|
the TV ratings will be in the pits because nobody watches TV anymore the democrats and MSM haven't caught on to that yet - they still think they control what people see and hear 100%
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 01:58 |
|
|
# ? Mar 29, 2024 07:20 |
|
reallivedinosaur posted:the TV ratings will be in the pits because nobody watches TV anymore i mean the aggregate of people who view the debates through whatever channel will vastly outnumber those who actually cast a ballot
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 01:59 |
|
these debates are about to be the most bizarre moments in American History.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 02:04 |
|
i think a bunch of piss babies will tune out in frustration when trump outperforms hrc then wait for a summary of how great abuela muerte did and how racist that white man was to her
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 02:04 |
|
trump will babble inane nonsense, clinton will seem to die but is actually just molting. bleh, nothing i haven't seen before.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 02:05 |
|
im here to chew bubble gum and melt down
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 02:07 |
|
The Protagonist posted:haha yeah tell us about who belongs in the garbage (pogroms) the all y'all demographic
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 02:08 |
|
reallivedinosaur posted:the TV ratings will be in the pits because nobody watches TV anymore Lol, the democrats have an extremely successful social media team and are noted by political commentators of all political affiliations for having embraced and adapted to technology. Whereas the republicans have failed completely in this regard and seem increasingly embarrassing and hokey. This seems like something that can be agreed upon regardless of political ideology. It is no wonder that Trump wrecking balled his way through the gop. He at least has some sort of chintzy glamour, whereas the rest of the republican candidates had the appearance, mannerisms and charisma of Tim and Eric show extras.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 02:08 |
|
NotWearingPants posted:the all y'all demographic you mean the southern states?
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 02:08 |
|
the only way to save this election is to kill all the white people, then all the non-white people, and then blow up the earth.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 02:09 |
|
reallivedinosaur posted:you mean the southern states? no, I mean all y'all
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 02:09 |
|
The Protagonist posted:haha yeah tell us about who belongs in the garbage (pogroms) My next-door neighbor who blasts lovely dubstep at 2 AM in the morning.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 02:12 |
|
what a coincidence i just found out she's stealing from poor people, deliberately making sure the amounts stolen are under $100 so they don't get investigated http://observer.com/2016/09/exclusive-hillary-clinton-campaign-systematically-overcharging-poorest-donors/
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 02:52 |
|
She raised all this money for her campaign and what the hell is she doing with it? Paying surrogates to rotate through the words sexist racist misogynist has an immunizing effect, that's diminishing returns son
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 02:57 |
|
8 bit, we agree on most issues. the fiend hillary clinton is no exception
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 03:05 |
|
shillary should pay me 10 grand. i will publish a blog post about the evils of horst wessel pepe
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 03:08 |
|
The Saurus posted:what a coincidence i just found out she's stealing from poor people, deliberately making sure the amounts stolen are under $100 so they don't get investigated quote:Disclosure: Donald Trump is the father-in-law of Jared Kushner, the publisher of Observer Media. this some pulitzer poo poo here thx shrimpdick
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 03:21 |
|
Moon Atari posted:Guess which side of politics is currently combating the private prison industry with some success. Guess which side of politics has better considered policies on the middle east. Put some thought into who is more likely to ease racial tensions rather than try to forcefully maintain their cause. I think your answer to this is vastly more interesting than mine. Look at the past eight years, which has seen more deportation of immigrants, more convictions of whistleblowers, and the establishment and expansion of a domestic spy program that is so insidious and creepy, I'm kind of astonished that more people aren't actively furious about it. Clinton is NOT a better choice in any stretch of the term--she's going to continue our warpath through the Middle East, which I am very confident will only lead to more ISIS attacks on the West, more anti-American sentiment, and the erosion of our European support. Clinton will continue the War on Drugs, which is a policy that is at present filling our prisons with literal black slaves, is responsible for the decline and destruction of Mexico's sovereignty, and is expensive, immoral and otherwise just a loving buzz kill. If wanting to maybe stop my country from engaging in behavior I find morally wrong is a "juvenile fancy" then maybe