|
a deal is a deal before I go, all scum are on my vote ##vote AR
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2016 22:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 03:43 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2016 22:43
|
|
|
Oh god! Absurd Revolver is hammered!
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2016 22:43
|
|
|
Board game night enjoy no flip for a while. You can all post except AR
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2016 22:45
|
|
|
I think this vote was stupid and will lead to lynching another townie. Going back to my tailgate.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2016 22:47
|
|
|
Sorry AR I forgot to invite I feel like poo poo. You did the pinky swear and everything. I was busy cleaning dishes and listening to A Bonfire Side Chat.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2016 23:43
|
|
|
JimsonTheBetrayer posted:Sorry AR I forgot to invite I feel like poo poo. You did the pinky swear and everything. Mafia edit: unvote
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2016 23:44
|
|
|
JimsonTheBetrayer posted:Sorry AR I forgot to invite I feel like poo poo. You did the pinky swear and everything.  it's okay ilu
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2016 23:49
|
|
|
Absurd Revolver posted:
Ilu too ghastly gun
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 00:26
|
|
|
Totally bogue dude! Absurd Revolver, Vigilante-Aligned Brutal Cop, was killed day two!quote:
Votecount for Day 2 Absurd Revolver (7): Poison Mushroom, Poison Mushroom (3): BottleKnight, Aggro, JimsonTheBetrayer, Atomic Soda, mirotrem, BottleKnight (1): CapitalistPig, mirotrem, Poison Mushroom, Aggro (0): Poison Mushroom, JimsonTheBetrayer (0): Atomic Soda, Atomic Soda (0): Poison Mushroom, Not Voting (2): AnonymousNarcotics, The Lord of Hats With 13 alive, it's 7 votes to execute. The current deadline is October 02nd, 2016 at 10 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 21 hours, 22 minutes.   24 hours to let me know what's happenin' tonight, man
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2016 05:38
|
|
|
Totally bogue dude! Atomic Soda, Vigilante-Aligned Doctor, was killed day two!quote:
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 13:41
|
|
|
Hello it's PMush thank you God bless. ##vote PMush
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 13:46
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 3 Poison Mushroom (1): CCKeane Not Voting (10): Aggro, AnonymousNarcotics, BottleKnight, CapitalistPig, DickBastardly, JimsonTheBetrayer, Krunge, mirotrem, Poison Mushroom, The Lord of Hats With 11 alive, it's 6 votes to execute. The current deadline is October 04th, 2016 at 10 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 1 day, 13 hours. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 13:47
|
|
|
So, AnonymousNarcotics, CapitalistPig, DickBastardly, and The Lord of Hats all posted loving nothing substantial on day #2. Pretty tough to find scum when a third of the surviving players in the game are barely posting. AnonymousNarcotic's one serious post from day #1 was a low-key claim, stating that he was roleblocked. I don't think there's much to be gained from that, as it seems like just about everyone has some sort of role. CCKeane, did you try to kill anyone last night? I honestly can't tell if you're being serious about being a vigilante.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 14:42
|
|
|
I also think I might understand how the events of night #1 shook out. AR says that he killed Max with his investigation, and there’s nothing in AR’s flip to suggest that he was insane or that he could kill Townies. The only thing that I can think of is that Ecco’s dying action was to bus drive himself and Max, but why in the gently caress would anyone bus-drive himself? Although, that would make sense. There’s a [REDACTED] portion of Ecco’s flip, which I would have to imagine is, “If the scum try to kill you, they instead recruit you.” At least that’s how I’ve seen traitors work previously. So AR tries to investigate Max, but instead investigates Ecco and kills him. Meanwhile, the scum end up killing Max. And this comedy of errors results in nothing but good things for the scum.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 14:43
|
|
|
I also don't think we should lynch BottleKnight today. With 11 players left, I would guess that 3 are scum. This would make the initial set up 3 scum, 1 traitor, and 1 third party, which seems reasonably fair. If we lynch BK, we have a 0% chance of finding scum.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 14:45
|
|
|
Aggro posted:So, AnonymousNarcotics, CapitalistPig, DickBastardly, and The Lord of Hats all posted loving nothing substantial on day #2. Pretty tough to find scum when a third of the surviving players in the game are barely posting. I can't tell if I'm being serious either, I drink a lot Aggro.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 14:46
|
|
|
Aggro do you like hamburgers?
