|
reallivedinosaur posted:those would be the guys he says "YOU'RE FIRED" to except you can't do that as president time to learn how the gov works
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 19:31 |
|
|
Romney - 500 generals endorse Trump - Under 90 endorse Hillary - CIA endorse
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:20
|
|
|
Nice meltdown
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:20
|
|
|
Rasta_Al posted:Nice meltdown nice original material keep posting catchphrases
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:21
|
|
|
Robot Pride posted:nice original material "Extremely Careless"
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:24
|
|
|
Robot Pride posted:except you can't do that as president he is commander in chief of the armed forces time to learn how the gov works
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:25
|
|
|
Roylicious posted:Not quantifiable is not the same as 'it's hard to define so it doesn't really matter' which is what was being insinuated. "I'm not sure what is really required or why people care about it It's fine for people to care about different things in their preferred president. Heck, you should probably vote based on your preferences!
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:25
|
|
" is what was said. Maybe a good qualification should be 'not easily trolled by comments making fun of physical quirks like small hands.'
|
Robot Pride posted:i don't understand what the problem is with people fighting for democracy in syria and libya is Thank you for your valuable input george double u bush junior.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
reallivedinosaur posted:he is commander in chief of the armed forces https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...d-the-military/ quote:Trump offered that line about “different generals” casually, but it’s not an insignificant claim. As president, Trump’s ability to overhaul the leaders of the military is limited. As commander in chief, he can remove generals from positions but he “doesn’t enjoy Donald Trump-like powers to summarily fire service members,” as Brian Palmer explained for Slate back in 2010 (clearly when “The Apprentice” was still on the air). When President Obama relieved Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal of his command in 2010 after McChrystal gave some ill-advised comments to a reporter, McChrystal retained his rank as a four-star general, until he decided to retire. Trump could seek the counsel of other members of the military’s leadership, but he can’t simply clean house or bring in people from the outside.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:27
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:Romney - 500 generals endorse I wish the CIA, Bush Foreign Policy team, and Henry Kissinger wouldn't endorse Hillary. It's bad optics.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:27
|
|
|
Robot Pride posted:i don't understand what the problem is with people fighting for democracy in syria and libya is ha ha ha ha ha you poor naive fool
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:27
|
|
|
Robot Pride posted:frankly, i'm shocked that trump supporters immediately go to vitriol, ad hominem and wishes of harm on another person rather than logical argument using facts Why'd you call him chump if you think ad hominem is bad
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
the washington post can write hit pieces all day, the US president is still the commander in chief of the armed forces
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
Robot Pride posted:i don't understand what the problem is with people fighting for democracy in syria and libya is welp
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:29
|
|
Slime Bro Helpdesk posted:It's fine for people to care about different things in their preferred president. Heck, you should probably vote based on your preferences! Sure but let's not pretend like any rear end in a top hat could do a good job because all that's really needed is some conviction and pluck.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:29
|
|
|
reallivedinosaur posted:the washington post can write hit pieces all day, the US president is still the commander in chief of the armed forces spoken like someone who has never served good insight, bruh quote:It’s not clear that Trump recognizes such nuances, though. He has in the past seen the line between the military and the commander in chief as blurrier than it is in reality. During a debate in March, Trump was asked by Fox News’s Bret Baier what he would do if the military refused to carry out his orders to commit acts of torture or target civilians.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
8-Bit Scholar posted:Have you ever considered that Trump's badness is not that impressive compared to Hillary's? Trump's campaign is a short history of insultingly bad lies, incompetence, burned bridges, naked nepotism, and psychosis...but he hasn't had a chance to gently caress up a government position yet! C'mon, give him a chance.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:30
|
|
|
Believe me.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:31
|
|
|
it's kinda refreshing to have a hillbot actually lose it outside the hill hugbox mission accomplished
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:33
|
|
|
Knight posted:Ah, the old "What do you have to lose?" Actually you should vote Gary Johnson for president in 2016
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:33
|
|
|
rezatahs posted:it's kinda refreshing to have a hillbot actually lose it outside the hill hugbox hell yeah
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:34
|
|
|
VR Native American posted:https://theintercept.com/2016/09/18/washpost-makes-history-first-paper-to-call-for-prosecution-of-its-own-source-after-accepting-pulitzer/ The intercept is good
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:34
|
|
|
Knight posted:Ah, the old "What do you have to lose?" So just endorse the candidate who already has hosed one up. Gotcha
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:35
|
|
|
8-Bit Scholar posted:ha ha ha ha ha funny how people who were against the W's Iraq war are repeating the exact same rhetoric for even more military adventures in some middle-eastern poo poo-holes
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:35
|
|
|
8-Bit Scholar posted:Actually you should vote Gary Johnson for president in 2016 look at this guy....3rd party in a first past the post system for his next trick: refuting gravity
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:35
|
|
|
Roylicious posted:Sure but let's not pretend like any rear end in a top hat could do a good job because all that's really needed is some conviction and pluck. I think conviction and pluck would be two great traits for our next president, actually.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:39
|
|
|
8-Bit Scholar posted:Actually you should vote Gary Johnson for president in 2016 Rasta_Al posted:So just endorse the candidate who already has hosed one up. Gotcha
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:39
|
|
|
So Hillary will be distant, make few public appearances, and all leaks from within her administration will be met with mysterious "suicides" "accidents" and "botched robberies"?
