|
Grape Soda posted:
The worst part about this is that chihuahua mixes and lab mixes are somehow not considered mixed breeds.
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 05:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 15:56 |
|
|
Why is "terrier" a category when there are at least 27 different terrier breeds?
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 08:56
|
|
|
doverhog posted:Why is "terrier" a category when there are at least 27 different terrier breeds? Because people are stupid.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 08:59
|
|
|
all dogs are one species, replace with dog please
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 11:13
|
|
|
doverhog posted:Why is "terrier" a category when there are at least 27 different terrier breeds? Clearly the maker of the graph has an all-terrier motive.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 14:52
|
|
|
Are there any other examples of treemaps in the wild (where "the wild" is "the news media or clickbait or infographics")? I know the wikipedia import/export graphs use treemaps, and there's the map of the market, and some disk space analysis software, but all of those applications are sort of for wonks anyway. I am trying to think of where the general public would see a fair number of hierarchical quantities where a bar chart wouldn't be a better option.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 16:19
|
|
|
Powered Descent posted:Clearly the maker of the graph has an all-terrier motive. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 16:58
|
|
|
Powered Descent posted:Clearly the maker of the graph has an all-terrier motive. gently caress yooouuuuuuuuuuuuu
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 17:53
|
|
|
Powered Descent posted:Clearly the maker of the graph has an all-terrier motive. I hope you die
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 19:49
|
|
|
Powered Descent posted:Clearly the maker of the graph has an all-terrier motive. Tree Goat posted:Are there any other examples of treemaps in the wild (where "the wild" is "the news media or clickbait or infographics")? I know the wikipedia import/export graphs use treemaps, and there's the map of the market, and some disk space analysis software, but all of those applications are sort of for wonks anyway. I am trying to think of where the general public would see a fair number of hierarchical quantities where a bar chart wouldn't be a better option.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 20:11
|
|
|
The difference between a "<insert breed here> Mix" and a "mix" is the first costs triple an <insert breed here>, and the second costs dog food and vaccinations. Both will probably have serious health issues a few years down the line.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 20:17
|
|
|
dpbjinc posted:The difference between a "<insert breed here> Mix" and a "mix" is the first costs triple an <insert breed here>, and the second costs dog food and vaccinations. Both will probably have serious health issues a few years down the line.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 20:38
|
|
|
Yeah, mutts are usually way healthier and they just won't die
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 21:11
|
|
|
Stuntman posted:You're mixing up purebreds and mutts. Yeah, but I think Lab-mix is referring to "Labradoodle" and things like that. Official crossbreeds recognized by the AKC. They can suffer the same kind of genetic disadvantages as purebreds. "Mix", I'm guessing is straight-up mutts.
|
|
#
?
Aug 28, 2016 22:29
|
|
|
Anyone who has the chance to choose the breed of their dog and doesn't want a mongrel of everything is stupid. Anyone insisting on a particular breed is either a herdsman or a vain twat.
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2016 17:13
|
|
|
No, they just want their dog's family tree to fit in this thread
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2016 19:24
|
|
|
Outrail posted:Anyone who has the chance to choose the breed of their dog and doesn't want a mongrel of everything is stupid. Anyone insisting on a particular breed is either a herdsman or a vain twat. I think that's a little unfair to say considering that not everyone wants a companion dog. Some people want agility dogs or hunting dogs or tracking dogs (or even protection dogs, though I'm kinda iffy on those personally), and want to have an exact health history that you don't get with a mutt. Assuming every breeder is just making show dogs isn't correct, some prefer working dogs, and mutts still have the possibility of inheriting whatever issues purebreds can get, so it's kind of a crapshoot. Ofc you're not going to see them on craigslist or whatever for obvious reasons, but saying "all dog breeding is bad" is just disingenuous. This isn't to say "think of the breeders!" it's just pointing out that not everyone is rubbing their grubby hands together and posting "puppies available in 5 weeks!" while their brother-sister AKC certified pugs are goin' at it
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2016 23:04
|
|
|
I was discussing this scientific paper with some friends. It purports to show a link between homophobia and being aroused by homosexual pornography. Self-identified heterosexual men were given a test battery to determine whether or not they were homophobic. The homophobic and non-homophobic men were then presented with heterosexual pornography and homosexual pornography and checked for arousal. Arousal was determined both by using a device that measures changes in the size of the penis and by directly asking men whether they experienced arousal. Both homophobic and non-homophobic men were aroused by the heterosexual pornography. However, the homophobic men were also aroused by the homosexual pornography, though they denied it. This is the source of the oft-repeated claim that homophobic men are often closet homosexuals themselves (along with numerous anecdotes of anti-gay politicians being outed as gay). One woman in the discussion did not approve of the paper's conclusion. Her alternative hypothesis was that the homophobic men were simply liable to be aroused by any depiction of sex, including animal porn. She produced this graph, which... well, just take a look. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 00:12
|
|
|
Gay people are most aroused by robots having sex. Got it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 00:30
|
|
|
I like how generic each of those test parameters are. Even if the data is 100% perfect, that's like saying "Oh, she has an allergic reaction to contact with a creature from the Animalia kingdom"
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 00:33
|
|
|
What I get from this is that gay men get so aroused by bestiality and gay porn that their boners travel back in time.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 00:35
|
|
|
Pakled posted:What I get from this is that gay men get so aroused by bestiality and gay porn that their boners travel back in time. The anti-gay parts of the world's religions were written due to the constant rain of future dicks.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 00:56
|
|
|
I can't even buy that it's a real graph. I don't have any way of interpreting it and a lot of the gay man lines go backward on the x axis. It's a joke, right? Like somebody scribbled in MSpaint on a grid?
