|
Also ##unvote because reasons.
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 16, 2024 05:02 |
|
|
DickBastardly posted:You know, considering Aggro criticized my posting or "lack thereof" on day 2, and having not mentioned anything regarding your posting activities seems strange to me. Why start a bandwagon on him? Seems he's got a soft spot for you. Eh, your posts on day #2 were all just really wishy-washy before deciding to vote for AR. Who was, you know, Town. CCKeane didn't post anything more substantial, but my notes had "Claimed Vig???" instead of "no good posts", and that's how he didn't get included. It's hard as gently caress to get a read on someone that doesn't post anything more than a sentence at at a time. Going back to that, CCKeane, were you being serious with your claim?
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:08
|
|
|
Anyone have any theories on how many scum there are? I know someone said possibly 4 but with the traitor wouldn't it be 3 and 1 traitor? I'm just asking because if we mislynch today tomorrow puts us at lrol (lynch right or lose ).
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:15
|
|
|
I'm honestly not sure? Role madness means it could be as few as one with a bunch of lives, or as many as 4 or 5 working at cross purposes. (Two scum teams isn't unheard of.)
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:18
|
|
|
Lmao rolemadness games are the epitome of DON'T USE META ARGUMENTS. since no one knows what the composition is except kash
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:21
|
|
|
Thanks, kettle.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:26
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:I mean, sure? That feels like a flimsy reason for Day 3, especially without even a basic case. Why do you feel safe speculating on why the NK was picked? There must be more to it than "AS didn't like you, and I am therefore picking up their ball and running with it". Because the information on both how you reacted and who jumped on it is useful in and of itself.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:26
|
|
|
Aggro posted:Eh, your posts on day #2 were all just really wishy-washy before deciding to vote for AR. Who was, you know, Town. Aggro I'm legally prevented from real claiming, most older players can confirm (we call the event that caused this "the incident") But your role fishing is pretty cool.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:27
|
|
|
DickBastardly posted:CC, do you have a good reason for mobbing Aggro? I feel weird just going along with it. I dont think Aggro is contributing as much as posing questions and positioning themselves to appear to be contributing. There are a lot of safe opinions and I find this questionable.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:28
|
|
|
Aggro posted:Eh, your posts on day #2 were all just really wishy-washy before deciding to vote for AR. Who was, you know, Town. So this is a post that is long but not substantial. Observe: -A statement that is generally a reflection of posting without a hard claim behind it, punctuated with an irrefutable statement that PMush voted AR. No opinion is attached. Just implications. -A reason for excluding me with another statement that can't be refuted, that I'm being cagey. Importantly, no opinion is attached here either. Just implications. -Role fishing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:31
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:Thanks, kettle. Oh lol I meant my statement and lmao to be in agreement of your confusion rather than an admonishment of you saying it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:34
|
|
|
Did ANarc die? I haven't seen her post since I think D1?
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:35
|
|
|
Aggro posted:So, AnonymousNarcotics, CapitalistPig, DickBastardly, and The Lord of Hats all posted loving nothing substantial on day #2. Pretty tough to find scum when a third of the surviving players in the game are barely posting. More role fishing here, by the way.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:35
|
|
|
To play devil's advocate, I rolefished you, too. Because, I seriously don't want people to forget: The claimed tracker was roleblocked.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:36
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:Did ANarc die? I haven't seen her post since I think D1? She recently made a post in the mason doc telling me what her wincon is but I am mobile and don't know how to read last edited timestaml so I have no idea when she said it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:36
|
|
|
JimsonTheBetrayer posted:She recently made a post in the mason doc telling me what her wincon is but I am mobile and don't know how to read last edited timestamp so I have no idea when she said it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:38
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:To play devil's advocate, I rolefished you, too. Because, I seriously don't want people to forget: The claimed tracker was roleblocked. I am no longer am interested in voting you.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:39
|
|
|
Multiple possible wincons makes me suspicious? Unless she meant "I have a wincon that is pro-town".
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:39
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:Did ANarc die? I haven't seen her post since I think D1? Seriously? I posted on the last page
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:41
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Hey I'm a vig so ##vote AR CCKeane posted:I breadcrumbed this very cleverly at the beginning of the game. CCKeane posted:Krunge I have a GUN who should I SHOOT It's not role fishing if someone proclaims their role, uses it as a reason to vote against a Townie, and then repeats the claim. Having a Vigilante dramatically increases our chances of winning, since we can potentially kill two scum in one day/knight. And if you're not, then why vote against AR?
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:42
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Seriously? I posted on the last page 
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:45
|
|
|
Anarc, how do you feel about announcing your next mason invite to test the"if i die, they're scum" thing?
