|
I tried to track CCKeane last night and my action failed. If anyone wants to claim an RB, that'd be great.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 20:01 |
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2024 13:42 |
|
Aggro posted:Didn't you spend literally all of day #2 explaining why lynching you is a poor use of our time? No the whole not lynching me thing is good, the setup spec seems very specific and like you're a bit too sure. CapitalistPig posted:because survivors are bad and favor scum. you know what else favors scum townies that don't read
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 20:43 |
|
BottleKnight posted:No the whole not lynching me thing is good, the setup spec seems very specific and like you're a bit too sure. My notes also have plausible groups of scum instead of just individuals. It makes it a little easier to make connections that way.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 20:52 |
|
Poison Mushroom posted:This isn't me being rusty, this is just me being an idiot, and now I'm getting upset about it, probably because of the new hormones. I was also in the process of building a case against PMush, but this post stopped me in my tracks. It's kinda meta, but that first sentence is just something so oddly personal that I have trouble picturing a scum player saying it. Anyone else have input?
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 20:57 |
|
Aggro posted:I was also in the process of building a case against PMush, but this post stopped me in my tracks. It's kinda meta, but that first sentence is just something so oddly personal that I have trouble picturing a scum player saying it. Anyone else have input? Not sure why I don't remember PMush saying that..but that does stand out. Hmm
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 20:59 |
|
Aggro posted:I was also in the process of building a case against PMush, but this post stopped me in my tracks. It's kinda meta, but that first sentence is just something so oddly personal that I have trouble picturing a scum player saying it. Anyone else have input? I dunno. Anyways, BK's flipflopping like a motherfucker, so I'm gonna go ahead and bet that the lynchproof claim is a lie. ##vote BottleKnight
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 21:00 |
|
If I thought I was incapable of playing properly, I'd have replaced out.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 21:01 |
|
Aggro posted:So, AnonymousNarcotics, CapitalistPig, DickBastardly, and The Lord of Hats all posted loving nothing substantial on day #2. Pretty tough to find scum when a third of the surviving players in the game are barely posting. Of these four, I feel like I posted the most. Perhaps lacking in quality investigation, but I just don't know where to start. My role has no investigative benefit I can assure you. Regardless of Pmush's random meta-esque post, which probably was a result of hormones by her own admission, her willingness to bandwagon krell day 1 feels like a scum wanting to rid a townie playing it off as policy vote concurrence. But I really don't know the history there, nor do I care much to look it up myself. I guess I'll have to play this game with my gut, and my gut favors not the flavor of mushrooms. ##vote Pmush
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 21:25 |
|
BTW Anarc is town! Or at least, not scum aligned! Last night I was invited into her Masonry. She said she has a town Wincon, as well as another secondary wincon that has already expired. I don't want to go too into detail, and slip her up. So I will let her finish after this bit, if they want to give more info.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 21:31 |
|
DickBastardly posted:Of these four, I feel like I posted the most. Perhaps lacking in quality investigation, but I just don't know where to start. My role has no investigative benefit I can assure you. Regardless of Pmush's random meta-esque post, which probably was a result of hormones by her own admission, her willingness to bandwagon krell day 1 feels like a scum wanting to rid a townie playing it off as policy vote concurrence. But I really don't know the history there, nor do I care much to look it up myself. I guess I'll have to play this game with my gut, and my gut favors not the flavor of mushrooms. My wife puts mushrooms on EVERYTHING she gets, and we went to a chinese buffet and she even started to pick the chicken out of the Mushroom and chicken and eat only the mushrooms. I had to stop myself from gagging. ##vote PMUSH For all of the reasons you said before, but mostly that Krell vote. I can understand BLOOD IN THE WATER FEEDING FRENZY! Cuz, that's why I voted but like, it just seemed really disingenuous how she felt the need to justify it.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 21:36 |
|
So either I was roleblocked night 1 or the person I tried to invite to the masonry was scum and that doesn't work? It's an unconfirmed masonry but maybe it's a hidden requirement that it only works if the person I invite is also town. I know setup spec is stupid. Just putting it out there.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 21:58 |
|
I guess I can try inviting them again and see if it works
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 21:59 |
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:I guess I can try inviting them again and see if it works I wouldn't waste your time trying again.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 22:09 |
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:So either I was roleblocked night 1 or the person I tried to invite to the masonry was scum and that doesn't work? It's an unconfirmed masonry but maybe it's a hidden requirement that it only works if the person I invite is also town. I know setup spec is stupid. Just putting it out there. From what I've read, usually the mason dies if they attempt to recruit a scum player. So a role block is more likely.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 22:29 |
|
DickBastardly posted:From what I've read, usually the mason dies if they attempt to recruit a scum player. So a role block is more likely. It's terrible that we are such a deficit because we could use this by having her claim who she's going to investigate before she does, and then see if she dies or not...
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 22:32 |
|
JimsonTheBetrayer posted:It's terrible that we are such a deficit because we could use this by having her claim who she's going to investigate before she does, and then see if she dies or not... True. But if we assume the role blocker is scum, then this would be a foolhardy tip-off. Is the risk worth the reward (in this case "reward" being another town death)?