it's for the best. Your cynicism--and the cycnicism of the centrist left in general in America right now--has led to eight years of economic degeneration, thousands of death Libyans and Syrians, more private prisons, just as much torture, assassinations, and all that other poo poo everyone hated Bush for, and worse of all, it's given the common person absolutely nothing to show for it. This is the status quo, and if it persists, I do think the consequences to the United States will be existentially dire. Four years of Johnson puts a stop to our imperial appetite, for just a little while. Give the world a chance to breathe, and maybe we can clean our own house while we're at it. I'll stomach private prisons another term--if we're not filling them with non-violent drug offenders, that's a major, concrete and tangible outcome that could happen well within 4 years, possibly even within the first 100 days. 8-Bit Scholar fucked around with this message at 03:33 on Sep 16, 2016 |
# ? Sep 16, 2016 03:31 |
|
The economic situation has improved rather than degenerated, although it is somewhat stagnate, as can be expected of the neo-liberal economic policy both sides fancy, and which i don't support. As to middle eastern policy, it is far from ideal and full of extreme moral compromise, but is infinitely less counterproductive and outright destructive than Bush era policy and anything that the republican party champions. Failure to adequately clean up the mess of foreign policy is one of the biggest weaknesses of Obama's government, particularly in regards to torture, detainment and drone policy. But in general there isn't exactly a clear solution to US involvement in the middle east. Complete withdrawal will cause even greater humanitarian crisis, further ground force intervention is unlikely to be successful and will be deeply unpopular, and financing local forces is complicated by all parties being terrible. I would prefer far less military involvement and more humanitarian spending, but isis is a big obstacle to that at the moment. As to the police state, the democrats aren't very strongly opposed to it but liberals in general are far more involved in combating it than any political alternative. They are even partially or fully responsible for notable small victories at the state level. The movement against private prisons and police policy is finally heating up. Again, democrats are more amenable to it than republicans or any of the fringe right groups, who uniformly support more authoritarianism as long as it applies to minorities rather than them personally. To be honest i don't even live in the US, I just follow its politics. I live in a country where i can vote for a third party greens candidate and have my vote swept into the centre left party's tally should they fail to get adequate numbers. If i couldn't do this i would face a harder dilemma over whether or not i should vote for the compromised but less destructive and occasionally productive party, or vote for a third party candidate. However, even if i were voting third party it would certainly not be for a libertarian, who if miraculously elected would perform worse in all areas except maybe foreign policy (although even that is unlikely).
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 03:56 |
|
you retard. johnson loves private prisons more than life itself. how dumb are you if "legalize weed" makes you ignore every other thing the man has ever done or said?
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 03:57 |
|
Serious Frolicking posted:you retard. johnson loves private prisons more than life itself. how dumb are you if "legalize weed" makes you ignore every other thing the man has ever done or said? Read my post maybe, lol. I'm biting that bullet in favor of an executive push for widespread decriminalization, something Johnson wants to do. And hey, one bad policy is nothing compared to the baker's dozen that Bush, Obama, and Clinton after them will do. Moon Atari posted:The economic situation has improved rather than degenerated, although it is somewhat stagnate, Industries are abandoning the U.S. like a sinking ship, job growth is pitifully small, and rural America is eroding. Small towns are dying and cities are growing bloated and overloaded. America scarcely produces anything, and the majority of our exports are made by prison labor. quote:As to middle eastern policy, it is far from ideal and full of extreme moral compromise, but is infinitely less counterproductive and outright destructive than Bush era policy and anything that the republican party champions. It is the literal same policy, except with drone strikes and carpet bombing in lieu of an actual ground invasion, so basically...it's the same policy, but with modern tech. Secret prisons and torture and all! quote:To be honest i don't even live in the US, I just follow its politics. Then there's literally no point to even talking about this with you, lmao.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:03 |
|
"Get a load of this broad! She's sendin' fuckin' classified emails all over the place, ya know!? And meanwhile, her husband's dickin bimbos left and right! And did you get a load of her foundation and the Saudi's? I mean, come on, am I right? Sad! Cuck! Pepe!" "Secretary Clinton, your response?" *Hillary swoons before trying to discretely vomit behind podium. She claws her way upright once more.* "It.....It's *URK* my turn."
