadership contest. None of them have pigfucker's skill at deflection.

TheRat
Aug 30, 2006

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvV1zFWWRJ4

Corbyn talking Iraq war in 2003

Firos
Apr 30, 2007

Staying abreast of the latest developments in jam communism



Ewan posted:

But someone with more charisma would at least have an automatic head start over him.

I don't think anyone disagrees with the sentiment, but who? People that are more charismatic than Jeremy Corbyn in the PLP seem to be in very short supply at the moment.

Xandu
Feb 19, 2006


It's hard to be humble when you're as great as I am.

Vengeance of Pandas posted:

Bollocks, the vast majority of people are not members of any political party in the UK.

    From Wiki the current registered membership numbers.

  • Conservatives - 150k
  • Labour - 554,272 split between 380k full members and 170k registered supporters
  • SNP - 110k
  • Lib Dems - 66,905
  • Green Party of England and Wales - 60,000
  • UKIP - 27,517
  • Socialist Worker's Party - 2300

Even including the other small parties not listed with membership in the hundreds or the thousands we don't break 1 million registered members of a political party. In fact if we were to base interest in a type of politics based on party membership as you did then interest in Left Wing/centre-left politics is vastly more popular than Right Wing politics.

Simple truth is most people are too busy dealing with the daily grind of life to think much about politics beyond the headlines or in the weeks leading up to an election.

I know registering for a political party means more to you guys than in the US, but I don't understand how the left is not dominating with numbers like this. Do the conservatives just not care about party membership at all?

Renaissance Robot
Oct 10, 2010

Bite my furry metal ass

Christ, he looks so much younger.

I mean, I guess it has been 13 years.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009


Strong stuff - I like his bravery in doing it metres away from some of those responsible.

Ewan
Sep 29, 2008

Ewan is tired of his reputation as a serious Simon. I'm more of a jokester than you people think. My real name isn't even Ewan, that was a joke it's actually MARTIN! LOL fooled you again, it really is Ewan! Look at that monkey with a big nose, Ewan is so random! XD

Xandu posted:

I know registering for a political party means more to you guys than in the US, but I don't understand how the left is not dominating with numbers like this. Do the conservatives just not care about party membership at all?
Registering for a political party means gently caress all tbh. I have never met anyone who has registered for a political party..

Pissflaps
Oct 20, 2002

by VideoGames

Renaissance Robot posted:

Christ, he looks so much younger.

I mean, I guess it has been 13 years.

Look how much younger Blair and Brown look from the same year...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPCTBXse80c

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro


Ewan posted:

I totally understand the love for Corbyn's policies here, and why he is seen as somewhat of a "saviour" of left wing politics and I respect the efforts he has taken to try to bring Labour back to its roots. I agree UK politics having a political party more truly to the left in order to give the electorate more of a choice of centre-right vs centre-right is long overdue and reflect the views of a large chunk of the wider Labour party.

BUT, I revert to my previous point, however amazing or visionary his policies are, he is simply not a natural political leader and he has failed to bring factions of the party together. For a start (I will repeat this ad infinitum), he lacks energy, wit, charisma and charm.

But, as I said above, I am sure most other prospective Labour leaders will similarly fail with the current bunch of snakes in the PLP. But someone with more charisma would at least have an automatic head start over him.

Yeah, but you can only play with the hand you've been dealt. Wishing for something that doesn't exist just seems like an exercise in disappointment. Unless you've got a time machine, in which case lets go back in time & mess with young Tony Blair until he becomes a dyed in the wool socialist.

Extreme0
Feb 28, 2013

I dance to the sweet tune of your failure so I'm never gonna stop fucking with you.

Continue to get confused and frustrated with me as I dance to your anger.

As I expect nothing more from ya you stupid runt!


Jedit posted:

Can we have an agreement that in the new thread people will just not respond to Pissflaps? He's making the thread all but unreadable.

Just post this everytime he mentions Corbyn.

OvineYeast
Jul 16, 2007

Freiheit ist immer Freiheit der Andersdenkenden

Xandu posted:

I know registering for a political party means more to you guys than in the US, but I don't understand how the left is not dominating with numbers like this. Do the conservatives just not care about party membership at all?

The conservatives don't need to worry about membership because they have all the money

LemonyTang
Nov 29, 2009

Ask me about holding 4gate!

Xandu posted:

I know registering for a political party means more to you guys than in the US, but I don't understand how the left is not dominating with numbers like this. Do the conservatives just not care about party membership at all?

Being a Tory is a shameful secret. People don't even admit they're going to vote Tory, let alone join the party.

