|
Infinitum posted:Was voting imgay to see a claim, as the thread was heading that way earlier. Not seeing the push any longer Infinitum posted:Gonna vote Jimbo until we see a claim. Congrats on activating your trap card.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2016 22:13 |
|
|
# ? Apr 24, 2024 22:08 |
|
On one hand, that is suspicious. On the other hand I really liked him sending jimbo to the shadow realm. But yeah its a stupid thing for him to do. I'm not sure scum would be so brazen though. But its such a loving weird way to vote someone. I will have to ponder this.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2016 22:16 |
|
Your Personal Muse posted:Where did Inf say that? The worst part is inf has had no scum reads so far that he has cased at all. It was just to get claims, and then nothing for justifying Me
|
# ? Jul 6, 2016 22:30 |
|
Your Personal Muse posted:Two questions: 1) your case boils down to him not pushing anything. It seems to me that he just doesn't believe any cases out there. It seems you are suggesting that he should manufacture a case and push it, because he doesn't have any reads. How do you respond to this sick burn (inane question) I made it pretty clear if you just look over my posts. His serious criticism of Meds jokepost, and his lame case on Moat. I'm not saying he's the only poster being useless, but of the useless poster, he's the most actively scummy.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2016 22:52 |
|
Kasumeat posted:I made it pretty clear if you just look over my posts. His serious criticism of Meds jokepost, and his lame case on Moat. I'm not saying he's the only poster being useless, but of the useless poster, he's the most actively scummy. You just said that he is not being pro town, which is different than actively scummy
|
# ? Jul 6, 2016 22:53 |
|
I'm very clearly saying that he's both.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2016 22:55 |
|
Ok I think Kas believes that poo poo and I'm going to ##vote Inf
|
# ? Jul 6, 2016 22:56 |
|
Your Personal Muse posted:Two questions: 1) your case boils down to him not pushing anything. It seems to me that he just doesn't believe any cases out there. It's not that I didn't believe any cases, there simply weren't any on Day 1. Everyone was away or drunk for the 4th of July weekend. The game didn't pick up until the last five hours before deadline, which unfortunately coincided with my regular Tuesday boardgame night.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2016 23:04 |
|
Jedit posted:It's not that I didn't believe any cases, there simply weren't any on Day 1. Everyone was away or drunk for the 4th of July weekend. The game didn't pick up until the last five hours before deadline, which unfortunately coincided with my regular Tuesday boardgame night. It seems weird that you are at all worried about what I just said. Yes, you didn't believe in any cases. Neither did I. Tell me more about this Moat case. You've been mostly defending yourself which I can understand, so tell me about this case you have.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2016 23:06 |
|
I feel like there are a lot of cases floating around that are just sliding by me. If you think you have a good case please sum it up and I will take a look at it.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2016 23:07 |
|
The Ninth Layer posted:I feel like there are a lot of cases floating around that are just sliding by me. If you think you have a good case please sum it up and I will take a look at it. jedit dropped off the imgay vote to hedge, backed off mafia dadding the second he had heat and played it off as a joke, and he's also contributed very little besides half-assedly defending himself also he's a real piece of poo poo
|
# ? Jul 6, 2016 23:09 |
|
Jedit posted:It's not that I didn't believe any cases, there simply weren't any on Day 1. Everyone was away or drunk for the 4th of July weekend. The game didn't pick up until the last five hours before deadline, which unfortunately coincided with my regular Tuesday boardgame night. what games u play
|
# ? Jul 6, 2016 23:18 |
|
gently caress, I'm feeling Jedit hard now. Lot of effort to shift away from him.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2016 23:18 |
|
CCKeane posted:gently caress, I'm feeling Jedit hard now. Lot of effort to shift away from him. That's because certain people are taking every little thing as an excuse to put it back on me, and if I ignore their lame cases they'll use that as an excuse to put it back on me. If you let it stay there you'll get a second mislynch and Town won't have talked about anyone else. YPM - the case against Moat is pretty much all in the same post as the vote. AR voted me with no explanation, Moat came in immediately to hold his hand. Since then AR has declared that he's tunneled on me, which is nice for him as it relieves him of any further responsibility to make cases for himself. Thinking about it more I may be more inclined to think AR is scum than Moat. But, neither of them has yet responded to my asking how I'm supposed to have Mafia dadded. I can see AR not doing so because he doesn't know, but for Moat to broach it as a thought implies he had a reason for doing so. As is he's just casting shade on me without basis.