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:40
|
|
|
Knight posted:A campaign is a preview of how a candidate will run the office. I would write-in George W. Bush before I would give Trump a chance, after watching his campaign. It's not a decision. Well a vote for Hillary is a vote for W, so you will get your wish kemosabe.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:41
|
|
|
Has anyone mentioned Hillary's IT drone asking Reddit how to wipe info from email servers using the same username he uses for everything else because lol
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:43
|
|
|
Slime Bro Helpdesk posted:Well a vote for Hillary is a vote for W, so you will get your wish kemosabe.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:44
|
|
|
Can you guys please provision further posts with: AFFILIATION: HILARY/TRUMP/OTHER TROLLING: YES/NO I am getting really confused and I am not exactly smart to begin with. Thanks!
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:45
|
|
|
Knight posted:I thought Hillary was more of the same of Obama, but if Hillary is W, too, then it's all W's all the way down. It's as if Obama, once separated from skin color and party affiliation and the minor details that make one half of the country loathe him instead of the other, has basically pursued the same ends as W.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:47
|
|
|
Slime Bro Helpdesk posted:It's as if Obama, once separated from skin color and party affiliation and the minor details that make one half of the country loathe him instead of the other, has basically pursued the same ends as W. there are people that still don't see this at all
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:48
|
|
|
Knight posted:A campaign is a preview of how a candidate will run the office. I would write-in George W. Bush before I would give Trump a chance, after watching his campaign. It's not a decision. Trump's campaign has had the misfortune of being calculatingly scrutinized by every single major news outlet, while every single one of Hillary's gaffes disappears down the toilet or is spun into some story about how it's "totally no big deal". They both suck poo poo my friend.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 20:50
|
|
|
I'm with her
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 21:10
|
|
|
I've still yet to see a single hilldawg sign in a yard
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 21:31
|
|
|
GET MY BELT SON posted:I've still yet to see a single hilldawg sign in a yard i haven't seen any in the age of facebook, etc i think most people are beyond ancient campaign methods and it prob makes sense that more trump supporters would have them since his demographic skews to the older crowd that still do caveman type poo poo
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 21:37
|
|
|
Rasta_Al posted:Trump's campaign has had the misfortune of being calculatingly scrutinized by every single major news outlet, while every single one of Hillary's gaffes disappears down the toilet or is spun into some story about how it's "totally no big deal". For me, it matters that Trump says Obama is the founder of ISIS, then later doubles down on it and Obama is "literally" the founder of ISIS, and even later says he was being sarcastic. His lies are constant and sometimes so nonsensical that they become insulting. The closest thing I can compare it to is when Hillary was claiming she didn't actually faint this 9/11 and just felt dizzy, which is a really dumb lie, but at least I know she's saying that to cover what poor condition she was in. When Trump spends decades pretending to be "John Miller" to promote himself, then admits it later, then denies it again, or when he has his staff try to pass anti-Semitic imagery through their twitter and claim that the Star of David is just a "sheriff's star", or they retweet fake crime statistics from white supremacists and then lie about it, when we can all plainly see the tweets, it paints the picture of someone who is horribly mentally unwell. That his campaign can't raise funds at the same level of his competition, has gone through 2 previous campaign managers amid controversy and drama with his family, still keeps making insane comments blaming Obama for events that took place before he even held office, or struggles working with him so much that they sometimes have to admit they can't speak for the campaign when acting as campaign spokesperson are pretty illuminating of what his presidency would look like. He should be scrutinized for that and more, because he cultivates an environment of cheap lackeys stabbing each other in the back and scrambling to stay on whatever he's babbling about today before they are replaced by his family members and he funnels more money to himself through the campaign expenses. His complete inexperience, bad policies, and proud ignorance on issues does nothing but repel me, but I'm in NY so he's going to lose this state with or without me.
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 21:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 19:31 |
|
|
Knight posted:That his campaign can't raise funds at the same level of his competition So... Hillary has more rich supporters, since neither lure small donors like Sanders did? How is this a positive exactly?
|
|
#
?
Sep 19, 2016 21:45
|
|