Lead out in cuffs
Sep 18, 2012

"That's right. We've evolved."

"I can see that. Cool mutations."




Miruvor posted:

Leadership takes conviction, and vision, in equal measures..

Pretty much any politician I can think of would have resigned in Corbyn's position, rather than be the victim of this smear campaign. Seeing him actually refuse to back down to the kind of poo poo thrown at him is one of the biggest acts of political courage I've seen in a long time.

I'm pretty sure it was pointed out that Corbyn wanted to resign, but didn't after consulting with his advisors. This isn't really about Corbyn himself. It's a battle for the soul of the party. Corbyn is hanging in because the PLP is now so divorced from the politics of the rest of the party that if he leaves, they may block the candidacy of any left wing candidates for leadership, and there is no way of getting rid of the PLP in that scenario since they're appointed by the party leader.

I do agree, though, that this takes courage!

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Xandu posted:

I know registering for a political party means more to you guys than in the US, but I don't understand how the left is not dominating with numbers like this. Do the conservatives just not care about party membership at all?

All of those are less than 1% of the population per party. In the US where something like 40+% are registered one way or another it's comparatively weeny here.

For examples, the Tories have 150k members apparently, and they got 11 million votes last year. Labour has 500k members and got 9 million votes. SNP 110k, got 1.5 million votes. Lib Dems 67k, got 2.5 million votes.

Membership is not mandatory and can be overly expensive for the poorer.

Jrbg
May 20, 2014

Xandu posted:

I know registering for a political party means more to you guys than in the US, but I don't understand how the left is not dominating with numbers like this. Do the conservatives just not care about party membership at all?

They rely on people who have never done an iota of political activism voting in droves and a cooperative press and donors from the world of business. It's a successful formula

Ratpick
Oct 9, 2012

And no one ate dinner that night.

I very much like the cut of this man's jib.

He's grown old very gracefully. Grey is a good look on him.

Fans
Jun 27, 2013

A reptile dysfunction

Xandu posted:

I know registering for a political party means more to you guys than in the US, but I don't understand how the left is not dominating with numbers like this. Do the conservatives just not care about party membership at all?

That increase has been very recent and we've not had a proper election yet to really capitalize on it. We did pretty good in the Council elections with one of the best results in years, but because it was a tiny bit worse than the last time (One of the best ever) it was seen as a disaster.

Also Conservatives get more of their money from big donations and rely on non-grassroots advertising and friendly news coverage. Labour relies on the Unions and Membership for money and relies more on grassroot campaigning and hoping the Tories are really, really poo poo.

UK politics and US politics are so unalike when it comes to money and campaigning it's almost comical. Imagine the House and Presidential election was all one election and the Democrats spent $16 million dollars on the entire campaign for it. That's the UK.

Vengeance of Pandas
Sep 8, 2008

THE TERRIBLE POST WENT THATAWAY!

Xandu posted:

I know registering for a political party means more to you guys than in the US, but I don't understand how the left is not dominating with numbers like this. Do the conservatives just not care about party membership at all?

The Conservatives have richer donors and far greater support in the media, particularly amongst the tabloids. There's also the First Past the Post electoral system which screws things even more, in the last election the Conservatives took 36.8% of the vote and gained 50.8% of the seats, Labour took 30.5% of the votes and gained 35.7% of the seats.

communism bitch
Apr 24, 2009

Xandu posted:

I know registering for a political party means more to you guys than in the US, but I don't understand how the left is not dominating with numbers like this. Do the conservatives just not care about party membership at all?
The tories used to have some of the largest grass-roots members and supporters organisations. Groups like the Primrose League, and the National Union of Conservative Associations, but they significantly decayed and I don't think they actually exist anymore. Nowadays the tories are funded primarily through wealthy donors and large businesses. I couldn't tell you exactly why those groups died out - there's obviously still electoral support for the tories. But they don't seem to care awfully much about maintaining a large membership because the media and business are on side.

e: I suppose if I had to venture an opinion it'd be that by not having a huge number of engaged lower-class members they avoid those people trying to influence the party's direction.

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Fans posted:

UK politics and US politics are so unalike when it comes to money and campaigning it's almost comical. Imagine the House and Presidential election was all one election and the Democrats spent $16 million dollars on the entire campaign for it. That's the UK.

And conversely, imagine Boris had paid over $120million before his climbdown today. That's Jeb!'s amount.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tesseraction
Apr 5, 2009

Oberleutnant posted:

I couldn't tell you exactly why those groups died out

Old age. :ssh:

  • Locked thread