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 00:19 |
|
Jedit posted:That's because certain people are taking every little thing as an excuse to put it back on me, and if I ignore their lame cases they'll use that as an excuse to put it back on me. If you let it stay there you'll get a second mislynch and Town won't have talked about anyone else. Right, and scum would have good motivation to throw it on you if you were town.
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 00:21 |
|
Real quick you were complaining about imgay's playstyle. Also dongs playstyle. Mafia dadding. Dunno why it's gotta be so hostile. I was actually calling out AR because I didn't really get the conviction behind his vote
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 00:21 |
|
Moatillata posted:Real quick you were complaining about imgay's playstyle. Also dongs playstyle. Mafia dadding. Last game I was in with imgay he falsified a Daycop claim, forced a Town PR to claim, and then doubled down on the lie to get the guy lynched. I've got a right to complain about his playstyle. dongsbot I haven't mentioned at all, unless you count an indirect mention in an obvious joke post.
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 00:35 |
|
Jedit posted:Last game I was in with imgay he falsified a Daycop claim, forced a Town PR to claim, and then doubled down on the lie to get the guy lynched. I've got a right to complain about his playstyle. dongsbot I haven't mentioned at all, unless you count an indirect mention in an obvious joke post. so wait you're saying the whole anti-shitposter thing was a joke? because yeah imgay did sorta gently caress that up badly but i took offense
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 00:45 |
|
God drat it all 90% of everyone's arguments are meta from games I have never played. How can I speak to this crap?
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 00:48 |
|
Moatillata posted:God drat it all 90% of everyone's arguments are meta from games I have never played. How can I speak to this crap? I don't know I'm ignoring it but check that poo poo out about Inf its pretty good
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 00:49 |
|
It is odd because he has been pretty absent from the thread.
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 00:52 |
|
Absurd Revolver posted:jedit dropped off the imgay vote to hedge, backed off mafia dadding the second he had heat and played it off as a joke, and he's also contributed very little besides half-assedly defending himself We didn't lynch imgay, so this is probably the absolute most non-sense I've ever seen you post. We have no idea what imgay's alignment is, so it's moot on how Jedit hedged. Also he didn't back off mafia dadding from heat, it was because people were dicks about it. Jedit has definitely put forward questions, so stop misrepresenting him/tunneling.
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 00:52 |
|
Your Personal Muse posted:On one hand, that is suspicious. On the other hand I really liked him sending jimbo to the shadow realm. I'm pretty sure infinitums middle name is brazen
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 00:53 |
|
Kashuno posted:We didn't lynch imgay, so this is probably the absolute most non-sense I've ever seen you post. We have no idea what imgay's alignment is, so it's moot on how Jedit hedged. Also he didn't back off mafia dadding from heat, it was because people were dicks about it. Jedit has definitely put forward questions, so stop misrepresenting him/tunneling. Thank you Kash you are a true hero
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 00:54 |
|
Kashuno posted:We didn't lynch imgay, so this is probably the absolute most non-sense I've ever seen you post. We have no idea what imgay's alignment is, so it's moot on how Jedit hedged. Also he didn't back off mafia dadding from heat, it was because people were dicks about it. Jedit has definitely put forward questions, so stop misrepresenting him/tunneling. eh i guess still would like a clarification from jedit
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 00:55 |
|
The Ninth Layer posted:I feel like there are a lot of cases floating around that are just sliding by me. If you think you have a good case please sum it up and I will take a look at it. hmm i re-read and i disagree with myself. what i saw as unwillingness to be dragged into the conversation was just indifference. ##unvote i do think the couple of cases and lines of logic keane is taking are all fabricated as all hell though
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 01:12 |
|
Absurd Revolver posted:eh i guess ????