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 22:44 |
|
DickBastardly posted:True. But if we assume the role blocker is scum, then this would be a foolhardy tip-off. Is the risk worth the reward (in this case "reward" being another town death)? Oh, no don't get me wrong, that's why I was sure to throw in the fact that we are losing. Hard. We really can't afford any kind of screw ups right now, it sounds super anti-town but I would rather a day of no lynch if we can narrow down WHO is scum, because I think we can learn a lot if we do. My biggest concern is that drat vote on Krell. There is A LOT to be learned from it, but no one likes playing with Krell. so It's hard to tell what is scum riding a vote on a town player, and what is people actually hating krell and not wanting to play with him.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 22:48 |
|
If anyone is a huge loser, and wants to take the time. We can try and figure out who actually played games with Krell and who didn't. That way we can narrow down who actually had a reason to vote him, and who was just voting him to propagate a band wagon.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 22:53 |
|
JimsonTheBetrayer posted:If anyone is a huge loser, and wants to take the time. We can try and figure out who actually played games with Krell and who didn't. That way we can narrow down who actually had a reason to vote him, and who was just voting him to propagate a band wagon. *puts finger on nose* not it
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 22:58 |
|
JimsonTheBetrayer posted:If anyone is a huge loser, and wants to take the time. We can try and figure out who actually played games with Krell and who didn't. That way we can narrow down who actually had a reason to vote him, and who was just voting him to propagate a band wagon. Well, Ecco, Max, and AR are dead. So that leaves from first vote to last vote: Poison Mushroom BottleKnight Jimson mirotrem DickBastardly Lord of Hats (hammer)
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 23:13 |
|
Not it!
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 23:13 |
|
Aggro posted:Well, Ecco, Max, and AR are dead. So that leaves from first vote to last vote: My first game here and I was just going with the group consensus. I also dislike day 1 in a role madness game so it worked in hand in hand.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 23:33 |
|
Could those who are voting Pmush, please summarize their reasons for doing so?
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 23:34 |
|
Krunge posted:Could those who are voting Pmush, please summarize their reasons for doing so? They were one of the few people to justify the reason for their vote, and then keep pushing it, after it was obvious everyone was okay with just voting him because they hate him. Seems disingenuous and forced. Maybe, she just wanted to reinforce why she was doing it, but IDK. My whole reason was BLOOD IN THE WATER! FEEDING TIME! (also I played a game with krell before where it got bogged down in discussing whether we should lynch him like... day 3 and it was boring and lost a lot of traction)
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 23:38 |
|
Playing defensively because of how close we must be to LYLO: One of the following must be true: -- I am what I say I am. -- I am a scum tracker. -- I lied about investigating Krunge on Day 2, either knowing or guessing that they wouldn't go anywhere. I'm town, but since I really don't wanna get dunked, let's humor the people who think I'm scum for a minute. Why would I lie about investigating Krunge? If they were scum, wouldn't that be a terrible, terrible idea? Wouldn't either risking a dunk on being caught in a lie, or outing my basically-unreadable scumbuddy be monumentally idiotic? If you believe I lied on Night 1, please justify why I would do so. But if you believe I'm actually a scum tracker, why would I out myself on D2? Scum Tracker would be way more useful on the DL to shake out town power roles and/or SKs. Please justify why you are voting on me.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 23:40 |
|
##unvote I'm way to tired to read and parse your argument PMUSH but with what little I could understand I am gonna take my vote off of you, if only because you seem to be genuine with your intent, but IDK. You say, Justify why we are voting you when as town all we have to say is "Because we think you're scum" and it should be good enough. It should be on you to provide an alternate scum read, instead of having us waste time defending our votes on you.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2016 23:43 |
|
##unvote Eeeeeeeehhhhhh. Also let's not vote BK. I'd vote Aggro next.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 00:31 |
|
CCKeane posted:##unvote ##vote aggro
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 00:33 |
|
Poison Mushroom posted:Playing defensively because of how close we must be to LYLO: ##unvote I can't really find any holes in your defense at the moment. If you are a tracker, which I can't really find a reason not to believe, then keep it coming with the info. We need all of it that we can get. What's your beef with BK exactly? mafia e: forgot to bold the unvote...not sure if that's important to do or not.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 00:40 |
|
BK vote is a mistake. Ignore him.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 00:41 |
|
CCKeane posted:##unvote Do have anything you would like to share with the class?
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 00:45 |
|
DickBastardly posted:Do have anything you would like to share with the class? Yes. *Farts for 15 minutes*
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 00:46 |
|
You know, considering Aggro criticized my posting or "lack thereof" on day 2, and having not mentioned anything regarding your posting activities seems strange to me. Why start a bandwagon on him? Seems he's got a soft spot for you.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 00:53 |
|
CCKeane posted:Hello it's PMush thank you God bless. Or why I failed when I tried to see where you went? Because I'm starting to suspect you might be a ninja or an autoblocker or something.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 00:56 |
|
DickBastardly posted:You know, considering Aggro criticized my posting or "lack thereof" on day 2, and having not mentioned anything regarding your posting activities seems strange to me. Why start a bandwagon on him? Seems he's got a soft spot for you. That's fine. His opinion on me doesnt affect if he's scum or not. Poison Mushroom posted:Care to explain your reasons? I was going off of the AS kill, who was pursuing you aggressively.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 00:58 |
|
Krunge posted:
Can we please not start another band wagon
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 01:01 |
|
Krunge posted:
Would dig any reasoning for this. I've been trying as much as possible to articulate my thoughts and provide explanations for why I'm voting or not voting.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 01:02 |
|
Aggro posted:Would dig any reasoning for this. I've been trying as much as possible to articulate my thoughts and provide explanations for why I'm voting or not voting. Got any capri sun?
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 01:03 |
|
CCKeane posted:I was going off of the AS kill, who was pursuing you aggressively. Krunge posted:
Also, anyone wanna claim the RB? I'm currently operating under the assumption that my Track failed for antitown reasons since no one's admitting it.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 01:05 |
|
|
# ? Apr 18, 2024 13:42 |
|
CC, do you have a good reason for mobbing Aggro? I feel weird just going along with it.
|
# ? Oct 4, 2016 01:05 |