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:47
|
|
|
Pmush I feel like you're either not reading very carefully or you're deliberately misinterpreting this info about me. I had a secondary wincon (along with the town wincon) that if I invited Houston to my masonry I would win. But Houston is dead so now I will only win if town wins
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:47
|
|
|
DickBastardly posted:Anarc, how do you feel about announcing your next mason invite to test the"if i die, they're scum" thing? I just have a feeling I'd get rbed again
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:48
|
|
|
I'm just going to leave this here... ##vote The Lord of Hats
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:48
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:I just have a feeling I'd get rbed again I forgot about that, good point.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:54
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:Can I ask why you believe her so implicitly? Is it because your mason recruit went through? Eh mason just feels like a town role? What could scum get from inviting town players into a masonry with them? Other than more chances to screw up and scumslip?
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:56
|
|
|
Aggro posted:It's not role fishing if someone proclaims their role, uses it as a reason to vote against a Townie, and then repeats the claim. Alternate question. If they are why vote against ar? CCKEANE could have just slipped in through the window in the dead of night and help them fight crime in heaven. Real peaceful like. Something seems off about Keanes motives.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:58
|
|
|
Okay, that's pretty reasonable. Also, hi, Anarc! Sorry we haven't talked in a while. I'll bug you again when this game's over.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 01:59
|
|
|
JimsonTheBetrayer posted:Can we please not start another band wagon  Aggro posted:Would dig any reasoning for this. I've been trying as much as possible to articulate my thoughts and provide explanations for why I'm voting or not voting. That's part of it. Your posts have the je ne sais quoi of effortful scum. At the same time you've managed to throw a lot of shade without a lot drive, like you're setting up for multiple possible votes. Finally, there's this which I think CCKeane just articulated very well: CCKeane posted:I dont think Aggro is contributing as much as posing questions and positioning themselves to appear to be contributing. There are a lot of safe opinions and I find this questionable. Also: mirotrem posted:I'm just going to leave this here... Would also vote, but I think it's more likely Hats will just suicide by modkill, so it's moot right now unless he posts. In that case I'm willing to give him a chance to engage despite my previous suspicions.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 02:00
|
|
|
JimsonTheBetrayer posted:Eh mason just feels like a town role? What could scum get from inviting town players into a masonry with them? Other than more chances to screw up and scumslip? Anyone who is recruited and isn't immediately suspicious of the person who recruited them is scummy in my book. Pmush questioning you on this is good. No reason for us to believe you and him. He could just be a Cult Recruiter. Which is interesting, because he brought up recruiting a scum-aligned person...interesting.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 02:03
|
|
|
mirotrem posted:Anyone who is recruited and isn't immediately suspicious of the person who recruited them is scummy in my book. Pmush questioning you on this is good. Except I thought if it was cult recruit that the recruit was made aware they are a cultist now?
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
JimsonTheBetrayer posted:Except I thought if it was cult recruit that the recruit was made aware they are a cultist now? Who says you aren't? We can't see your PM.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 02:06
|
|
|
mirotrem posted:Who says you aren't? We can't see your PM. Oh nevermind I get what you're saying.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 02:08
|
|
|
Krunge posted:That's part of it. Your posts have the je ne sais quoi of effortful scum. At the same time you've managed to throw a lot of shade without a lot drive, like you're setting up for multiple possible votes. Finally, there's this which I think CCKeane just articulated very well: I try not to vote until I have a reasonably strong conviction, but I try to make my thoughts public so that when I do vote, the reasoning is clear. CCKeane posted:Hello it's PMush thank you God bless. As opposed to votes like this, which drive me loving crazy.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 02:10
|
|
|
mirotrem posted:Anyone who is recruited and isn't immediately suspicious of the person who recruited them is scummy in my book. Pmush questioning you on this is good. Anarc mentioned a failed recruit attempt which was attributed to a role block (in theory). I find it highly unlikely that if you attempted to recruit a scummie it would just simply fail without ramifications (the death of the recruiter).
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 02:11
|
|
|
DickBastardly posted:Anarc mentioned a failed recruit attempt which was attributed to a role block (in theory). I find it highly unlikely that if you attempted to recruit a scummie it would just simply fail without ramifications (the death of the recruiter). The tracker just claimed to be roleblocked night 2...........who was roleblocked night 1?
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 02:12
|
|
|
I feel like maybe I'm not understanding Masonry very well...
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 02:13
|
|
|
Aggro posted:Yea, I kind of have been hypocritical re: throwing shade :/ I felt the same way when I had a steering wheel in my pants. It was driving me nuts.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 02:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 16, 2024 05:02 |
|
|
The fact that he was worried about the outcome of it makes me suspicious.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2016 02:13
|
|