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:04 |
|
I'm voting for the people's champion, Pepe
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:05 |
|
Trump compromising with the democratic members of congress is better than Hillary compromising with the Republican members of congress. Gary.... has no popular support that he can use to whip congress with and he would accomplish not a single thing besides sitting on his hands to stall the executive.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:09 |
|
Ork of Fiction posted:Gary.... has no popular support that he can use to whip congress with and he would accomplish not a single thing besides sitting on his hands to stall the executive. Inaction has its own virtues, but I think people underestimate Johnson. He could probably get Congress to play ball with decent success. I mean, poo poo, Obama failed to get anything through the legislature either, and the executive branch can dissolve the NSA and stop the goddamn drone strikes.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:14 |
|
8-Bit Scholar posted:I think your answer to this is vastly more interesting than mine. Look at the past eight years, which has seen more deportation of immigrants, more convictions of whistleblowers, and the establishment and expansion of a domestic spy program that is so insidious and creepy, I'm kind of astonished that more people aren't actively furious about it. Clinton is NOT a better choice in any stretch of the term--she's going to continue our warpath through the Middle East, which I am very confident will only lead to more ISIS attacks on the West, more anti-American sentiment, and the erosion of our European support. Clinton will continue the War on Drugs, which is a policy that is at present filling our prisons with literal black slaves, is responsible for the decline and destruction of Mexico's sovereignty, and is expensive, immoral and otherwise just a loving buzz kill. sir this is a mcdonalds drive thru window
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:24 |
|
lol this guy cannot be real. LITERAL BLACK SLAVES A BLOO HOO HOO but oh well this guy who is all about LITERAL BLACK SLAVES is okay because i could get high without my mom yelling at me.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:26 |
|
Serious Frolicking posted:lol this guy cannot be real. LITERAL BLACK SLAVES A BLOO HOO HOO but oh well this guy who is all about LITERAL BLACK SLAVES is okay because i could get high without my mom yelling at me. lol bitter
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:28 |
|
Moon Atari posted:Lol, the democrats have an extremely successful social media team and are noted by political commentators of all political affiliations for having embraced and adapted to technology. Whereas the republicans have failed completely in this regard and seem increasingly embarrassing and hokey. This seems like something that can be agreed upon regardless of political ideology. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxfMUEf9otQ
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:29 |
|
She needs to apologize for this stuff IMO.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:30 |
|
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:30 |
|
wow, seriously embarrassing
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:31 |
|
personal liability financial reparations level even
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:31 |
|
unironically worse than the email thing
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:32 |
|
uuuuuugggghhhh. you know, hitler never went on tv to make a commercial like that.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:33 |
|
Serious Frolicking posted:uuuuuugggghhhh. you know, hitler never went on tv to make a commercial like that. gang lynch murderers need to be put on public tv ya
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:34 |
|
Anything that involves hillary actually talking is a mistake. its funnier when she tweets like a snarky millennial and people respond as if she actually wrote it herself.
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:34 |
|
Moon Atari posted:Anything that involves hillary actually talking is a mistake. its funnier when she tweets like a snarky millennial and people respond as if she actually wrote it herself. stop being a nice guy
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:34 |
|
Serious Frolicking posted:uuuuuugggghhhh. you know, hitler never went on tv to make a commercial like that. hitler actually had charisma so in that regard i guess hillary really is worse than hitler? makes you think
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:36 |
|
|
# ? Mar 29, 2024 07:20 |
|
rezatahs posted:hitler actually had charisma hillary is a fuckin lame duck but we'll put up with her
|
# ? Sep 16, 2016 04:36 |