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 01:12 |
|
CCKeane posted:gently caress, I'm feeling Jedit hard now. Lot of effort to shift away from him. like this is all just pointless grandstanding. either vote for jedit or don't. the only thing this post achieves is create a playing narrative, rather than advance any case in any way whatsoever.
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 01:13 |
|
Kashuno posted:???? i asked him if he was seriously joking regarding his whole tirade against lower case posting
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 01:15 |
|
Ernie. posted:like this is all just pointless grandstanding. either vote for jedit or don't. the only thing this post achieves is create a playing narrative, rather than advance any case in any way whatsoever. Have you considered biting me?
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 01:48 |
|
That post is pointless grandstanding, he said, in a post that is itself pointless grandstanding.
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 01:51 |
|
The Ninth Layer posted:I feel like there are a lot of cases floating around that are just sliding by me. If you think you have a good case please sum it up and I will take a look at it. My case on Kash is: AR started the day by listing me among scummy people then dropping a vote on jedit. Kash came in, dropped a vote on me without explanation, then tried to shift the vote away from Jedit. When push for an explanation for his vote on me, Kash says I usually react when voted Kash citing my meta/using meta is a move he has done before as scum in order to excuse scummy votes Kash is using me calling bullshit on him as an example of my scumminess. This is nonsense on it's face, but particularly when he previously said that voting me usually gets a strong reaction. If he was expecting a strong reaction and he got one, that is indicative that I am playing as I usually do, and is a null tell. This isn't what he did, however. By his own words I usually react strongly, so surely this is just how I play? Kash is making a nonsense case and citing meta as a means of excusing himself from having to make a meaningful case. This is scummy.
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 01:59 |
|
and your case on jedit is that you are voting and casing kash?
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 02:00 |
|
Ernie. posted:and your case on jedit is that you are voting and casing kash? WELP ONLY ONE PERSON CAN BE SCUM I GUESS/YOU CANT LOOK AT OTHER POSSIBILITIES INSPECTOR ERNIE IS ON THE CASE
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 02:03 |
|
Ernie. posted:and your case on jedit is that you are voting and casing kash? Whoa loving Nelly hold the phone there mister, I notice you are saying something is possible when you also said something else is possible only one thing is possible in this here town and hats witchcraft that's right im a witch and if you look down you will see that you are now a frog welcome to the ambizone population you and like a newt or two
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 02:04 |
|
look, i'm just asking you to clarify your case on jedit. can you do that?
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 02:04 |
|
Keane, once again I haven't called you scum not cited meta as a reason for scumminess, just a reaction. What is with you
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 02:05 |
|
Ernie. posted:look, i'm just asking you to clarify your case on jedit. can you do that? My case on jedit is that I am very uncomfortable with the shift away from Jedit that seems to have brewed and has happened without good cases (except mine, on Kash) having been made and without a good defense happening. That often happens when player is scum since scum are motivated to continue nailing town to the wall and if momentum exists it is in their interest to push it. You're welcome for the mafia 101 lesson that'll be 250 dollars.
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 02:07 |
|
Kashuno posted:Keane, once again I haven't called you scum not cited meta as a reason for scumminess, just a reaction. What is with you Kashuno posted:Clearly I elicited a strong reaction from you because that's what happened. I voted you because I had no reads and wanted to get something rolling. You got defensive and have thrown out bizarre conjecture that doesn't follow logically. I haven't called you a motherfucker, I just say you sleep in the same bed as yor mother and both of you can frequently be hear moaning the call of the beast with two backs oh also I think you wanted to borrow this *drops copy of Oedipus on floor*
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 02:09 |
|
|
# ? Apr 24, 2024 22:08 |
|
CCKeane posted:My case on jedit is that I am very uncomfortable with the shift away from Jedit that seems to have brewed and has happened without good cases (except mine, on Kash) having been made and without a good defense happening. That often happens when player is scum since scum are motivated to continue nailing town to the wall and if momentum exists it is in their interest to push it. Ah now I understand. Can you, in no uncertain terms, list three players (other than yourself of course) who shifted momentum away from Jedit (and therefore could be hypothetical scum)?
|
# ? Jul 7, 2016 02:10 |