|
Marching Powder posted:Really weird how everyone critical of this thread or the people who post in it are terrible posters. I mean if it were me, I'd take stock of the fact that there was enthusiastic and prolonged mock-outrage conversations about not liking pizza and the pronunciation of the dotgif file extension for computers. If I was some sort of authority on humour I'd place that somewhere between the proverbial 'lowest form of humour' - puns (which this thread, and reddit, enjoys), and the *holds up spork* thing. If you don't consider that terrible, you're probably not in a position to judge the value of written entertainment, or basically anything. This leaves me in such a conflicted place since I both think this thread is a hive of idiots when it comes to the whole doxxing thing but I also hate your constant whining about literally everything in this thread and your determination to keep reading it anyway. I guess I am doomed to walk this earth alone, save for the occasional phone call with my parents. edit: hang on, I got this.... Just one more second... There I did it I thread memed. Man that feels good. Even better in context, too. Chalks fucked around with this message at 09:25 on Nov 25, 2016 |
# ? Nov 25, 2016 09:22 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 18:06 |
|
Chalks posted:This leaves me in such a conflicted place since I both think this thread is a hive of idiots when it comes to the whole doxxing thing but I also hate your constant whining about literally everything in this thread and your determination to keep reading it anyway. He just wants to carve out his own Star Citizen thread niche, leave him alone
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 09:25 |
|
orcinus posted:So you do realize that this will look like poo poo from 1st person, because the lack of parallax will make them look quite obviously like a flat texture, right? That trick also flat out fails completely in VR.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 09:37 |
|
Tokamak posted:Procedural rocks https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/5epycr/new_procedural_objects_tech_from_atv_314/
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 09:38 |
|
Chin posted:SC is like a modern day Scientology where you get to watch L. Ron Hubbard flail his arms around on Youtube and the inevitable final act is going to come within months not decades. I watched The Master a couple of weeks ago (amazing movie) and Star Citizen did cross my mind a couple of times. Philip Seymour Hoffman did an extraordinary job of playing a megalomaniac with charisma, as Hubbard so clearly was. The mind boggling thing about Star Citizen is that Chris Roberts has all the charisma of a styrofoam cup, but somehow he's created a cult of personality around his completely boring personality.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 09:40 |
|
no_recall posted:
loving whoa, so they don't use skyboxes and the sun you see in the sky is the star of the system, but a designer can somehow grab that sun and wave it around in the sky like it was part of a skybox? Something doesn't add up in that scene......
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 09:44 |
|
no_recall posted:
They're moving the sun, which indicates that's a skybox and not a solar system you're looking at from the planet surface. I don't care about 'cheating'. You can cheat all you want but don't make a loving big deal out of your commitment to "fidelity". Also the clouds appear to be a layered texture, it's especially clear when the clouds are 'moving'. E: ^ Harold Stassen fucked around with this message at 09:52 on Nov 25, 2016 |
# ? Nov 25, 2016 09:45 |
|
Beet Wagon posted:Looks like they're doing a Bar Citizen reasonably near me next month.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 09:49 |
|
Marching Powder posted:Really weird how everyone critical of this thread or the people who post in it are terrible posters. I mean if it were me, I'd take stock of the fact that there was enthusiastic and prolonged mock-outrage conversations about not liking pizza and the pronunciation of the dotgif file extension for computers. If I was some sort of authority on humour I'd place that somewhere between the proverbial 'lowest form of humour' - puns (which this thread, and reddit, enjoys), and the *holds up spork* thing. If you don't consider that terrible, you're probably not in a position to judge the value of written entertainment, or basically anything.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 09:50 |
|
https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/358400/sandi-gardners-marketing-machine lol, this thread didn't go the way as the OP intended.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 09:54 |
|
Star Citizen: I've never seen such a beautiful image of rocks
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 09:56 |
|
cool new Polack jokes posted:They're moving the sun, which indicates that's a skybox and not a solar system you're looking at from the planet surface. I don't care about 'cheating'. You can cheat all you want but don't make a loving big deal out of your commitment to "fidelity". Yea you'd think more of these retards would be asking that question. "Why is the star being drug around in a "procgen planet?" Definitely not correct in all of my non-existent game dev knowledge, but this just screams 'built level,' and how it doesn't to these imbecile backers, I'll never know. It's also funny they mentioned a few months back on star citizen's development on volumetric clouds (Seen here how CryEngine ACTUALLY has clouds: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjqddgfzfuE) Yet, they're working with texture layered clouds? the gently caress is going on with this company? Can they just say anything and these retards willfully eat it up because BDSSE?
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 09:57 |
|
nawledgelambo posted:Yea you'd think more of these retards would be asking that question. "Why is the star being drug around in a "procgen planet?" Definitely not correct in all of my non-existent game dev knowledge, but this just screams 'built level,' and how it doesn't to these imbecile backers, I'll never know. They're probably on a CryEngine version that doesn't have it
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 09:58 |
|
Daztek posted:https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/5epycr/new_procedural_objects_tech_from_atv_314/ I don't think they understand
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:09 |
|
By this point this has become tantamout to dangling a shiny object in front of a cat to play with, but never actually catch. The only difference being, that the cat doesn't empty its wallet for this.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:13 |
|
Raskolnikov posted:I don't think they understand If they understood game development, they might have played something like HL2: Lost Coast, and noticed how it does the whole rock thing… So yeah.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:15 |
|
Marching Powder posted:I'm not saying she was the thread's Sandi because I disliked her, but because she was a primary source of malevolent tedium tolerated only because of And yet, still, we traded down and got you instead.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:16 |
|
Dear Star Citizen Developers, I am hollow like death, is your game for me? edit: Wasn't it "Deloria" that recommended Humility buy a luxerious Hot Tub Space Machine? Raskolnikov fucked around with this message at 10:20 on Nov 25, 2016 |
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:17 |
|
Cymelion deserves a badge for always being first in the line of defense.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:29 |
|
I guess Sandi didn't want to do Black Friday discounts. Does she not like Money or something?
