|
Li Dawny posted:I doctored myself. And before anyone flips out, it was the first time I did.
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 04:22 |
|
|
##unvote
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:07
|
|
|
Kinda didn't want to have to claim, but I guess there it is.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:08
|
|
|
I believe either JakeP or RF attempted a nk on LD. ##vote RF
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:09
|
|
|
That gives us a fair bit of information. We have an action chain of YPM -> IllegallySober -> Ninth -> JakeP -> Li Dawny -> Li Dawny. Assuming that matches YPM's results we've cleared a lot of people from nightkilling or at least from attempting a nightkill.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:10
|
|
|
Also the nightkiller could have targeted any of about half the game and hit the doctor block.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:11
|
|
|
The Ninth Layer posted:Also the nightkiller could have targeted any of about half the game and hit the doctor block. It doesn't matter if RF originally targetted LD, he's the oddman out
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:12
|
|
|
I saw myself, Jake P, LD, and RF visit my target. I saw LD visit my target.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:12
|
|
|
Still a little confused on how visiting in this game actually works. For example why would JakeP show up as visiting Li Dawny but I wouldn't, even though I presumably visited JakeP who would then redirect to Li Dawny.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:14
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:I saw myself, Jake P, LD, and RF visit my target. Was I your target? Or was a bus driver involved?
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:14
|
|
|
But based on those results I'd be inclined to think RF is the killer too.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:15
|
|
|
Li Dawny posted:Was I your target? Or was a bus driver involved? IS was my initial target
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:16
|
|
|
And I got passed down the chain like a whore
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:16
|
|
|
I'm the backglass, alternate night hider. I wasn't hiding last night but I definitely don't have an action that targets people. With your N1 results I figured it was some kind of fuckery and didn't see any point in claiming yet, but I defintiely didn't do anything last night, so either there's another witch type role or a disguiser or something.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:37
|
|
|
Tonight's my night to hide again so if people want to directly test, I'll be untargetable by any actions
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:38
|
|
|
I think it's scummy that you didn't claim to have done nothing on day 2.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:39
|
|
|
Anything the scum could have done to frame you would have had to be a huge coincidence to get the result I did because of all the redirectors. They would have just had to roll the dice and hope.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:39
|
|
|
For posterity, I don't think its relevant, but n2 I track TNL, and the result was whoever I tracked visited AW
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:42
|
|
|
The Ninth Layer posted:I think it's scummy that you didn't claim to have done nothing on day 2.  Didn't see much point in playing all my cards right away. If he'd specifically called me out like today maybe, but I figured it made more sense to wait it outYour Personal Muse posted:Anything the scum could have done to frame you would have had to be a huge coincidence to get the result I did because of all the redirectors. They would have just had to roll the dice and hope. Every night action in this came is a big crap shoot.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:44
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:For posterity, I don't think its relevant, but n2 I track TNL, and the result was whoever I tracked visited AW I swapped myself and AW. Not sure who you would have seen in that instance.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:44
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:
You didn't think it was noteworthy that you were seen targeting someone even though you did nothing?
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:45
|
|
|
The Ninth Layer posted:I swapped myself and AW. Not sure who you would have seen in that instance. I think that CPig gave up on figuring that out because going back and looking, he literally confirmed that you, TNL, visited AW instead of keeping it vague like usual
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:47
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:I think that CPig gave up on figuring that out because going back and looking, he literally confirmed that you, TNL, visited AW instead of keeping it vague like usual One of the reasons I rarely put in redirectors in my games and never put them in with a roleblocker on top. Good luck trying to figure out what happens when a roleblocker targets a busdriver who redirected himself with someone else, or worse, what happens to a roleblocker who targets the person the busdriver redirected themselves with.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:49
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:Every night action in this came is a big crap shoot. I am aware. My point is that it doesn't make much sense to frame you in particular when they don't even know how they are going to be able to frame you. Plus I don't think scum have framing elements that aren't redirecting
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:49
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:I am aware. My point is that it doesn't make much sense to frame you in particular when they don't even know how they are going to be able to frame you. They straight up had a witch so it's not outside the realm of possibility. All I know is I didn't go anywhere last night. The Ninth Layer posted:You didn't think it was noteworthy that you were seen targeting someone even though you did nothing? No. Not when his result was "Everyone except this one guy"
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2016 23:57
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:They straight up had a witch so it's not outside the realm of possibility. All I know is I didn't go anywhere last night. A witch, as far as I know, is a type of redirector. And when you know that my result could be faulty, yeah, it is noteworthy. But it wasn't faulty because you are scum.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2016 00:02
|
|
|
My understanding is that a witch makes Target A try to kill Target B, so it would work on non-active roles. That's how I've always implemented them
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2016 00:24
|
|
|
I would like for RF to be murdered violently
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2016 00:25
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2016 00:25
|
|
|
Sorry buddy but unless CPig comes in with "lol I messed up you saw RF reading a bible" you gotta die
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2016 00:26
|
|
|
Li Dawny who did you target on the other nights?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2016 00:28
|
|
|
JakeP posted:Li Dawny who did you target on the other nights? N1 AR N2 Dongbot N3 YPM because even if we don't agree on things I'm fairly certain he's town N4 myself
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2016 00:30
|
|
|
##vote RF Li Dawny is def the doc, so is more likely town, leaving RF as the last person in my scum bucket on my bucket listTM
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2016 00:33
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 5  Retro Futurist (2): Your Personal Muse, JakeP Li Dawny (0): Your Personal Muse, Not Voting (6): dongsbot 9000, IllegallySober, Li Dawny, Retro Futurist, The Ninth Layer, tpinkWith 8 alive, it's 5 votes to lynch. The current deadline is July 08th, 2016 at 10 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 2 days, 2 hours.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2016 00:34
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:I believe either JakeP or RF attempted a nk on LD. Your Personal Muse posted:I saw myself, Jake P, LD, and RF visit my target. Seems legit. ##vote RF
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2016 00:35
|
|
|
He is certainly a sCUM bucket
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2016 00:35
|
|
|
For anyone confused, I realized I made a typo. I saw myself, jakeP, RF, and LD visit my target, and I saw my target visit LD.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2016 00:36
|
|
|
Okay, I'm seeing it now. ##vote RF
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2016 00:40
|
|
|
I mean no big loss if you kill me I guess but I have a very easily verified action tonight
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2016 00:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 04:22 |
|
|
That's true only town can be hiders pretend I said that in a really obnoxious and sarcastic way
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2016 00:48
|
|