|
Took them months to get that jump working without you flying into space. Just that one jump.
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 00:37 |
|
|
CAPTAIN CAPSLOCK posted:why... jfc, seeing all these RSI posting personalities, and recalling what they were like several years back compared to nowadays' madness, is so depressing. The RSI forums and CIG's work in general should genuinely be labelled a mental health hazard.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:31
|
|
|
im glad they showed the on foot first person shooter team-based arena mode in the large space simulator game but no simulation of space have they ever made a full scale star or planetary system or pulsar or black hole or jump point in four years? have they simulated space? i think they just made the water z level invisible and added a star skybox personally those planets are cute but they're ten gigabytes per single planet let alone a single game environment (if we count jump points as loading screens) but im glad to see they finally tackled the problem of a networked 4v4 first person shooter in the first person shooter engine, and im glad people are buying the big 3dsmax things that aren't even playable because that means this thing gets even more bloated and causes even more software developers to go bald Justin Tyme fucked around with this message at 10:34 on Nov 19, 2016 |
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:31
|
|
|
SelenicMartian posted:Took them months to get that jump working without you flying into space. It was kind of funny because it almost looked like he was preparing for it and just hoping it wouldn't gently caress up and then they just sorta slipshod edited it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:33
|
|
|
do you think they realize having a single planet that isn't even remotely as fleshed out as what would be necessary for an actual game let alone a demo that is like ten gigabytes is not feasible at all, and all that work they're doing to develop tools is useless because they're not feasible for what they're trying to achieve like do you think they really looked at how the tools work, how the environments are made, and seeing the file size and going "yeah this is nice! gonna be able to make planets in no time flat now  "
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:36
|
|
|
TheLastRoboKy posted:It was kind of funny because it almost looked like he was preparing for it and just hoping it wouldn't gently caress up and then they just sorta slipshod edited it. http://i.imgur.com/hEpCnkh.mp4
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:40
|
|
|
man, if you ever wonder what Sandi thinks about the backers or the SC dream look at this drat gif. loving telling man.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:41
|
|
|
My software/game dev knowledge is limited to matlab programs and little UE4 toys but even I know there is no way the tools and systems they have to make planets is workable for their scope. like it's literally impossible. You cannot have a game that is a terabyte big. I mean I don't even think a map would fit into memory And there is no way you can handwave it away either, it's not a question of being "unoptimized", it's like trying to make a matlab script run faster by making the font size smaller. Why are citizens not screaming from the rooftops about this? The planet wasn't even fully fleshed out.... it's not procedural if the engine has to store heightmap information from hand-drawn regions...  how are they going to populate an entire planet with points of interest and multiple little missions here and there when one little controlled demo environment is 100 gigabytes not counting every other thing in the solar system. I'm curious to see how big the Crusader map is without any sort of planet tech they're using is, I wouldn't be surprised if it's at least ~3 gigabytes. Anyone still got this shithead of a game who can unpack the files and look? Peter? guys help i thought deeply about the spacegame and now my brain is broken- the game will be required to ship on terabyte external hard drives hooked up via usb 3.0 Justin Tyme fucked around with this message at 10:48 on Nov 19, 2016 |
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:44
|
|
|
TheLastRoboKy posted:You're wrong but I think the Star Citizen thread is probably the wrong place to argue about poo poo people did in the 70s. Coming from a gay guy "lol ok"
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:48
|
|
|
jaegerx posted:Did we break a 40 year old guy playing a long game 18 year old Norwegian girl? Deloria come back your poo poo was funny. Hiya! not really - I just kinda lost interest :P The discussions round here arent very good >.< Nice you missed me though
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:48
|
|
|
It looks even better when you study it closer. http://i.imgur.com/eCqtXZo.mp4  
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:48
|
|
|
Crazy_BlackParrot posted:man, if you ever wonder what Sandi thinks about the backers or the SC dream look at this drat gif. I have the feeling she feels the same about CR. After all it was here marketing genius since a little girl that they have gotten all this money and dont you dare say anything bad or close your wallet nerd.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:48
|
|
|
SelenicMartian posted:It looks even better when you study it closer. esports right there. The CIG/RSI invitational next year. Top Prize? Jpegs.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:51
|
|
|
SelenicMartian posted:It looks even better when you study it closer. dont worry guys we did a vector trace for objects/surfaces with the "mantlable" tag and hooked up an animation to the playermodel it only took us 4 years but we finally got this massive achievement done, working on seeing if a texture has the "mineable" tag using a special ship weapon class but we need another fifty fuckin million dollars and twenty years and access to Deep Blue and a signed copy of the magna carta that somehow has chris roberts' signature on it to begin developing a proof of concept
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:51
|
|
|
SelenicMartian posted:It looks even better when you study it closer. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:56
|
|
|
AP posted:
You've had a long day so I help you out on that one.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:57
|
|
|
SelenicMartian posted:It looks even better when you study it closer. They spent all their professional lives coding for this day.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:59