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 00:56
|
|
|
I'm aroused by point 20, the transition between gay sex and robot sex. Gay robots having sex. Or robots sexing gay people. Guess I'm either homosexual or homophobic. I'm not into 8, the transition between fat people loving food and animals loving each other (fat people loving dead animals?), so I guess homophobia is out.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
Judge Schnoopy posted:I'm aroused by point 20, the transition between gay sex and robot sex. Gay robots having sex. Or robots sexing gay people. Guess I'm either homosexual or homophobic. Look at this robosexual over here.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 02:47
|
|
|
sweeperbravo posted:I can't even buy that it's a real graph. I don't have any way of interpreting it and a lot of the gay man lines go backward on the x axis. It's a joke, right? Like somebody scribbled in MSpaint on a grid? This appears to be exactly what happened.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 03:08
|
|
|
From examining that graph, the only valid data I can determine is that it was made by a homophobic woman.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 06:28
|
|
|
I like how the "homosexual male" line double backs on itself in a few places.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 08:52
|
|
|
flosofl posted:I like how the "homosexual male" line double backs on itself in a few places. That's why their sexuality is classified as "inverted"
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 08:53
|
|
|
You guys are misreading it. When the number 1 is introduced to gay robots or day animals it becomes most homophobic.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 11:56
|
|
|
Yep, definitely some impossible graphs there. And let's not miss the fact that there's no scatter plots. Definitely brewed up by someone who doesn't know what science looks like.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 15:02
|
|
|
Catnipped posted:I think that's a little unfair to say considering that not everyone wants a companion dog. Some people want agility dogs or hunting dogs or tracking dogs (or even protection dogs, though I'm kinda iffy on those personally), and want to have an exact health history that you don't get with a mutt. Assuming every breeder is just making show dogs isn't correct, some prefer working dogs, and mutts still have the possibility of inheriting whatever issues purebreds can get, so it's kind of a crapshoot. Ofc you're not going to see them on craigslist or whatever for obvious reasons, but saying "all dog breeding is bad" is just disingenuous. That's what I mean by the herdsman comment. Breeding for a particular task is okay because they want them healthy, breeding for looks is what I was getting at. edit: Wait, so homophobic men are basically aroused by pretty much everything equally (assuming there's some undefined standard deviations). And the dips and rises don't correlate with the X axis labels, it should be a bar graph. It's like she went out of her way to make it nonsensical. Outrail has a new favorite as of 17:17 on Aug 31, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 17:11
|
|
|
I loved the fact that the x axis is continuous but the labels are not, too. Why make a line graph at all? This is a pretty textbook example of someone who has no business critiquing a scientific paper.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 17:39
|
|
|
That chart couldn't have been made in earnest, right? It's a joke, right? I can't believe that this person made this chart with any real sincerity, and the joke is just going over people's heads.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
Titus Sardonicus posted:That chart couldn't have been made in earnest, right? It's a joke, right? I can't believe that this person made this chart with any real sincerity, and the joke is just going over people's heads. Isn't it a joke? Like graphs don't work like this...
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 17:47
|
|
|
Titus Sardonicus posted:That chart couldn't have been made in earnest, right? It's a joke, right? I can't believe that this person made this chart with any real sincerity, and the joke is just going over people's heads. Looks pretty legit to me. I wouldn't be surprised if the thought process went something like "Everyone's buying into this bullshit science paper but no one will listen to me when I post giant rants about how wrong it is on facebook. Well if those queers like fancy graphs and charts so much I'll just have to make my own!" WrenP-Complete posted:Isn't it a joke? Like graphs don't work like this... You'd be surprised how many people make it through school without learning basic information like how to read/make a bar graph. Hardcordion has a new favorite as of 18:27 on Aug 31, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 17:50
|
|
|
Titus Sardonicus posted:That chart couldn't have been made in earnest, right? It's a joke, right? I can't believe that this person made this chart with any real sincerity, and the joke is just going over people's heads. The joke is "I hate gay people, they are all perverts". Hilarious stuff. \/\/\/Yeah, that's what I meant. From the original post it was obvious this was a person with deeply negative views regarding gay people. Megillah Gorilla has a new favorite as of 18:34 on Aug 31, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 18:18
|
|
|
It's not a joke. This was made in earnest by a woman who has some liberal leanings but is otherwise super-Catholic and not a fan of the gays.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 18:28
|
|
|
Neutral: neither homophobic or not. Like, I'm not racist but... I'm not not racist either
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 19:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 15:56 |
|
|
Maybe the truth lies somewhere in the middle ???
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 20:13
|
|