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 15:03
|
|
|
Aggro posted:I also don't think we should lynch BottleKnight today. With 11 players left, I would guess that 3 are scum. This would make the initial set up 3 scum, 1 traitor, and 1 third party, which seems reasonably fair. If we lynch BK, we have a 0% chance of finding scum. 0% chance means he is confirmed 3p aligned...which he isnt.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 15:18
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Hello it's PMush thank you God bless. I was willing to vote PMush yesterday, do you have something conrete?
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 15:23
|
|
|
mirotrem posted:0% chance means he is confirmed 3p aligned...which he isnt. True. It would be a ballsy and brilliant gambit and no offense to BK, but I find it easier to trust him than to label him at evil genius.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 15:43
|
|
|
Aggro posted:So, AnonymousNarcotics, DickBastardly, and The Lord of Hats all posted loving nothing substantial on day #2. Pretty tough to find scum when a third of the surviving players in the game are barely posting. ikr? Let's just start posing Anarc and dick and hats ffs.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 17:12
|
|
|
also ##vote bk
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 17:12
|
|
|
Kash mentioned penalties for lurking SO.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 17:23
|
|
|
Aggro posted:I also don't think we should lynch BottleKnight today. With 11 players left, I would guess that 3 are scum. This would make the initial set up 3 scum, 1 traitor, and 1 third party, which seems reasonably fair. If we lynch BK, we have a 0% chance of finding scum. I don't like this post.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 17:25
|
|
|
I don't know this game... Does that mean there's a Houston 1 and 2?
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 17:29
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:ikr? I don't know what "ikr" means.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 17:31
|
|
|
I know right
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 17:36
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:I know right I agree, CPig really should explain his abbreviations.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 17:37
|
|
|
Aggro posted:I don't know what "ikr" means. Nevermind. AnonymousNarcotics posted:I don't know this game... Does that mean there's a Houston 1 and 2? According to Wikipedia, the first two models were failures. So I'm going to go with "no".
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 17:39
|
|
|
oh my , I am sorry that you did not know a very popular internet abbreviation that gets said all the time on these forums. Also what else is there to say? bk says he is a 3p and I shall not suffer a 3p to live. He is a detriment to town whether he is a survivor or lying and is an sk
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 17:40
|
|
|
BottleKnight posted:I don't like this post. Didn't you spend literally all of day #2 explaining why lynching you is a poor use of our time?
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 17:40
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:oh my , I am sorry that you did not know a very popular internet abbreviation that gets said all the time on these forums. An SK who didn't kill yesterday? And probably didn't kill night #1 since the extra death was attributed to our Brutal Cop?
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 17:41
|
|
|
Aggro posted:An SK who didn't kill yesterday? And probably didn't kill night #1 since the extra death was attributed to our Brutal Cop? You are ignoring the first part of what I said, BK is probably a survivor, but survivor is an anti town role that gives scum an edge.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 17:56
|
|
|
I doubt there is a traditional sk, we'd have the potential for a lot of bloodshed if so.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 18:13
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:You are ignoring the first part of what I said, BK is probably a survivor, but survivor is an anti town role that gives scum an edge. He is, at the very least, not a "normal survivor", per Retro Futurist's lie detector. I'm inclined to believe that he's a 1x lynchproof Survivor, as he has claimed. So we lynch him -- twice, while two Townies are killed overnight (barring interventions).
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 19:10
|
|
|
Aggro posted:He is, at the very least, not a "normal survivor", per Retro Futurist's lie detector. I'm inclined to believe that he's a 1x lynchproof Survivor, as he has claimed. oh poo poo I missed that
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 19:14
|
|
|
that does suck and scum likely will not kill him since he helps them win. drat, this is a lovely role kash why did you do this to us?
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 19:14
|
|
|
How about we just ignore the survivor and let them help town and we actually hunt scum
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 19:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 03:43 |
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:How about we just ignore the survivor and let them help town and we actually hunt scum because survivors are bad and favor scum.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2016 19:46
|
|