|
can you link the promise or you going to moma
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 18:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 15:47 |
|
|
I swear by the Great Boar of Carnutes that I am now a proud and loyal citizen of the UEE. ego sum gay
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 18:59
|
|
|
The Marauder posted:
It's not rocket science when your primary work is based on AI. The power of reasoning and deduction cannot be understated. So, here, let me help you with the heavy lifting: Bad analogy on your part btw, but I'm in a playful mood, so I will indulge: 1) this is an apple. TRUE 2) this is a tree. TRUE 3) this is gravity: FALSE // unknown entity at the time 4) this is an apple falling from a tree. TRUE 5) there must be an unknown force acting on the apple as it falls, pulling it to the ground. 6) this unknown force is called gravity* the "apple falling from the tree" experiment i) proves the existence of gravity ii) demonstrates the effects of gravity quote:* the force that attracts a body toward the center of the earth, or toward any other physical body having mass. For most purposes Newton's laws of gravity apply, with minor modifications to take the general theory of relativity into account. Back to my point: 1) He never - NOT ONCE - said this was 3.0. Not loving once. <---- this is the part were you focus all your brain power so that once comes next, makes more sense 2) Stating that "this is what is coming in 3.0" != "this is 3.0" 3) While "this is what is coming in 3.0" == TRUE {"this is 3.0" != "this is what is coming in 3.0"} So there is no "underlying" force|evidence (as in the case of the gravity deduction) to indicate that what was seen at Gamescom will somehow be in 3.0 D_Smart fucked around with this message at 19:03 on Aug 21, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:00
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:You don't expect Derek to have an answer to that, and even if he did you wouldn't be interested.        This place has too many smileys.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:00
|
|
|
Google Butt posted:can you link the promise or you going to moma
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:01
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:It's not rocket science when your primary work is based on AI. The power of reasoning and deduction cannot be understated. So, here, let me help you with the heavy lifting: Nice meltdown
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:01
|
|
|
Mukip posted:I swear by the Great Boar of Carnutes that I am now a proud and loyal citizen of the UEE. This guy gets it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:02
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:I just want to know why Star Citizen is still in development. We were promised a spectacular crash and burn where CIG was going to run out of money and the game would be canceled. What changed after those damning articles across the internet that questioned Star Citizens development? Also probably some very clueless outside investors.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:03
|
|
|
Flarpy posted:
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:03
|
|
|
Sure maybe you can assume one mission and one planet and one moonbase is coming in "3.0". Guess what else is coming in 3.0: Bugs of poo poo that you'd never expect because the game is a janky mess, which makes all the accomplishments go away. e: why the gently caress are we even talking about this? Seriously, remember the mantra: There is always more, and it's always worse. There are going to be so many fuckups on the way, as per usual.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:03
|
|
|
Question for D Smart. gently caress, marry, kill - CRoberts, Sandi, Ben Lesnick?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:04
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:It's not rocket science when your primary work is based on AI. The power of reasoning and deduction cannot be understated. So, here, let me help you with the heavy lifting:
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:04
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:lol you're adorable. Seriously dude, nobody cares about how much you hate Derek. It's not a novelty either, there's an entire subreddit filled with people sharing your opinions that's unsurprisingly unfunny You've nothing to contribute here, so please suck your poo poo off Derek's cock and get over it
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:04
|
|
|
Chalks posted:But if you spent $2000 on the game you'd have less money and no tangible benefit in game, surely you should consider buying some jpgs now while it's uncertain if the game will exist? If you wait too long you'll be able to get them for free and this would be bad. So yes, buy in while you can! Like Chris said, a pistol costs 500, and an aircraft carrier costs 12 billion, so, um, you know, like, the scale might be slightly different but big ships will require entire teams of people doing team missions (there are large scale team missions now) to afford.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:04
|
|
|
thatguy posted:This is one of the Gooniest posts Derek has ever made.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:04
|
|
|
thatguy posted:
He's removing it now because clearly he knows now that the Feds are in fact involved. Checkmate.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:05
|
|
|
Propagandist posted:Sure maybe you can assume one mission and one planet and one moonbase is coming in "3.0". This is now basically goons going "nuh uh, I have a bullet proof vest so you can't shoot me, Timmy, I shot you!".