|
|
|
I finished Titanfall 2 SP Campaign (superb game btw!) some days ago, and Star Marine looks like a game from 2011 compared to this, and that fit's because SC development started back then. 130+ Mio Dollars for a fps module that is about 6 years technically behind is money well spent, Commandos lmao 
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 10:59
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 11:03
|
|
|
I'm looking at the gun frame by frame to figure out where it's going, but it's moving so fast the motion blur obscures it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 11:06
|
|
|
Deloria posted:Hiya! not really - I just kinda lost interest :P The discussions round here arent very good >.< Nice meltdown.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 11:07
|
|
|
MedicineHut posted:Yes, it seems to be primarily a crap way to simply refactor the way they totally do not want to give out promises on dates. None of those bars can be checked and controlled by the backers at all. Only the evocati, PTU and actual release milestones. But like beyond that it's a "roadmap" that's exclusively for 2.6 (which according to every believer was going to be released as part of CitCon) not even the final release itself, and it's only show a single month time frame.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 11:11
|
|
|
AP posted:Nice meltdown. im still having it tbh.. I just took it elsewhere.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 11:15
|
|
|
Deloria posted:im still having it tbh.. I just took it elsewhere. You should link it, you worked hard on it and I don't want to claim all the credit.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 11:17
|
|
|
AP posted:You should link it, you worked hard on it and I don't want to claim all the credit. I just reopened my blogg to be honest. I realised theres no feckin way I can win here short of running down Karl Johan in my knickers with a I hate SC flag... but at least I can define my own identity somewhere else. And yeah it was a pretty big meltdown
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 11:25
|
|
|
Oh, did anybody notice, that "Stanton" stands for "St. Anton" a high class ski resort in Austria? The next system could be named "Mon' Akho". It's a feature so the backers see where the money went.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 11:31
|
|
|
Deloria posted:I just reopened my blogg to be honest. I realised theres no feckin way I can win here short of running down Karl Johan in my knickers with a I hate SC flag... but at least I can define my own identity somewhere else. You should link it, you worked hard on it and I don't want to claim all the credit.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 11:35
|
|
|
Oh, they've uploaded all of the stream videos... 
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 11:36
|
|
|
Mr.PayDay posted:I finished Titanfall 2 SP Campaign (superb game btw!) some days ago, and Star Marine looks like a game from 2011 compared to this, and that fit's because SC development started back then. Yeah. People are right this moment playing BF1, COD:IW and Titanfall 2. And this is what CIG comes strutting out with, big grins on their faces like proud new fathers.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 11:39
|
|
|
Looking through old threads at funny/disturbing stuff again.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 11:44
|
|
|
AP posted:You should link it, you worked hard on it and I don't want to claim all the credit. Its the one I always had - It was never hidden. http://deloriasworld.blogspot.no/ (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 12:01
|
|
|
Was that lovely "Galactic Tour" thing at the start created specifically for this livestream, or are they going to be using that in the eventual "game"? Great use of their resources, either way. Let's make some terrible Jeremy Clarkson knock-off instead of making the game that people have paid us upwards of $130m for. Took a look at their "roadmap" too - looks like bollocks. One bit in particular got me inquisitive though - under Network is "Serialized Variable (Stretch Goal)" - what the hell is that? Surely they've not made it a stretch goal and a specific element of the roadmap to be able to serialize data being transmitted across the network? -- Oh, and where's SQ42? If Star Marine is an FPS, and SQ42 is an FPS, why are they not pooling resources and using the same engine for both etc.?
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 12:17
|
|
|
After all Chris Roberts was right. Star Marine was in the game.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 12:19
|
|
|
 https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/comment/7251814/#Comment_7251814 Star Citizen: not as simple a project as World of Warcraft
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 12:30
|
|
|
You would expect after 4 years of the same tactic shitizens would be smarter.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 12:37
|
|
|
There are already plenty of women here who like games, you weird, creepy little dramaking. However, your spicy crazy will be missed when this current flap dies down.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 12:37
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 12:50
|
|
|
MedicineHut posted:Yes, it seems to be primarily a crap way to simply refactor the way they totally do not want to give out promises on dates. None of those bars can be checked and controlled by the backers at all. Only the evocati, PTU and actual release milestones. The thing that really blows my mind is that these roadmaps aren't forward looking at all. They've released a roadmap stretching back a month and a half into the past but only shows the next 3 weeks into the future. Not to mention the fact that, unless 2.6 is on Evocati already then the "roadmap" was incorrect before they even released it. Where did these things even come from?
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 12:55
|
|
|
Chalks posted:The thing that really blows my mind is that these roadmaps aren't forward looking at all. They've released a roadmap stretching back a month and a half into the past but only shows the next 3 weeks into the future. Probably the intern who made it in an afternoon
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 12:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 00:37 |
|
|
how is the brown sea reacting to this SM footage? are they broken enough to be excited?
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2016 13:29
|
|