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:29 |
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:And yet, still, we traded down and got you instead.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:30 |
|
Marching Powder posted:Really weird how everyone critical of this thread or the people who post in it are terrible posters. I mean if it were me, I'd take stock of the fact that there was enthusiastic and prolonged mock-outrage conversations about not liking pizza and the pronunciation of the dotgif file extension for computers. If I was some sort of authority on humour I'd place that somewhere between the proverbial 'lowest form of humour' - puns (which this thread, and reddit, enjoys), and the *holds up spork* thing. If you don't consider that terrible, you're probably not in a position to judge the value of written entertainment, or basically anything. the guy is post very bad, lets dismiss the point about how doxxing is bad and pumping our penises to spaceship ponography is real loving weird like come on dude
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:51 |
|
Btw this goes for everyone stop following random people through every social media forum yahoo answers credit card apllication because of the epic fail space ship game. Its real weird and somehow makes the jacking it to calendars look less retarded in comparison.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:54 |
|
nawledgelambo posted:Yea you'd think more of these retards would be asking that question. "Why is the star being drug around in a "procgen planet?" Definitely not correct in all of my non-existent game dev knowledge, but this just screams 'built level,' and how it doesn't to these imbecile backers, I'll never know. They claimed procedural planets, not procedural everything, being able to move lights around is normal. It does kinda disprove their "high-fidelity simulation" though.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:54 |
|
if their clouds are layered textures how is that going to look flying from space down to planet? ruh-roh
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:57 |
|
Dongsturm posted:They claimed procedural planets, not procedural everything, being able to move lights around is normal. That's not "a light", that's a star. How does moving it around affect the other planets in the system?
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:58 |
|
Dongsturm posted:They claimed procedural planets, not procedural everything, being able to move lights around is normal. also, it wouldn't be strange to work on and demo a solution separately in an editor but still be able to add it to the overall game later
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 10:59 |
|
also also, although the demo of the rocks they showed looked like dogshit to me we shouldn't be piling on CiG for trying to develop a workable "cheated" solution when 100 pages ago we were dogpiling them for insisting everything had to be full fidelitious
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 11:01 |
|
Tokamak posted:Procedural rocks "Sneak Up On A Rock" COMING 2017
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 11:04 |
|
Daztek posted:https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/5epycr/new_procedural_objects_tech_from_atv_314/ have these people never played a video game in the last 10 years?
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 11:07 |
|
ArfJason posted:the guy is post very bad, lets dismiss the point about how doxxing is bad and pumping our penises to spaceship ponography is real loving weird like come on dude that's quite a gimmick
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 11:10 |
|
Daztek posted:https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/5epycr/new_procedural_objects_tech_from_atv_314/ Maybe shitizens are just really high all the time?
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 11:10 |
|
Marching Powder posted:god drat. not only do i care, and am mad, but i have to put up with this own. this is NOT my day. Just chill a bit and it will be okay. I promise you that. No chance of seeing a better day if you die of an aneurysm or a cardiac insult.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 11:16 |
|
Marching Powder posted:Really weird how everyone critical of this thread or the people who post in it are terrible posters. I mean if it were me, I'd take stock of the fact that there was enthusiastic and prolonged mock-outrage conversations about not liking pizza and the pronunciation of the dotgif file extension for computers. If I was some sort of authority on humour I'd place that somewhere between the proverbial 'lowest form of humour' - puns (which this thread, and reddit, enjoys), and the *holds up spork* thing. If you don't consider that terrible, you're probably not in a position to judge the value of written entertainment, or basically anything.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 11:25 |
|
MeLKoR posted:That's not "a light", that's a star. How does moving it around affect the other planets in the system? Anything that casts light is "a light" in a game engine, and it's usually easy to move around. And it isn't going to affect other planets because there aren't any, and never will be.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 11:41 |
|
Dongsturm posted:Anything that casts light is "a light" in a game engine, and it's usually easy to move around. That's the point, it's not supposed to be "just a light", it's supposed to be a real object but it's obviously not otherwise what happens to the rest of the solar system?
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 11:49 |
|
Isn't parallax occlusion mapping extremely resource intensive compared to say using normal maps for small details and actual geometry for things like rocks the size of your spaceman?
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 11:51 |
|
MeLKoR posted:That's the point, it's not supposed to be "just a light", it's supposed to be a real object but it's obviously not otherwise what happens to the rest of the solar system? I'm not sure what your point is here, since we appear to be in agreement that it's not a fidelitous simulation, despite claims that it is?
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 11:57 |
|
Acquilae posted:You should get a hold of Rhiload (http://www.youtube.com/user/airforcelol/featured), he does a lot of hilarious EVE videos using that exact same thing. Cheers for the lead. I pinged him on Twitter. See what happens. Something about that text to speech I really like and I would like to track it down if possible.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 12:00 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 18:06 |
|
CrazyLoon posted:By this point this has become tantamout to dangling a shiny object in front of a cat to play with, but never actually catch. The only difference being, that the cat doesn't empty its wallet for this. You forgot. At some point the cat will realize they aren't actually getting said object, get bored, and wander off.
|
# ? Nov 25, 2016 12:03 |