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:06
|
|
|
Decrepus posted:Remember how a year ago you kind of bonked your head? Everything since that point has been a dream and you are in a coma right now like the popular theory about Rudy or every other movie where anyone got hit in the head after they heard about the Rudy theory. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:07
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:He's removing it now because clearly he knows now that the Feds are in fact involved. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:07
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:I just want to know why Star Citizen is still in development. Yes, I agree. Should have been canceled a long time ago rather than waste everyone's time imo
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:11
|
|
|
AP posted:
You assume he's telling the truth. What has given you ANY indication that he is?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:12
|
|
|
Mukip posted:This is now basically goons going "nuh uh, I have a bullet proof vest so you can't shoot me, Timmy, I shot you!". I don't think you really understand - if the game comes out and delivers what they're saying they'll deliver, I'm going to buy it and play it. No poo poo. I think a lot of people here would. I don't give a poo poo about "being wrong". I'd love to drop $60 on a crunk vidya game. For real, I want to actually play what they say they can make. It sounds great. I don't think it's gonna happen, but if it does, poo poo yeah boi. But I'm not dropping a dime in pledge/donation/purchase/preorder on the current trajectory of this thing. I don't think it's fair to assume that we're all here in some kind of "war" where the failing of SC constitutes a "victory". At least, I certainly am not treating it that way. I'm here to laugh at this clusterfuck until it either goes under, releases something that bombs, or releases something that kills, and go from there.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:12
|
|
|
SelenicMartian posted:Now streaming: Japanese porn.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:13
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:You don't expect Derek to have an answer to that, and even if he did you wouldn't be interested. I feel digitally violated now.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:13
|
|
|
shitizens in a nutshell: after watching call of duty infinite warfare trailer: "i bet it's just another on-rails scripted borefest and none of this is gameplay" after watching star citizen alpha 3.0 presentation: "OMG IT'S THE BEST THING EVER!!!! DEREK SMART AND THE GOONIES ARE WRONG, SUCK IT!!!!!111"
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:14
|
|
|
Who is sadder out of these three groups. 1) Citizens who have been enthusiastically following the development of innovative blockbuster space sim Star Citizens by noted rockstar game developer Chris Roberts, marvelling at the infinities of space with almost child-like wonder and fiscal sense 2) Reeking rat ogres on SA who have spent months, if not years, obsessively making GBS threads over development of same space sim and harassing a woman for reasons which I don't care about. Making tens of thousands of posts about something they don't like. Hours of their lives on this poo poo. 3) Myself, who checks in every now and then to see if this game is ever coming out.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:15
|
|
|
Propagandist posted:I don't think you really understand - if the game comes out and delivers what they're saying they'll deliver, I'm going to buy it and play it. No poo poo. I think a lot of people here would. I don't give a poo poo about "being wrong". I'd love to drop $60 on a crunk vidya game.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:16
|
|
|
Mukip posted:Who is sadder out of these three groups. You, definitely you for being a bad troll. I hope this helps.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:17
|
|
|
Ash1138 posted:shitizens in a nutshell: LOL!! Yeah, pretty much. It's just so painful to watch. It's amazing to me how Shitizens are claiming "victory" over a scripted demo based on wonky R&D. Like the games were suddenly delivered. Even as they conveniently ignore/forget that CIG have done this same very thing many times before and NONE of that is IN the game right now. Shitizens wanted "something" to tide them for the next 6 months. then come Dec 2016, they're going to (again) pretend Gamescom 2016 never happened. Meanwhile, they're completely oblivious to the fact that NEITHER Star Citizen now SQ42 is a 2016 release & BOTH will be 2 YEARS late in Nov 2016
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:18
|
|
|
Mukip posted:Who is sadder out of these three groups. u because u still think there's a chance it's coming out
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:18
|
|
|
Mukip posted:Who is sadder out of these three groups. Truly, every single actual post in this thread, except yours, falls into category number 2. What a profound observation. Literally every other person in this dead gay comedy forum thread is harrassing people and actively trying to disrupt game development, instead of shitposting and laughing. I think it's time for you to check back out.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:19
|
|
|
I love that dickwulf has admitted that the only reason he was doing all that FOIA stuff was because he was afraid Star Citizen was a scam and wanted to attack the messenger. Now he's convinced that it's not a scam he drops the whole thing.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:20
|
|
|
Tippis posted:Ben isn't a particularly well-educated man-child, is he?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:20
|
|
|
Chin posted:In an interview today Chris said ships will cost a lot more at launch than people are getting them for now. lol what the gently caress, is that true or are you joking? No way are they going to be so stupid as to try to MTX this game after launch, it would destroy the whole thing....
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:22
|
|
|
Propagandist posted:I think it's time for you to check back out. It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:23
|
|
|
Chalks posted:No way are they going to be so stupid.... But you aren't new here?!?
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:24
|
|
|
Mukip posted:Who is sadder out of these three groups.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:24
|
|
|
Derek, have a drink
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:25
|
|
|
thatguy posted:Check back in four months and let us know.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 15:47 |
|
|
Chalks posted:lol what the gently caress, is that true or are you joking? No way are they going to be so stupid as to try to MTX this game after launch, it would destroy the whole thing.... I am not sure if you were just stringing me along before in our epic debates. In case you were not: No I am pretty sure that guy is only joking.
|
|
#
?
Aug 21, 2016 19:25
|
|